Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Application of an Optimized and Highly Discriminatory Method Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR for Epidemiologic Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNosocomial Infections

Antonio Olmos, Juan J. Camarena, José M. Nogueira, Juan C. Navarro, Julia Risen, Roberto Sánchez
Antonio Olmos
Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Dr. Peset,” E-46017 Valencia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan J. Camarena
Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Dr. Peset,” E-46017 Valencia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José M. Nogueira
Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Dr. Peset,” E-46017 Valencia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan C. Navarro
Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Dr. Peset,” E-46017 Valencia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julia Risen
Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Dr. Peset,” E-46017 Valencia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Sánchez
Department of Microbiology, Hospital “Dr. Peset,” E-46017 Valencia, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The optimization of an arbitrarily primed PCR method for typing 96 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates was compared with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Identical results in the differentiation of MRSA clones and identification of the main cluster that included 82 strains (88% of patients) were obtained by both techniques.

Outbreaks of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) continue to be a major problem for patients admitted to intensive care units. Since 1993, there has been an increase in the incidence of nosocomial outbreaks of MRSA strains in different geographic areas in Spain (4, 17), with an incidence of close to 50% at our institution for the period 1994 to 1995, which is covered in the present study. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is a highly discriminatory method for typing MRSA isolates because it can distinguish among several concurrent epidemic strains (12). However, it is a time-consuming and expensive typing method not well suited for screening a large number of isolates by a diagnostic laboratory (5). By arbitrarily amplifying variable regions in the bacterial genome (arbitrarily primed PCR [AP-PCR]), an isolate-specific DNA fingerprint can be obtained in a rapid and reproducible manner (11). Although AP-PCR is a cost-effective procedure as well, its discriminatory ability for typing MRSA isolates is lower than that of PFGE (6, 14, 16). Amplification of fragments of the 16S to 23S rRNA intergenic spacer region by ribosome spacer PCR (RS-PCR) (5) or with the nested-PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA spacer region (13) have been proposed recently as being highly reproducible and almost as discriminatory as PFGE for the local investigation of MRSA outbreaks.

We describe here the optimization of AP-PCR for typing isolates of MRSA and compared the effectiveness of this rapid assay with that of PFGE.

Ninety-six MRSA isolates from 51 patients (31 men and 20 women between 22 and 90 years of age) with nosocomial infection collected from 1994 to 1995 at our institution were included (Table1), as well as otherStaphylococcus isolates from 29 men and 17 women between 27 and 89 years of age (26 methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus [MSSA] strains, 17 coagulase-negative strains, and 3 unrelated [community-acquired] MRSA strains), which served as controls (Table 2). Reference strains were S. aureus CECT435 and CECT4630. Methicillin resistance was assessed with 1-μg methicillin disks at 35°C for 24 h on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 4% NaCl, according to standard MICs (≤4 mg/liter) (6) and E-Test-oxacillin (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The mecA gene was confirmed by PCR with the RSM2647 and RSM2648 primers (8).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Clinical features of 51 patients with nosocomial infection and results obtained with isolates analyzed by PFGE and AP-PCR

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Features of the control isolates tested and results of the characterization by PFGE and AP-PCR

The PFGE method of Prévost et al. (12) was used, with minor modifications according to the instructions of a different manufacturer (Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif.). Electrophoresis was performed with the CHEF DRIII electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad) with a 5-s initial pulse, 60-s final pulse, voltage of 6 V/cm, angle of 120°, time of 23 h, and temperature of 13°C (9). Gels were stained with ethidium bromide and photographed. Banding patterns were interpreted according to the method of Bannerman et al. (1), considering as isolates of the same strain (modal pattern) those that appeared identical in size and number of bands and considering as subtypes those with three or fewer band differences.

For the AP-PCR protocol, the method of DNA extraction described by Pitcher et al. (10) was used, except that the suspension time of S. aureus colonies in enzymatic solutions was reduced to 15 min, the incubation time was reduced to 15 min, and protein precipitation was reduced to 5 min. The DNA concentration was measured with a GeneQuant II RNA/DNA calculator (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). To determine the optimal conditions for the reliability and reproducibility of AP-PCR, the effects of different DNA template concentrations (5, 25, 50, 75, and 100 ng), DNA polymerases (RedHot, an enzyme from Thermus“Icelandicus,” a new strain [Advanced Biotechnologies, Surrey, United Kingdom]; GIBCO-BRL Taqpolymerase [Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.]; Boehringer Mannheim Taq polymerase [Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany]; and Promega Taq polymerase [Promega, Madison, Wis.], at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 U), arbitrary primers (a total of 20 included in the kit from Operon Technologies, Alameda, Calif., at concentrations of 0.1 to 1 μM), MgCl2concentrations (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and 4 mM), annealing temperatures (25 to 45°C), and multiplication factors per degree centigrade in ramps of the thermocycling conditions (1, 2, 3, and 4) were tested in triplicate for 11 MRSA strains previously characterized by PFGE.

The optimization of the technique was as follows. The PCR mixture consisted of 5 U of RedHot DNA polymerase (Advanced Biotechnologies); 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8 at 25°C); 2.5 mM MgCl2; 50 mM KCl; 250 μM (each) dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP; 1 μM primer OPA11 (5′-CAATCGTCCGT-3′); and 50 ng of template DNA for a final volume of 25 μl. Cycling was performed in a Perkin-Elmer PCR machine (model Gene Amp 9600) and consisted of the following steps: denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 44 cycles of 94°C for 1 min and a ramp of 3 min 52 s to 36°C for 1 min, a ramp of 2 min 24 s to 72°C for 1 min, and a ramp of 1 min 18 s to 94°C, followed by 10 min of extension at 72°C. Five strains were used as internal controls in each AP-PCR assay.

For the analysis of reproducibility and similarity, each new PFGE and AP-PCR pattern was included in subsequent tests for comparison. The similarity between PFGE and AP-PCR patterns was assessed by using the Dice coefficient for each pair of isolates. The GelPrinter and Lane Manager 2.0 software (TDI, S.A., Madrid, Spain) were used for the analysis. A coefficient of similarity higher than 95% was required to establish a same-clone origin.

PFGE after restriction with SmaI resolved the chromosomal DNA of the 96 MRSA isolates into six main distinct PFGE patterns (A to F). PFGE type A contained 82 strains (88% of patients), which could be further classified into three subtypes (A.1 to A.3) (Fig.1), of which subtype A.1 represented the majority (48 strains [50%]), followed by A.2 (32 strains [33.3%] and A.3 (2 strains [2.1%]). The remaining PFGE patterns had no subtypes. PFGE types B, C, D, E, and F contained one, five, one, three, and four isolates, respectively (Table 1). The Dice coefficient of similarity among major patterns had an average value of 67%. The subtype variants showed similarity values higher than 95%. Control isolates showed different PFGE patterns (Table 2), with average similarity values ranging between 43 and 84%. Figure2A shows the epidemiologic clustering according to all PFGE banding patterns of all S. aureus strains included in the study.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

The principal PFGE pattern (type A). Lanes: 1, PFGE marker I, λ ladder (Boehringer Mannheim); 2, 5, 6, 9, 13, and 15,SmaI macrorestriction pattern A1; 3, 4, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 14, SmaI macrorestriction pattern A2; 8, SmaI macrorestriction pattern A3.

  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean Tree. (A) PFGE. (B) AP-PCR. Results are from analysis of similarity by Dice’s coefficient, corresponding to all strains included in the study.

AP-PCR analysis generated between 8 and 17 DNA products from 0.4 to 3.2 kb (Fig. 3) and also characterized the 96 MRSA isolates into six main distinct clusters (A to F). Eighty-two MRSA isolates (88% of patients) were grouped into main cluster A. The remaining AP-PCR clusters, B, C, D, E, and F, contained one, five, one, three, and four isolates, respectively (Table 1). The Dice coefficient of similarity among major patterns had an average value of 50%. Control isolates showed different AP-PCR patterns (Table 2), with an average similarity value lower than 50%, except for two MSSA strains and one unrelated MRSA strain. Figure 2B shows the epidemiologic clustering according to all AP-PCR banding patterns of all S. aureus strains included in the study.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

OPA11-PCR patterns belonging to different clonal groups. Lanes: 1, 100-bp DNA ladder (GIBCO BRL); 2 to 10, different PCR fingerprinting profiles (2, 8, 9, and 10, pattern A; 3, pattern CNS2; 4, pattern C; 5, pattern MSSA9; 6, pattern D; 7, pattern MSSA18).

Complete coincidence between PFGE and AP-PCR in differentiation of MRSA clones and in identification of the main cluster that included 82 MRSA strains was obtained.

During the past few years, MRSA has become an increasing source of nosocomial infections causing therapeutic and control problems in hospitals in many parts of the world (3, 7). Accurate epidemiological typing by reproducible and rapid methods is a major step in determining MRSA clones and sources of transmission. Although PFGE was developed as an epidemiological marker for typing S. aureus strains (10), different PCR-based methods have been introduced to overcome the complexity of this technique. Among these relatively novel techniques, AP-PCR has been one of the most used because of its simplicity and rapidity (a few hours versus about 3 days for PFGE). Recently, RS-PCR (5) and the nested-PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA spacer region (13) have been proposed as alternatives to PFGE for typing MRSA isolates in local investigations of MRSA outbreaks (5, 13). However, PFGE detects minor variations among the isolates and could identify variants that are not discriminated by RS-PCR (5). Moreover, the nested-PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA spacer region increases the time-consuming aspects of detection and enhances the risks of contamination. Based on our previous experience of AP-PCR with commercially available primers (2), we selected this simple fast technique as an epidemiological molecular marker. In contrast to the study of Saulnier et al. (14), in which PFGE was superior to the randomly amplified polymorphic DNA assay for typing MRSA strains, we obtained a complete correlation between PFGE and the optimization of AP-PCR. This included 1 μM OPA11 primer, 50 ng of DNA template, 5 U of RedHot DNA polymerase, 2.5 mM MgCl2, a 36°C annealing temperature, and ramps in the thermocycling conditions. The optimized AP-PCR technique was a useful tool for the discrimination and surveillance of MRSA strains associated with an outbreak localized in the intensive care and surgery wards that spread to other departments. Reproducible patterns for different MRSA, MSSA, and coagulase-negative S. aureus clones confirmed the validity of this method. The comparative typing of the 136 strains (40 as controls) by SmaI macrorestriction patterns and OPA11-PCR resulted in the same clustering by similarity in dendrograms and disclosed the most persistent local MRSA clone in the hospital. In conclusion, together with a simple method of template DNA extraction, OPA11-PCR seems to be a very rapid, inexpensive, and useful technique for epidemiological typing of S. aureus strains in routine surveillance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the staff of the Department of Microbiology of Hospital “Dr. Peset” for useful comments, M. Cambra and M. J. Asins from the “Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias” for providing the CHEF DRIII electrophoresis system, and Marta Pulido for editing the manuscript and editorial assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 August 1997.
    • Returned for modification 29 September 1997.
    • Accepted 9 January 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Bannerman T. L.,
    2. Hancock G. A.,
    3. Tenover F. C.,
    4. Miller J. M.
    (1995) Pulsed-field electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:551–555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Camarena J. J.,
    2. Nogueira J. M.,
    3. Dası́ M. A.,
    4. Moreno F.,
    5. Garcı́a R.,
    6. Ledesma E.,
    7. Llorca J.,
    8. Hernández J.
    (1995) DNA amplification fingerprinting for subtyping Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains. Sex. Transm. Dis. 22:128–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Cotter L.,
    2. Lynch M.,
    3. Cryan B.,
    4. Greer P.,
    5. Fanning S.
    (1997) Investigation of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreak in an Irish hospital: triplex PCR and DNA amplification fingerprinting. J. Hosp. Infect. 36:37–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Dominguez M. A.,
    2. de Lencastre H.,
    3. Linares J.,
    4. Tomasz A.
    (1994) Spread and maintenance of a dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone during an outbreak of MRSA disease in a Spanish hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32:2081–2087.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Kumari D. N. P.,
    2. Keer V.,
    3. Hawkey P. M.,
    4. Parnell P.,
    5. Joseph N.,
    6. Richardson J. F.,
    7. Cookson B.
    (1997) Comparison and application of ribosome spacer DNA amplicon polymorphisms and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for differentiation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:881–885.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Leitch C.,
    2. Boonlayangoor S.
    (1992) Tests to detect oxacillin (methicillin)-resistant staphylococci with an oxacillin screen plate. in Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, ed Isenberg H. D. (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C), 1:5.5.1–5.5.7.
  7. ↵
    1. Mulligan M. E.,
    2. Murray-Leisure K. A.,
    3. Ribner B. S.,
    4. Standiford H. C.,
    5. John J. F.,
    6. Korvick J. A.,
    7. Kauffman C. A.,
    8. Yu V. L.
    (1993) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a consensus review of the microbiology, pathogenesis, and epidemiology with implications for prevention and management. Am. J. Med. 94:313–328.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Murakami K.,
    2. Minamide W.,
    3. Wada K.,
    4. Nakamura E.,
    5. Teraoka H.,
    6. Watanabe S.
    (1991) Identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29:2240–2244.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Pfaller M. A.,
    2. Hollis R. J.,
    3. Sader H. S.
    (1992) PFGE analysis of chromosomal restriction fragment. in Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, ed Isenberg H. D. (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C), 2:10.5.c.1–10.5.c.12.
  10. ↵
    1. Pitcher D. G.,
    2. Saunders N. A.,
    3. Owen R. J.
    (1989) Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 8:151–156.
  11. ↵
    1. Power E. G. M.
    (1996) RAPD typing in microbiology—a technical review. J. Hosp. Infect. 34:247–265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Prévost G.,
    2. Pottecher B.,
    3. Dahlet M.,
    4. Bientz M.,
    5. Mantz J. M.,
    6. Piemont Y.
    (1991) Pulsed field electrophoresis as a new epidemiological tool for monitoring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. J. Hosp. Infect. 17:255–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Saruta K.,
    2. Matsunaga T.,
    3. Kono M.,
    4. Hoshina S.,
    5. Ikawa S.,
    6. Sakai O.,
    7. Machida K.
    (1997) Rapid identification and typing of Staphylococcus aureus by nested PCR amplified ribosomal DNA spacer region. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 146:271–278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Saulnier P.,
    2. Bourneix C.,
    3. Prévost G.,
    4. Andremont A.
    (1993) Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:982–985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tyler K. D.,
    2. Wang G.,
    3. Tyler S. D.,
    4. Johnson W. M.
    (1997) Factors affecting reliability and reproducibility of amplification-based DNA fingerprinting of representative bacterial pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:339–346.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Van Belkum A.,
    2. Kluytmans J.,
    3. van Leeuwen W.,
    4. Bax W.,
    5. Quint W.,
    6. Peters E.,
    7. Fluit A.,
    8. Vandenbroucke-Grauls C.,
    9. van den Brule A.,
    10. Koeleman H.,
    11. Melchers W.,
    12. Meis J.,
    13. Elaichouni A.,
    14. Vaneechoutte M.,
    15. Moonens F.,
    16. Maes N.,
    17. Struelens M.,
    18. Tenover F.,
    19. Verbrugh H.
    (1995) Multicenter evaluation of arbitrarily primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1537–1547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Vindel, A., and J. A. Saez-Nieto. 1992. Caracterización de cepas de Staphylococcus aureusresistentes a meticilina causantes de brotes mediante fagotipicación. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin.10(Suppl. 3):36–38.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Application of an Optimized and Highly Discriminatory Method Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR for Epidemiologic Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNosocomial Infections
Antonio Olmos, Juan J. Camarena, José M. Nogueira, Juan C. Navarro, Julia Risen, Roberto Sánchez
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 1998, 36 (4) 1128-1134; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Application of an Optimized and Highly Discriminatory Method Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR for Epidemiologic Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNosocomial Infections
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
Application of an Optimized and Highly Discriminatory Method Based on Arbitrarily Primed PCR for Epidemiologic Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusNosocomial Infections
Antonio Olmos, Juan J. Camarena, José M. Nogueira, Juan C. Navarro, Julia Risen, Roberto Sánchez
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 1998, 36 (4) 1128-1134; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X