Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 2002, p. 314-315, Vol. 40, No. 1
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.1.314-315.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
| LETTERS TO THE EDITOR |
|
|
|---|
Strategy III involves the use of three immunoassays, each using different antigen preparations and/or different test principles. Sera are considered HIV antibody positive when all three tests are reactive. This most stringent of the alternative strategies is recommended for the diagnosis of HIV in asymptomatic persons in low-prevalence populations (
10%) (1).
We report six cases tested during 1994 to 1997 where the use of Strategy III would have caused a false-positive result. These patients were asymptomatic and were tested for HIV antibodies for work permit applications (five) and antenatal screening (one). The prevalence of HIV in this group is <0.1%.
The following three tests were used in order. (i) The Abbott HIV-1/HIV-2 3rd Generation Plus EIA, a double antigen sandwich assay. Antigens used are recombinant HIV-1 env and gag proteins, HIV type 2 (HIV-2) env proteins, and HIV-1 synthetic env peptides. (ii) The Genelavia Mixt (Sanofi Diagnostic Pasteur), an indirect binding assay detecting both immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG. Antigens used are gp160 recombinant protein and peptides mimicking the immunodominant epitopes of the HIV-1 and HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein. (iii) The Serodia Particle Agglutination Assay (Fujirebio), which is essentially a double antigen sandwich assay using gelatin particles as the solid phase. Antigens used are viral lysates of HIV-1 and HIV-2. The selection of the three assays fulfilled the criteria for Strategy III.
All six patients had reactive results for the three assays. Supplementary tests were carried out, because at least one of the two ELISA tests had a low OD/CO (sample optical density/cutoff) value. The four patients with follow-up samples showed no seroprogression, and negative PCR (HIV-1 proviral DNA) by both Amplicor HIV 1 (Roche) and in-house assays gave further weight to the HIV-negative status. The Western blot (HIV Blot 2.2; Genelabs Diagnostics) assays performed produced indeterminate results. This was, however, more acceptable than erroneous HIV antibody-positive results, as it points to the need for further evaluation of the patient (Table 1).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Serology and PCR results of the six patientsa
|
Hence, even the most stringent alternative HIV confirmatory strategy requires judicious use. Samples giving low positive OD/CO values should be subjected to other supplementary tests, such as the Western blot assay and/or PCR. Guidelines should be developed in each laboratory as to which cases require further supplementary tests. Clinical risk assessment is also necessary to decide if asymptomatic patients require follow-up serology.
|
|
|---|
|
Cecilia C. L. Ngan* Su-Yun Se Thoe Kwai-Peng Chan Jimmy E. H. Sng Ai-Ee Ling HIV Reference Laboratory Department of Pathology Singapore General Hospital Outram Rd. Singapore 169608
|
||||||
|
* Phone: 65 326 5206 Fax: 65 321 4419 E-mail: gptncl{at}sgh.com.sg |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»