Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Isolation of Serpulina pilosicoli from Rectal Biopsy Specimens Showing Evidence of Intestinal Spirochetosis

Nicolle L. Trivett-Moore, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Carmella L. H. Law, Darren J. Trott, David J. Hampson
Nicolle L. Trivett-Moore
Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert
Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmella L. H. Law
Sexual Health Service, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darren J. Trott
Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia 6150,Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Hampson
Division of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia 6150,Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.1.261-265.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Histologic evidence of intestinal spirochetosis (IS) was found in 22 of 41 (53.7%) rectal biopsy specimens from homosexual men attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Serpulina pilosicoli was cultured from 11 of the IS-positive biopsy specimens (50%) and from 2 specimens (10.5%) in which spirochetes were not observed. The association between seeing spirochetes in biopsy specimens and isolating S. pilosicoli was statistically significant, clearly indicating that this spirochete is the agent of IS.

The term intestinal spirochetosis (IS) was coined in 1967 for an infection of the large bowel in which uncharacterized spirochetes were found attached by one end to the colonic epithelium to form a dense “false brush border” (11). Subsequently, there has been considerable controversy over the pathologic and epidemiologic significance of this colonization. Some investigators have reported symptoms such as rectal bleeding and/or diarrhea in patients with IS (6, 7, 9, 20, 30, 42), and in some cases clinical improvement has occurred after treatment with antibiotics which eliminated the spirochetes (7, 14, 29). Other investigators have been unable to relate the presence of intestinal spirochetes to gastrointestinal symptoms (3, 26, 31, 32).

Most studies of IS have involved histologic examination of biopsy material, without concurrent bacterial culture (17, 21, 24, 31, 42); a smaller number of studies have involved only fecal culture for spirochetes (3, 13, 18, 30, 33). One exception was a study by Hovind-Hougen et al. (12) in which the newly described spirochete Brachyspira aalborgi was isolated from the feces of one of five patients showing histologic evidence of IS in rectal biopsy specimens. Since then, when IS has been diagnosed on the basis of histologic examination, it has usually been assumed that the organism involved was B. aalborgi (10, 15, 26, 27, 29). This is despite the fact that in another study in which spirochetes were seen in rectal biopsy specimens from five of eight homosexual men, a different, incompletely characterized spirochete was isolated (5).

Histologic studies have suggested that spirochetes are present in 2.5 to 9% of rectal biopsy specimens from unselected Europeans (11, 17, 20, 26), but are more common (9 of 14; 64%) in biopsy specimens from individuals in southern India (22) and are present in 30 to 39% of biopsy specimens from homosexual men in western societies (16, 24). Studies involving selective culture for spirochetes have established that they can be isolated from the feces of only 1.2 to 1.5% of unselected individuals in the United Kingdom and Australia (18, 33), while they were isolated from 12 of 27 (44%) samples from untreated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive homosexual males in Germany (14). Rates of colonization in adult Omani Arabs (3), Australian Aboriginal children (18), and villagers of all ages in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea (38) have also been high, ranging from 11.4 to 32.6%. These highly variable colonization rates may be influenced by a variety of factors, including immune function, sexual practices, diet, sanitation, and community structure (4, 19, 33, 38).

Representative isolates from the studies described above were recently analyzed by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE). None of these isolates was B. aalborgi; instead, all were shown to beSerpulina pilosicoli (formerly “Anguillina coli”) (19, 36), the recently described agent of porcine intestinal spirochetosis (37). Infection of pigs with S. pilosicoli is widespread and is associated with poor growth rates, colitis, and diarrhea. S. pilosicoli also infects dogs and birds and again is associated with diarrhea (8, 23). Experimentally, infection of pigs with a human isolate ofS. pilosicoli caused colitis with crypt abscessation (35). In experimentally infected chicks, human isolates have caused watery diarrhea and reduced growth rates, and they also attached by one end to the cecal epithelium (25, 34). These findings strongly suggest that human strains of S. pilosicoli have pathogenic potential.

To date systemic disease associated with S. pilosicoli has not been reported in animals, but S. pilosicoli has recently been isolated from the bloodstreams of critically ill human patients, some of whom had a history of intestinal disease (39). In humans, spirochetes have occasionally been seen in colonic or rectal epithelial cells, goblet cells, macrophages, and Schwann cells in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients (1, 10, 15, 27). In some cases severe inflammatory reactions have been recorded, including crypt abscessation and epithelial ulceration and necrosis (15). In all these cases it was assumed that the spirochetes were B. aalborgi. The purpose of the present study was to isolate and identify spirochetes from rectal biopsy specimens taken from a group of high-risk individuals with histologic evidence of IS. This would then answer the question of whether spirochetes that can be seen in biopsy specimens from patients with IS are B. aalborgi or the more recently described spirocheteS. pilosicoli.

The subjects of the study were a group of 40 homosexual men attending a sexual health clinic in Sydney, Australia. Approximately half the men were HIV antibody positive, but none was suffering from AIDS. Most reported having minor nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. Informed consent was obtained for participation in the study. For one individual a second biopsy specimen was taken 6 months after the first biopsy specimen was obtained. Proctoscopy was performed with disposable sigmoidoscopes. Rectal biopsy specimens were taken 10 to 15 cm from the anal verge by using flexible colonoscopy biopsy forceps as described previously (16). Half of the biopsy specimen was placed in neutral buffered formalin for histologic examination, and the other half was streaked directly onto selective Trypticase soy agar (BBL, Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood and 400 μg of spectinomycin (Sigma-Aldrich Pty Ltd., Castle Hill, Australia) per ml (33). Plates were incubated at 37°C in an environment of 85% N2–10% H2–5% CO2 and were examined daily for up to 14 days for the presence of spirochetes. Suspected spirochete colonies were examined by dark-field microscopy to determine cell morphology. Isolated spirochetes were maintained on antibiotic-free Columbia agar plates (Columbia Agar base; Oxoid Unipath Ltd., Basingstoke, United Kingdom) containing 5% defibrinated horse blood.

Isolates were subjected to a S. pilosicoli-specific PCR designed to amplify a 1.33-kb portion of the S. pilosicoli16S rRNA gene (28). Whole cells were harvested from plates in phosphate-buffered saline, washed, and then boiled for 10 min prior to amplification. The product was detected by ethidium bromide staining following electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose. For nine isolates, including the two isolates recovered from biopsy specimens collected from the same individual 6 months apart, the electrophoretic mobilities of 15 constitutive enzymes were determined by MLEE. The same electrophoretic running conditions, buffers, and enzyme assays reported previously were used (19). The allele profiles generated were grouped into electrophoretic types (ETs) and were compared with the ETs generated for 70 human fecal strains of S. pilosicoli which we had examined previously (19, 39). Genetic distances between ETs were calculated as the proportion of fixed loci at which dissimilar alleles occurred. A phenogram illustrating genetic distances between ETs was constructed as described previously (19).

Formalin-fixed biopsy tissues were dehydrated through alcohol, paraffin embedded, cut to a thickness of 5 μm, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined by light microscopy. A total of 22 of the 41 biopsy specimens (53.7%) exhibited a blue-stained haze of spirochetes on the surface of the epithelium, but there was no evidence of spirochete penetration or inflammation. The positive samples were examined further by transmission electron microscopy. These biopsy specimens were washed and postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (buffered in 0.1 M cacodylate) for 4 h. Samples were dehydrated through alcohol and prepared for embedding by absorption in a 1:1 mixture of acetone and low-viscosity epoxy resin. The tissue was embedded in 100% low-viscosity epoxy resin and polymerized at 70°C for a minimum of 8 h. Semithin (0.5 μm) and ultrathin (70 to 90 nm) sections were cut from the biopsy specimen by ultramicrotomy. These were stained with 2% uranyl acetate containing 50% ethanol for 15 min and then washed and restained with lead citrate for 4 min. The preparations were examined with a Phillips CM10 transmission electron microscope.

A 20-μm-thick layer of spirochetes was observed attached end on to the mucosal layer of the rectal epithelial cells of the 22 positive biopsy specimens. These spirochetes were situated between and parallel to the microvilli, with little obvious loss of microvilli (Fig.1). At the point of attachment between the ends of the spirochetes and the mucosal cell membrane was seen a depression or pocket, forming a small electron-lucent pit, and some exhibited an electron-dense cap at this point (Fig.2). The epithelial cell membranes remained intact, with the spirochetes confined to the cell surface.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Transmission electron microscopic view of sectioned rectal biopsy specimen showing a “false brush border” of intestinal spirochetes attached by one end to the mucosa, with minimal disruption of the microvilli. Bar, 3 μm.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Transmission electron micrograph of sectioned rectal biopsy tissue showing spirochetes on the mucosal layer of rectal epithelial cells, invaginated into the terminal web of the cells. Bar, 0.5 μm.

Spirochetes were isolated from 11 of the 22 (50%) biopsy specimens showing histologic evidence of IS and from 2 of the 19 specimens (10.5%) not showing histologic evidence of colonization. The association between histologic evidence of spirochete colonization and isolation was examined by a chi-squared test and was shown to be significant (χ2 = 7.34; P < 0.01).

Two different weakly β-hemolytic colony types were observed on blood agar plates, and both were visible only after 6 days of incubation. The first colony type was <1 mm in diameter, convex, grey, and translucent, and the other was 1 to 1.5 mm in diameter, crenated, mucoid, grey, and translucent. Bacteria from the two colony types were indistinguishable by both light and electron microscopy; they were 6 to 10 μm long, with a tapered end, and had four to six periplasmic flagella at each cell end (Fig. 3). All gave positive DNA amplifications in the S. pilosicoli-specific PCR, and the 9 that were subjected to MLEE analysis all grouped with well-characterized fecal isolates of S. pilosicoli (Fig. 4). Each of the nine isolates belonged to a different ET. One, in ET 62, was relatively distantly related to the others. Pairs of isolates in ETs 16 and 17 and ETs 28 and 29 differed by only a single allele. The two isolates cultured from the same individual 6 months apart were different, being located in ETs 28 and 32, respectively.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Transmission electron micrograph of a transversely sectioned spirochete showing five periplasmic flagella. Bar, 0.1 μm.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Phenogram illustrating relationships of nine isolates ofS. pilosicoli cultured from rectal biopsy specimens, indicated by bold lines, and 70 fecal isolates from previous studies located in another 53 ETs.

This study has shown a clear and significant relationship between the presence of intestinal spirochetes attached as a “false brush border” in histologic sections from the rectum—a condition consistent with previous reports of IS—and isolation of S. pilosicoli from the biopsy specimens. It is therefore highly likely that in other studies in which IS has been diagnosed on the basis of histologic examination alone, these spirochetes also wereS. pilosicoli. In no case was B. aalborgiisolated in this study, even though the medium used supports its growth, and plates were incubated for 2 weeks, as described when the organism was originally isolated (12). Since that original report, no other isolations of this organism have been made. UnlikeS. pilosicoli, B. aalborgi recently failed to colonize experimentally infected chicks (41). Clearly, over the years, the significance of B. aalborgi appears to have been greatly overestimated.

The high prevalence of rectal biopsy specimens showing evidence of IS (53.7%) among the group of individuals examined in the present study was similar to that in previous reports of studies with homosexual males with or without HIV infection (5, 14, 16). The relatively low rate of isolation of S. pilosicoli from the biopsy specimens showing evidence of IS (50%) was interesting and suggests that studies based on culture alone, including fecal culture, may underestimate the true prevalence of infection. In the two cases in which S. pilosicoli was isolated from biopsy specimens without histologic evidence of IS, these organisms may have been present in the intestinal lumen, having originated from the mucosa in more proximal colonic sites.

S. pilosicoli is a known pathogen of animals, and its capacity to cause disease in humans now requires further assessment. In the current study no attempt was made to associate histologic evidence of IS and disease. All the subjects described here reported only mild nonspecific gastrointestinal disorders. Rectal spirochetosis has been reported in patients with proctitis (5, 7, 42), but this was not present in any of the current subjects, and indeed, no evidence of inflammation was found at the histologic level. Because samples were taken only from the rectum, it was not known whether colonization extended beyond this site. This is significant, since diarrheal disease in pigs is associated with extensive colonization of the cecum and colon (37). Similarly, in humans it seems likely that extensive colonization at other sites is more likely than rectal colonization to be problematic, but it is not known how frequently rectal colonization and colonic colonization coexist. Lindboe et al. (20) reported finding spirochetes more commonly in the rectum (2.5%) than at other large intestinal sites (1.2 to 1.9%) in patients undergoing biopsy, while Lo et al. (21) reported finding spirochetes in the proximal colon but not the distal colon or rectum of one of their patients. When spirochetes are isolated from the feces, their major site of colonization in the intestine remains unknown. This may help explain some of the difficulties in linking the presence of S. pilosicoli in the feces or in rectal biopsy specimens to the presence or absence of specific intestinal symptoms.

The large genetic diversity found among the strains isolated here was consistent with previous findings for strains recovered from humans and animals (2, 19). The isolation of different strains ofS. pilosicoli from biopsy specimens from the same patient taken 6 months apart was also consistent with findings for some individuals in an Australian Aboriginal community (18, 19) and in villages in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea (38, 40). Nevertheless, in the former study some other subjects were found to be colonized with the same strain of S. pilosicoliover a 12-month period, while in the latter studies the average duration of colonization was calculated to be approximately 4 months. It is also possible that individuals can be colonized concurrently with different strains of the spirochete, and this could have important implications for the development of protective immunity and for antimicrobial drug therapy if one or more resistant strains were also present. This possibility requires further investigation, for example, by undertaking strain typing with multiple isolates obtained from a range of sites sampled along the length of the large intestine.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ross Boadle, Department of Anatomical Pathology, ICPMR, for the use of the electron microscope and Adrian Lee, School of Microbiology and Immunology, University of New South Wales, for assistance with interpreting the electron micrographs.

The original study on sexually transmitted diseases and bowel conditions in homosexual men attending a sexual health clinic was funded by the Sydney Hospital Foundation for Medical Research, with grants awarded to Carmella L. H. Law.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 17 June 1997.
    • Returned for modification 12 August 1997.
    • Accepted 15 September 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Antonakopoulos G.,
    2. Newman J.,
    3. Wilkinson M.
    Intestinal spirochaetosis: an electron microscopic study of an unusual case.Histopathology 6 1982 477 488
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Atyeo R. F.,
    2. Oxberry S. L.,
    3. Hampson D. J.
    Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for sub-specific differentiation of Serpulina pilosicoli (formerly “Anguillina coli”).FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 141 1996 77 81
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Barrett S. P.
    Intestinal spirochaetes in a Gulf Arab population.Epidemiol. Infect. 104 1991 261 266
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barrett S. P.
    Human intestinal spirochaetosis Intestinal spirochaetes in domestic animals and humans. Hampson D. J., Stanton T. B. 1997 243 265 CAB International Wallingford, England
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cooper C.,
    2. Cotton D. W.,
    3. Hudson M. J.,
    4. Kirkham N.,
    5. Wilmott F. E.
    Rectal spirochaetosis in homosexual men: characterisation of the organism and pathophysiology.Genitourin. Med. 62 1986 47 52
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Crucioli V.,
    2. Busuttil A.
    Human intestinal spirochaetosis.Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 16 1981 177 179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Douglas J. G.,
    2. Crucioli V.
    Spirochaetosis: a remediable cause of diarrhoea and rectal bleeding? Br. Med. J. 283 1981 1362
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Duhamel G. E.,
    2. Hunsaker B. D.,
    3. Mathieson M. R.,
    4. Moxley R. A.
    Intestinal spirochetosis and giardiasis in a beagle pup with diarrhea.Vet. Pathol. 33 1996 360 362
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Gad A.,
    2. Willen R.,
    3. Furugard K.,
    4. Fors B.,
    5. Hradsky M.
    Intestinal spirochaetosis as a cause of longstanding diarrhoea.Uppsala J. Med. Sci. 82 1977 49 54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Guccion J. G.,
    2. Bentor D. A.,
    3. Zeller J.,
    4. Termanini B.,
    5. Saini N.
    Intestinal spirochetosis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: ultrastructural studies of two cases.Ultrastruct. Pathol. 19 1995 15 22
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Harland W. A.,
    2. Lee F. D.
    Intestinal spirochaetosis.Br. Med. J. 2 1967 718 719
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hovind-Hougen K.,
    2. Birch-Andersen A.,
    3. Hendrik-Nielsen R.,
    4. Orholm M.,
    5. Pedersen J. O.,
    6. Teglbaerg P. S.,
    7. Thaysen E. H.
    Intestinal spirochetosis: morphological characterization and cultivation of the spirochete Brachyspira aalborgi gen. nov., sp. nov.J. Clin. Microbiol. 6 1982 1127 1136
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Jones M. J.,
    2. Miller J. N.,
    3. George W. L.
    Microbiological and biochemical characterization of spirochetes isolated from the feces of homosexual males.J. Clin. Microbiol. 6 1986 1071 1074
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kasbohrer A.,
    2. Gelderblom H. R.,
    3. Arasteh K.,
    4. Heise W.,
    5. Grosse G.,
    6. L’age M.,
    7. Schonberg A.,
    8. Koch M. A.,
    9. Pauli G.
    Intestinale spirochatose bei HIV-infektion.Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 115 1990 1499 1506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kosterman J. R.,
    2. Patel M.,
    3. Catalano E.,
    4. Camacho J.,
    5. Hoffpauir J.,
    6. DiNubile M. J.
    Invasive colitis and hepatitis due to previously uncharacterized spirochetes in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection.Clin. Infect. Dis. 21 1995 1159 1165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Law C. L. H.,
    2. Grierson J. M.,
    3. Stevens S. M. B.
    Rectal spirochaetosis in homosexual men: the association with sexual practices, HIV infection and enteric flora.Gentourin. Med. 70 1994 6 29
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lee F. D.,
    2. Kraszewski A.,
    3. Gordon J.,
    4. Howie J. G. R.,
    5. McSeveney D.,
    6. Harland W. A.
    Intestinal spirochaetosis.Gut 12 1971 126 133
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Lee J. I.,
    2. Hampson D. J.
    Intestinal spirochaetes colonising Aboriginals from communities in the remote north of Western Australia.Epidemiol. Infect. 109 1992 133 141
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lee J. I.,
    2. Hampson D. J.
    Genetic characterisation of intestinal spirochaetes and their association with disease.J. Med. Microbiol. 40 1994 365 371
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lindboe C. F.,
    2. Tostrup N. E.,
    3. Nersund R.,
    4. Rekkavik G.
    Human intestinal spirochaetosis in mid-Norway.APMIS 101 1993 858 864
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lo T. C. N.,
    2. Heading R. C.,
    3. Gilmour H. M.
    Intestinal spirochaetosis.Postgrad. Med. J. 70 1994 134 137
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mathan M. M.,
    2. Mathan V. I.
    Rectal mucosal morphologic abnormalities in normal subjects in southern India: a tropical colonopathy? Gut 26 1985 710 717
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. McLaren A. J.,
    2. Trott D. J.,
    3. Swayne D. E.,
    4. Oxberry S. L.,
    5. Hampson D. J.
    Genetic and phenotypic characterization of intestinal spirochetes colonizing chickens and allocation of known pathogenic isolates to three distinct genetic groups.J. Clin. Microbiol. 35 1997 412 417
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. McMillan A.,
    2. Lee F. D.
    Sigmoidoscopic and microscopic appearance of the rectal mucosa in homosexual men.Gut 22 1981 1035 1041
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Muniappa N.,
    2. Duhamel G. E.,
    3. Mathiesen M. R.,
    4. Bargar T. W.
    Light microscopic and ultrastructural changes in ceca of chicks inoculated with human and canine Serpulina pilosicoli.Vet. Pathol. 33 1996 542 550
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Neilsen H. R.,
    2. Orholm J. O.,
    3. Pedersen K.,
    4. Hovind-Hougen K.,
    5. Thaysen E. H.
    Colorectal spirochaetosis: clinical significance of the infestation.Gastroenterology 85 1983 62 67
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Padmanabhan V.,
    2. Dahlstrom J.,
    3. Maxwell L.,
    4. Kaye G.,
    5. Clarke A.,
    6. Barrett P. J.
    Invasive intestinal spirochaetosis: a report of three cases.Pathology 28 1996 283 296
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Park N. Y.,
    2. Chung C. Y.,
    3. McLaren A. J.,
    4. Atyeo R. F.,
    5. Hampson D. J.
    Polymerase chain reaction for identification of human and porcine spirochaetes recovered from cases of intestinal spirochaetosis.FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 125 1995 225 230
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Rodgers F. G.,
    2. Rodgers C.,
    3. Shelton A. P.,
    4. Hawkey C. P.
    Proposed pathogenic mechanism for the diarrhoea associated with human intestinal spirochaetes.Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 86 1984 679 682
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sanna A.,
    2. Dettori G.,
    3. Agliano A. M.,
    4. Branca G.,
    5. Grillo R.,
    6. Leone F.,
    7. Rossi A.,
    8. Parisi G.
    Studies of treponemes isolated from human gastrointestinal tract.Ig. Mod. 81 1984 959 973
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Surawicz C. M.,
    2. Roberts P. L.,
    3. Rompalo A.,
    4. Quinn T. C.,
    5. Holmes K. K.,
    6. Stamm W. E.
    Intestinal spirochetosis in homosexual men.Am. J. Med. 82 1987 587 592
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Takeuchi A.,
    2. Jervis H. R.,
    3. Nakazawa H.,
    4. Robinson D. M.
    Spiral-shaped organisms on the surface colonic epithelium of the monkey and man.Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 27 1974 1287 1296
    OpenUrlAbstract
  33. 33.↵
    1. Tompkins D. S.,
    2. Foulkes S. J.,
    3. Godwin P. G. R.,
    4. West A. P.
    Isolation and characterisation of intestinal spirochaetes.J. Clin. Pathol. 39 1986 535 541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Trott D. J.,
    2. McLaren A. J.,
    3. Hampson D. J.
    Pathogenicity of human and porcine intestinal spirochetes in one-day-old specific-pathogen-free chicks: an animal model of intestinal spirochetosis.Infect. Immun. 63 1995 3705 3710
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Trott D. J.,
    2. Huxtable C. R.,
    3. Hampson D. J.
    Experimental infection of newly weaned pigs with human and porcine strains of Serpulina pilosicoli.Infect. Immun. 64 1996 4648 4654
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Trott D. J.,
    2. Stanton T. B.,
    3. Jensen N. S.,
    4. Hampson D. J.
    Phenotypic characterisation of Serpulina pilosicoli, the agent of intestinal spirochetosis.FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 142 1996 209 214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Trott D. J.,
    2. Stanton T. B.,
    3. Jensen N. S.,
    4. Duhamel G. E.,
    5. Johnson J. L.,
    6. Hampson D. J.
    Serpulina pilosicoli sp. nov., the agent of porcine intestinal spirochetosis.Int. J. System. Bacteriol. 46 1996 206 215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Trott, D. J., B. G. Combs, A. S. J. Mikosza, S. L. Oxberry, I. D. Robertson, M. Passey, J. Taime, R. Sehuko, M. P. Alpers, and D. J. Hampson. The prevalence of Serpulina pilosicoli in humans and domestic animals in the eastern highlands of Papua New Guinea. Epidemiol. Infect., in press.
  39. 39.↵
    1. Trott D. J.,
    2. Jensen N. S.,
    3. Saint Girons I.,
    4. Oxberry S. L.,
    5. Stanton T. B.,
    6. Lindquist D.,
    7. Hampson D. J.
    Identification and characterization of Serpulina pilosicoli isolates recovered from the blood of critically ill patients.J. Clin. Microbiol. 35 1997 482 485
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Trott, D. J., A. S. J. Mikosza, B. G. Combs, S. L. Oxberry, and D. J. Hampson. Submitted for publication.
  41. 41.↵
    1. Trott D. J.,
    2. Oxberry S. L.,
    3. Hampson D. J.
    Evaluation of day-old SPF chicks for pathogenicity testing of intestinal spirochete species.Abstracts of the NADC First International Virtual Conference on Infectious Diseases of Animals. I00003 1997
  42. 42.↵
    1. Willen R.,
    2. Carlen B.,
    3. Cronstedt J.,
    4. Willen H.
    Intestinal spirochaetosis of the colon diagnosed with colono-ileoscopy and multiple biopsies.Endoscopy 17 1985 86 88
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Isolation of Serpulina pilosicoli from Rectal Biopsy Specimens Showing Evidence of Intestinal Spirochetosis
Nicolle L. Trivett-Moore, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Carmella L. H. Law, Darren J. Trott, David J. Hampson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 1998, 36 (1) 261-265; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.1.261-265.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Isolation of Serpulina pilosicoli from Rectal Biopsy Specimens Showing Evidence of Intestinal Spirochetosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Isolation of Serpulina pilosicoli from Rectal Biopsy Specimens Showing Evidence of Intestinal Spirochetosis
Nicolle L. Trivett-Moore, Gwendolyn L. Gilbert, Carmella L. H. Law, Darren J. Trott, David J. Hampson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 1998, 36 (1) 261-265; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.1.261-265.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Brachyspira
Intestinal Diseases
Rectum
Spirochaetales Infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X