This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, R. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2181-2187, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2181-2187.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Non-Culture-Based Methods for Detection of Systemic Fungal Infections, with an Emphasis on Invasive Candida Infections

P. Lewis White,* Alice E. Archer, and Rosemary A. Barnes

Department of Medical Microbiology and NPHS, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom

Received 6 July 2004/ Returned for modification 28 August 2004/ Accepted 16 December 2004

The accepted limitations associated with classic culture techniques for the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections have lead to the emergence of many non-culture-based methods. With superior sensitivities and quicker turnaround times, non-culture-based methods may aid the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. In this review of the diagnostic service, we assessed the performances of two antigen detection techniques (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and latex agglutination) with a molecular method for the detection of invasive Candida infection and invasive aspergillosis. The specificities for all three assays were high (≥97%), although the Candida PCR method had enhanced sensitivity over both ELISA and latex agglutination with values of 95%, 75%, and 25%, respectively. However, calculating significant sensitivity values for the Aspergillus detection methods was not feasible due to a low number of proven/probable cases. Despite enhanced sensitivity, the PCR method failed to detect nucleic acid in a probable case of invasive Candida infection that was detected by ELISA. In conclusion, both PCR and ELISA techniques should be used in unison to aid the detection of invasive fungal infections.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medical Microbiology and NPHS, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. Phone: 029 2074 6581. Fax: 029 2074 2161. E-mail: lewis.white{at}nphs.wales.nhs.uk.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2005, p. 2181-2187, Vol. 43, No. 5
0095-1137/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2181-2187.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Barnes, R A, White, P L, Bygrave, C, Evans, N, Healy, B, Kell, J (2009). Clinical impact of enhanced diagnosis of invasive fungal disease in high-risk haematology and stem cell transplant patients. J. Clin. Pathol. 62: 64-69 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Barnes, R. A. (2008). Early diagnosis of fungal infection in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: i3-i6 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Innings, A., Ullberg, M., Johansson, A., Rubin, C. J., Noreus, N., Isaksson, M., Herrmann, B. (2007). Multiplex Real-Time PCR Targeting the RNase P RNA Gene for Detection and Identification of Candida Species in Blood. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 874-880 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • White, P. L., Barton, R., Guiver, M., Linton, C. J., Wilson, S., Smith, M., Gomez, B. L., Carr, M. J., Kimmitt, P. T., Seaton, S., Rajakumar, K., Holyoake, T., Kibbler, C. C., Johnson, E., Hobson, R. P., Jones, B., Barnes, R. A., on behalf of the United Kingdom Fungal Polymerase, (2006). A Consensus on Fungal Polymerase Chain Reaction Diagnosis?: A United Kingdom-Ireland Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods for Detection of Systemic Fungal Infections. J. Mol. Diagn. 8: 376-384 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hassan, I A, Critten, P, Isalska, B, Denning, D W (2006). Audit of laboratory mycology services for the management of patients with fungal infections in the northwest of England.. J. Clin. Pathol. 59: 759-763 [Abstract] [Full Text]