This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, K. C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2005, p. 5642-5647, Vol. 43, No. 11
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5642-5647.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of an Automated Repetitive Sequence-Based PCR Microbial Typing System to Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Analysis of Outbreaks of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

T. L. Ross,* W. G. Merz, M. Farkosh, and K. C. Carroll

Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Received 4 March 2005/ Returned for modification 20 April 2005/ Accepted 8 August 2005

Rapid and sensitive methods for accurate strain delineation are essential for monitoring and preventing transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been the standard technique for strain typing most bacterial species including MRSA. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of the DiversiLab microbial typing system (Bacterial BarCodes, Inc., Houston, TX) (rep-PCR) to that of PFGE for typing MRSA isolates from five well-defined outbreaks. The DiversiLab rep-PCR assay is a rapid, semiautomated method based on PCR amplification of specific regions between noncoding repetitive sequences in the bacterial genome. rep-PCR was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and the results were analyzed and dendrograms were generated using the DiversiLab analysis software (version 2.1.66a). PFGE was performed and interpreted according to published procedures. rep-PCR results using similarity indices (SI) of 80%, 85%, and 90% were compared to PFGE analysis. In addition, intra- and interrun reproducibility was determined for rep-PCR. Overall, correct assignment to outbreak versus nonoutbreak clusters occurred for 91 of 109 isolates (85% agreement) when using a SI of 85%. For each specific outbreak, concordance between rep-PCR and PFGE ranged from 73% to 100%. There were 18 discrepant results (17%). Fourteen isolates were unique by PFGE, but they were placed in clusters by rep-PCR; the other 4 were placed in clusters different from those assigned by PFGE. Intra- and interrun reproducibility was excellent. Times to results were 12 to 24 h for rep-PCR compared to 2 to 4 days for PFGE. Rapid, standardized results and excellent reproducibility make rep-PCR a valuable tool for use in MRSA investigations. However, since rep-PCR was less discriminatory than PFGE, we recommend that it be used to screen isolates, followed by testing isolates which share the same rep-PCR pattern with a more sensitive method, such as PFGE or multilocus sequence typing.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Meyer B1-193, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-7093. Phone: (410) 955-5077. Fax: (410) 614-8087. E-mail: tross{at}jhmi.edu.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2005, p. 5642-5647, Vol. 43, No. 11
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5642-5647.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pourcel, C., Hormigos, K., Onteniente, L., Sakwinska, O., Deurenberg, R. H., Vergnaud, G. (2009). Improved Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem-Repeat Assay for Staphylococcus aureus Genotyping, Providing a Highly Informative Technique Together with Strong Phylogenetic Value. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3121-3128 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tenover, F. C., Gay, E. A., Frye, S., Eells, S. J., Healy, M., McGowan, J. E. Jr. (2009). Comparison of Typing Results Obtained for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with the DiversiLab System and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2452-2457 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Musta, A. C., Riederer, K., Shemes, S., Chase, P., Jose, J., Johnson, L. B., Khatib, R. (2009). Vancomycin MIC plus Heteroresistance and Outcome of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Trends over 11 Years. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1640-1644 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Perez, F., Hujer, A. M., Hujer, K. M., Decker, B. K., Rather, P. N., Bonomo, R. A. (2007). Global Challenge of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 3471-3484 [Full Text]  
  • Harrington, S. M., Stock, F., Kominski, A. L., Campbell, J. D., Hormazabal, J. C., Livio, S., Rao, L., Kotloff, K. L., Sow, S. O., Murray, P. R. (2007). Genotypic Analysis of Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae from Mali, Africa, by Semiautomated Repetitive-Element PCR and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 707-714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Goldberg, T. L., Gillespie, T. R., Singer, R. S. (2006). Optimization of Analytical Parameters for Inferring Relationships among Escherichia coli Isolates from Repetitive-Element PCR by Maximizing Correspondence with Multilocus Sequence Typing Data. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 6049-6052 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sandt, C. H., Krouse, D. A., Cook, C. R., Hackman, A. L., Chmielecki, W. A., Warren, N. G. (2006). The key role of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in investigation of a large multiserotype and multistate food-borne outbreak of salmonella infections centered in pennsylvania.. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44: 3208-3212 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Singh, A., Goering, R. V., Simjee, S., Foley, S. L., Zervos, M. J. (2006). Application of Molecular Techniques to the Study of Hospital Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 512-530 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»