This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by André, P.
Right arrow Articles by Guiso, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by André, P.
Right arrow Articles by Guiso, N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2008, p. 1672-1677, Vol. 46, No. 5
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02187-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Serological and Real-Time PCR Assays To Diagnose Bordetella pertussis Infection in 2007{triangledown}

Philippe André,1 Valerie Caro,2 Elisabeth Njamkepo,2 Aaron M. Wendelboe,3 Annelies Van Rie,3 and Nicole Guiso2*

Sanofi Pasteur, 2 Avenue Pont Pasteur, 69367 Lyon Cedex 07, France,1 Institut Pasteur, Unité Prévention et Thérapie Moléculaires des Maladies Humaines, URA-CNRS 3012, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France,2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina3

Received 13 November 2007/ Returned for modification 17 December 2007/ Accepted 18 March 2008

Bacterial culture for diagnosing pertussis infection has high specificity but poor sensitivity and is slow. Highly sensitive real-time PCR assays and single-serum pertussis serology have been developed to overcome these limitations, but there are few data available on the relative sensitivities and specificities of such assays for pertussis diagnosis. Using data on 195 participants (≥7 years old) from an epidemiological study, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and performance (Youden index) for pertussis diagnosis of the pertussis toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (using single and paired serology) and of real-time PCR assays (using the IS481 and ptxA-Pr targets). All available diagnostic information (clinical and laboratory) was pooled to serve as the gold standard. Single serology was the most efficient diagnostic test (Youden index, 0.57 to 0.58), with relatively high sensitivity (>64%) and high specificity (>90%), independent of the cutoff level. IS481 PCR performance was superior to that of ptxA-Pr PCR, and it was the second-most-efficient tool (Youden index, 0.30). Performing both ptxA-Pr and IS481 PCRs did not improve diagnostic performance. The greatest test efficiency (Youden index, 0.69 to 0.74) was achieved when single-serum serology was used in combination with IS481 or ptxA-Pr PCR or paired serology. Combining single serology with one PCR or paired serology increased the sensitivity with an associated limited decrease in specificity. The most specific tests for diagnosis of pertussis were single serology and ptxA-Pr PCR, and the most sensitive diagnostic tool was the combination of IS481 PCR with single serology.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut Pasteur, Unité Prévention et Thérapie, Moléculaires des Maladies Humaines, URA-CNRS 3012, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75015 Paris, France. Phone: 33 1 45 68 83 34. Fax: 33 1 40 61 35 33. E-mail: nguiso{at}pasteur.fr

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 26 March 2008.

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2008, p. 1672-1677, Vol. 46, No. 5
0095-1137/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.02187-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Caro, V., Guiso, N., Alberti, C., Liguori, S., Burucoa, C., Couetdic, G., Doucet-Populaire, F., Ferroni, A., Papin-Gibaud, S., Grattard, F., Reglier-Poupet, H., Raymond, J., Soler, C., Bouchet, S., Charreau, S., Couzon, B., Leymarie, I., Tavares, N., Choux, M., Bingen, E., Bonacorsi, S. (2009). Proficiency Program for Real-Time PCR Diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis Infections in French Hospital Laboratories and at the French National Reference Center for Whooping Cough and other Bordetelloses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3197-3203 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fry, N. K., Duncan, J., Wagner, K., Tzivra, O., Doshi, N., Litt, D. J., Crowcroft, N., Miller, E., George, R. C., Harrison, T. G. (2009). Role of PCR in the diagnosis of pertussis infection in infants: 5 years' experience of provision of a same-day real-time PCR service in England and Wales from 2002 to 2007. J Med Microbiol 58: 1023-1029 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Xing, D., Wirsing von Konig, C. H., Newland, P., Riffelmann, M., Meade, B. D., Corbel, M., Gaines-Das, R. (2009). Characterization of Reference Materials for Human Antiserum to Pertussis Antigens by an International Collaborative Study. CVI 16: 303-311 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Caro, V., Bouchez, V., Guiso, N. (2008). Is the Sequenced Bordetella pertussis Strain Tohama I Representative of the Species?. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 2125-2128 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»