This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1046-1049, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01480-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae Infections in Adults with Bacteremia and Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Clinical Comparison of Pneumococcal PCR and Urinary Antigen Detection{triangledown}

Michael D. Smith,1* Carmen L. Sheppard,2 Angela Hogan,3 Timothy G. Harrison,2 David A. B. Dance,4 Petra Derrington,5,{dagger} Robert C. George,2 on behalf of the South West Pneumococcus Study Group {ddagger}

Department of Microbiology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, TA1 5DA,1 Respiratory and Systemic Infections Department, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, 61 Colindale Road, London NW9 5EQ,2 Vaccine Evaluation Unit, Health Protection Agency South West, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, GL1 3NN,3 Health Protection Agency South West, Tamar Science Park, 1 Davy Road, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX,4 Health Protection Agency South West Regional Laboratory, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, United Kingdom5

Received 1 August 2008/ Returned for modification 13 October 2008/ Accepted 3 February 2009

The diagnosis of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae infection relies heavily on insensitive culture techniques. To improve the usefulness of PCR assays, we developed a dual-PCR protocol (targeted at pneumolysin and autolysin) for EDTA blood samples. This was compared to the Binax NOW S. pneumoniae urine antigen test in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal infections. Patients with nonbacteremic community-acquired pneumonia also were tested by these methods to determine what proportion could be confirmed as pneumococcal infections. A direct comparison was made in a group of patients who each had both tests performed. The Binax NOW S. pneumoniae urine antigen test was positive in 51 of 58 bacteremic pneumococcal cases (sensitivity, 88%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77 to 95%), whereas the dual PCR was positive in 31 cases (sensitivity, 53.5%; 95% CI, 40 to 67%; P < 0.0001), and all of these had detectable urinary antigens. Both tests gave positive results in 2 of 51 control patients (referred to as other-organism septicemia), giving a specificity of 96% (95% CI, 86.5 to 99.5%). In 77 patients with nonbacteremic community-acquired pneumonia, urinary antigen was detected significantly more often (in 21 patients [27%]) than a positive result by the dual-PCR protocol (6 [8%]) (P = 0.002). The development of a dual-PCR protocol enhanced the sensitivity compared to that of the individual assays, but it is still significantly less sensitive than the Binax NOW urine antigen test, as well as being more time-consuming and expensive. Urinary antigen detection is the nonculture diagnostic method of choice for patients with possible severe pneumococcal infection.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 5DA, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 01823 342424. Fax: (44) 01823 259453. E-mail: mike.smith{at}tst.nhs.uk

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 18 February 2009.

{dagger} Present address: Department of Microbiology, Gold Coast Hospital, 108 Nerang Street, Southport, Queensland 4215, Australia.

{ddagger} Other members of the South West Pneumococcus Study Group are listed in the acknowledgements.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2009, p. 1046-1049, Vol. 47, No. 4
0095-1137/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JCM.01480-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.