Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Comparative Study | Journal Article

Q-beta replicase-amplified assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens.

J S Shah, J Liu, D Buxton, A Hendricks, L Robinson, G Radcliffe, W King, D Lane, D M Olive, J D Klinger
J S Shah
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Liu
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Buxton
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A Hendricks
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Robinson
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G Radcliffe
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W King
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Lane
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D M Olive
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J D Klinger
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We report the results of a study conducted to evaluate the performance of manual Q-Beta replicase-amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex assay compared with that of culture for detecting M. tuberculosis directly from digested sputum pellets. A total of 261 specimens submitted to three tuberculosis testing laboratories were analyzed. Culture and acid-fast bacillus smear results were provided by the tuberculosis testing laboratories. Of these 261 specimens, 34 (13% prevalence rate) were positive for M. tuberculosis by culture. The samples were digested and decontaminated by the testing laboratories by using their standard digestion and decontamination procedures. An aliquot of the digested and decontaminated pellet was sent to GENE-TRAK. The digested and decontaminated pellet was neutralized by washing it with 0.067 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and the bacteria present in the washed pellet were heat inactivated at 100 degrees C for 15 min. The samples were combined with sample processing buffer containing GuSCN and were treated for 6 min in the GENE-TRAK Sample Processing Instrument to release the nucleic acids. The release rRNA was analyzed in a manual Q-Beta replicase assay format which incorporates elements of sandwich hybridization, reversible target capture, and Q-beta replicase signal amplification technologies. In comparison with culture, the overall assay sensitivity and specificity were 97.1 and 96.5%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 80.5%, and the negative predictive value was 99.5%. After analysis of discrepant results, the assay sensitivity and specificity were 97.3 and 97.8, respectively, and the prevalence rate was 14%. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 87.8 and 99.5%, respectively. The Q-Beta replicase assay is rapid sensitive, semiquantitative, and specific for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis from clinical specimens.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Q-beta replicase-amplified assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens.
J S Shah, J Liu, D Buxton, A Hendricks, L Robinson, G Radcliffe, W King, D Lane, D M Olive, J D Klinger
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 1995, 33 (6) 1435-1441; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Q-beta replicase-amplified assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Q-beta replicase-amplified assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens.
J S Shah, J Liu, D Buxton, A Hendricks, L Robinson, G Radcliffe, W King, D Lane, D M Olive, J D Klinger
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 1995, 33 (6) 1435-1441; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X