This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, M. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3546-3548, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01555-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Detection of Bloodstream Infections in Adults: How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed?{triangledown}

Andrew Lee,1 Stanley Mirrett,2 L. Barth Reller,2,3 and Melvin P. Weinstein1,4*

Departments of Medicine,1 Pathology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903-0019,4 Departments of Pathology,2 Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 277103

Received 3 August 2007/ Returned for modification 8 August 2007/ Accepted 11 September 2007

Although several reports have shown that two to three 20-ml blood cultures are adequate for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia in adults, a recent study (F. R. Cockerill et al., Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1724-1730, 2004) found that two blood cultures detected only 80% of bloodstream infections and that three blood cultures detected 96% of episodes. We reviewed data at two university hospitals to determine whether the recent observations by Cockerill et al. are applicable more widely. We assessed all blood cultures obtained from adult inpatients from 1 January 2004 through 31 December 2005 at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital and Duke University Medical Center. All instances in which ≥3 blood cultures per patient were obtained during a 24-h period were included. The medical records of patients who met the inclusion criteria were reviewed retrospectively to determine the clinical significance of the positive blood culture (true infection versus contamination). Data were analyzed to determine the cumulative sensitivity of blood cultures obtained sequentially during the 24-h time period. Of 629 unimicrobial episodes with ≥3 blood cultures obtained during the 24-h period, 460 (73.1%) were detected with the first blood culture, 564 (89.7%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, 618 (98.2%) were detected with the first three blood cultures, and 628 (99.8%) were detected with the first four blood cultures. Of 351 unimicrobial episodes with ≥4 blood cultures obtained during the 24-h period, 257 (73.2%) were detected with the first blood culture, 308 (93.9%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, 340 (96.9%) were detected with the first three blood cultures, and 350 (99.7%) were detected with the first four blood cultures. Among unimicrobial episodes, Staphylococcus aureus was more likely to be detected with the first blood culture (approximately 90% detected with the first blood culture). There were 58 polymicrobial episodes in which ≥3 blood cultures were obtained. Forty-seven (81.0%) were detected with the first blood culture, 54 (93.1%) were detected with the first two blood cultures, and 58 (100%) were detected with the first three blood cultures. The results of this study indicate that two blood cultures in a 24-h period will detect approximately 90% of bloodstream infections in adults. To achieve a detection rate of >99%, as many as four blood cultures may be needed. The previously held axiom that virtually all bloodstream infections can be detected with two to three blood cultures may no longer be valid but may also depend on the definition of the "first" blood culture obtained (see Materials and Methods and Discussion in the text).

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Departments of Medicine and Pathology, MEB 364, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-0019. Phone: (732) 235-7713. Fax: (732) 235-7951. E-mail: weinstei{at}umdnj.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 19 September 2007.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2007, p. 3546-3548, Vol. 45, No. 11
0095-1137/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01555-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Endorsed by the European Society of Clinical Micro, , Authors/Task Force Members, , Habib, G., Hoen, B., Tornos, P., Thuny, F., Prendergast, B., Vilacosta, I., Moreillon, P., de Jesus Antunes, M., Thilen, U., Lekakis, J., Lengyel, M., Muller, L., Naber, C. K., Nihoyannopoulos, P., Moritz, A., Zamorano, J. L., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), , Vahanian, A., Auricchio, A., Bax, J., Ceconi, C., Dean, V., Filippatos, G., Funck-Brentano, C., Hobbs, R., Kearney, P., McDonagh, T., McGregor, K., Popescu, B. A., Reiner, Z., Sechtem, U., Sirnes, P. A., Tendera, M., Vardas, P., Widimsky, P., Document Reviewers, , Vahanian, A., Aguilar, R., Bongiorni, M. G., Borger, M., Butchart, E., Danchin, N., Delahaye, F., Erbel, R., Franzen, D., Gould, K., Hall, R., Hassager, C., Kjeldsen, K., McManus, R., Miro, J. M., Mokracek, A., Rosenhek, R., San Roman Calvar, J. A., Seferovic, P., Selton-Suty, C., Uva, M. S., Trinchero, R., van Camp, G. (2009). Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009): The Task Force on the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 30: 2369-2413 [Full Text]  
  • Rowther, F. B., Rodrigues, C. S., Deshmukh, M. S., Kapadia, F. N., Hegde, A., Mehta, A. P., Joshi, V. R. (2009). Prospective Comparison of Eubacterial PCR and Measurement of Procalcitonin Levels with Blood Culture for Diagnosing Septicemia in Intensive Care Unit Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 2964-2969 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Riedel, S., Bourbeau, P., Swartz, B., Brecher, S., Carroll, K. C., Stamper, P. D., Dunne, W. M., McCardle, T., Walk, N., Fiebelkorn, K., Sewell, D., Richter, S. S., Beekmann, S., Doern, G. V. (2008). Timing of Specimen Collection for Blood Cultures from Febrile Patients with Bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1381-1385 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nicola, F. G., Weinstein, M. P., Lee, A., Reller, L. B., Mirrett, S. (2008). Assessing How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed for Detecting Bloodstream Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1155-1156 [Full Text]  
  • (2007). Diagnosing Bloodstream Infection: How Many Cultures?. JWatch Infect. Diseases 2007: 4-4 [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»