Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Trends in Antifungal Susceptibility amongCandida sp. Urinary Isolates from 1994 and 1998

Joseph Baran Jr., Enid Klauber, Jeffrey Barczak, Kathleen Riederer, Riad Khatib
Joseph Baran Jr.
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enid Klauber
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Barczak
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Riederer
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riad Khatib
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.2.870-871.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Antifungal susceptibilities were determined from 80 urinary isolates of Candida species collected in 1994 and 1998. Our findings demonstrate increasing geometric means of fluconazole MICs and fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans andCandida tropicalis (those for Candida glabratawere unchanged) within the 4-year span. Amphotericin B and voriconazole MICs remained constant.

Treatment of fungal infections has changed in the last decade due to the introduction of the newer triazole antifungal agents (1-3). With the ease of use of these agents, indiscriminate utilization has become common (1). While resistance to amphotericin B was rare, resistance to these drugs has been increasing in individuals receiving prolonged therapy (4, 6, 7). In this study, we compared antifungal susceptibilities in urinary tract isolates of common Candidaspecies collected in 1994 and 1998 to monitor for changing trends in the general patient population.

(This work was presented in part at the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Diego, Calif., 24 to 27 September 1998.)

Forty urinary isolates of Candida albicans, C. glabrata, and C. tropicalis from 1994 (collected consecutively from inpatients for a possible study of colonization and stored at −70°C) and a comparable number from 1998 (collected from 15 January 1998 through 12 June 1998) were studied. Organisms were grown on inhibitory mold agar (BBL, Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.). Species were identified by germ tube formation, CA50 test (Murex Diagnostics, Inc., Norcross, Ga.), and Yeast Biochemical Cards (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.). Control strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md.) and included C. albicans ATCC 24433 (MIC range, 0.25 to 1 μg/ml for amphotericin B and fluconazole) andC. tropicalis ATCC 750 (MIC ranges, 0.5 to 2.0 and 1.0 to 4.0 μg/ml for amphotericin B and fluconazole, respectively). All isolates were subcultured twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar prior to antifungal testing.

Fluconazole (Pfizer Inc., Groton, Conn.; compound UK-049,858) stock solution of 5,120 μg/ml in sterile water, amphotericin B (Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, N.J.; type 1) stock solution of 1,600 μg/ml in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.), and voriconazole (Pfizer Inc.; compound UK-109,496) stock solution of 1,600 μg/ml in DMSO were prepared. Serial dilutions in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) resulting in test concentrations of 0.125 to 64 μg/ml for fluconazole and 0.03 to 16 μg/ml for amphotericin B and voriconazole were aliquoted into microtiter wells (100 μl each) and stored at −70°C until testing was done.

Susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution by utilizing the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A method (8). A minimum of five colonies were suspended in 0.9% saline and adjusted to an 0.5 McFarland standard (corresponds to 1 × 106 to 5 × 106CFU/ml) by using a Vitek colorimeter (bioMérieux, Vitek Inc.). This stock solution was diluted 1:50 in RPMI 1640 medium and then 1:20 to obtain a 2× test concentration. One hundred microliters of the 2× inoculum was pipetted to prepare antifungal dilutions in microwells to achieve a final concentration of 0.5 × 103 to 2.5 × 103 CFU/ml in a final test volume of 200 μl. Microwell plates were incubated at 35°C for 48 ± 2 h (mean ± standard deviation). The MIC was calculated by two independent observers as the lowest drug concentration with no growth for amphotericin B and an 80% reduction in growth for fluconazole and voriconazole (6, 9). All tests and controls were performed in duplicate. Final inoculum size was confirmed by subculture and colony count.

We studied 80 isolates of Candida species: C. albicans (n = 51), C. tropicalis(n = 11), and C. glabrata (n = 18). In 1994, 96% of C. albicans and all C. tropicalis isolates were susceptible to fluconazole. In 1998, fluconazole resistance was noted in 2 of 30 (6.7%) C. albicans isolates (MIC ≥ 64 μg/ml) and in 1 of 4 (25%)C. tropicalis isolates (MIC > 64 μg/ml); dose-dependent susceptibility (MIC = 16 to 32 μg/ml) was not observed. The MIC at which 50% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC50) and geometric mean analysis for these two species increased two- to threefold during this time period (Table1). Resistance and/or dose-dependent susceptibility was more prevalent among C. glabrataisolates, but the rate did not change.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

In vitro susceptibility of urinary Candidaisolates to fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B in 1994 and 1998

Amphotericin B and voriconazole MICs remained constant. There was a significant correlation between fluconazole and voriconazole MICs (r2 = 0.54; P = 0.01) but not with amphotericin B MICs.

The MICs of fluconazole and amphotericin B for all control strains were in the expected susceptibility range.

The epidemiology of Candida infections appears to be changing, with increasing prevalence of non-C. albicansspecies and the development of triazole resistance in ordinarily susceptible species (10, 11). The resistance has been reported most frequently for C. albicans oropharyngeal isolates from patients with advanced AIDS (11). Our findings show a trend towards increasing fluconazole MICs among C. albicans and C. tropicalis and a higher rate of fluconazole resistance over a 4-year period. In comparison, resistance among C. glabrata isolates was much more common but had already reached a steady state in 1994 and did not increase any further in 1998. These findings are not surprising because fluconazole resistance and/or dose-dependent susceptibility probably emerged in C. glabrata well before 1994 and remained relatively constant.

The MICs of voriconazole were low for all isolates tested. This finding most likely represents the extended potency of this newer antifungal agent as well as its limited use outside of clinical trials. However, although voriconazole remained highly effective against fluconazole-resistant strains, there was a significant correlation between voriconazole and fluconazole MICs. Whether this drug will remain effective against fluconazole-resistant strains after widespread use remains to be determined.

Amphotericin B MICs remained constant for all three species, and amphotericin resistance remained exceedingly rare. We did not observe any correlation between fluconazole and amphotericin B MICs.

The reasons for this trend in antifungal susceptibilities are unclear. The mechanisms of fluconazole resistance appear to be stepwise microevolutionary changes that occur during treatment (5). Whether our patients with higher MICs had received antifungal therapy in the past or these changes took place in response to selective pressure from widespread use of antifungal agents in the community is uncertain.

Although we studied only urine isolates, we suspect that similar trends may also be present in isolates from other sites. The clinical significance of these findings is unclear at this point since most of the MICs remain within the susceptibility range. Nevertheless, this trend is worrisome and requires close monitoring and better control of the use of antifungal agents.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Graduate Medical Education Research Committee, St. John Health System, Detroit, Mich.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 July 1999.
    • Returned for modification 2 October 1999.
    • Accepted 1 December 1999.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ayeni O.,
    2. Riederer K. M.,
    3. Wilson F. M.,
    4. Khatib R.
    Clinicians reactions to positive urine culture for Candida organisms.Mycoses421999285289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barry A. L.,
    2. Brown S. D.
    In vitro studies of two triazole antifungal agents (voriconazole [UK-109,496] and fluconazole) against Candida species.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.40199619481949
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Berrouane Y. F.,
    2. Herwaldt L. A.,
    3. Pfaller M. A.
    Trends in antifungal use and epidemiology of nosocomial yeast infections in a university hospital.J. Clin. Microbiol.371999531537
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Fan-Harvard P.,
    2. Capano D.,
    3. Smith S. M.,
    4. et al.
    Development of resistance in Candida isolates from patients receiving prolonged antifungal therapy.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.35199123022305
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Franz R.,
    2. Kelly S. L.,
    3. Lamb D. C.,
    4. Kelly D. E.,
    5. Ruhnke M.,
    6. Morschhauser J.
    Multiple molecular mechanisms contribute to a stepwise development of fluconazole resistance in clinical Candida albicans strains.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42199830653072
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ghannoum M. A.,
    2. Rex J. H.,
    3. Galgiani J. N.
    Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of correlation of in vitro data with clinical outcome.J. Clin. Microbiol.341996489495
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Johnson E. M.,
    2. Warnock D. W.
    Azole drug resistance in yeasts.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.361995751755
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast. Approved standard M27-A. 1997 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Villanova, Pa
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pfaller M. A.,
    2. Rex J. H.,
    3. Rinaldi M. G.
    Antifungal susceptibility testing: technical advances and potential clinical applications.Clin. Infect. Dis.241997776784
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Pfaller M. A.,
    2. Jones R. N.,
    3. Doern G. V.,
    4. Sader H. S.,
    5. Hollis R. J.,
    6. Messer S. A.
    for the Sentry Participant Group International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibilities of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada, and South America for the SENTRY Program.J. Clin. Microbiol.36199818861889
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Witthuhn F.,
    2. Toubas D.,
    3. Beguinot I.,
    4. Aubert D.,
    5. Rouger C.,
    6. Remy G.,
    7. Pinon J. M.
    Evaluation of the Fungitest kit by using strains from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: study of azole drug susceptibility.J. Clin. Microbiol.371999865866
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Trends in Antifungal Susceptibility amongCandida sp. Urinary Isolates from 1994 and 1998
Joseph Baran Jr., Enid Klauber, Jeffrey Barczak, Kathleen Riederer, Riad Khatib
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Feb 2000, 38 (2) 870-871; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.2.870-871.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trends in Antifungal Susceptibility amongCandida sp. Urinary Isolates from 1994 and 1998
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Trends in Antifungal Susceptibility amongCandida sp. Urinary Isolates from 1994 and 1998
Joseph Baran Jr., Enid Klauber, Jeffrey Barczak, Kathleen Riederer, Riad Khatib
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Feb 2000, 38 (2) 870-871; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.38.2.870-871.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antifungal agents
Candida
Candida albicans
urine

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X