Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Veterinary Microbiology

Identification of Nonlipophilic Corynebacteria Isolated from Dairy Cows with Mastitis

Jozef Hommez, Luc A. Devriese, Mario Vaneechoutte, Philippe Riegel, Patrick Butaye, Freddy Haesebrouck
Jozef Hommez
Regional Veterinary Laboratory, Torhout,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luc A. Devriese
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, Merelbeke,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mario Vaneechoutte
Department of Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University Hospital, Ghent, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Riegel
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine, Hôpitaux Universitaires, Strassbourg, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Butaye
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, Merelbeke,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Freddy Haesebrouck
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Ghent, Merelbeke,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.954-957.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Nonlipophilic corynebacteria associated with clinical and subclinical mastitis in dairy cows were found to belong to four species: Corynebacterium amycolatum, Corynebacterium ulcerans, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, andCorynebacterium minutissimum. These species may easily be confused. However, clear-cut differences between C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis were found in their acid production from maltotriose and ethylene glycol, susceptibility to vibriostatic agent O129, and alkaline phosphatase. Absence of growth at 20°C and lack of α-glucosidase and 4MU-α-d-glycoside hydrolysis activity differentiatedC. amycolatum from C. pseudotuberculosis andC. ulcerans. The mastitis C. pseudotuberculosisstrains differed from the biovar equi and ovis reference strains and from caprine field strains in their colony morphologies and in their reduced inhibitory activity on staphylococcal β-hemolysin.C. amycolatum was the most frequently isolated nonlipophilic corynebacterium.

The lipophilic speciesCorynebacterium bovis is frequently isolated from milk samples in many dairy farms. It is associated with very mild forms of mammary inflammation. Slightly increased somatic (leukocyte) cell counts in the milk are usually the only manifestations of these infections. A new lipophilic oxidative species, Corynebacterium mastitidis, and a new fermentative species,Corynebacterium camporealensis, have been recognized and described from the milk of sheep (9, 10). These bacteria are also associated with subclinical mastitis.

Fermentative nonlipophilic corynebacteria are much less often found in mastitic milk. They usually remain unidentified or are namedCorynebacterium ulcerans (23) orCorynebacterium pseudotuberculosis. The latter name is usually given when the bacteria are found in combination with cutaneous lesions. These identifications are tentative at best becauseC. ulcerans was not a recognized species until 1995 (21). Two other nonlipophilic fermentative species,Corynebacterium minutissimum and Corynebacterium amycolatum, associated with humans, were described in 1983 (5) and 1988 (6), respectively. They are often confused (11, 24, 27), and they have been identified erroneously as Corynebacterium xerosis orCorynebacterium striatum (16, 24).

In the present communication we report the isolation and identification of C. amycolatum and C. minutissimum, hitherto unknown in animals, from cows with mastitis, and we describe their differentiation from two other nonlipophilic corynebacteria,C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis, associated with the same type of animal infection. Special attention was given to the differentiation of the latter two species because the phenotypic characteristics described in the literature proved insufficient to allow reliable identification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples and strains.Milk samples included samples from cows with clinical infections sent in for bacteriological diagnosis by veterinary practitioners and samples from the quarters of normal cows showing subclinical mastitis with increased somatic cell counts collected during routine subclinical-mastitis control examinations. The strains were isolated on Columbia blood agar base (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) with 5% sheep blood. Nonlipophilic coryneform bacteria isolated in concentrations of over 1,000 CFU per ml of milk were selected for further study. The following reference strains were included: C. amycolatum CIP 103452, C. minutissimum ATCC 10288, C. pseudotuberculosis CIP 5297T (biovar equi) and CIP 102968 (biovar ovis), andC. ulcerans CCUG 2708T, CCUG 16556, CCUG 18647, CCUG 22327, and CCUG 22328. Additionally, four C. pseudotuberculosis field strains obtained from four herds of goats infected with cutaneous lymphadenitis were included to examine differences in hemolytic activity and colony morphology.

DNA hybridizations.DNAs of the reference strains and threeC. ulcerans and four C. pseudotuberculosis mastitis strains were extracted and purified following a previously described procedure (19). DNA fromC. ulcerans CCUG 2708T and fromC. pseudotuberculosis CIP 5297T was labeled in vitro by nick translation with tritium-labeled dCTP (Amersham International, Amersham, England). Hybridization experiments with labeled DNA and fragmented DNA preparations were carried out under optimal conditions at 60°C for 16 h in 0.42 M NaCl by the S1 nuclease-trichloroacetic acid method (19). The results were normalized to those of the homologous reaction, after the percentage of S1 nuclease-resistant nucleic acid in the control tube (DNA calf thymus) was subtracted.

Phenotypic identification.Growth characteristics were recorded after aerobic and anaerobic incubation at 37°C in air or in 5% CO2 in brain heart infusion (Oxoid) and on Trypticase soy agar (Gibco, Paisley, United Kingdom) supplemented with 5% sheep blood and with or without 1% Tween 80 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The reverse CAMP test was carried out with a Staphylococcus aureus strain showing only β-hemolysin effects on sheep blood. Urease was tested with urea agar base concentrate (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) and 1.5% agar incubated for 10 days. Nitrate broth (Difco) in Durham tubes was incubated for 2 days. Amylase activity was recorded after 1 or 2 days on spot-inoculated Columbia agar (Biolife, Milan, Italy), which contains 1 g of starch/liter, on the same medium with a supplement of 0.5 g of soluble starch/liter, and additionally with the rapid amylase test (Biolife). Tyrosinase was investigated on nutrient agar (Oxoid) with 0.5 g of tyrosine/liter, spot inoculated and incubated up to 15 days. Filter strips impregnated with 0.1%N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-1,4-phenylenediammonium-dichloride (Merck) were used for oxidase testing, and 3% H2O2 was used for catalase testing. Esculin hydrolysis was recorded after 1 and 2 days of incubation on medium containing yeast extract, peptone, tryptone, agar, 0.5% esculin, and 0.5% ammonium ferric citrate. Growth at 20°C, glucose fermentation at 42°C, formate alkalinization, and ethylene glycol acidification were tested as described by Wauters et al. (25). Susceptibility to the vibriostatic agent O129 was tested with Rosco (Taastrup, Denmark) diagnostic tablets O129 (150 μg) on Isosensitest agar (Oxoid) with 5% sheep blood. API CORYNE, API 50 CH (BioMérieux, La-Balme-les-Grottes, France) galleries, and the BBL CRYSTAL gram-positive identification kit (Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) were used according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The medium used for testing carbohydrate breakdown in API 50 CH contained 2% tryptone (Oxoid L42), 0.5% sodium chloride, 0.05% sodium sulphite, and 0.017% phenol red. Reactions were recorded after 2 days of incubation, except where otherwise indicated.

RESULTS

Samples and isolations.Twenty strains identified asC. amycolatum (see below), seven C. pseudotuberculosis strains, six C. ulceransstrains, and three C. minutissimum strains were isolated in concentrations higher than 1,000 CFU/ml of milk and in pure or nearly pure culture from approximately 80,000 milk samples examined over a 3-year period. All were from different cows and their quarters from 34 different farms. Two C. amycolatum strains were from a farm with poor milking hygiene where 22 isolates were obtained on several monthly repeat visits from 14 quarters of 14 cows. These isolates were considered likely to be related representatives of a single strain and were not further studied. Five strains were obtained from approximately 3,000 cows with cases of clinical mastitis, 15 strains were from nearly 6,000 samples with high cell counts, and the remaining strains were from approximately 70,000 routine control examinations of udders with unspecified clinical status. Species distributions did not clearly differ among these samples of different origin.

DNA similarity.DNAs of the C. ulcerans type strain CCUG 2708T and the C. pseudotuberculosis type strain CIP 5297T were labeled and tested by DNA-DNA hybridization against unlabeled DNAs of strains whose biochemical characteristics resembled those of these two species. The DNA relatedness between strain CCUG 2708T and the mastitis strains A 203, B 204, and B 205 revealed similarity percentages of 78, 74, and 69, respectively, indicating that these strains are members of the species C. ulcerans. Field strains C 206, C 207, C 208, and C 209 showed hybridization percentages of only 23 to 26 with the same C. ulcerans strain, while they were related at the species level with the C. pseudotuberculosis type strain, CIP 5297T, exhibiting DNA relatedness ranging from 63 to 67%.

Growth characteristics.The colonies of the 21 C. amycolatum strains on aerobically incubated blood plates were dry and waxy, with crenate edges and whitish-pale elevated centers. Tween 80 did not influence their growth appreciably. Deposits, surface pellicles, and flakes were seen in broth. The anaerobic growth ofA. amycolatum was particularly feeble, and colonies were scarcely visible with the naked eye after 2 days of incubation. Growth was better at 37°C than at 30 or 42°C. C. amycolatum strains did not grow at 20°C. Colonies ofC. pseudotuberculosis reference and caprine field strains on aerobically incubated agar plates were smaller and more dry and crumbly than those of C. ulcerans. Colonies ofC. pseudotuberculosis bovine mastitis strains had an appearance intermediate between these two types. The two species grew much better anaerobically than C. amycolatum, and they were able to grow at 20°C. In broth, they formed deposits with clumps or pellicles near the surface. C. minutissimumstrains produced moist mucoid colonies, and in broth they showed uniform turbidity without clumps at the surface.

The C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans strains, except four of the C. ulceransmastitis strains, differed from the others in being hemolytic. Hemolysis was much stronger in anaerobiosis than in aerobiosis. OnlyC. pseudotuberculosis and hemolytic C. ulcerans strains inhibited staphylococcal β-hemolysin in the reverse CAMP test. However, the inhibitory effects of the C. pseudotuberculosis mastitis strains were distinctly less vigorous than the effects of other strains.

Biochemical activity.All strains fermented glucose. They were catalase positive and hydrolized l-phenylalanine–AMC,l-tryptophan–AMC, l-arginine–AMC,l-pyroglutamic acid–AMC, l-isoleucine–AMC,l-valine–AMC, and proline- combined with leucine- p -nitroanilide. They all remained negative in the following tests: gelatin hydrolysis, tyrosinase (except theC. minutissimum reference strain), oxidase, β-glucuronidase, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase, β-galactosidase, 4MU-β-d-glucoside (except one C. minutissimum and one C. amycolatum strain), 4MU- N -acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidine (except oneC. pseudotuberculosis strain), 4MU-β-glucuronide, p -nitrophenyl-β-d-cellobioside, o -nitrophenyl-β-d-galactoside combined with p -ni-trophenyl-α-d-galactoside, and  N -acetyl-β-glucosaminidase. None of the strains produced acid from adonitol, amygdaline,d- and l-arabinose, d- andl-arabitol, arbutine (except one strain ofC. amycolatum and one C. minutissimumstrain), cellobiose (except one C. amycolatum strain), dulcitol, erythritol, d- and l-fucose, β-gentiobiose, gluconate, 2- and 5-keto-gluconate, inositol, inulin, lactose (except one C. amycolatumstrain), d-lyxose, mannitol, melezitose, melibiose (except one C. minutissimum strain), α-methyl-d-glucoside, α-methyl-d-mannoside, β-methyl-xyloside,d-raffinose, rhamnose, salicin (except one C. minutissimum and two C. amycolatum strains), sorbitol, l-sorbose, d-tagatose,d-turanose (except two weakly positive C. amycolatum strains), xylitol, or d- andl-xylose. Variable reactions, including reactions differentiating between species, are listed in Table1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Variable and differentiating characteristics of nonlipophilic corynebacteria isolated from mastitic bovine milk

DISCUSSION

The four species discussed here are infrequently encountered in mastitis diagnostic bacteriology. Nevertheless, they appeared to be involved in a number of clinical or subclinical mastitis cases.C. xerosis, which resembles C. amycolatum in growth and biochemical characteristics, is very rare in human clinical specimens (11), and a discrepancy has been noted between the large number of C. minutissimumisolations in routine clinical bacteriology and the relatively small number of publications claiming a disease association (13, 20). C. amycolatum, on the other hand, has been reported as the most frequently encountered nonlipophilic corynebacterium in human clinical specimens (11, 13). This species has been recognized in recent years as possibly an important infectious agent (3, 8). The human clinical situation is reflected in the dairy material discussed here: C. xerosis was not found, and C. amycolatum was the most frequently isolated fermenting nonlipophilic corynebacterium.

Along with these strains, two other species which are known to occur in animals were found. C. ulcerans has been described as a cause of bovine mastitis (14, 23), but its pathogenic significance has remained unclear, possibly because of identification problems. C. pseudotuberculosis has long been known as a cause of caseous lymphadenitis, an important disease of goats, sheep, deer, and buffalo and, in certain regions, also of horses (4, 15). More rarely, at least in temperate climates, the organism causes severe disease in cattle, and in these animals a mastitic as well as a cutaneous form may develop (26). It is less well known as an exclusive agent of bovine mastitis without simultaneously occurring cutaneous lesions.

The results of the present study demonstrate that the differentiation of nonlipophilic corynebacteria from cows with mastitis is quite possible by taking advantage of a number of useful characteristics (Table 1). Unlike that of the lipophilic C. bovis, their growth on primary isolation plates extends outside the fatty zone of the milk spots inoculated on the plates. Apart from the rareC. minutissimum strains identified in the present study, the nonlipophilic corynebacteria associated with mastitis in cows all grow similarly in broth. They produce deposits and clumps near the surface. Their colonies vary from dry and crumbly for C. pseudotuberculosis or with a mat surface forC. amycolatum to smooth for C. minutissimum. The newly described C. camporealensis from sheep with subclinical mastitis differs from these strains in its positive CAMP reaction. C. mastitidis from the same origin differs in its oxidative and lipophilic nature. Other reactions differentiating both ovine species from the individual species in the present study are given in references 9 and 10.

C. amycolatum and C. minutissimumstrains differ from C. pseudotuberculosis and mostC. ulcerans strains in their negative urease and 4MU-α-d-glucoside reactions and their lack of hemolysis and absence of inhibitory activity on staphylococcal β-hemolysin. It should be recognized that although all C. amycolatummastitis strains studied were urease negative, the type strain has urease activity (Table 1), and the inhibitory effect on β-hemolysin in the reverse CAMP test may be weak, as was the case with theC. pseudotuberculosis mastitis strains in the present study, or absent, as with the nonhemolytic C. ulceransstrains. The present results cannot be used to separate C. minutissimum from C. amycolatum because only four isolates of the first species were found in the mastitis samples studied. Carbon substrate assimilation tests can be used for that purpose (18).

As mentioned in the introduction, the differentiation ofC. ulcerans from C. pseudotuberculosisis problematic when only characteristics reported in the literature are used. The urease, glycogen, sucrose, amylase, and alkaline phosphatase reactions have been indicated in Bergey’s Manual (7) and in the more recent descriptions of C. ulcerans (12, 21) as means to differentiate these two species. However, the species were urease positive in our tests, acid production from glycogen was variable in C. ulcerans, and acid from sucrose as well as alkaline phosphatase, both reported to be variable in C. pseudotuberculosis, were found to be negative in our strain collection. Only C. ulcerans was found to show strong amylase reactions, but the nonhemolytic mastitis strains did not produce large reaction zones on Columbia agar supplemented to contain 0.15% starch, and they were negative in the commercially available amylase tube test. Enzymatic hydrolysis of alkaline phosphate and 4MU-phosphate, acid production from maltotriose, and acidification of ethylene glycol, as well as susceptibility to O129, proved to be more useful differential characteristics of C. ulcerans. These findings were corroborated by the results of the DNA similarity tests. The improved identification of this species will also be helpful in elucidating its potential zoonotic implications.

With the exception of maltotriose and ethylene glycol, useful in the differentiation of C. ulcerans from C. pseudotuberculosis, and certain reactions of possible utility in the identification of C. minutissimum (Table 1), carbohydrate and polyalcohol breakdown tests had only limited discriminatory capacity for the species studied. It should be noted, however, that only four C. minutissimum strains were present in the strain collection studied. Moreover, this species is biochemically and genomically heterogenic (1, 13). One of the four strains studied here differed in several characteristics from the other three.

Although many results of individual tests contained in the biochemical galleries proved most helpful, the databases provided with these systems to interpret the biochemical activity profiles rarely gave reliable identifications. Only with C. pseudotuberculosis and the API CORYNE test were satisfactory results obtained. With other species and system combinations less than 10% of the identifications were exact. Undoubtedly, updates will yield considerably better results.

Certain host-associated (ecovar) differences appear to exist among C. pseudotuberculosis strains. Equine (biovar equi) strains, unlike caprine and ovine (biovar ovis) strains (2, 17, 22) and bovine strains from cutaneous lesions (26), reduce nitrate, as did the bovine mastitis strains we studied. The last group of strains also differ from biovar equi and biovar ovis strains as well as from caprine field strains in their colony morphologies and in their reduced inhibitory activities on staphylococcal β-hemolysin. These findings suggest that C. pseudotuberculosis strains involved in the exclusively mastitic form of corynebacterial infection may belong to a distinct group.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The technical assistance of B. Deheegher, P. Vanclooster, L. Corbanie, F. Grillaert, and A. Van de Kerckhove is greatly appreciated.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 July 1998.
    • Returned for modification 22 September 1998.
    • Accepted 17 December 1998.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aubel D.,
    2. Renaud F. N. R.,
    3. Freney J.
    Genomic diversity of several Corynebacterium species identified by amplification of the 16-23S rRNA gene spacer regions.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.471997767772
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Benham C. L.,
    2. Seaman A.,
    3. Woodbine M.
    Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and its role in diseases of animals.Vet. Bull.321962645657
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Berner R.,
    2. Pelz K.,
    3. Wilhelm C.,
    4. Funke A.,
    5. Leititis J. U.,
    6. Brandis M.
    Fatal sepsis caused by Corynebacterium amycolatum in a premature infant.J. Clin. Microbiol.35199710111012
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Biberstein E. L.,
    2. Knight H. D.,
    3. Jang S.
    Two biotypes of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.Vet. Rec.891971691692
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Jones D.
    Corynebacterium minutissimum sp. nov., nom. rev.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.331983870871
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Burton R. A.,
    3. Jones D.
    Corynebacterium amycolatum sp. nov., a new mycolic acid-less Corynebacterium species from human skins.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.491988349352
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    1. Collins M. D.,
    2. Cummins C. S.
    Genus Corynebacterium Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology Sneath P. H. A., Mair N. S., Sharpe M. E., Holt J. G. 2 1986 1266 1276 Williams and Wilkins Baltimore, Md
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. de Miguel-Martinez I.,
    2. Fernandez-Fuertes F.,
    3. Ramos-Macias A.,
    4. Bosch-Benitez J. M.,
    5. Martin-Sanchez A. M.
    Sepsis due to multiply resistant Corynebacterium amycolatum.Eur. J. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.151996617618
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fernandez-Garayzabal J. F.,
    2. Collins M. D.,
    3. Hutson R.,
    4. Fernandez E.,
    5. Monasterio E. R.,
    6. Marco J.,
    7. Dominguiz L.
    Corynebacterium mastitidis, sp. nov., isolated from milk of sheep with subclinical mastitis.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.47199710821085
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fernandez-Garayzabal J. F.,
    2. Collins M. D.,
    3. Hutson R.,
    4. Fernandez E.,
    5. Gonzalez I.,
    6. Dominguiz L.
    Corynebacterium camporealensis sp. nov., associated with subclinical mastitis in sheep.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.481997463468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Funke G.,
    2. Lawson P. A.,
    3. Bernard K. A.,
    4. Collins M. D.
    Most Corynebacterium xerosis strains identified in the routine clinical laboratory correspond to Corynebacterium amycolatum.J. Clin. Microbiol.34199611241128
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Funke G.,
    2. Lawson P. A.,
    3. Collins M. D.
    Corynebacterium riegelii sp. nov., an unusual species isolated from female patients with urinary tract infections.J. Clin. Microbiol.361998624627
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Funke G.,
    2. von Graevenitz A.,
    3. Clarridge J. E. III,
    4. Bernard K. A.
    Clinical microbiology of coryneform bacteria.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.101997125159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hedlund M.,
    2. Pohjanvirta T.
    Corynebacterium ulcerans in dairy cattle—a potential risk for man. A review on C. ulcerans and a survey of its occurrence in mastitic milk in Eastern Finland.Suom. Elain.951989552558
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hellmann E.,
    2. Hartwigk H.,
    3. Marx M.,
    4. Lübke A.
    Corynebacterium-Infektionen Handbuch der bakteriellen Infektionen bei Tieren Blobel H., Schliesser T. II/3 1995 155 195 Gustav Fischer Jena, Germany
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Martinez-Martinez L.
    Clinical significance of newly recognized coryneform bacteria.Rev. Med. Microbiol.919985568
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Muckle C. A.,
    2. Gyles C. L.
    Characterization of strains of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.Can. J. Comp. Med.461981206208
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Renaud F. N. R.,
    2. Dutaur M.,
    3. Daoud S.,
    4. Aubel D.,
    5. Riegel P.,
    6. Monget D.,
    7. Freney J.
    Differentiation of Corynebacterium amycolatum, C. minutissimum, and C. striatum by carbon substrate assimilation tests.J. Clin. Microbiol.36199836983702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Riegel P.,
    2. de Briel D.,
    3. Prévot G.,
    4. Jehl F.,
    5. Monteil H.
    Genomic diversity among Corynebacterium jejeikum strains and comparison with biochemical characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibilities.J. Clin. Microbiol.32199418601865
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Riegel P.,
    2. Ruimy R.,
    3. Christen R.,
    4. Monteil H.
    Species identities and antimicrobial susceptibilities of corynebacteria isolated from various clinical sources.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.151996657662
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Riegel P.,
    2. Ruimy R.,
    3. de Briel D.,
    4. Prévost G.,
    5. Jehl F.,
    6. Christen R.,
    7. Monteil H.
    Taxonomy of Corynebacterium diphtheriae and related taxa, with recognition of Corynebacterium ulcerans sp. nov. nom. rev.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.1261995271276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Songer J. G.,
    2. Beckenbach K.,
    3. Marshall M. M.,
    4. Olson G. B.,
    5. Kelly L.
    Biochemical and genetic characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis.Am. J. Vet. Res.491988223226
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Watts J. L.
    Etiological agents of bovine mastitis.Vet. Microbiol.1619884166
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wauters G.,
    2. Driessen A.,
    3. Ageron E.,
    4. Janssens M.,
    5. Grimont P. A. D.
    Propionic acid-producing strains previously designated as Corynebacterium xerosis, C. minutissimum, C. striatum and CDC group I2 and group F2 coryneforms belong to the species Corynebacterium amycolatum.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.461996653657
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Wauters G.,
    2. Van Bosterhaut B.,
    3. Janssens M.,
    4. Verhaegen J.
    Identification of Corynebacterium amycolatum and other nonlipophilic fermentative corynebacteria of human origin.J. Clin. Microbiol.36199814301432
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Yeruham I.,
    2. Elad D.,
    3. Van-Ham M.,
    4. Shpigel N. Y.,
    5. Perl S.
    Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis infection in Israeli cattle: clinical and epidemiological studies.Vet. Rec.1401997423427
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Zinkernagel A. F.,
    2. Von Graevenitz A.,
    3. Funke G.
    Heterogeneity within Corynebacterium minutissimum strains is partly explained by misidentified Corynebacterium amycolatum strains.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.1061996378383
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of Nonlipophilic Corynebacteria Isolated from Dairy Cows with Mastitis
Jozef Hommez, Luc A. Devriese, Mario Vaneechoutte, Philippe Riegel, Patrick Butaye, Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 1999, 37 (4) 954-957; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.954-957.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of Nonlipophilic Corynebacteria Isolated from Dairy Cows with Mastitis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of Nonlipophilic Corynebacteria Isolated from Dairy Cows with Mastitis
Jozef Hommez, Luc A. Devriese, Mario Vaneechoutte, Philippe Riegel, Patrick Butaye, Freddy Haesebrouck
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 1999, 37 (4) 954-957; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.4.954-957.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Corynebacterium
Mastitis, Bovine

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X