This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barkham, T.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barkham, T.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3877, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3877.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Sniffing Bacterial Cultures on Agar Plates: a Useful Tool or a Safety Hazard?


arrow
LETTER
 
There has recently been a flurry of e-mails on the ASM DivC list concerning the safety of sniffing bacterial cultures. Opinions with respect to the safety of sniffing were divided. Several contributors were adamant that all sniffing should be prohibited. Others were skeptical and countered that the risk was very small and that sniffing was a useful tool. The undoubted reality of laboratory-acquired infections was considered to stem from manipulating and producing aerosols of pathogenic organisms outside of a biological safety cabinet, although some felt that they had witnessed cases where the only exposure was from sniffing plates. This seems unlikely, as almost any further processing of plate cultures is likely to involve the production of aerosols. This letter reports our attempt to measure the bacterial load of the air above bacterial cultures on solid agar.

Fresh overnight cultures on blood agar plates of nine genera of organisms commonly isolated in our laboratory were prepared. Escherichia coli was chosen to represent Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. A Brucella sp. was not tested as we felt the risk was not warranted. We removed the lids and sampled the air above the plates for 4 min from a distance of 2 cm with a Biotest HYCON standard RCS air sampler that has a separation volume of 40 liters/min. The agar strips were incubated at 35°C for 48 h in an appropriate atmosphere, and the colonies were identified by traditional methods. The results are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Colony count from air sampled 2 cm from cultures on blood agar

The highest colony count was equal to 12.5 CFU/m3. An average sniff might be expected to sample 50 to 200 ml of air, so it would require 6,000 to 7,000 sniffs to inhale 12.5 CFU. The velocity of air while sniffing might be expected to vary and to affect the number of cells drawn off the colonies. Depending on the enthusiasm of the sniffer, it might well exceed that produced by the air sampler. Nevertheless, in our experience the lid is only partially removed and sniffing is conducted with caution, and the air velocity is low. Technique is relevant: the aim of plate-sniffing is to detect particular volatile compounds (for example, diacetyl produced by members of the anginosus group of streptococci [1]). It should be possible by opening a plate gently to allow outward diffusion of such moieties without allowing rapid air currents to move across the surface of the agar.

Our results suggest that the risk of inhaling a significant dose of a bacterium from solid agar is low. Despite this, we would caution staff against sniffing plate cultures that they suspect to include Neisseria meningitidis, Brucella spp., or other highly virulent pathogens.


arrow
REFERENCE
 
    1
  1. Chew, T. A., and J. M. Smith. 1992. Detection of diacetyl (caramel odor) in presumptive identification of the "Streptococcus milleri" group. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3028-3029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Timothy Barkham*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore 308433, Singapore

Mark B. Taylor
Department of Microbiology
National University of Singapore
Singapore 11797, Singapore

* Phone: 65-6357 8957
Fax: 65-6253 6507
E-mail: timothy_barkham{at}ttsh.com.sg.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2002, p. 3877, Vol. 40, No. 10
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3877.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barkham, T.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barkham, T.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, M. B.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»