Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

Comparison of Four Clinical Specimen Types for Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses by Optical Immunoassay (FLU OIA Test) and Cell Culture Methods

Kristi A. Covalciuc, Kenneth H. Webb, Curtis A. Carlson
Kristi A. Covalciuc
BioStar, Inc., Boulder, Colorado 80301
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth H. Webb
BioStar, Inc., Boulder, Colorado 80301
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Curtis A. Carlson
BioStar, Inc., Boulder, Colorado 80301
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.12.3971-3974.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Percentages of specimens positive by the FLU OIA test or 14-day culture taken from patients who were culture positive for influenza virus with any specimen type. NA, nasal aspirate; NPS, nasopharyngeal swab; TS, throat swab; SP, sputum; ∗, 95% confidence intervals.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Number and distribution of each specimen type donated and collected from each age group

    Age (years)No.a of specimens of indicated type donatedTotal no. (%) of specimens
    Nasal aspirateNasopharyngeal swabThroat swabSputum
    0–1645 (40.9)36 (32.7)18 (16.4)11 (10)110 (27.3)
    17–5433 (11.9)102 (36.8)90 (32.5)52 (18.8)277 (68.7)
    ≥551 (6.3)4 (25.0)4 (25.0)7 (43.8)16 (4.0)
      Total79 (19.6)142 (35.2)112 (27.8)70 (17.4)403 (100)b
    • ↵a The percentages of specimens by age group and sample type are in parentheses.

    • ↵b A total of 404 specimens were donated. One patient report did not have an age provided; therefore, this specimen was not included in the table.

  • Table 2.

    Comparison of the FLU OIA test to 14-day cell culture

    Specimen typeTotal no. of specimensNo. of specimens that were:SensitivityaSpecificitya
    OIA test+ and culture+OIA test+ and culture−OIA test−and culture+OIA test− and culture−
    Nasal aspirate79381152588.4 (74.9–96.1)69.4 (51.9–83.7)
    Nasopharyngeal swab143352477783.3 (68.6–93.0)76.2 (66.7–84.1)
    Throat swab1121817116662.1 (42.3–79.3)79.5 (69.2–87.6)
    Sputum70301671781.1 (64.8–92.0)51.5 (33.5–69.2)
     Total40412168b3018580.1 (72.9–86.2)73.1 (67.2–78.5)
    • ↵a Sensitivities and specificities are shown as percentages; 95% confidence intervals (by the exact binomial method) are shown in parentheses.

    • ↵b Thirty-two of these specimens were available for the RT-PCR-EHA; 21 of 32 were positive for influenza virus nucleic acid.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Comparison of Four Clinical Specimen Types for Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses by Optical Immunoassay (FLU OIA Test) and Cell Culture Methods
Kristi A. Covalciuc, Kenneth H. Webb, Curtis A. Carlson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 1999, 37 (12) 3971-3974; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.12.3971-3974.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Four Clinical Specimen Types for Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses by Optical Immunoassay (FLU OIA Test) and Cell Culture Methods
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of Four Clinical Specimen Types for Detection of Influenza A and B Viruses by Optical Immunoassay (FLU OIA Test) and Cell Culture Methods
Kristi A. Covalciuc, Kenneth H. Webb, Curtis A. Carlson
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 1999, 37 (12) 3971-3974; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.12.3971-3974.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

immunoassay
influenza A virus
Influenza B virus
Influenza, Human
Specimen Handling

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X