Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, October 2007, p. 3251-3256, Vol. 45, No. 10
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JCM.00898-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Respiratory and Systemic Infection Laboratory,1 Statistics, Modelling, and Bioinformatics Department, Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, London, United Kingdom2
Received 30 April 2007/ Returned for modification 17 July 2007/ Accepted 1 August 2007
We report the results of an international external quality assessment (EQA) program to assess the performance of laboratories in genotyping Legionella pneumophila isolates using the standard European Working Group for Legionella Infections sequence-based typing protocol. Three coded distributions of L. pneumophila isolates were sent to laboratories in 12, 14, and 20 countries, respectively. The data were returned by 11 of 16, 18 of 19, and 27 of 29 centers, respectively. Incomplete submission of data resulted in exclusion from certain aspects of the analyses. The number of centers achieving 100% score, for all loci tested, rose successively from 50% (5 of 10) for the first EQA distribution, to 56% (9 of 16) for the second EQA distribution, to 76% (19 of 25) for the third EQA distribution. A number of additional centers made only a few errors (one to three) in each distribution. Sequence data from the first two distributions were collected in flat text file format and using specially developed software, the sequence quality tool (SQT), in the third distribution. The SQT allows users to upload trace files in standard file formats, automates basecalling using phred and phrap software, contig assembly, trimming, and matching against a reference library. The program described here allow users an independent measure of sequence quality, and such schemes are vital in order to identify strengths and weakness in centers responsible for the generation of genotyping data in legionella outbreak investigation. The present study demonstrates that DNA sequence data can be highly reproducible but, when independently assessed, in practice frequently falls short of this goal. However, experience and training in the methodology results in increased performance.
Published ahead of print on 8 August 2007.
The members of the European Working Group for Legionella Infections who participated in this study were as follows: A. Indra (Vienna, Austria), A. Deplano and O. Soetens (Brussels, Belgium), P. Tilley (Calgary, Alberta, Canada), K. Bernard, (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada), J. Bangsborg (Herlev, Denmark), S. Nielsen (Copenhagen, Denmark), J. Etienne (Lyon, France), S. Mentula (Helsinki, Finland), P. C. Lück (Dresden, Germany), L. Franzin (Turin, Italy), M. Scaturro, and P. Visca (Rome, Italy), J. Amemura-Maekawa (Tokyo, Japan), J. Mossong (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), J. P. Bruin (Haarlem, The Netherlands), K. van der Zwaluw (Bilthoven, The Netherlands), D. A. Caugant (Oslo, Norway), T. Marques (Lisbon, Portugal), D. S. Lindsay (Glasgow, Scotland), S. Blanco (Barcelona, Spain), C. Pelaz (Madrid, Spain), F. Fendukly (Stockholm, Sweden), B. Herrmann (Uppsala, Sweden), V. Gaia (Bellinzona, Switzerland), S. Lai (London, United Kingdom), and R. F. Benson (Atlanta, Georgia).
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»