Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, March 2005, p. 1301-1303, Vol. 43, No. 3
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.43.3.1301-1303.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Memorial Medical Center,1 Division of Statistics and Research Consulting, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois2
Received 31 March 2004/ Returned for modification 6 June 2004/ Accepted 4 November 2004
Because samples are frequently submitted on swabs from distant sites, viability of the organism must be maintained. We compared two transport systems, a new Copan Liquid Stuart's swab with an Easy-Flow swab applicator and the Starplex Liquid Stuart's swab. The purpose of the study was to assess the release and/or recovery of organisms from the Copan system compared to that from Starplex. Triplicate swabs were seeded with 3 dilutions of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Although the amount of the initial inoculum was the same for both transport systems, recovery by the roll-plate method at time zero was consistently increased with the Copan system (31 to 87% higher). This is the most important finding in this study. With N. gonorrhoeae, subsequent recoveries were similar for Copan and Starplex but poor for both systems. With N. meningitidis and Haemophilus, higher levels of recovery were clearly obtained with Copan (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). With Streptococcus, subsequent recoveries for Copan and Starplex were mixed. In conclusion, Copan generally demonstrated better recovery of organisms compared to Starplex even (and especially) at time zero.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»