JCM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 3 July 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
JCM.00551-07v1
45/9/2819    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Citron, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Abramson, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Citron, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Abramson, M. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/JCM.00551-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Bacteriology of Moderate to Severe Diabetic Foot Infections and In Vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Agents

Diane M. Citron*, Ellie J. C. Goldstein, C. Vreni Merriam, Benjamin A. Lipsky, and Murray A. Abramson

R.M. Alden Research Lab, Santa Monica, CA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; VA Puget Sound Health Care System, & Univ. of Washington School of Med., Seattle, WA; Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: d.m.citron{at}verizon.net.


   Abstract

As part of a United States-based multicenter clinical trial conducted 2001-2004 comparing ertapenem to piperacillin/tazobactam for treating moderate to severe diabetic foot infections (DFI), we obtained 454 pretreatment specimens from 433 patients. After debridement, investigators collected wound specimens, mostly by curettage or biopsy, and sent them to our laboratory for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Among the 427 positive cultures, 83.8% were polymicrobial, 48% grew only aerobes, 43.7% had both aerobes and anaerobes, and 1.3% only anaerobes. Cultures yielded a total of 1145 aerobic and 462 anaerobic strains with an average (range) of organisms per culture of 2.7 (1-8) for aerobes and 2.3 (1-9) for anaerobes. The predominant aerobic organisms were: Staphylococcus aureus, oxacillin-susceptible (14.3%), oxacillin-resistant, (4.4%); Staphylococcus species, coagulase-negative (15.3%); Streptococcus species (15.5%); Enterococcus species (13.5%); Corynebacterium species (10.1%); Enterobacteriaceae (12.8%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.5%). Predominant anaerobes were gram-positive cocci (45.2%), Prevotella species (13.6%), Porphyromonas species (11.3%), and Bacteroides fragilis group (10.2%). Pure cultures were noted for 20% of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 9.2% of S. epidermidis, and 2.5% of P. aeruginosa. Two or more species of Staphylococcus were present in 13.1% of patients. Ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were each active against >98% of enteric gram-negative rods, methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, and anaerobes. Among fluoroquinolones, 24% of anaerobes were resistant to moxifloxacin, especially the gram-positive cocci; 27% of gram-positive aerobes, but only 6% of Enterobacteriaceae, were resistant to levofloxacin. Moderate to severe DFIs are typically polymicrobial, and almost half include anaerobes. Our antibiotic susceptibility results can help to inform therapeutic choices.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.