This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ligozzi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fontana, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ligozzi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fontana, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2002, p. 1681-1686, Vol. 40, No. 5
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1681-1686.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Medically Relevant Gram-Positive Cocci

Marco Ligozzi, Cinzia Bernini, Maria Grazia Bonora, Maria de Fatima, Jessica Zuliani, and Roberta Fontana*

Sezione di Microbiologia, Dipartimento di Patologia, Università di Verona, 35100 Verona, Italy

Received 12 July 2001/ Returned for modification 27 September 2001/ Accepted 5 February 2002

A study was conducted to evaluate the new VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux) for identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (n = 100), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (n = 100), Enterococcus spp. (n = 89), Streptococcus agalactiae (n = 29), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 66) were examined with the ID-GPC identification card and with the AST-P515 (for staphylococci), AST-P516 (for enterococci and S. agalactiae) and AST-P506 (for pneumococci) susceptibility cards. The identification comparison methods were the API Staph for staphylococci and the API 20 Strep for streptococci and enterococci; for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the agar dilution method according to the procedure of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) was used. The VITEK 2 system correctly identified to the species level (only one choice or after simple supplementary tests) 99% of S. aureus, 96.5% of S. agalactiae, 96.9% of S. pneumoniae, 92.7% of Enterococcus faecalis, 91.3% of Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and 88% of Staphylococcus epidermidis but was least able to identify Enterococcus faecium (71.4% correct). More than 90% of gram-positive cocci were identified within 3 h. According to the NCCLS breakpoints, antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the VITEK 2 system gave 96% correct category agreement, 0.82% very major errors, 0.17% major errors, and 2.7% minor errors. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed category agreement from 94 to 100% for S. aureus, from 90 to 100% for CNS, from 91 to 100% for enterococci, from 96 to 100% for S. agalactiae, and from 91 to 100% for S. pneumoniae. Microorganism-antibiotic combinations that gave very major errors were CNS-erythromycin, CNS-oxacillin, enterococci-teicoplanin, and enterococci-high-concentration gentamicin. Major errors were observed for CNS-oxacillin and S. agalactiae-tetracycline combinations. In conclusion the results of this study indicate that the VITEK 2 system represents an accurate and acceptable means for performing identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests with medically relevant gram-positive cocci.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Università di Verona, Dipartimento di Patologia, Sezione di Microbiologia, Strada le Grazie 8, 37100 Verona, Italy. Phone: 0039-45-8028191. Fax: 0039-45-584606. E-mail: roberta.fontana{at}univr.it.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2002, p. 1681-1686, Vol. 40, No. 5
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1681-1686.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kaase, M., Baars, B., Friedrich, S., Szabados, F., Gatermann, S. G. (2009). Performance of MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in a Set of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Diverse Genetic Backgrounds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2623-2625 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Farber, J., Moder, K.-A., Layer, F., Tammer, I., Konig, W., Konig, B. (2008). Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Detection with Different Panels for Automated Susceptibility Testing and with a Chromogenic Medium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3721-3727 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Delmas, J., Chacornac, J. P., Robin, F., Giammarinaro, P., Talon, R., Bonnet, R. (2008). Evaluation of the Vitek 2 System with a Variety of Staphylococcus Species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 311-313 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Valenza, G., Ruoff, C., Vogel, U., Frosch, M., Abele-Horn, M. (2007). Microbiological Evaluation of the New VITEK 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus Identification Card. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 3493-3497 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brigante, G., Luzzaro, F., Bettaccini, A., Lombardi, G., Meacci, F., Pini, B., Stefani, S., Toniolo, A. (2006). Use of the Phoenix Automated System for Identification of Streptococcus and Enterococcus spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3263-3267 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Layer, F., Ghebremedhin, B., Moder, K.-A., Konig, W., Konig, B. (2006). Comparative study using various methods for identification of Staphylococcus species in clinical specimens.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 2824-2830 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ishii, Y., Alba, J., Maehara, C., Murakami, H., Matsumoto, T., Tateda, K., Furuya, N., Iwata, M., Yamaguchi, K. (2006). Identification of biochemically atypical Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates with three automated identification systems.. J Med Microbiol 55: 387-392 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Abele-Horn, M., Hommers, L., Trabold, R., Frosch, M. (2006). Validation of VITEK 2 Version 4.01 Software for Detection, Identification, and Classification of Glycopeptide-Resistant Enterococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 71-76 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Brown, D. F. J., Edwards, D. I., Hawkey, P. M., Morrison, D., Ridgway, G. L., Towner, K. J., Wren, M. W. D., on behalf of the Joint Working Party of the Britis, (2005). Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 1000-1018 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Eisner, A., Feierl, G., Gorkiewicz, G., Dieber, F., Kessler, H. H., Marth, E., Kofer, J. (2005). High Prevalence of VanA-Type Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Austrian Poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 6407-6409 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Giammarinaro, P., Leroy, S., Chacornac, J.-P., Delmas, J., Talon, R. (2005). Development of a New Oligonucleotide Array To Identify Staphylococcal Strains at Species Level. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 3673-3680 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ben-Ami, R., Navon-Venezia, S., Schwartz, D., Schlezinger, Y., Mekuzas, Y., Carmeli, Y. (2005). Erroneous Reporting of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci as Kocuria spp. by the Vitek 2 System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1448-1450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fontana, C., Favaro, M., Pelliccioni, M., Pistoia, E. S., Favalli, C. (2005). Use of the MicroSeq 500 16S rRNA Gene-Based Sequencing for Identification of Bacterial Isolates That Commercial Automated Systems Failed To Identify Correctly. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 615-619 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Funke, G., Funke-Kissling, P. (2005). Performance of the New VITEK 2 GP Card for Identification of Medically Relevant Gram-Positive Cocci in a Routine Clinical Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 84-88 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Horstkotte, M. A., Knobloch, J. K.-M., Rohde, H., Dobinsky, S., Mack, D. (2004). Evaluation of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for Detection of Methicillin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 5041-5046 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rolain, J. M., Mallet, M. N., Fournier, P. E., Raoult, D. (2004). Real-time PCR for universal antibiotic susceptibility testing. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 538-541 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Donay, J.-L., Mathieu, D., Fernandes, P., Pregermain, C., Bruel, P., Wargnier, A., Casin, I., Weill, F. X., Lagrange, P. H., Herrmann, J. L. (2004). Evaluation of the Automated Phoenix System for Potential Routine Use in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1542-1546 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fiebelkorn, K. R., Crawford, S. A., McElmeel, M. L., Jorgensen, J. H. (2003). Practical Disk Diffusion Method for Detection of Inducible Clindamycin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4740-4744 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spanu, T., Sanguinetti, M., Ciccaglione, D., D'Inzeo, T., Romano, L., Leone, F., Fadda, G. (2003). Use of the VITEK 2 System for Rapid Identification of Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci from Bloodstream Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 4259-4263 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fahr, A.-M., Eigner, U., Armbrust, M., Caganic, A., Dettori, G., Chezzi, C., Bertoncini, L., Benecchi, M., Menozzi, M. G. (2003). Two-Center Collaborative Evaluation of the Performance of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41: 1135-1142 [Abstract] [Full Text]