Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Production of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies toAspergillus Species and Their Use in Immunohistochemical Identification of Aspergillosis

L. E. Fenelon, A. J. Hamilton, J. I. Figueroa, M. A. Bartholomew, M. H. Allen, P. McCarthy, R. J. Hay
L. E. Fenelon
Departments of Clinical Microbiology and Histopathology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. J. Hamilton
Dermatology Unit, St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s Hospital, Kings College, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. I. Figueroa
Dermatology Unit, St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s Hospital, Kings College, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Bartholomew
Dermatology Unit, St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s Hospital, Kings College, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. H. Allen
Dermatology Unit, St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s Hospital, Kings College, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. McCarthy
Departments of Clinical Microbiology and Histopathology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. J. Hay
Dermatology Unit, St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s Hospital, Kings College, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.1221-1223.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Two anti-Aspergillus murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), designated 164G and 611F, have been produced; both specifically recognize cytoplasmic antigens of A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. niger by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The MAbs can identify Aspergillus spp. both in frozen sections by immunofluorescence and in paraffin-embedded clinical specimens by immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase staining.

Invasive aspergillosis, usually caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, is second only toCandida species as a cause of fungal infections in the immunocompromised host (1, 10) and is a relatively frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. The diagnosis is usually clinical and is often difficult to confirm using current laboratory methods. The most successful laboratory methods described to date have been based on the detection of antigen (13, 14, 17). However, the sensitivity of these methods may be limited by the need to obtain sequential samples from each patient (9). PCR-based methods have also been developed (14, 16), although such approaches have not yet gained general acceptance. Thus, cultural and histopathological identifications remain the definitive methods of diagnosing invasive aspergillosis. However, histopathological identification may encounter difficulties, particularly in relation to the differentiation ofAspergillus species from other fungi. The implications of this are mainly therapeutic; the diversity of fungi causing disease in neutropenic patients is increasing, and some of these fungi, notablyPseudallescheria boydii, are resistant to amphotericin B, which would normally be used to treat infections caused byAspergillus and many other species. Thus, it has become increasingly important to be able to differentiateAspergillus species from other fungi where tissue is available for examination. Specific antibodies which may be used to label fungal hyphae in tissue sections would be very useful in these situations; however, polyclonal antibodies are frequently cross-reactive among fungal species, and even monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) may suffer the same limitations (3, 8, 12). In this report, we detail the production and partial characterization of twoAspergillus-specific MAbs which have been used to specifically identify Aspergillus hyphae in histological sections.

Initially, lyophilized isolates of A. fumigatus (NCPF no. 2010 and 2078), Aspergillus flavus (NCPF 2208 and 2617),Aspergillus terreus (NCPF 2026), Aspergillus niger (NCPF 2599), Aspergillus nidulans (NCPF 2232 and 2078), Candida albicans (NCPF 3343), Candida tropicalis (NCPF 3114), Cryptococcus neoformans (NCPF 3081 and 3168), Penicillium piceum (NCPF 2720),Penicillium marneffei (NCPF 4160), P. boydii(NCPF 2216), Sporothrix schenckii (NCPF 3181),Trichosporon beigelii (NCPF 4874), and Histoplasma capsulatum (NCPF 4100) were obtained from the National Collection of Pathogenic Fungi, Mycological Reference Laboratory, Colindale, London, United Kingdom. Three species of zygomycetes (Absidia corymbifera, Rhizomucor pusillus, and Rhizopus arrhizus), were also obtained as clinical isolates from the Mycology Laboratory, St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas’s Hospital, London. Lyophilized isolates were reconstituted with 0.5 ml of sterile water and cultured for 48 h on Sabouraud agar slopes before subculture with continual shaking for 3 to 7 days in 2.5 liters of Sabouraud liquid culture medium at room temperature. Cultures were filtered through Whatman no. 2 filter paper to remove media and were then washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.01 M, pH 7.4). Cytoplasmic antigens (CAs) were then prepared as previously described (4). Some of the filtered mycelia and yeast were also frozen for use in the production of cryostat sections (see below). In the case of A. fumigatus NCPF 2078, the culture filtrate was retained and concentrated 50-fold by dialysis against polyethylene glycol 8000, divided into aliquots, and frozen at −70°C (A. fumigatus filtrate antigen [FA]).

For the production of specific MAbs, cyclophosphamide was used as an immunomodulator (2, 4). In this context, cyclophosphamide has its effect via the suppression of B-cell responses to an initial primary antigen (which may contain a large number of cross-reactive epitopes); subsequently, when a second antigen is used as an immunogen, only B cells specific to the latter will respond. On day 0, five BALB/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with A. flavus CA (NCPF 2208; 50 μg of protein per mouse) in Freund’s complete adjuvant. Five control BALB/c mice received the same inoculation. Two days later, cyclophosphamide (Sigma, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom) at a dose of 40 mg per kg of body weight in PBS was injected intraperitoneally into the first group of 5 mice; the control mice were not treated. On day 15, A. fumigatus CA (NCPF 2010; 50 μg of protein in Freund’s incomplete adjuvant per mouse) was used to inoculate control and test mice. This protocol was repeated on day 21. Two days later, all mice were bled, and the serum was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (see below) to ascertain which animal had the greatest differential response to A. fumigatus CA, compared with A. flavus CA. This mouse was given a further intravenous inoculation of A. fumigatusCA (50 μg of protein) in PBS, and its spleen was used in a fusion 3 days later.

MAbs were produced as previously described by using the myeloma line sp. 2/0 (2, 4). Hybridomas were screened for differential reactivity by ELISA (see below) against A. fumigatus andA. flavus CAs. Clones showing either species specificity or a markedly stronger reaction to A. fumigatus than A. flavus were subcloned twice, and those clones of interest were used for ascites formation in mice. MAbs were subsequently tested by ELISA for activity against all of the fungal CAs, together with theA. fumigatus FA detailed above, and were also subclassed as appropriate (5). An ELISA was performed as described previously (2, 4), with the following modifications. To determine the individual mouse with the greatest differential response to A. fumigatus CA, mouse sera at dilutions of 1:200, 1:400, 1:800, 1:1,600, and 1:3,200 in PBS–0.05% Tween 20 were used. Goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) peroxidase-linked conjugate (Jackson Immunochemicals, West Grove, Pa.) was used at a dilution of 1:1,000. To determine the reactivities of the MAbs to all the fungal CAs, ascitic fluid was used at dilutions of 1:100, 1:500, and 1:1,000 in PBS-Tween. Goat anti-mouse IgG peroxidase-linked conjugate was used at a dilution of 1:5,000 in PBS-Tween. MAb P4, produced againstParacoccidioides brasiliensis (2), was used as a negative control antibody (and was also used in this manner in the immunohistochemical studies described below). All assays were performed in duplicate.

For the production of cryostat sections, small aliquots of mycelium or yeast cultures from the various fungal pathogens (see above) were embedded in Cryo-M-Bed compound (Bright Instruments, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom), and 5-μm sections were cut, mounted, air dried, and fixed for 5 min in 100% acetone. In addition, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from the following patient groups (all postmortem) were cut (5-μm sections), mounted on glass slides, and incubated at 37°C overnight: 11 culture-confirmed A. fumigatus infections (6 from lung, 2 from liver, 2 from paranasal sinuses, and 1 from brain tissue), 1 confirmed A. flavusinfection (from lung), 5 confirmed C. albicans infections (2 from lung, 2 from liver, and 1 from skin), 4 confirmed P. brasiliensis infections (2 from lung, 1 from myocardium, and 1 from lymph node tissue), 3 confirmed C. neoformansinfections (all brain), and 1 each of confirmed Conidiobolus coronatus infection (from peripheral nervous tissue) andChaetomium globosum infection (from lung). Those sections destined for immunofluorescence staining were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated in an ethanol series, washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (0.1 M, pH 7.6), treated with 0.05 mg of protease V8 (Sigma)/ml in distilled water for 30 min at 37°C, and finally washed in TBS. For immunoperoxidase staining, sections were dewaxed, placed in absolute ethanol for 8 to 10 min, and then treated with a solution of 100 ml of methanol containing 2.8 ml of 3.6% H2O2 and 0.6 ml of 10 M HCl (10 min), followed by washes in distilled water and PBS.

For immunofluorescence staining, cryostat and paraffin sections were incubated with MAbs 611F and 164G and control MAb P4 as ascitic fluid diluted 1:10, 1:20, 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, and 1:320 in PBS for 1 h at 37°C in a humid chamber. After three washes in PBS, sections were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with rabbit anti-mouse IgG fluorescein conjugate (Ortho Diagnostics Systems, Raritan, N.J.) used at dilutions of 1:20 in PBS. After three washes in PBS, the sections were mounted and examined as previously described (4). Additional negative controls consisted of sections incubated with PBS instead of either the primary or secondary antibodies. For immunoperoxidase staining, paraffin sections were incubated for 10 min in normal swine serum (NSS) diluted 1:5 in TBS, which was then removed prior to incubation with MAbs 611F and 164G as ascitic fluid diluted 1:40 and 1:80 in TBS (1 h at 37°C) in a humid container. Negative controls were as described previously. After washing in TBS the sections were incubated with rabbit anti-mouse IgG peroxidase conjugate (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark), diluted 1:50 in NSS, and then washed in TBS before incubation as described above with peroxidase anti-peroxidase (Dakopatts) diluted 1:100 in NSS. Following another TBS wash, 3,3′ diaminobenzidine (1 mg/ml in TBS) was added, and sections were incubated in the dark for 10 min at 37°C prior to a final TBS wash. Sections were counterstained with Mayer’s haemalum, washed in tap water, and mounted.

Serum from one of the BALB/c mice immunized successively with A. flavus CA, cyclophosphamide, and A. fumigatus CA demonstrated a marked differential ELISA response to A. fumigatus CA, and the spleen from this individual was used in the fusion (data not shown). The five control mice showed no difference in reactivity to the two antigen preparations. Two MAbs, designated 164G and 611F, were obtained after screening by ELISA and subcloning. When these MAbs were tested by ELISA against CAs of all the fungal pathogens produced as described above, both reacted strongly to A. fumigatus CA (with optical densities at 492 nm of greater than 1.0). The MAbs were less reactive to the A. flavus andA. niger CAs, with no recognition of any of the other fungal antigens compared to negative controls (data not shown). Both MAbs were also reactive against A. fumigatus FA by ELISA (data not shown). MAb 164G was found to be of the IgG1 subclass, while 611F was found to belong to the IgG3 subclass.

Both MAbs 164G and 611F demonstrated bright fluorescence staining of cultured A. fumigatus and A. flavus in cryostat sections with a limited reaction to A. niger (data not shown). Staining of both cytoplasm and cell wall was evident. There was no recognition of either A. nidulans or A. terreus or of any of the other fungal pathogens examined (data not shown). Both MAbs were able to stain A. fumigatus hyphae to a titer of 1:320, although optimal staining was seen at a titer of 1:80. MAb 611F clearly identified Aspergillus hyphae in all 12 paraffin-embedded clinical specimens from patients with culture confirmed invasive aspergillosis by both immunofluorescence (Fig.1a) and immunoperoxidase staining (Fig.1b). Both staining methods provided a clear contrast between the fungal elements and background tissue. Fungal elements were not recognized by MAb 611F in any of the 14 patients with other fungal infections (data not shown). MAb 164G stained Aspergillus hyphae in paraffin sections to a much lesser degree than 611F (data not shown), although the pattern of staining was broadly similar to that seen with 611F.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase reactivities of MAb 611F in paraffin wax-embedded tissue. (a) Immunofluorescence staining of paraffin wax-embedded section of lung tissue from a patient with invasive aspergillosis caused by A. fumigatus. Representative hyphal elements are indicated by arrows. Bar represents 30 μm. (b) Immunoperoxidase staining of paraffin wax-embedded section of liver from a patient with invasive aspergillosis caused by A. fumigatus. Representative hyphal elements are indicated by arrows. Bar represents 25 μm.

We have produced two MAbs which specifically recognize the three species of Aspergillus which most commonly cause disease in humans: A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. niger. There are now a substantial number of reports in the literature on the production of MAbs against Aspergillusspecies, although in most cases these antibodies have been found to be cross-reactive with other fungal pathogens to a greater or lesser extent (3, 8, 11, 12). Attempts to use MAbs to detectAspergillus in histopathological sections have been more restricted and either have demonstrated cross-reactivity (15) or have been limited in scope, preventing a meaningful assessment of specificity (6). To date, the application of the Aspergillus MAb apparently specific to most species has been restricted to the identification of this pathogen in tissue from cattle (7).

While the immunization protocol described in this article was designed to maximize antibody production specifically to A. fumigatus, the MAbs produced specifically recognize, by ELISA,A. fumigatus, A. flavus, and A. niger. Both MAbs are also able to specifically recognize these three species of Aspergillus in frozen sections of fungal hyphae and are also reactive in paraffin-embedded tissue sections containing A. fumigatus and A. flavus hyphae. Neither MAb reacted with cryostat sections from a broad range of fungal pathogens, and paraffin sections from a more limited number of fungal infections were also negative. These observations confirmed the specificity of the two MAbs which was revealed by the ELISA data. MAb 611F was particularly useful in the specific identification of Aspergillus hyphae in pathological specimens.

The ability to immunolabel fungi in tissue sections is a considerable aid to histological identification. Discrimination betweenAspergillus species and other fungi in situ, such asP. boydii, is notoriously difficult, and the increasing incidence of unusual filamentous fungal infections in neutropenic patients, some of which are poorly sensitive to amphotericin B, makes the correct identification of fungal species extremely important clinically. Using our MAbs, we have been able to differentiate infections caused by Aspergillus species from those caused by a large number of other fungi using standard immunohistochemical techniques which are easily applicable to routine histopathology. However, it is important to note that this study was retrospective and was performed using only postmortem material. As a result, we have no precise information yet as to how effective this method might be in improving clinical outcomes via the direct identification ofAspergillus infection in biopsy material from patients actually undergoing clinical evaluation. A large-scale study of this type is currently being planned; however, there is every reason to believe that these MAbs, particularly 611F, will be an extremely useful adjunct to standard histological techniques for the identification of conditions arising from infection with Aspergillus.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

L.E.F. was supported by a grant from The Janssen Foundation. We also acknowledge the support of the Asthma Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.

We thank C. Campbell and Y. Clayton for the provision of fungal isolates and M. Pilkington for assistance with the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 August 1998.
    • Returned for modification 25 September 1998.
    • Accepted 9 January 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Degregorio M. W.,
    2. Lee W. M. F.,
    3. Linker C. A.,
    4. Jacobs R. A.,
    5. Ries C. A.
    Fungal infections in patients with acute leukemia.Am. J. Med.731982543548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Figueroa J. I.,
    2. Hamilton A. J.,
    3. Bartholomew M. A.,
    4. Harada T.,
    5. Fenelon L. E.,
    6. Hay R. J.
    Preparation of species-specific murine monoclonal antibodies against the yeast phase of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis.J. Clin. Microbiol.28199017661769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Fratamico P. M.,
    2. Long W. K.,
    3. Buckley H. R.
    Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to a 58-kilodalton antigen of Aspergillus fumigatus.Infect. Immun.591991316322
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Hamilton A. J.,
    2. Bartholomew M. A.,
    3. Fenelon L. E.,
    4. Figueroa J. I.,
    5. Hay R. J.
    A murine monoclonal antibody exhibiting high species specificity for Histoplasma capsulatum var. capsulatum.J. Gen. Microbiol.1361990331335
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hamilton A. J.,
    2. Bartholomew M. A.,
    3. Figueroa J.,
    4. Fenelon L. E.,
    5. Hay R. J.
    Production of species-specific murine monoclonal antibodies against Cryptococcus neoformans which recognize a noncapsular exoantigen.J. Clin. Microbiol.291991980984
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hetherington S. V.,
    2. Henwick S.,
    3. Parham D. M.,
    4. Patrick C. C.
    Monoclonal antibodies against a 97-kilodalton antigen from Aspergillus flavus.Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.119946367
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jensen H. E.,
    2. Halbeck B.,
    3. Lind P.,
    4. Krogh H. V.,
    5. Frandsen P. L.
    Development of murine monoclonal antibodies for the immunohistochemical diagnosis of systemic bovine aspergillosis.J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.819966875
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kumar A.,
    2. Kurup V. P.
    Murine monoclonal antibodies to glycoprotein antigens of Aspergillus fumigatus show cross reactivity with other fungi.Allergy Proc.141993189193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rogers T. R.,
    2. Haynes K. A.,
    3. Barnes R. A.
    Value of antigen detection in predicting invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.Lancet336199012101213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Sherertz, R. J., A. Belani, B. S. Kramer, G. J. Elfenbein, R. S. Weiner, M. L. Sullivan, R. G. Thomas, and G. P. Samsa. Impact of air filtration on nosocomial Aspergillus infections: unique risk of bone marrow transplant recipients. Am. J. Med. 83:709–718.
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ste-Marie L.,
    2. Sénéchal S.,
    3. Boushira M.,
    4. Garzon S.,
    5. Strykowski H.,
    6. Pedneault L.,
    7. de Repentigny L.
    Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to cell wall antigens of Aspergillus fumigatus.Infect. Immun.58199021052114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Stryer D.,
    2. Sarfati J.,
    3. Goris A.,
    4. Prevost M. C.,
    5. Lesourd M.,
    6. Kamphuis H.,
    7. Darras V.,
    8. Latge J. P.
    Rat monoclonal antibodies against Aspergillus galactomannan.Infect. Immun.60199222372245
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Sulahian A.,
    2. Tabouret M.,
    3. Ribaud P.,
    4. Sarfati J.,
    5. Gluckman E.,
    6. Latge J. P.,
    7. Derouin F.
    Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and latex agglutination test for detection of galactomannan in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.151996139145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Verweij P. E.,
    2. Latgé J.-P.,
    3. Rijs A. J. M. M.,
    4. Melchers W. J.,
    5. De Pauw B. E.,
    6. Hoogkamp-Korstanje J. A. A.,
    7. Meis J. F. G. M.
    Comparison of antigen detection and PCR assay using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients receiving treatment for hematological malignancies.J. Clin. Microbiol.33199531503153
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Verweij P. E.,
    2. Smedts F.,
    3. Poot T.,
    4. Bult P.,
    5. Hoogkamp-Korstanje J. A.,
    6. Meis J. F.
    Immunoperoxidase staining for identification of Aspergillus species in routinely processed tissue sections.J. Clin. Pathol.491996798801
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Yamakani Y.,
    2. Hashimoto A.,
    3. Tokimatsu I.,
    4. Nasu M.
    PCR detection of DNA specific for Aspergillus species in serum of patients with invasive aspergillosis.J. Clin. Microbiol.34199624642468
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Yu B.,
    2. Niki Y.,
    3. Armstrong D.
    Use of immunoblotting to detect Aspergillus fumigatus antigen in sera and urines of rats with experimental invasive aspergillosis.J. Clin. Microbiol.28199015751579
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Production of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies toAspergillus Species and Their Use in Immunohistochemical Identification of Aspergillosis
L. E. Fenelon, A. J. Hamilton, J. I. Figueroa, M. A. Bartholomew, M. H. Allen, P. McCarthy, R. J. Hay
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 1999, 37 (4) 1221-1223; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.1221-1223.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Production of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies toAspergillus Species and Their Use in Immunohistochemical Identification of Aspergillosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Production of Specific Monoclonal Antibodies toAspergillus Species and Their Use in Immunohistochemical Identification of Aspergillosis
L. E. Fenelon, A. J. Hamilton, J. I. Figueroa, M. A. Bartholomew, M. H. Allen, P. McCarthy, R. J. Hay
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 1999, 37 (4) 1221-1223; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.1221-1223.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Fungal
Antibodies, Monoclonal
aspergillosis
Aspergillus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X