Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2006, p. 1869-1872, Vol. 44, No. 5
0095-1137/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.44.5.1869-1872.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York,1 Kaiser Permanente-NW, Portland, Oregon2
Received 4 January 2006/ Returned for modification 26 January 2006/ Accepted 8 March 2006
The Q score and Q234 systems were compared to our current protocol for interpreting wound cultures. The Q score and Q234 systems were more cost effective than our current method, with the Q234 system being considered the most useful protocol for implementation by both the laboratory and our clinicians.
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»