Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Research Article

Simplified lyogroup system, a new method for routine identification of staphylococci: description and comparison with three other methods.

P E Varaldo, G Grazi, O Soro, G Cisani, G Satta
P E Varaldo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Grazi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O Soro
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Cisani
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Satta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A simplified system for routine identification of the six lyogroups of human staphylococci is described. The method is based on the determination of the lytic activity on five different test media and of the phosphatase activity of each isolate. A total of 689 staphylococci isolated from clinical material over a 6-month period were identified according to this simplified system. The same strains were identified in parallel using three other methods designed for routine identification of staphylococci: the Kloos and Schleifer abbreviated scheme (J Clin. Microbiol. 1:82-88, 1975) the scheme proposed by the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Staphylococci and Micrococci (Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 26:332-334, 1976), and the API STAPH micromethod. Isolated whose identification was in disagreement were identified on a taxonomic level according to the extensive classification scheme of Schleifer and Kloos. In addition, 42 reference staphylococci of known identity were reidentified using the simplified lyogroup system as well as the three other routine methods. The results of this comparative study was detailed and discussed. A primary advantage of the simplified lyogroup system is that it also provides separation of staphylococci from micrococci, which must be performed separately when the other methods are used. Other significant advantages concerned with reliability, speed, and practicality are shown.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Simplified lyogroup system, a new method for routine identification of staphylococci: description and comparison with three other methods.
P E Varaldo, G Grazi, O Soro, G Cisani, G Satta
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jul 1980, 12 (1) 63-68; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Simplified lyogroup system, a new method for routine identification of staphylococci: description and comparison with three other methods.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Simplified lyogroup system, a new method for routine identification of staphylococci: description and comparison with three other methods.
P E Varaldo, G Grazi, O Soro, G Cisani, G Satta
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jul 1980, 12 (1) 63-68; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X