Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Confirmation of the Distinct Genotype Groups within the Form Species Candida parapsilosis

Basabi Roy, Sally A. Meyer
Basabi Roy
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally A. Meyer
Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The DNA relatedness and restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns of whole-cell DNA and the general phenotypic properties of 14 isolates of the form species Candida parapsilosis representing three diverse genetic groups were compared. The data confirm the unrelatedness of the three groups at the species level.

In recent years, Candida parapsilosis, a form species of the Fungi Imperfecti defined by morphological and physiological properties, has been increasingly implicated as a cause of fungemia, endocarditis in neutropenic or severely debilitated patients, and candidal vaginitis (22). The species has been commonly associated with the skin and fingernails of humans (18), and it has been isolated from soil and fresh and marine waters (1, 3, 13).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Source and G+C content of isolates grouped within C. parapsilosis

Genetic heterogeneity has been reported within this species in several studies. Scherer and Stevens (16) divided their clinical isolates of C. parapsilosis into three groups on the basis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). The data from this study suggested that C. parapsilosis is genotypically more heterogeneous than Candida albicans. Lehmann et al. (6), on the basis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA profiles, also observed three distinct groups among isolates ofC. parapsilosis. Group I and II isolates of the latter study shared the API 20C (Analytab, Plainview, N.Y.) code 6756171, whereas the two isolates in group III had the biotype code 6776171. Further studies of representative strains from these three groups indicated that each group included isolates with distinctive karyotypes (9). Lin et al. (8) examined 45 clinical isolates that were physiologically similar to C. parapsilosis as determined with the API 20C kit and reported the presence of three distinct isoenzyme-defined groups that were also distinguishable on the basis of sequence analysis of the internally transcribed spacer sequences flanking the 5.8S RNA gene.

In this investigation, we examined the nuclear DNA base composition, DNA-DNA reassociation, and DNA RFLPs of 13 isolates of C. parapsilosis from diverse sources (including representatives of groups I to III mentioned above) and the type strain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast strains.The strains examined in this study are listed in Table 1. They include the type strain of C. parapsilosisand representative strains of the three groups reported by Lin et al. (8). The standard morphological and physiological characterizations of the yeasts were performed according to the methods described by van der Walt and Yarrow (21).

DNA base composition and reassociation studies.DNA was isolated and purified by the method of Marmur (10) as modified by Meyer and Phaff (12). DNA base composition (mol% G+C) was determined by the thermal denaturation method as described by Marmur and Doty (11). The optical renaturation method of Seidler and Mandel (17) as modified by Kurtzman et al. (5) was employed for the DNA reassociation studies.

RFLPs.DNA was extracted and purified by the methods of Su and Meyer (19) and Scherer and Stevens (16), and restriction enzyme analysis was performed with HinfI,HindIII, PvuII, and HaeIII restriction endonucleases (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The DNA fragments were separated in a 1% agarose gel in Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer (40 mM Tris-OH, 20 mM acetic acid, 2 mM Na2EDTA [pH 8.1]) (2).

RESULTS

Percent DNA relatedness divided the isolates into three distinct groups, each of which agreed with the molecular characteristics of the representative cultures of the groups established by Lin et al. (8). There was greater than 95% DNA relatedness among isolates within a group and less than 25% relatedness between isolates from different groups (Table2). The G+C contents of the isolates were 40.2 to 41.5 mol% (group I), 38.5 to 40.5 mol% (group II), and 39.4 to 40.7 mol% (group III) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

DNA relatedness among groups I, II, and III of C. parapsilosis

Group I isolates all had similar RFLP patterns after digestion withHinfI (Fig. 1). Polymorphisms were evident in this group after double digestion withHindIII and HaeIII (Fig.2) and HindIII andPvuII (Fig. 3). The RFLP patterns of representative isolates of each group after digestion withHinfI (data not shown) and the double digestions demonstrated RFLP distinctions among the three groups (Fig.4 and 5). No polymorphisms were observed with the restriction digest patterns of isolates of group II and group III.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

C. parapsilosis group I RFLP patterns fromHinfI digests. Lanes: M, λ DNA digested withHindIII; A, ATCC 22019; B, NRRL Y-10022; C, NRRL Y-10208; D, NRRL Y-9282; E, NRRL Y-10518; F, CBS 2215; G, CBS 8181.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

C. parapsilosis group I RFLP patterns fromHindIII-HaeIII digests. Lanes: M, λ DNA digested with HindIII; A, ATCC 22019; B, NRRL Y-10022; C, NRRL Y-10208; D, NRRL Y-10518; E, CBS 2215; F, NRRL Y-9282; G, CBS 8050; H, CBS 8181.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

C. parapsilosis group I RFLP patterns fromHindIII-PvuII digests. Lanes: M, λ DNA digested with HindIII; A, ATCC 22019; B, NRRL Y-10022; C, NRRL Y-10208; D, NRRL Y-10518; E, CBS 2215; F, NRRL Y-9282; G, CBS 8050; H, CBS 8181.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

C. parapsilosis RFLP profiles fromHindIII-HaeIII digests. Lanes: M, λ DNA digested with HindIII; A and B, group I ATCC 22019 and CBS 8050, respectively; C and D, group II MCO 452 and NRRL Y-9536, respectively; E and F, group III MCO 429 and MCO 448, respectively.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

C. parapsilosis RFLP profiles fromHindIII-PvuII digests. Lanes: M, λ DNA digested with HindIII; A and B, group I ATCC 22019 and CBS 8050, respectively; C and D, group II MCO 452 and NRRL Y-9536, respectively; E and F, group III MCO 429 and MCO 448, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our DNA relatedness and RFLP analyses support the earlier divisions of isolates classified as C. parapsilosis into three separate groups. The low degree of DNA relatedness among the groups indicates that they represent distinct species. Although two of these groups (II and III) have been recognized only within the past decade, one of the group II cultures was originally isolated in 1966 from the Antarctic Peninsula (possibly from human or animal pollution). Our recent clinical isolates (1996) represented group I and group III. We do not have sufficient information for the phenotypic differentiation of these genetically distinct yeasts, nor can we currently discern if differences in their epidemiology exist.

The finding of genetically diverse groups among the form species of the imperfect yeasts is not unusual. Lehmann et al. (7) found two distinct genetic groups within Candida haemulonii. The phenotype of Candida famata is found among strains ofCandida guilliermondii and several species ofDebaryomyces (14). A variety of distinct genotypes are present within the general phenotype ofTrichosporon cutaneum (15). Most recently,C. albicans was found to include a diverse genetic group which was designated a distinct species, Candida dubliniensis (20). The application of molecular procedures to yeast systematics has resulted in major reclassifications of many species and genera (4, 13). It is obvious that understanding the genetic diversity of the yeasts associated with human infections requires further study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We offer special thanks to D. G. Ahearn, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Ga., for his guidance and recommendations in this research and the preparation of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 19 June 1997.
    • Returned for modification 18 August 1997.
    • Accepted 13 October 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Ahearn, D. G. Yeasts pathogenic for humans. In C. P. Kurtzman and J. W. Fell (ed.), The yeasts, a taxonomic study, in press. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  2. ↵
    1. Davis R. W.,
    2. Botstein D.,
    3. Roth J. R.
    (1980) Advanced bacterial genetics. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y).
  3. ↵
    1. Fell J. W.
    (1976) Yeasts in oceanic regions. in Recent advances in aquatic mycology. ed Jones E. B. C. (Elek Science, London, England), pp 93–124.
  4. ↵
    1. Kurtzman C. P.
    (1994) Molecular taxonomy of the yeasts. Yeast 10:1727–1740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Kurtzman C. P.,
    2. Smiley M. J.,
    3. Johnson C. J.,
    4. Wickerham L. J.,
    5. Fuson G. B.
    (1980) Two new and closely related heterothallic species, Pichia amylophila and Pichia mississippiensis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30:208–216.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Lehmann P. F.,
    2. Lin D.,
    3. Lasker B. A.
    (1992) Genotypic identification and characterization of species and strains within the genus Candida by using random amplified polymorphic DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:3249–3254.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Lehmann P. F.,
    2. Wu L.-C.,
    3. Pruitt W. R.,
    4. Meyer S. A.,
    5. Ahearn D. G.
    (1993) Unrelatedness of groups of yeasts within the Candida haemulonii complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1683–1687.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Lin D.,
    2. Wu L.-C.,
    3. Rinaldi M. G.,
    4. Lehmann P. F.
    (1995) Three distinct genotypes within Candida parapsilosis from clinical sources. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1815–1821.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Lott T. J.,
    2. Kuykendall R. J.,
    3. Welbel S. F.,
    4. Pramanik A.,
    5. Lasker B. A.
    (1993) Genomic heterogeneity in the yeast Candida parapsilosis. Curr. Genet. 23:463–467.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Marmur J.
    (1961) A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J. Mol. Biol. 3:208–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Marmur J.,
    2. Doty P.
    (1962) Determination of the base composition of deoxyribonucleic acid from its thermal denaturation temperature. J. Mol. Biol. 5:109–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Meyer S. A.,
    2. Phaff H. J.
    (1969) Deoxyribonucleic acid composition in yeasts. J. Bacteriol. 97:52–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Meyer, S. A., R. W. Payne, and D. Yarrow.Candida Berkhout. In C. P. Kurtzman and J. W. Fell (ed.), The yeasts, a taxonomic study, in press. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  14. ↵
    1. Nishikawa A.,
    2. Tomomatsu H.,
    3. Sugita T.,
    4. Ikeda R.,
    5. Shinoda T.
    (1996) Taxonomic position of clinical isolates of Candida famata. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 34:411–419.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Nishiura Y.,
    2. Nakagawa-Yoshida K.,
    3. Suga M.,
    4. Shinoda T.,
    5. Gueho E.
    (1997) Assignment and serotyping of Trichosporon species: the causative agents of summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 35:45–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Scherer S.,
    2. Stevens D. A.
    (1987) Application of DNA typing methods to epidemiology and taxonomy of Candida species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:675–679.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Seidler R. J.,
    2. Mandel M.
    (1971) Quantitative aspects of deoxyribonucleic acid renaturation: base composition, state of chromosome replication, and polynucleotide homologies. J. Bacteriol. 106:608–614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Strausbaugh L. J.,
    2. Sewell D. L.,
    3. Ward T. T.,
    4. Pfaller M. A.,
    5. Heitzman T.,
    6. Tjoelker R.
    (1994) High frequency of yeast carriage on hands of hospital personnel. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2299–2300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Su C.-S.,
    2. Meyer S. A.
    (1991) Characterization of mitochondrial DNA in various Candida species: isolation, restriction endonuclease analysis, size, and base composition. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41:6–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Sullivan D. J.,
    2. Westerneng T. J.,
    3. Haynes K. A.,
    4. Bennett D. E.,
    5. Coleman D. C.
    (1995) Candida dubliniensis sp. nov.: phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV-infected individuals. Microbiology 141:1507–1521.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. van der Walt J. P.,
    2. Yarrow D.
    (1984) Methods for the isolation, maintenance, classification and identification of yeasts. in The yeasts: a taxonomic study, ed Kreger-van Rij N. J. W. (Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands), 3rd ed. pp 45–104.
  22. ↵
    1. Vazquez J. A.,
    2. Beckley A.,
    3. Donabedian S.,
    4. Sobel J. D.,
    5. Zervos M. J.
    (1993) Comparison of restriction enzyme analysis versus pulsed-field gradient gel electrophoresis as a typing system for Torulopsis glabrata and Candida species other than C. albicans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:2021–2030.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Confirmation of the Distinct Genotype Groups within the Form Species Candida parapsilosis
Basabi Roy, Sally A. Meyer
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 1998, 36 (1) 216-218; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Confirmation of the Distinct Genotype Groups within the Form Species Candida parapsilosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
Confirmation of the Distinct Genotype Groups within the Form Species Candida parapsilosis
Basabi Roy, Sally A. Meyer
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 1998, 36 (1) 216-218; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X