Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycobacteriology and Aerobic Actinomycetes

Processing Respiratory Specimens with C18-Carboxypropylbetaine: Development of a Sediment Resuspension Buffer That Contains Lytic Enzymes To Reduce the Contamination Rate and Lecithin To Alleviate Toxicity

Charles G. Thornton, Kerry M. MacLellan, Thomas L. Brink Jr., David M. Wolfe, Oscar J. Llorin, Selvin Passen
Charles G. Thornton
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21227
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerry M. MacLellan
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21227
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas L. Brink Jr.
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21227
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Wolfe
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21227
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oscar J. Llorin
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21227
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Selvin Passen
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland 21227
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2004-2013.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Growth curves of M. tuberculosis ATCC 27294 in reconstitution fluid (A) or PANTA/caz (B) at various concentrations of CB-18.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Growth curves of M. tuberculosis 571/573-S1 in reconstitution fluid (A) or PANTA/caz (B) at various concentrations of CB-18.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Growth curves of M. avium ATCC 25291 in reconstitution fluid (A) or PANTA/caz (B) at various concentrations of CB-18.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Growth curves of M. fortuitum ATCC 6841 in reconstitution fluid (A) or PANTA/caz (B) at various concentrations of CB-18.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Growth curves of 571/573-S1 resuspended in and planted in buffer/RF, buffer/PANTA/caz (P/caz), lecithin/RF, lecithin/PANTA/caz, CB-18/RF, CB-18/PANTA/caz, lecithin (Lec)/CB-18/RF, and lecithin/CB-18/PANTA/caz.

  • Fig. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6.

    Time-dependent kill curves of M. tuberculosis(MTB) ATCC 27294, M. tuberculosis 571/573-S1, M. avium ATCC 25291, M. kansasii ATCC 12478, and M. fortuitum ATCC 6841 following incubation in 1 mM CB-18.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Culture sensitivity and contamination rate comparisons on split specimens processed by NALC/NaOH (4) and different versions of the CB-18 procedure

    Processing method or study (n)No. of specimens AFB positiveResult by decontamination method
    NALC/NaOHCB-18
    Contamination rate (%)Culture sensitivity (%)Contamination rate (%)Culture sensitivity (%)
    CB-18 preliminary study (489)375.062.216.181.1
    NaOH/CB-18 study (531)676.491.010.956.7
    OxAc/CB-18 study (224)275.996.36.737.0
    CB-18 pilot study (573)1067.561.320.887.7
    CB-18/Acid redigestion (119)a1816.027.76.922.2
    • ↵a The 119 specimens described in this study represent the subset of contaminated liquid cultures subjected to CB-18/Acid redigestion in the CB-18 pilot study (24). There were 18 AFB-positive specimens within this group. The corresponding 7H11-selective slants (from the original CB-18-processed specimens) identified 12 of these 18 (66.7%), and NALC/NaOH-processed specimens identified 5 of these 18 (27.7%), whereas CB-18/Acid-redigested specimens identified only 4 of these 18 (22.2%). The contamination rate among NALC/NaOH-processed specimens represents the contamination rate within this subset of 119 specimens, and the contamination rate among the CB-18/Acid-processed specimens represents subsequent contamination among liquid cultures following redigestion.

  • Table 2.

    Spectrum of contaminants isolated from CB-18-processed respiratory specimens

    IdentificationNo. (%) of specimens with resulta
    Contamination spectrum study; Quest microbiology laboratoryCB-18 pilot studyLZCT studies
    All AFB laboratoriesQuest AFB laboratoryQuest microbiology laboratoryQuest AFB laboratory
    Gram negative
     Pseudomonassp.11b31c9d13d1d
     Providencia stuartii137
     Proteus mirabilis71
     Alcaligenes sp.3241
     Morganella morganii312
     Serratia marcescens253
     Klebsiella sp.32
     Xanthomonas maltophilia15
     Acinetobactersp.131
     Enterobacter sp.12
     Escherichia coli11
     Citrobacter freundii1
     Flavobacterium breve1
     Cedecae davisae1
     Nonfermenter1
    Total48 (84.2)55 (38.2)9 (25.7)30 (73.2)2 (100)
    Gram positive
     Staphylococcus21638
     Cocci312
     Rods3102
    Total5 (8.8)29 (20.1)6 (17.1)10 (24.4)
    Yeast3 (5.3)50 (34.7)e17 (48.6)1 (2.4)
    Fungal1 (1.8)9 (6.2)3 (8.6)
    Unknown1 (0.7)f
    Total contaminants isolated5714435412
    Total specimens contaminated40 (14.4g)119 (20.8g)31 (18.1g)36 (18.6g)2 (4.3g)
    Total specimens processed27757317119446
    • ↵a The contamination spectrum study used CB-18/12B/PANTA, the CB-18 pilot study used CB-18/12B/PANTA/caz, and the LZCT studies used CB-18/LZCT/12B/PANTA/caz.

    • ↵b Of these 11 pseudomonads, 10 were P. aeruginosa.

    • ↵c Of these 31 pseudomonads, 24 were P. aeruginosa.

    • ↵d All of these pseudomonads were P. aeruginosa.

    • ↵e Candida albicans was by far the most common yeast isolate (≈90%).

    • ↵f One isolate was lost before identification and was judged to be bacterial in nature.

    • ↵g Contamination rate (percentage).

  • Table 3.

    Culture results for statistically significant concentrations of CB-18 (P < 0.05)

    Critical parameter for isolateTime [days] to positive result [GI ≥ 15] (CB-18 concn [μg/ml])Time [days] to max GI [999] (CB-18 concn [μg/ml])CB-18 concn [μg/ml] with no growth
    12B/RF12B/PANTA/caz12B/RF12B/PANTA/caz12B/RF12B/PANTA/caz
    M. tuberculosis ATCC 27294
     Control8.8 ± 0.5a10.2 ± 0.513.5 ± 1.016.8 ± 0.5
     Time at significant concn of CB-18>3535
      First10.5 ± 0.6b (20)c12.5 ± 1.0 (20)17.5 ± 0.6 (20)18.8 ± 0.5 (10)
      Second12.5 ± 1.0d (30)e15.0 ± 1.6 (25)21.8 ± 2.5 (25)>28 (20)
    M. tuberculosis 571/573-S1
     Control9.2 ± 0.510.8 ± 1.015.0 ± 0.016.0 ± 0.8
     Time at significant concn of CB-182525
      First11.0 ± 0.8 (10)12.5 ± 1.0 (10)>28 (20)17.8 ± 0.5 (5)
      Second18.2 ± 1.0 (20)>28 (20)f>28 (25)>28 (20)
    M. avium ATCC 25291
     Control6.0 ± 0.08.8 ± 1.010.2 ± 0.516.8 ± 2.1
     Time at significant concn of CB-18>35>35
      First7.5 ± 0.6 (30)11.8 ± 1.0 (15)11.2 ± 0.5 (15)21.0 ± 2.4 (15)
      SecondNot tested (>35)16.0 ± 2.7 (20)13.8 ± 1.0 (20)>28 (25)
    M. kansasii ATCC 12478
     Control3.0 ± 0.04.5 ± 0.67.0 ± 0.08.8 ± 0.5
     Time at significant concn of CB-1830>35
      First4.5 ± 0.6 (20)5.8 ± 0.3 (25)>28 (25)g24.0 ± 2.0 (20)
      Second6.2 ± 0.5 (25)Not tested (>35)>28 (30)>28 (25)
    M. fortuitum ATCC 6841
     Control1.0 ± 0.01.0 ± 0.02.0 ± 0.03.2 ± 0.5
     Time at significant concn of CB-18>100>100
      First2.5 ± 0.6 (30)6.8 ± 1.7 (30)4.8 ± 1.7 (30)5.0 ± 0.8 (10)
      Second7.2 ± 0.5 (100)10.0 ± 1.4 (40)8.8 ± 1.5 (40)10.5 ± 1.7 (30)
    • ↵a This is the average time (± standard deviation) to a given result in the absence of CB-18.

    • ↵b This time represents the average time (± standard deviation) to a given result at the lowest CB-18 concentration at which the first statistically significant change occurred.

    • ↵c This is the CB-18 concentration at which the first statistically significant change occurred for a given result relative to the control result.

    • ↵d This time represents the average time (± standard deviation) to a given result at the second statistically significant CB-18 concentration.

    • ↵e This concentration represents the next, or second, statistically significant change that occurred relative to the CB-18 concentration at which the first statistically significant change occurred.

    • ↵f Although the graph of this result appears to be positive, only one of the four replicates became positive during the 4-week incubation.

    • ↵g The time to maximum GI result at 20 μg/ml (17.8 ± 8.8 days) was not significantly different (P = 0.081) from the control result because of the wide replicate-to-replicate variation in this series of bottles.

  • Table 4.

    Percent survival of 571/573-S1 on 7H11-selective plates at different CB-18 concentrations in the presence or absence of lecithin

    Concn (μg/ml) of CB-18 in inoculation solution% Survival (±SD) after inoculation onto 7H11 ina:
    CB-18/bufferCB-18/lecithin
    25567.7 ± 9.192.7 ± 4.1
    19187.9 ± 4.1100 ± 7.6
    7795.9 ± 2.8100 ± 9.3
    • ↵a Bacilli were diluted to 2,385 ± 260 CFU/ml in inoculation solution.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Processing Respiratory Specimens with C18-Carboxypropylbetaine: Development of a Sediment Resuspension Buffer That Contains Lytic Enzymes To Reduce the Contamination Rate and Lecithin To Alleviate Toxicity
Charles G. Thornton, Kerry M. MacLellan, Thomas L. Brink Jr., David M. Wolfe, Oscar J. Llorin, Selvin Passen
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jul 1998, 36 (7) 2004-2013; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2004-2013.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Processing Respiratory Specimens with C18-Carboxypropylbetaine: Development of a Sediment Resuspension Buffer That Contains Lytic Enzymes To Reduce the Contamination Rate and Lecithin To Alleviate Toxicity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Processing Respiratory Specimens with C18-Carboxypropylbetaine: Development of a Sediment Resuspension Buffer That Contains Lytic Enzymes To Reduce the Contamination Rate and Lecithin To Alleviate Toxicity
Charles G. Thornton, Kerry M. MacLellan, Thomas L. Brink Jr., David M. Wolfe, Oscar J. Llorin, Selvin Passen
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jul 1998, 36 (7) 2004-2013; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.2004-2013.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Mycobacterium tuberculosis
nontuberculous mycobacteria
Specimen Handling
sputum

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X