This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ling, T. K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A. F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ling, T. K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A. F. B.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2003, p. 4705-4707, Vol. 41, No. 10
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4705-4707.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Rapid Direct Identification and Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures

Thomas K. W. Ling,* Z. K. Liu, and Augustine F. B. Cheng

Department of Microbiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China

Received 29 April 2003/ Returned for modification 9 July 2003/ Accepted 29 July 2003

This study explores the possibility of combining the BacT/Alert Microbial Detection System with the VITEK 2 system to achieve rapid bacterial identification and susceptibility testing. Direct inoculation of bacterial suspension to the VITEK 2 ID-GNB card and AST-NO09 card was made by differential centrifugation of blood cultures of organisms with gram-negative enteric bacillus-like morphology. A total of 118 strains were investigated; of these, 97 (82.2%) strains were correctly identified to the species level and 21 (17.8%) strains were not identified; by comparing the results with those of the reference method of API identification systems using a pure culture, it was found that no strain had been misidentified. Among the 21 strains with no identification, 13 (61.9%) strains were nonfermenters. The direct-identification reporting time of VITEK 2 was 3.3 h. Direct testing of susceptibility to 11 antibiotics, i.e., amikacin, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, netilmicin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and tobramycin, was also performed by using the broth microdilution (MB) method according to the NCCLS guidelines as a reference. After comparing the MICs of the VITEK 2 system with those obtained by the MB method within ±twofold dilution, it was determined that the 1,067 organism-antibiotic combinations had an overall correct rate of 97.6% (1,041 combinations). The rates of susceptibility to the 11 antibiotics ranged from 88.7 to 100%, respectively. Only two (0.2%) and four (0.4%) combinations of the susceptibility tests gave very major errors (i.e., reported as sensitive by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be resistant by the MB method) and major errors (i.e., reported as resistant by the VITEK 2 system but shown to be sensitive by the MB method), respectively. The reporting time for the direct testing of susceptibility against the 11 antibiotics for 97 blood culture isolates by the VITEK 2 system ranged from 3.3 to 17.5 h. Compared with conventional methods that require 1 or 2 days, this method can make same-day reporting possible and thus permit better patient management.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China. Phone: 852-26322307. Fax: 852-26451256. E-mail: lingt{at}cuhk.edu.hk.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2003, p. 4705-4707, Vol. 41, No. 10
0095-1137/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4705-4707.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tan, T Y, Ng, L S Y, Kwang, L L (2008). Evaluation of disc susceptibility tests performed directly from positive blood cultures. J. Clin. Pathol. 61: 343-346 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wellinghausen, N., Pietzcker, T., Poppert, S., Belak, S., Fieser, N., Bartel, M., Essig, A. (2007). Evaluation of the Merlin MICRONAUT System for Rapid Direct Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Positive Cocci and Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 789-795 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • O'Hara, C. M. (2005). Manual and Automated Instrumentation for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae and Other Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 147-162 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de Cueto, M., Ceballos, E., Martinez-Martinez, L., Perea, E. J., Pascual, A. (2004). Use of Positive Blood Cultures for Direct Identification and Susceptibility Testing with the Vitek 2 System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3734-3738 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Wellinghausen, N., Wirths, B., Essig, A., Wassill, L. (2004). Evaluation of the Hyplex BloodScreen Multiplex PCR-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay System for Direct Identification of Gram-Positive Cocci and Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 3147-3152 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Funke, G., Funke-Kissling, P. (2004). Use of the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System for Direct Identification and Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Rods from Positive Blood Cultures in a Three-Phase Trial. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1466-1470 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»