This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Good, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Good, C. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2002, p. 3269-3276, Vol. 40, No. 9
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3269-3276.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effects of Various Test Media on the Activities of 21 Antimicrobial Agents against Haemophilus influenzae

Michael R. Jacobs,1* Saralee Bajaksouzian,1 Anne Windau,1 Peter C. Appelbaum,2 Gengrong Lin,2 David Felmingham,3 Christine Dencer,3 Laura Koeth,4 Mendel E. Singer,5 and Caryn E. Good1

Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University,1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, and Center for Quality Improvement Research, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland,5 Laboratory Specialists, Westlake, Ohio,4 Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania,2 GR Micro, London, United Kingdom3

Received 16 October 2001/ Returned for modification 7 December 2001/ Accepted 17 June 2002

As considerable variation in the antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae has been reported, the effects of various test media on the susceptibility of H. influenzae were studied. MICs were determined by three laboratories for 21 antimicrobial agents against a panel of 100 selected isolates. Testing was performed using a reference NCCLS frozen broth microdilution method with Haemophilus test medium (HTM) broth and dried commercial MIC trays rehydrated with the following media: in-house and commercially prepared HTM broth, Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% lysed horse blood and NAD, IsoSensitest broth with 2% lysed horse blood and NAD, and IsoSensitest broth-based HTM. Overall, all results were very reproducible, with the MIC at which 50% of the isolates tested are inhibited (MIC50), MIC90, and geometric mean MIC being within one doubling dilution by all six methods and at all three testing centers for 15 of the 21 agents tested. Interlaboratory differences were more marked than intralaboratory differences or differences among media. Cefprozil, cefaclor, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole results differed the most, while results for ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefdinir, cefixime, ceftriaxone, and clarithromycin were the most reproducible. However, these variations in results caused considerable differences in susceptibility rates for agents for which NCCLS susceptible breakpoints were close to the geometric mean MIC, particularly for cefaclor and cefprozil. This was much less of a problem when pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic breakpoints were used. Reproducible susceptibility results were obtained for a wide range of agents against H. influenzae in three laboratories using a variety of media that support the growth of this fastidious species.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106. Phone: (216) 844-3484. Fax: (216) 844-5601. E-mail: mrj6{at}po.cwru.edu.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, September 2002, p. 3269-3276, Vol. 40, No. 9
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3269-3276.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tristram, S., Jacobs, M. R., Appelbaum, P. C. (2007). Antimicrobial Resistance in Haemophilus influenzae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20: 368-389 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Haritova, A. M., Rusenova, N. V., Parvanov, P. R., Lashev, L. D., Fink-Gremmels, J. (2006). Integration of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Indices of Marbofloxacin in Turkeys. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3779-3785 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jacobs, M. R., Felmingham, D., Appelbaum, P. C., Gruneberg, R. N., the Alexander Project Group, (2003). The Alexander Project 1998-2000: susceptibility of pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infection to commonly used antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 229-246 [Abstract] [Full Text]