Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Lactobacillus Species Identification, H2O2 Production, and Antibiotic Resistance and Correlation with Human Clinical Status

Annie Felten, Claude Barreau, Chantal Bizet, Philippe Henri Lagrange, Alain Philippon
Annie Felten
Service de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, Hôpital St-Louis, 75475 Paris Cedex 10,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claude Barreau
Collection de l’Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chantal Bizet
Collection de l’Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Henri Lagrange
Service de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, Hôpital St-Louis, 75475 Paris Cedex 10,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alain Philippon
Service de Bactériologie-Virologie, Hôpital Cochin, 75679 Paris Cedex 14, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.729-733.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Lactobacilli recovered from the blood, cerebrospinal fluid, respiratory tract, and gut of 20 hospitalized immunocompromised septic patients were analyzed. Biochemical carbohydrate fermentation and total soluble cell protein profiles were used to identify the species. Hydrogen peroxide production was measured. Susceptibility to 19 antibiotics was tested by a diffusion method, and the MICs of benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, imipenem, erythromycin, vancomycin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin were determined. A small number of species produced H2O2, and antibiotic susceptibilities were species related. Eighteen (90%) of the isolates wereL. rhamnosus, one was L. paracasei subsp. paracasei, and one was L. crispatus. L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei subsp. paracasei isolates, and the type strains were neither H2O2 producers nor vancomycin susceptible (MICs, ≥256 μg/ml). L. crispatus, as well as most of the type strains of lactobacilli which belong to the L. acidophilus group, was an H2O2 producer and vancomycin susceptible (MICs, <4 μg/ml).

Lactobacilli are ubiquitous and widespread commensal bacteria in the human and animal microflora. They are widely used by humans: as adjuvants against gastrointestinal disorders, as dietary supplements, and as biological food processors in view of their fermentative properties (1, 15).

Severe lactobacillus infections occur as endocarditis in patients with valve defects and as local or disseminated infections in neutropenic patients with sepsis receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. The conditions of the patients in the latter group are usually leukemia with chemotherapy, an immunocompromised state due to organ transplantation, or AIDS (1, 2, 5, 13, 15, 22, 23, 25, 31). The current widespread use of glycopeptides and broad-spectrum cephalosporins for the management of sepsis may increase the rate of occurrence of lactobacillus infections among immunocompromised patients (5, 13).

Recent phylogenetic analyses have resulted in taxonomic changes in this genus (6, 26, 30, 34, 36). For example, in 1989,Lactobacillus casei subsp. rhamnosus was elevated to species status as L. rhamnosus sp. nov., and all other members of the L. casei subspecies except L. casei subsp. casei were grouped in a separate species, L. paracasei sp. nov. (7). Further changes are under way (9, 10, 30). Since 1980, the members of the L. acidophilus group have been divided into two subgroups, the L. acidophilus subgroup and the L. gasseri subgroup, and the two subgroups are divided into six species (14, 24).

Identification of Lactobacillus species to the species level is not possible on a routine basis. Commercially available carbohydrate fermentation tests fail to identify various Lactobacillusspecies. However, highly standardized whole-cell protein patterns obtained by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) have proved useful for Lactobacillus species identification (27, 32). The potential value of other tests, such as hybridization with oligonucleotide probes, is under investigation (32).

Few studies of lactobacilli from normal and diseased vaginal and intestinal mucosae report the species involved (11, 29). In vitro H2O2 production by lactobacilli from the vaginal microflora has recently been surveyed. H2O2-producing lactobacilli predominate in the normal vagina but are seldom found in the vaginas of patients with bacterial vaginosis (11). H2O2 is known to inhibit the growth of some bacteria and may be involved in the control of the normal microflora.

Vancomycin and teicoplanin are active against most gram-positive bacteria. However, various species (L. rhamnosus, L. casei, andL. plantarum) are intrinsically resistant to glycopeptides (21, 35). In contrast, most of the lactobacilli from the vaginal flora that we have tested were susceptible to these antibiotics (unpublished data). Our aim was to characterize the lactobacilli isolated from 20 patients with sepsis. The clinical status, carbohydrate fermentation profiles, whole-cell protein patterns, ability to produce H2O2, and antibiotic susceptibilities of the strains were analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and controls.The 20 patients were immunocompromised adults and children hospitalized in St-Louis Hospital between 1993 and 1995 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Characteristics of 20 immunocompromised patients infected with a Lactobacillus

Strains.Lactobacilli were isolated from diverse samples taken in the course of the biological management of sepsis and were then stored at −80°C in the laboratory and freeze-dried in the Bacterial Strains Collection at the Institute Pasteur (CIP). No strain was an obligate anaerobe.

Type strains.The following CIP type strains were tested in parallel as references: L. rhamnosus CIP A 157T, L. paracasei subsp.paracasei CIP 103918T, and L. jensenii CIP 69.17T. The following six strains of theL. acidophilus group were tested in parallel as references: four strains from the L. acidophilus subgroup (L. acidophilus CIP 76.13T, L. crispatus CIP 102990T, L. gallinarumCIP 103611T, and L. amylovorus CIP 102989T) and two strains from the L. gasseri subgroup (L. gasseri CIP 102991T and L. johnsonii CIP 103620T).

Fermentation profile.The API 50 CH test kit and API CHL medium (bioMérieux, La Balme les Grottes, France) were used to test the abilities of the strains to ferment 49 carbohydrates. An 18-h culture in de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) broth was centrifuged, and 200 μl of the sediment was introduced into API CHL medium. These samples were then tested with the API strips according to the manufacturer’s instructions, the top of the cupule was covered with mineral oil, and the results were read after 24 h of incubation at 37°C under aerobic conditions.

The species identifications obtained from the biochemical profiles were confirmed with identification software (bioMérieux). Carbohydrate fermentations gave either the species identification (noted as good or doubtful) or inconclusive results.

Whole-cell protein profile.An 18-h culture on an MRS agar slope was harvested, and the proteins were extracted by disruption with glass microbeads. The samples were then subjected to gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and the proteins in the gel were stained with Coomassie blue.

Computerized normalization of densitometric scans of the gels and numerical analysis were done as described by Kersters and De Ley (27). Clusters were identified by unweighted average pair group method analysis with Gelcompar software (Applied Maths, Ghent, Belgium). The similarities between the protein patterns of the isolates and the type strains were scored as the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. In agreement with previous assays, isolates and type strains with more than 82% similarity were clustered, and their assignment to the same species or the same L. acidophilus subgroup was considered (10, 28, 32).

H2O2 production.According to the qualitative method of Eschenbach et al. (11) lactobacilli were streaked onto a 20-ml MRS agar plate containing 5 mg of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB; T2885; Sigma), a benzidine-like chromogenic substrate of peroxidase, and 0.20 mg of horseradish peroxidase (P6782; Sigma) (11). Peroxidase generates O2 from any H2O2 produced by the lactobacilli, and the TMB stains the colonies blue in the presence of O2. After 48 h of incubation under 5% CO2in air, colonies that produce H2O2 on MRS agar thus appear dark blue. Nonproducers are colorless. The media were used within 48 h after preparation. All strains were tested twice. TheLactobacillus type strains were used as quality controls.

Agar diffusion method for determination of antibiotic susceptibility patterns.Nineteen antibiotics were tested: benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, cephalothin, streptomycin (10 IU), kanamycin (30 IU), gentamicin (10 IU), vancomycin, teicoplain, erythromycin, azithromycin, pristinamycin, lincomycin, rifampin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, pefloxacin, sparfloxacin, fosfomycin, and fusidic acid (disks; Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Marnes la Coquette, France). The instructions of the Comité Français de l’Antibiogramme related to streptococci were followed (34a).

Fifty microliters of the pellet of an overnight culture was diluted in MRS broth to about 107 CFU/ml. Mueller-Hinton agar plates containing 5% sheep blood (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) were flooded with this suspension in order to give confluent colonies and air dried for 15 min, and the disks impregnated with antibiotics were positioned on the plates. After 36 h of incubation at 37°C in air containing 5% CO2, the diameters of the bacteria-free zones were measured.

MICs.Benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, imipenem, gentamicin, erythromycin, vancomycin, and levofloxacin MICs were tested by the E-test method (Biomedical Diagnostics, Marne La Vallée, France). The inoculum, agar plates, and incubation conditions for the MIC determinations were as described above for the susceptibility assay. A large, 12-cm square Mueller-Hinton agar plate was flooded with this suspension, air dried for 15 min, and overlaid with the seven E-test antibiotic strips. After 36 h of incubation at 37°C in air containing 5% CO2, the elliptical zones of growth inhibition were examined and the MICs were interpreted as the value on the E-test strip scale where the inhibition zone intersected the edge of the strip. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was tested simultaneously on Mueller-Hinton agar, with an overnight culture diluted in Mueller-Hinton broth.

Both MICs and susceptibility patterns were determined for benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin, vancomycin, gentamicin, and erythromycin. Only the MICs of imipenem and levofloxacin were measured.

RESULTS

Patients.The 20 patients (15 males and 5 females; age range, 2 to 80 years; median age, 27 years) had severe underlying conditions, as indicated in Table 1. Seven patients had undergone autologous, homologous bone marrow or cord blood transplantation, one had undergone a kidney transplantation, seven were receiving antimitotic chemotherapy, two had septic shock, and two had AIDS (Table 1). Eighteen patients were granulocytopenic. Sixteen patients were treated with several systemic antibiotics, and nine were treated with oral antibiotics.

Lactobacilli were isolated from the blood of 12 patients: 7 with persistent lactobacillus septicemia (a lactobacillus was also isolated from cerebrospinal fluid samples from one of these patients) and 5 for whom only one blood sample was cultured. Lactobacilli were isolated from the respiratory tracts of two patients and from the stools or throats of six patients during treatment for total bacterial decontamination.

Antibiotic regimens were designed according to lactobacillus susceptibility in vitro. Four patients died over the next few days, and one had a lactobacillemia relapse.

Carbohydrate fermentation.Table2 summarizes the results of the API CH 50 test.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Species of Lactobacillus isolates from 20 septic patients according to fermentation properties and performance by SDS-PAGE and result of respective H2O2 production

Eighteen isolates were L. rhamnosus (see Table1 for strain numbers) one was L. paracasei subsp.paracasei (strain 1295), and one was L. crispatus (strain 1294).

Cluster analysis of whole-cell protein profiles.The results of cluster analysis of the protein profiles of the strains from patients and the type strains are presented in Fig.1.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Identification of Lactobacillus isolates from patients according to whole-cell protein patterns. Point traces were used for the calculation of the correlation coefficient (percent similarity) between individual traces. The clinical origin of each numbered strain is given in Table 1. The dendrogram was built by the unweighted average pair group method.

The 18 L. rhamnosus strains fell into one cluster; 17 had more than 90% similarity with L. rhamnosusT and 1 (strain 1274) with 84% similarity with L. rhamnosusT. The protein profile of L. paracasei subsp.paracasei shared 86% similarity with that of L. paracasei subsp. paracaseiT. The protein profile of the lactobacillus identified as L. crispatus by its fermentation profile (strain 1294) fell into a cluster that included all six type strains of the species from theL. acidophilus group (results for three members of this group, L. acidophilusT, L. crispatusT, and L. gasseriT, are presented in Fig. 1) and shared 94% similarity with L. gasseriT but only 84% similarity with L. crispatusT (Table 2; Fig. 1).

H2O2 production by lactobacilli.The findings from studies of H2O2 production by the lactobacilli tested are presented in Table 2.

Only one isolate, isolate 1294, either L. crispatus orL. gasseri, generated H2O2. Among the type strains studied, the only H2O2producers were the members of the L. acidophilus group, but not L. acidophilusT itself, and L. jenseniiT (data not shown).

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns determined by disc diffusion method.The mean diameters of the zones of inhibition (± standard deviations) were as follows: amoxicillin, 22.5 (± 6.4) mm; streptomycin, 12.1 (± 5.4) mm; kanamycin, 10.1 (±5.3) mm; gentamicin, 17.6 (±5.6) mm; erythromycin, 31.0 (±7.8) mm; azithromycin, 27.4 (±8.2) mm; pristinamycin, 27.7 (±5.5) mm; lincomycin, 22.6 (±10.5) mm; rifampin, 30.2 (±10) mm; tetracycline, 24.0 (±3) mm; and chloramphenicol, 23.0 (±4.8) mm. Fosfomycin and fusidic acid did not give inhibition zones for any strain tested. These results were similar to those for members of the normal vaginal flora studied simultaneously (data not shown).

For the strains from patients, the mean diameter of the zone of inhibition (±standard deviation) were as follows: benzylpenicillin, 22.5 (±6.4) mm; cephalothin, 13.4 (±9) mm; and vancomycin, no growth inhibition except for the strain from one patient (strain 1294). The diameters of the zones of inhibition for these antibiotics were significantly larger with normal vaginal lactobacillus. The findings for teicoplanin were similar to those for vancomycin. Among the quinolones, the mean (± standard deviation) diameter-for pefloxacin was 12.7 (±4) mm, and that for sparfloxacin was 24.3 (±5.2) mm. Both of these diameters are significantly larger than those found for normal vaginal lactobacilli (data not shown).

MIC results.The ranges of the MICs of benzylpenicillin, imipenem, and vancomycin were narrow: the MICs at which 50 and 90% of strains are inhibited were 0.5 and 2 μg/ml, respectively, for benzylpenicillin, 1 and 2 μg/ml, respectively, for imipenem, and ≥256 and ≥256 μg/ml, respectively, for vancomycin. For 19 (95%) isolates, all 18 L. rhamnosus strains and 1 L. paracaseistrain), vancomycin MICs were ≥256 μg/ml.

MICs were generally similar for type strains and isolates from the same species. The range of MICs for L. rhamnosus andL. paracasei subsp. paracasei (19 isolates and 2 type strains) and for the L. acidophilus group (1 isolate and 6 type strains) are presented in Table 3. The results for vancomycin and levofloxacin are noteworthy. The MICs of vancomycin forL. rhamnosus and L. paracaseisubsp. paracasei of all origins were ≥256 μg/ml, and the MICs for the L. acidophilus group were ≤2 μg/ml. The MICs of levofloxacin for L. rhamnosus and L. paracasei subsp.paracasei were ≤4 μg/ml, and those for theL. acidophilus group were all ≥32 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Distribution of MICs according toLactobacillus speciesa

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of L. rhamnosus in patients (up to 90%) is consistent with recent reports of disseminated lactobacillus infections in immunocompromised hosts (5, 15, 22, 25, 33). Our patients had severe underlying conditions (acute leukemia, neoplasia, organ transplantation, or AIDS) and received various systemic and oral antibiotics, including glycopeptides for 13 of them (65%) (Table 1).

Both fermentation profiles and protein profiles were reliable for the identification to the species level of all the isolates except the isolate belonging to the L. acidophilusgroup (Table 2; Fig. 1).

H2O2 was produced by one isolate, eitherL. crispatus or L. gasseri, by five of the six type strains of the L. acidophilusgroup, and by L. jenseniiT (Table 2). It was also produced by 80% of the normal vaginal isolates that we studied simultaneously (data not shown), in agreement with previous data (11).

The disk diffusion method and the E test gave concordant results. However, previous studies of cephalosporins determined that the MICs were much higher by the E test than by the dilution method with agar (8, 20).

The median MICs of benzylpenicillin and amoxicillin for L. rhamnosus and L. paracasei subsp.paracasei were two times higher than those for theL. acidophilus group, and those of imipenem were four times higher (Table 3).

The MICs at which 90% of strains are inhibited for erythromycin and gentamicin were similar for all lactobacilli (0.06 and 4 μg/ml, respectively) (Table 3). A synergistic bactericidal effect between the penicillins and gentamicin has been demonstrated previously (3, 16).

The MICs of vancomycin are species related: the MICs for L. rhamnosus and L. paracasei subsp.paracasei were ≥256 μg/ml, whereas those for theL. acidophilus group were ≤2 μg/ml (Table 3). L. caseiT and L. rhamnosusT have cell wall peptigoglycan precursors that end in a depsipeptided-alanine–d-lactate instead of the dipeptided-alanine–d-alanine, the target for vancomycin activity (4, 18).

The activities of the oral antibiotics used for the treatment of urinary tract infections were assessed with lactobacilli. The high levels of resistance to fosfomycin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin have been described before (17, 20).L. rhamnosus had low-level resistance to pefloxacin and sparfloxacin and was susceptible to levofloxacin. These are the first tests of the in vitro susceptibility of L. rhamnosus to levofloxacin to be published: the low levofloxacin MICs for L. rhamnosus are in contrast to the high-level resistance of the L. acidophilus group (Table 3). Most studies of the antibiotic susceptibilities of lactobacilli do not report on those for the Lactobacillus species. Thus, our results might help in the determination of the antibiotic susceptibilities of theLactobacillus species.

Sixty-five percent of our patients were on oral or parenteral glycopeptides (Table 1). In studies of oral glycopeptide treatment human volunteers had increased levels of fecal carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and lactobacilli (37). The pathogenicity of L. rhamnosus selected by the use of glycopeptides may be due to many factors such as its exploitation of mucosal defects and its colonization properties. Seventy-five percent of our patients had digestive tract mucosal alterations as a consequence of various conditions: mucositis following antimitotic chemotherapy, digestive graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation, protracted diarrhea with AIDS, septic shock, or gut carcinoma (Table 1). In liver transplant patients, biliary anastomosis is an independent risk factor for lactobacillus bacteremia (31). Platelet aggregation and endothelial cell binding have been demonstrated with L. rhamnosus strains responsible for endocarditis (19).

The L. rhamnosus isolates from patients with clinical infections and milk products studied by Klein et al. (28) were unrelated according to their total soluble protein patterns. The comparison of L. rhamnosusisolates from patients with bacteremia and of the probiotic strain ofL. rhamnosus GG performed by Saxelin et al. (33) showed various fermentation patterns. Our L. rhamnosus isolates belonged to various clusters according to their randomly amplified polymorphic DNA patterns (12).

Every lactobacillus isolate from immunocompromised patients with sepsis was identified to the species level according to its fermentation profile (Table 2). However, in a simultaneous study of normal vaginal isolates, fermentation profiles gave no identification for 40% of the isolates, and determination of the whole-cell protein pattern was necessary for their identification (data not shown).

The prevalence of the various Lactobacillus species is significantly different in immunocompromised patients with disseminated infections and the normal vaginal microflora (data not shown). H2O2 production and glycopeptide MICs are species related: H2O2 production and susceptibility to glycopeptides are common characteristics of theL. acidophilus group. These characteristics are not found in L. rhamnosus or L. paracasei subsp. paracasei. Identification ofLactobacillus species to the species level will help to elucidate the conditions for the emergence of infections by different species and will prompt study into species-related properties.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 July 1998.
    • Returned for modification 31 August 1998.
    • Accepted 5 November 1998.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aguirre M.,
    2. Collins M. D.
    Lactic acid bacteria and human clinical infection.J. Appl. Bacteriol.75199395107
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Antony S. J.,
    2. Stratton C. W.,
    3. Dummer J. S.
    Lactobacillus bacteremia: description of the clinical course in adult patients without endocarditis.Clin. Infect. Dis.231996773778
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bayer A. S.,
    2. Chow A. W.,
    3. Conception N.,
    4. Guze L. B.
    Susceptibility of 40 lactobacilli to six antimicrobial agents with broad gram-positive anaerobic spectra.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.141978720722
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Billot-Klein D.,
    2. Gutmann L.,
    3. Sable S.,
    4. Guittet E.,
    5. van Heijenoort J.
    Modification of peptidoglycan precursors is a common feature of the low-level vancomycin-resistant VanB type Enterococcus D366 and of the naturally glycopeptide-resistant species Lactobacillus casei, Pediococccus pentosaceus, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and Enterococcus gallinarum.J. Bacteriol.176199423982405
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Chomarat M.,
    2. Espinouse D.
    Lactobacillus rhamnosus septicemia in patients with prolonged aplasia receiving ceftazidime-vancomycin.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.10199144 (Letter.)
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Rodriguez U.,
    3. Ash C.,
    4. Aguirre M.,
    5. Farrow J. A. E.,
    6. Martinez-Murcia A.,
    7. Williams A. M.,
    8. Wallbanks S.
    Phylogenic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.771991512
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Phillips B. A.,
    3. Zanoni P.
    Deoxyribonucleic acid homology studies of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei sp. nov., subsp. paracasei and subsp. tolerans, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus sp. nov.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.391989105108
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. Croco J. L.,
    2. Erwin M. E.,
    3. Jennings J. M.,
    4. Putnam L. R.,
    5. Jones R. N.
    Evaluation of the E-test for antimicrobial spectrum and potency determinations of anaerobes associated with bacterial vaginosis and peritonitis.Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.201994213219
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Dellaglio F.,
    2. Dicks L. M. T.,
    3. du Toit M.,
    4. Torriani S.
    Designation of ATCC 334 in place of ATCC 393 (NCDO 161) as the neotype strain of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei and rejection of the name Lactobacillus paracasei (Collins et al., 1989): request for an opinion.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.411991340342
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dicks L. M. T.,
    2. Du Plessis E. M.,
    3. Dellaglio F.,
    4. Lauer E.
    Reclassification of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 15820 as Lactobacillus zeae nom. rev., designation of ATCC 334 as the neotype of L. casei subsp casei, and rejection of the name Lactobacillus paracasei.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.461996337340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Eschenbach D. A.,
    2. Davick P. R.,
    3. Williams B. L.,
    4. Kleibanoff S. J.,
    5. Young-Smith K.,
    6. Critchlow C. M.,
    7. Holmes K. K.
    Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis.J. Clin. Microbiol.271989251256
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Felten A.,
    2. Barreau C.,
    3. Taillez P.,
    4. Bizet C.,
    5. Philippon A.
    Phenotypic and genotypic relationship between Lactobacillus rhamnosus clinical isolates from immunocompromised patients, abstr. 84 Programm and abstracts of the 21st International Congress on Microbial Ecology and Disease. 1996 60 Institut Pasteur Paris, France
  13. 13.↵
    1. Fruchart C.,
    2. Salah A.,
    3. Gray C.,
    4. Martin E.,
    5. Stamatoullas A.,
    6. Bonmarchand G.,
    7. Lemeland J. F.,
    8. Tilly H.
    Lactobacillus species as emerging pathogens in neutropenic patients.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.161997681684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fujisawa T.,
    2. Benno Y.,
    3. Yaeshima T.,
    4. Mitsuoka T.
    Taxonomic study of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group, with recognition of Lactobacillus gallinarum sp. nov. and Lactobacillus johnsonii sp. nov., and synonymy of Lactobacillus acidophilus group A3 (Johnson et al. 1980) with the type strain of Lactobacillus amylovorus (Nakamura 1981).Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.421992487491
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gasser F.
    Safety of lactic acid bacteria and their occurrence in human clinical infections.Bull. Inst. Pasteur9219944567
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Griffiths J. K.,
    2. Daly J. S.,
    3. Dodge R. A.
    Two cases of endocarditis due to Lactobacillus species: antimicrobial susceptibility, review, and discussion of therapy.Clin. Infect. Dis.151992250255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T.,
    2. Shah S.
    Susceptibility patterns of vaginal lactobacilli to eleven oral antibiotics.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.33199410591060
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Handwerger S.,
    2. Pucci M. J.,
    3. Volk K. J.,
    4. Liu J.,
    5. Lee M. S.
    Vancomycin resistant Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactobacillus casei synthesize cytoplasmic peptidoglycan precursors that terminate in lactate.J. Bacteriol.1761994260264
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Harty D. W. S.,
    2. Oakey H. J.,
    3. Patrikakis M.,
    4. Hume E. B. H.,
    5. Knox K. W.
    Pathogenic potential of lactobacilli.Int. J. Food Microbiol.241994179189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Herra C. M.,
    2. Cafferkey M. T.,
    3. Keane C. T.
    The in-vitro susceptibilities of vaginal lactobacilli to four broad spectrum antibiotics, as determined by the agar dilution and E-test methods.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.351995775783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Holliman R. E.,
    2. Bone G. P.
    Vancomycin resistance of clinical isolates of lactobacilli.J. Infect.161988279283
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Horwitch C. A.,
    2. Furseth H. A.,
    3. Larson A. M.,
    4. Jones T. J.,
    5. Olliffe J. F.,
    6. Spach D. H.
    Lactobacillemia in three patients with AIDS.Clin. Infect. Dis.21199514601462
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Husni R. N.,
    2. Gordon S. M.,
    3. Washington J. A.,
    4. Longworth D. L.
    Lactobacillus bacteremia and endocarditis: review of 45 cases.Clin. Infect. Dis.25199710481055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Johnson J. L.,
    2. Phelps C. F.,
    3. Cummins C. S.,
    4. London J. L.,
    5. Gasser F.
    Taxonomy of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.3019805368
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kalima P.,
    2. Masterton R. G.,
    3. Roddie P. H.,
    4. Thomas A. E.
    Lactobacillus rhamnosus infection in a child following bone marrow transplant.J. Infect.321996165167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kandler O.,
    2. Weiss N.
    Regular, nonsporing gram-positive rods Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology 8th ed. 1986 1208 1234 The Williams & Wilkins Co. Baltimore, Md
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kersters K.,
    2. De Ley J.
    Identification and grouping of bacteria by numerical analysis of their electrophoretic protein patterns.J. Gen. Microbiol.871975333342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Klein G.,
    2. Hack B.,
    3. Hanstein S.,
    4. Zimmermann K.,
    5. Reuter G.
    Intraspecies characterization of clinical isolates and biotechnologically used strains of Lactobacillus rhamnosus by analysis of the total soluble cytoplasmic proteins with silver staining.Int. J. Food Microbiol.251995263275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Molin G.,
    2. Jeppsson B.,
    3. Johansson M. L.,
    4. Ahrné S.,
    5. Nobaek S.,
    6. Stahl M.,
    7. Bengmark S.
    Numerical taxonomy of Lactobacillus spp. associated with healthy and diseased mucosa of the human intestines.J. Appl. Bacteriol.741993314323
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mori K.,
    2. Yamazaki K.,
    3. Ishiyama T.,
    4. Katsumata M.,
    5. Kobayashi K.,
    6. Kawai Y.,
    7. Inoue N.,
    8. Shinano H.
    Comparative sequence analyses of the genes coding for 16S rRNA of Lactobacillus casei related taxa.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.4719975457
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Patel R.,
    2. Cockerill F. R.,
    3. Porayko M. K.,
    4. Osmon D. R.,
    5. Ilstrup D. M.,
    6. Keating M. R.
    Lactobacillemia in liver transplant patients.Clin. Infect. Dis.181994207212
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Pot B.,
    2. Hertel C.,
    3. Ludwig W.,
    4. Descheemaeker P.,
    5. Kersters K.,
    6. Schleifer K. H.
    Identification and classification of Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. gasseri and L. johnsonii strains by SDS-PAGE and rRNA targeted oligonucleotide probe hybridization.J. Gen. Microbiol.1391993513517
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Saxelin M.,
    2. Chuang N. H.,
    3. Chassy B.,
    4. Rautelin H.,
    5. Makela P. H.,
    6. Salminen S.,
    7. Gorbach S. L.
    Lactobacilli and bacteremia in southern Finland, 1989–1992.Clin. Infect. Dis.221996564566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Shleifer K. H.,
    2. Kandler O.
    Phylogenetic relationships of lactic bacteria The genera of lactic acid bacteria Wood B. J. B., Holzabfel W. H. 2. The lactic acid bacteria 1995 7 18 Blackie Academic & Professional Publishers Glasgow, Scotland
    OpenUrl
  35. 34a.↵
    Société Française de Microbiologie, Comité de l’Antibiogramme. Communiqué 1998. Pathol. Biol. 46:I-XVI.
  36. 35.↵
    1. Swenson J. M.,
    2. Facklam R. R.,
    3. Thornsberry C.
    Anntimicrobial susceptibility of vancomycin-resistant Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, and Lactobacillus species.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.341990543547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 36.↵
    1. Vandamme P.,
    2. Pot B.,
    3. Gillis M.,
    4. De Vos P.,
    5. Kersters K.,
    6. Swings J.
    Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics.Microbiol. Rev.601996407438
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 37.↵
    1. Van der Auwera P.,
    2. Pensart N.,
    3. Korten V.,
    4. Murray B. E.,
    5. Leclercq R.
    Influence of oral glycopeptides on the fecal flora of human volunteers: selection of highly glycopeptide resistant enterococci.J. Infect. Dis.173199611291136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Lactobacillus Species Identification, H2O2 Production, and Antibiotic Resistance and Correlation with Human Clinical Status
Annie Felten, Claude Barreau, Chantal Bizet, Philippe Henri Lagrange, Alain Philippon
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 1999, 37 (3) 729-733; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.729-733.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lactobacillus Species Identification, H2O2 Production, and Antibiotic Resistance and Correlation with Human Clinical Status
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Lactobacillus Species Identification, H2O2 Production, and Antibiotic Resistance and Correlation with Human Clinical Status
Annie Felten, Claude Barreau, Chantal Bizet, Philippe Henri Lagrange, Alain Philippon
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 1999, 37 (3) 729-733; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.3.729-733.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections
Lactobacillus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X