This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shehata, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ghannoum, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shehata, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ghannoum, M. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2008, p. 3668-3671, Vol. 46, No. 11
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01242-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison between the Standardized Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M38-A2 Method and a 2,3-Bis(2-Methoxy-4-Nitro-5-[(Sulphenylamino)Carbonyl]-2H-Tetrazolium Hydroxide- Based Method for Testing Antifungal Susceptibility of Dermatophytes {triangledown}

Atef S. Shehata,1,2 Pranab K. Mukherjee,2 and Mahmoud A. Ghannoum2*

Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt,1 Center for Medical Mycology, Department of Dermatology, Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio2

Received 1 July 2008/ Returned for modification 8 August 2008/ Accepted 21 September 2008

In this study, we determined the utility of a 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT)-based assay for determining antifungal susceptibilities of dermatophytes to terbinafine, ciclopirox, and voriconazole in comparison to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 method. Forty-eight dermatophyte isolates, including Trichophyton rubrum (n = 15), Trichophyton mentagrophytes (n = 7), Trichophyton tonsurans (n = 11), and Epidermophyton floccosum (n = 13), and two quality control strains, were tested. In the XTT-based method, MICs were determined spectrophotometrically at 490 nm after addition of XTT and menadione. For the CLSI method, the MICs were determined visually. With T. rubrum, the XTT assay revealed MIC ranges of 0.004 to >64 µg/ml, 0.125 to 0.25 µg/ml, and 0.008 to 0.025 µg/ml for terbinafine, ciclopirox, and voriconazole, respectively. Similar MIC ranges were obtained against T. rubrum by using the CLSI method. Additionally, when tested with T. mentagrophytes, T. tonsurans, and E. floccosum isolates, the XTT and CLSI methods resulted in comparable MIC ranges. Both methods revealed similar lowest drug concentrations that inhibited 90% of the isolates for the majority of tested drug-dermatophyte combinations. The levels of agreement within 1 dilution between both methods were as follows: 100% with terbinafine, 97.8% with ciclopirox, and 89.1% with voriconazole. However, the agreement within 2 dilutions between these two methods was 100% for all tested drugs. Our results revealed that the XTT assay can be a useful tool for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Medical Mycology, Department of Dermatology, Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106. Phone: (216) 844-8580. Fax: (216) 844-1076. E-mail: mahmoud.ghannoum{at}case.edu

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 1 October 2008.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, November 2008, p. 3668-3671, Vol. 46, No. 11
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01242-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pinto, E., Vale-Silva, L., Cavaleiro, C., Salgueiro, L. (2009). Antifungal activity of the clove essential oil from Syzygium aromaticum on Candida, Aspergillus and dermatophyte species. J Med Microbiol 58: 1454-1462 [Abstract] [Full Text]