Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

Mink Lung Epithelial Cells: Unique Cell Line That Supports Influenza A and B Virus Replication

Stacey Schultz-Cherry, Naomi Dybdahl-Sissoko, Martha McGregor, Virginia S. Hinshaw
Stacey Schultz-Cherry
Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, Georgia 30605, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naomi Dybdahl-Sissoko
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martha McGregor
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Virginia S. Hinshaw
Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.12.3718-3720.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We have demonstrated for the first time that a mink lung epithelial cell line (Mv1Lu) supports the replication of influenza A and B viruses, including the recently isolated H5N1 avian and human Hong Kong strains, to titers comparable to those in MDCK cells. These results suggest that Mv1Lu cells might serve as an alternative system for the isolation and cultivation of influenza A and B viruses and may be useful for vaccine development.

Isolation of influenza viruses in embryonated eggs or cell culture is critical for epidemiologic investigation of outbreaks and for vaccine production. The ability to culture influenza was critical in the recognition of the H5N1 avian influenza outbreak in humans in 1997. This recent emergence of lethal avian influenza viruses in humans justifies our need for reliable methods of isolating and identifying influenza A and B viruses from clinical samples. There is overwhelming evidence that the growth of influenza A and B viruses in eggs can lead to the selection of variants containing antigenic and structural changes in the hemagglutinin (HA) molecule (7, 12, 14). In addition, passaging of mammalian influenza viruses in eggs can result in a change in the receptor specificity from the mammalian α-2,6-galactose oligosaccharide to the avian α-2,3-sialic acid linkage (6). Finally, the lack of reliable high-quality eggs is a serious limitation in their use.

Many attempts have been made to find suitable alternatives to the use of eggs for isolating influenza virus from clinical samples and for virus propagation. Influenza viruses can infect a variety of primary and continuous cell lines; however, most cells do not support productive viral replication (1a, 2, 4, 8, 11). Currently, Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells are widely used for viral studies since they support the growth and isolation of virus (2, 11, 13). During the course of our studies assessing the role of cytokines in influenza A viral pathogenesis (15), we found that a mink lung epithelial cell line (Mv1Lu [ATCC CCL-64]) supports the replication of influenza A and B viruses to titers comparable to those in MDCK cells. In these studies, we examined the usefulness of the Mv1Lu cell line for the isolation and replication of numerous influenza A and B viruses, including the recently isolated human and chicken Hong Kong H5N1 isolates.

To examine the use of Mv1Lu cells for propagation of influenza viruses, we first compared the replication of reference strains of mammalian and avian influenza A and B viruses in Mv1Lu cells and MDCK cells. MDCK (passage 3 to 30) or Mv1Lu (passage 41 to 60) cells were seeded at 5 × 105 cells per well in six-well tissue culture plates and allowed to grow to confluency. The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and then infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01 and allowed to incubate for 1 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 1 h, the cells were washed with minimum essential medium (MEM) and further incubated in MEM containing 5% bovine serum albumin and 0.3 (Mv1Lu) or 1 (MDCK) μg of TPCK (l-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone)-treated trypsin per ml. Mv1Lu cells are more sensitive to trypsin; therefore, the optimal concentration of trypsin was determined by dose response assay (data not shown). Aliquots of supernatants were removed at 0, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h postinfection (p.i.), and the viral yield was determined by hemagglutination and 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assays on MDCK cells. The following viruses were obtained from the influenza virus repository at the University of Wisconsin—Madison: avian strains A/Mallard/NY/6874/78 (H3N2), A/Mallard/Wisconsin/994/82 (H5N2), and A/Turkey/Ontario/7732/66 (H5N9) (Ty/Ont); mammalian strains A/PR/8/34 (H1N1), A/Swine/Indiana/1726/88 (H1N1) (Sw/Ind), A/Udorn/307/72 (H3N2) (Udorn), A/Aichi (H3N2), and A/Seal/Massachusetts/92; and influenza B virus strains B/David Breeze/44, B/Lee/40, and B/Hong Kong. Viruses were propagated in the allantoic cavities of 11-day-old embryonated chicken eggs for 48 to 72 h at 35°C; the allantoic fluid was harvested, centrifuged for clarification, and stored at −70°C.

At 48 h p.i., all of the influenza A virus reference strains had replicated to comparable levels in MDCK and Mv1Lu cells (Table1). Similar results were seen with influenza B viruses at 72 h p.i. (Table 1). The strains were positive by hemagglutination assay, infectivity assays, and indirect immunofluorescent-antibody labeling (data not shown). Growth curves show the similar kinetics of replication of a highly pathogenic avian strain (Ty/Ont), two mammalian strains (Sw/Ind and Udorn), and an influenza B virus strain (B/David Breeze/44) in MDCK and Mv1Lu cells (Fig. 1). These studies suggest that Mv1Lu cells support the replication of mammalian and avian reference strains of influenza A and B viruses tested at levels similar to MDCK cells (Table 1). It is worth noting that, of all the strains tested, only the equine viruses (Equine/Kentucky/1/81 [H3N8] and Equine/Prague [H7N7]) failed to replicate in Mv1Lu cells (data not shown). The reason for this is unclear.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Efficiencies of influenza A and B virus replication in Mv1Lu and MDCK cellsa

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Growth curves in Mv1Lu and MDCK cells. Confluent monolayers of MDCK or Mv1Lu cells were infected with Ty/Ont (■), Sw/Ind (•), Udorn (⧫), or B/David Breeze/44 (×) with a multiplicity of infection of 0.01. Aliquots were removed at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h p.i., and infectivity was determined by TCID50 assays on MDCK cells. Results are representative of at least five separate experiments.

The viruses tested above were first propagated in embryonated eggs, a method shown to alter the receptor specificity and structure of the HA molecule (6, 7, 10). Therefore, we tested the replication of clinical isolates in Mv1Lu cells. Viruses from nasopharyngeal swabs of infected individuals were isolated, and confluent monolayers of MDCK or Mv1Lu cells were infected with H1N1, H3N2, and B strains (12 total) obtained from the Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene (Madison, Wis.). Supernatants were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h p.i., and infectivities were assessed by hemagglutination assay and TCID50 analysis on MDCK cells (Table 2). All of the clinical isolates replicated in Mv1Lu cells (Table 2 and data not shown). Interestingly, we found that two of the H1N1 strains failed to replicate in MDCK cells while replicating in Mv1Lu cells (Table 2). Finally, we found that the human and chicken H5N1 strains isolated during the recent Hong Kong outbreak replicated to comparable titers in the Mv1Lu and MDCK cells (Table 3). These studies suggest that a wide range of subtypes are capable of infecting and replicating in Mv1Lu cells. In addition, Mv1Lu cells support the replication of clinical isolates of influenza A and B virus strains, including those that do not replicate in MDCK cells. Unlike Vero cells, viruses do not have to be adapted for growth in Mv1Lu cells (3, 4). This may be important for the isolation of clinical strains.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Replication of human (H1N1) influenza A and B virus clinical samples in Mv1Lu and MDCK cells

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Replication of human and chicken influenza A virus Hong Kong strains in Mv1Lu and MDCK cells

In these studies, we describe the use of a mink lung epithelial cell line for the replication and isolation of influenza viruses. Mv1Lu cells were originally isolated from trypsinized lungs of unsexed fetal Aleutian mink and are reverse transcriptase negative (1). The cells are useful for focus-forming assays for murine and feline sarcoma viruses (5) and are susceptible to herpes simplex virus, reovirus type 3, and vaccinia virus (1). They are resistant to adenovirus type 5, coxsackieviruses A-9 and B-5, and poliovirus type 2 infections (1). We propose that Mv1Lu cells may serve as a valuable cell line for influenza virus isolation and identification for the following reasons: (i) they support the replication of laboratory and clinical isolates of viruses to titers similar to the standard MDCK system and are commercially available, making them accessible to any laboratory or institution; (ii) they support the replication of clinical isolates that fail to replicate in MDCK cells; (iii) flow cytometry analysis shows that Mv1Lu cells contain the α-2,6 and α-2,3 receptors necessary for influenza virus entry at levels similar to those of MDCK cells (79 versus 64%, respectively, for α-2,3 and 80 versus 83% for α-2,6); and (iv) mink can be experimentally infected with influenza virus and serve as a model system for human influenza virus pathogenesis (9), suggesting that Mv1Lu cells may be useful in studying the cell biology of influenza virus pathogenesis including the identification of cellular receptors and cell death pathways.

It is worth noting that differences were found in the cytopathic effects (CPE) produced in Mv1Lu cells with certain influenza A virus strains, and the appearance of CPE was also delayed compared to MDCK cells (data not shown). Because of variability in CPE, we were unable to use Mv1Lu cells for plaque assays or TCID50 analysis. All of the reported TCID50 data was generated by testing Mv1Lu cell supernatants on MDCK cells. The ability of Mv1Lu cells to support viral replication to high titers with delayed onset of cell death suggests that they may provide adequate quantities of virus for vaccine development. However, further studies examining the usefulness of Mv1Lu cells for vaccine production will have to be undertaken.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI33893 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to V.S.H. S.S.-C. was supported by a postdoctoral training fellowship in tumor virology through the McArdle Cancer Center of the University of Wisconsin.

We gratefully acknowledge C. Olsen, D. Larsen, D. Suarez, and M. Perdue for many helpful discussions. Finally, we acknowledge the excellent technical support of Patsy Decker, of the Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, for testing of the avian and human Hong Kong strains.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 June 1998.
    • Returned for modification 13 August 1998.
    • Accepted 23 September 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    American Type Culture Collection. ATCC CCL-64 product sheet. American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.
  2. 1a.↵
    1. Endo Y.,
    2. Carroll K. N.,
    3. Ikizler M. R.,
    4. Wright P. F.
    Growth of influenza A virus in primary, differentiated epithelial coils derived from adenoids.J. Virol.70199620552058
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 2.↵
    1. Frank A. L.,
    2. Couch R. B.,
    3. Griffits C. A.,
    4. Baxter B. D.
    Comparison of different tissue cultures for isolation and quantitation of influenza and parainfluenza viruses.J. Clin. Microbiol.1019793236
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 3.↵
    1. Govorkova E. A.,
    2. Kaverin N. V.,
    3. Gubareva L. V.,
    4. Meignier B.,
    5. Webster R. G.
    Replication of influenza A viruses in a green monkey kidney continuous cell line (Vero).J. Infect. Dis.1721995250253
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 4.↵
    1. Govorkova E. A.,
    2. Murti G.,
    3. Meignier B.,
    4. De Taisne C.,
    5. Webster R. G.
    African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells provide an alternative host cell system for influenza A and B viruses.J. Virol.70199655195524
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 5.↵
    1. Henderson I.,
    2. Lieber M.,
    3. Todaro G.
    Mink cell line Mv 1 Lu (CCL 64). Focus formation and the generation of “nonproducer” transformed cell lines with murine and feline sarcoma viruses.Virology601974282287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 6.↵
    1. Ito T.,
    2. Suzuki Y.,
    3. Takada A.,
    4. Kawamoto A.,
    5. Otsuki K.,
    6. Masuda H.,
    7. Yamada M.,
    8. Suzuki T.,
    9. Kida H.,
    10. Kawaoka Y.
    Differences in sialic acid-galactose linkages in the chicken egg amnion and allantois influence human influenza virus receptor specificity and variant selection.J. Virol.71199733573362
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 7.↵
    1. Katz J. M.,
    2. Naeve C. W.,
    3. Webster R. G.
    Host cell-mediated variation in H3N2 influenza viruses.Virology1561987386395
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 8.↵
    1. Lau S. C.,
    2. Scholtissek C.
    Abortive infection of Vero cells by an influenza A virus (FPV).Virology2121995225231
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 9.↵
    1. Matsuura Y.,
    2. Yanagawa R.,
    3. Noda H.
    Experimental infection of mink with influenza A viruses.Arch. Virol.6219797176
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 10.↵
    1. Raymond F. L.,
    2. Caton A. J.,
    3. Cox N. J.,
    4. Kendal A. P.,
    5. Brownlee G. G.
    The antigenicity and evolution of influenza H1 haemagglutinin, from 1950–1957 and 1977–1983: two pathways from one gene.Virology1481986275287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 11.↵
    1. Reina J.,
    2. Fernandez-Baca V.,
    3. Blanco I.,
    4. Munar M.
    Comparison of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK) with a green monkey continuous cell line (Vero) and human lung embryonated cells (MRC-5) in the isolation of influenza A virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates by shell vial culture.J. Clin. Microbiol.35199719001901
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 12.↵
    1. Robertson J. S.,
    2. Naeve C. W.,
    3. Webster R. G.,
    4. Bootman J. S.,
    5. Newman R.,
    6. Schild G. C.
    Alterations in the hemagglutinin associated with adaptation of influenza B virus to growth in eggs.Virology1431985166174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 13.↵
    1. Schepetiuk S. K.,
    2. Kok T.
    The use of MDCK, MEK, and LLC-MK2 cell lines with enzyme immunoassay for the isolation of influenza and parainfluenza viruses from clinical specimens.J. Virol. Methods421993241250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 14.↵
    1. Schlid G. C.,
    2. Oxford J. S.,
    3. de Jong J. C.,
    4. Webster R. G.
    Evidence for host-cell selection of influenza virus antigenic variants.Nature3031983706709
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 15.↵
    1. Schultz-Cherry S.,
    2. Hinshaw V. S.
    Influenza virus neuraminidase activates latent transforming growth factor β.J. Virol.70199686248629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Mink Lung Epithelial Cells: Unique Cell Line That Supports Influenza A and B Virus Replication
Stacey Schultz-Cherry, Naomi Dybdahl-Sissoko, Martha McGregor, Virginia S. Hinshaw
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 1998, 36 (12) 3718-3720; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.12.3718-3720.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mink Lung Epithelial Cells: Unique Cell Line That Supports Influenza A and B Virus Replication
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Mink Lung Epithelial Cells: Unique Cell Line That Supports Influenza A and B Virus Replication
Stacey Schultz-Cherry, Naomi Dybdahl-Sissoko, Martha McGregor, Virginia S. Hinshaw
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 1998, 36 (12) 3718-3720; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.12.3718-3720.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

influenza A virus
Influenza B virus
Lung
Mink
Virus Replication

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X