This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sigal, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brunner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sigal, L. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3213-3221, Vol. 39, No. 9
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3213-3221.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Use of Serum Immune Complexes in a New Test That Accurately Confirms Early Lyme Disease and Active Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi

Michael Brunner1 and Leonard H. Sigal1,2,*

Department of Medicine1 and Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Genetics & Microbiology,2 UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey

Received 26 March 2001/Returned for modification 2 June 2001/Accepted 23 June 2001

The present recommendation for serologic confirmation of Lyme disease (LD) calls for immunoblotting in support of positive or equivocal ELISA. Borrelia burgdorferi releases large quantities of proteins, suggesting that specific antibodies in serum might be trapped in immune complexes (ICs), rendering the antibodies undetectable by standard assays using unmodified serum. Production of ICs requires ongoing antigen production, so persistence of IC might be a marker of ongoing or persisting infection. We developed an immunoglobulin M (IgM) capture assay (EMIBA) measuring IC-derived IgM antibodies and tested it using three well-defined LD populations (from an academic LD referral center, a well-described Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) serum bank, and a group of erythema migrans patients from whose skin lesions B. burgdorferi was grown) and controls (non-Lyme arthritis inflammatory joint disease, syphilis, multiple sclerosis, and nondisease subjects from a region where LD is endemic, perhaps the most relevant comparison group of all). Previous studies demonstrated that specific antigen-antibody complexes in the sera of patients with LD could be precipitated by polyethylene glycol and could then be disrupted with maintenance of the immunoreactivity of the released antibodies, that specific anti-B. burgdorferi IgM was concentrated in ICs, and that occasionally IgM to specific B. burgdorferi antigens was found in the IC but not in unprocessed serum. EMIBA compared favorably with commercial and CDC flagellin-enhanced enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and other assays in confirming the diagnosis of LD. EMIBA confirmed early B. burgdorferi infection more accurately than the comparator assays. In addition, EMIBA more accurately differentiated seropositivity in patients with active ongoing infection from seroreactivity persisting long after clinically successful antibiotic therapy; i.e., EMIBA identified seroreactivity indicating a clinical circumstance requiring antibiotic therapy. Thus, EMIBA is a promising new assay for accurate serologic confirmation of early and/or active LD.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Rheumatology MEB484, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Pl., New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019. Phone: (732) 235-7702. Fax: (732) 235-7238. E-mail: sigallh{at}umdnj.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2001, p. 3213-3221, Vol. 39, No. 9
0095-1137/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3213-3221.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Brunner, M., Marques, A. R., Hornung, R. L. (2006). Report Refuting Value of Immune Complexes To Diagnose Lyme Disease Is Invalid. CVI 13: 304-306 [Full Text]  
  • Marques, A. R., Hornung, R. L., Dally, L., Philipp, M. T. (2005). Detection of Immune Complexes Is Not Independent of Detection of Antibodies in Lyme Disease Patients and Does Not Confirm Active Infection with Borrelia burgdorferi. CVI 12: 1036-1040 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Aguero-Rosenfeld, M. E., Wang, G., Schwartz, I., Wormser, G. P. (2005). Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 484-509 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Reed, K. D. (2002). Laboratory Testing for Lyme Disease: Possibilities and Practicalities. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 319-324 [Full Text]