Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Multilocus Sequence Typing System forCampylobacter jejuni

K. E. Dingle, F. M. Colles, D. R. A. Wareing, R. Ure, A. J. Fox, F. E. Bolton, H. J. Bootsma, R. J. L. Willems, R. Urwin, M. C. J. Maiden
K. E. Dingle
Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3FY, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. M. Colles
Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3FY, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. R. A. Wareing
The Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston PR2 9HG, 2 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Ure
The Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston PR2 9HG, 2 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. J. Fox
The Public Health Laboratory, Withington Hospital, Manchester M20 8LR, 3 United Kingdom, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. E. Bolton
The Public Health Laboratory, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston PR2 9HG, 2 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. J. Bootsma
Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands 4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. J. L. Willems
Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands 4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Urwin
Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3FY, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. C. J. Maiden
Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3FY, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The gram-negative bacterium Campylobacter jejuni has extensive reservoirs in livestock and the environment and is a frequent cause of gastroenteritis in humans. To date, the lack of (i) methods suitable for population genetic analysis and (ii) a universally accepted nomenclature has hindered studies of the epidemiology and population biology of this organism. Here, a multilocus sequence typing (MLST) system for this organism is described, which exploits the genetic variation present in seven housekeeping loci to determine the genetic relationships among isolates. The MLST system was established using 194 C. jejuni isolates of diverse origins, from humans, animals, and the environment. The allelic profiles, or sequence types (STs), of these isolates were deposited on the Internet (http://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk), forming a virtual isolate collection which could be continually expanded. These data indicated that C. jejuni is genetically diverse, with a weakly clonal population structure, and that intra- and interspecies horizontal genetic exchange was common. Of the 155 STs observed, 51 (26% of the isolate collection) were unique, with the remainder of the collection being categorized into 11 lineages or clonal complexes of related STs with between 2 and 56 members. In some cases membership in a given lineage or ST correlated with the possession of a particular Penner HS serotype. Application of this approach to further isolate collections will enable an integrated global picture of C. jejuniepidemiology to be established and will permit more detailed studies of the population genetics of this organism.

Campylobacter jejuni is the most common causative agent of human enterocolitits in many industrialized countries, representing a substantial drain on public health resources. Typically, infection is associated with sudden onset of fever, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea containing blood and leukocytes (16, 30, 34). Sequelae occur occasionally, and links have been made between infection by particular C. jejuni serotypes and Guillain-Barré syndrome (24). The gram-negative bacterium is widespread in the environment (13), forming part of the natural intestinal flora of birds and mammals (17). The handling or consumption of raw or undercooked meat products, particularly chicken contaminated during slaughter, is often implicated in disease (3). However, the majority of C. jejuniinfections are considered to be sporadic, with the source of infection remaining unidentified (2). Occasional larger-scale outbreaks of campylobacteriosis have been linked with consumption of contaminated water or raw milk (17, 27).

A plethora of methods have been developed to discriminate C. jejuni isolates for the investigation of epidemiology and infections. However, the lack of widely available reagents for methods such as serotyping has limited their general use. Genotyping methods have been developed (36), but the techniques and their interpretation have not been standardized or broadly accepted. This, coupled with the lack of a universal nomenclature system for isolate profiles, has prevented the development of an international campylobacter typing database.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (20) has been successful in the characterization of several other bacteria (1, 8, 20,33). This technique employs the same philosophy as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (29), in that neutral genetic variation from multiple chromosomal locations is indexed, but exploits nucleotide sequence determination to identify this variation. In MLST studies of other bacteria, stretches of nucleotide sequence of ∼500 bp from 7 loci provided discrimination approximately equivalent to that obtained with 15 to 20 loci in multilocus enzyme electrophoresis analyses (20). Sequence data are readily compared among laboratories and lend themselves to electronic storage and distribution. Furthermore, MLST can reduce the need to transport live bacteria, since nucleotide sequence determination from PCR products can be achieved from killed-cell suspensions, purified DNA, or clinical material. A World Wide Web site for the storage and exchange of data and protocols for MLST has been established (http://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk). While MLST is particularly suited to long-term and global epidemiology, as it identifies variation which is accumulating slowly within a population (20), the data can be used in the investigation of individual outbreaks, especially when MLST data are combined with other data, such as the nucleotide sequences of genes encoding antigens (6, 9).

Here, an MLST scheme for C. jejuni is described. The system is based on the nucleotide sequences of seven housekeeping loci and was established by the examination of 194 isolates obtained from a variety of sources. A total of 155 distinct sequence types (STs) were identified, which were resolved into 62 clonal lineages or complexes. There was evidence for extensive horizontal genetic exchange, including import of alleles from at least two other Campylobacterspecies, including C. coli. Further analysis indicated thatC. jejuni had a weakly clonal population structure and that some complexes were associated with particular Penner HS serotypes. These results provide a basis for further investigations of the epidemiology and population genetics of C. jejuni by MLST.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Campylobacter isolates. C. jejuni isolates were obtained from the collection held at Preston Public Health Laboratory, Preston, United Kingdom (35), and included isolates from cases of human campylobacteriosis, livestock, and the environment. Reference isolates for the Penner heat-stable antigen serotyping scheme (28) were donated to the Preston Public Health Laboratory culture collection by J. Penner and are available from the National Collection of Type Cultures and American Type Culture Collection. Eleven further isolates were obtained from a collection held in The Netherlands at the Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, at the National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, and at the Department of Bacteriology, Institute for Animal Science and Health. Of these, the nonhuman isolates were obtained from geographically dispersed farms in The Netherlands (11), and human isolates were obtained from a case-control study among general practitioners in The Netherlands. The total of 194 isolates comprised 79 from human cases of campylobacteriosis, 38 from livestock, 34 from environmental locations, 3 from milk, and 40 of the reference isolates for the Penner serotyping scheme. Of the human isolates, 75 were from cases which occurred in the United Kingdom during 1990 and 1991, 3 were isolated in the Netherlands during 1997 and 1998, and 1 was obtained from a case in Australia during 1998. The livestock isolates included 34 from chickens, 3 from cattle, and 1 from a duck (including 24 isolates from the United Kingdom, 5 from The Netherlands, and 5 from New Zealand, all isolated during the 1990s). The three isolates from milk were obtained in the United Kingdom during 1991, and all of the environmental isolates were from the sand of bathing beaches (United Kingdom, 1994 and 5), with the exception of one, which was from water (United Kingdom, 1991).

Culture of isolates and preparation of chromosomal DNA.All of the bacterial isolates included had been maintained with minimal passages at −70°C in 20% (vol/vol) glycerol in brain heart infusion broth, and consequently none of the genetic variation studied was likely to have been introduced during storage. Prior to DNA extraction, cultures were removed from storage and allowed to thaw at room temperature. For each isolate, a blood agar plate was spread for discrete colonies and incubated at 37°C for 72 h under microaerobic conditions (5). Chromosomal DNA was extracted using an Isoquick kit (Microprobe Corporation) or Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, Wis.).

Choice of loci.A number of candidate loci, encoding enzymes responsible for intermediary metabolism, were identified by searching the C. jejuni genome database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/C_jejuni/) (26) with gene sequences from other bacteria. Suitable genes were then chosen on the basis of a number of criteria, including chromosomal location, suitability for primer design, and sequence diversity in pilot studies. The following seven loci were chosen for the MLST scheme (protein products are shown in parentheses): aspA (aspartase A),glnA (glutamine synthetase), gltA (citrate synthase), glyA (serine hydroxymethyltransferase),pgm (phosphoglucomutase), tkt (transketolase), and uncA (ATP synthase α subunit). The chromosomal locations of these housekeeping loci suggested that it was unlikely for any of them to be coinherited in the same recombination event, as the minimum distance between loci was 70 kb (Fig.1).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chromosomal locations of MLST loci. The positions of the seven loci are shown on a map of the C. jejuni chromosome derived from the genome sequence of isolate NCTC 11168 (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/C_jejuni/). The 1,641,481-bp genome is divided into 10 segments (indicated on the inner circle), with each segment representing 164,148 bp.

Amplification and nucleotide sequence determination.PCR products were amplified with oligonucleotide primer pairs designed from the published C. jejuni sequence (26). A range of primers were tested, with those shown in Table1 providing reliable amplification from a diverse range of samples (additional dideoxyoligonucleotide primers are described at http://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk). Each 50-μl amplification reaction mixture comprised ∼10 ng of campylobacter chromosomal DNA, 1 μM each PCR primer, 1× PCR buffer (Perkin-Elmer Corp.), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 1.25 U of Amplitaq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp.). The reaction conditions were denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, primer annealing at 50°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, for 35 cycles. The amplification products were purified by precipitation with 20% polyethylene glycol–2.5 M NaCl (7), and their nucleotide sequences were determined at least once on each DNA strand using internal nested primers (Table 1) and BigDye Ready Reaction Mix (PE Biosystems) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Unincorporated dye terminators were removed by precipitation of the termination products with 95% ethanol, and the reaction products were separated and detected with an ABI Prism 3700 or an ABI Prism 377 automated DNA sequencer (PE Biosystems). Sequences were assembled from the resultant chromatograms with the STADEN suite of computer programs (32).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Oligonucleotide primers forCampylobacter MLST

Allele and ST assignment.For each locus, distinct allele sequences were assigned arbitrary allele numbers in order of identification; these were in-frame internal fragments of the gene which contained an exact number of codons. Each isolate was therefore designated by seven numbers, constituting an allelic profile or ST. The data were deposited in a database accessible on the Internet athttp://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk/. The STs were identified by arbitrary numbers assigned in order of description (e.g., ST-1). New sequences were assigned allele numbers and isolates were assigned their STs by interrogating the database. Allele numbers for new sequences and ST numbers for new allelic profiles are available by submission to the database.

The STs were grouped into lineages or clonal complexes using the program BURST (E. J. Feil and M.-S. Chan, available athttp://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk). The members of a lineage were defined as groups of two or more independent isolates with an ST that shared identical alleles at four or more loci. Each lineage was named after the ST identified as the putative founder of the group by BURST, followed by the word “complex” (e.g., ST-21 complex).

Phylogenetic analyses.The degree of clonality within the data set was estimated by measuring the index of association (IA ) and was calculated for all STs and for a subset of STs representative of each lineage with a program written by J. Maynard Smith (23). The relationships among the STs in a given complex were investigated by constructing a distance matrix of allelic mismatches with the program MLD DISTANCE MATRIX (K. A. Jolley). Each locus difference was treated identically in that no relationships among the different alleles were assumed. The distance matrix was then visualized by Split decomposition analysis using SPLITSTREE version 3.1 (14, 21). Where necessary, higher resolution of the splits graph was obtained by progressively pruning resolved branches, and the graphs were annotated by reference to the allelic profiles. Other data analyses, including calculation ofdN/dS , were performed using the MEGA suite of programs (18). All of the programs were available for electronic downloading (http://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk,http://bibserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/splits, andhttp://evolgen.biol.metro-u.ac.jp/MEGA/).

RESULTS

Diversity of housekeeping genes.The alleles defined for the MLST scheme were between 402 bp (gltA) and 507 bp (glyA) in length, and between 27 (gltA andunc) and 46 (pgm) alleles were present per locus. The proportion of variable sites present in the MLST alleles ranged from 9.2% (pgm) to 21.2% (tkt). In part, this was due to the polymorphisms present in a minority of alleles which were divergent (11 to 15% nucleotide sequence difference) from all other allele sequences. Such alleles were observed at least once for each of the MLST loci and were present in a total of 11 isolates, which had divergent alleles at between one and six loci. Searches of the GenBank database established that two of these, at the gltAlocus, were very similar (97% nucleotide sequence identity) to the sequence of this gene from C. coli. When the divergent alleles were removed from analysis, the remaining allele sequences had between 5.2% (aspA) and 11.8% (pgm) variable sites (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Genetic diversity at C. jejuniMLST locia

The proportion of nucleotide changes which changed the amino acid sequence was calculated and indicated by dN (nonsynonymous base substitutions), and the proportion of nucleotide changes which did not change the amino acid sequence was indicated bydS (synonymous base substitutions). ThedN/dS ratios were calculated for all seven loci and were much less than 1 whether or not the more divergent alleles were included in the analysis (Table 2). The frequency that each allele occurred in the sample population is shown in Fig.2; in each case several alleles predominated, with the remainder observed in one or two isolates.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Allele frequencies in the sample population. For each of the seven loci (A to G), the number of times that each allele occurs in the isolate collection is shown. The frequencies are shown in the order of most to least abundant.

STs and lineages.There were a total of 155 STs among the 194 isolates examined, 140 (90%) of which were present only once, with the most common ST (ST-21) occurring eight times in the dataset. Assignment of the STs to lineages established that 51 STs were both unique and unrelated to any others (data are available athttp://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk/). The remaining isolates were assigned to 11 complexes: the ST-21 complex was the largest, with 56 members; the ST-45 complex had 23 members; and the ST-179 complex comprised 7 STs. There were two lineages with three member STs (two lineages) and six lineages with two members (Table 3). TheIA for the complete data set was 2.016, with a value of 0.5671 obtained when only one representative of each lineage was included.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

C. jejuni lineages

Interrelationships of members of the ST-21 complex.The relationships among members of the ST-21 complex were visualized by an annotated splits graph of a distance matrix generated by pairwise comparisons of the allelic profiles (Fig.3). The unresolved splits graph including all members of the complex is shown at the top left of Fig. 3. The outer branches were then pruned to show a partially resolved network, which was further pruned to resolve completely the center of the graph. Consistent with the lineage assignment by BURST, this placed the predicted founder ST at a central position of the split graph. The relationships among other members of the group were assessed by examining the number of nodes (representing the number of changes) between two isolates. For example, in the central region of the graph, ST-21 and ST-19 are separated by one node, representing one allele change between the two. Their STs are 2-1-1-3-2-1-5 and 2-1-5-3-2-1-5, respectively. ST-21 and ST-31 were separated by two nodes and differed by two alleles (ST-31 is 2-20-12-3-2-1-5).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Splits graphs showing the interrelationships of members of ST-21 complex. Progressive pruning of branches to improve resolution is indicated by the circles and arrows. The completely resolved region (bottom left) derived from the center of the unpruned graph contains the most abundant members of the complex and the predicted founder of the lineage, ST-21.

Relationships of lineage, source, and serotype.Isolates belonging to the two largest lineages present in the data set, the ST-21 complex and ST-45 complex, had originated from a diversity of sources (Table 3). The ST-21 complex included 59 of the 79 human isolates studied (75%), 14 of the 34 chicken isolates (41%), 7 of the 33 sand isolates (21%), 3 of the 3 cattle isolates (100%), and 3 of the 3 milk isolates (100%). The ST-45 complex included 10 of the 79 human isolates (13%), 11 of the 34 chicken isolates (32%), and 2 of the 33 sand isolates (6%). Three Penner HS serotypes predominated in the ST-21 complex (HS1, 25%; HS2, 33%; and HS4, 8%), and some of the STs forming this lineage were homogenous for serotype (e.g., the six ST-19 isolates were all HS1, while the eight ST-21 isolates were all HS2 or non typeable), although these serotypes were also present in isolates exhibiting different STs. Conversely, the ST-45 complex contained a wide variety of serotypes and a number of cross-reactive isolates, but the two most common serotypes observed in the ST-21 complex, HS1 and HS2, were not present in the ST-45 complex. The remaining complexes comprised small numbers in the isolate collection and these were homogenous for serotype, with the exception of the seven ST-179 complex isolates which originated in sand and were HS2 or HS5 and two members of the ST-130 complex (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Unambiguous, discriminatory isolate characterization schemes are essential for epidemiological, population genetic, and evolutionary studies. Ideally, these schemes generate data that are relevant to all of these areas, but before the recent advent of high-throughput nucleotide sequence determination technology, this goal had proved elusive (19). There is a particular need for appropriate typing schemes for C. jejuni, as this common human pathogen (3) has extensive animal and environmental reservoirs and the relationships between disease-associated and animal or environmental populations remain to be fully elucidated. This study demonstrates that MLST (i) discriminates among C. jejuniisolates effectively and (ii) generates data that can be applied to the investigation of the population structure and evolutionary mechanisms in this organism. The advantages of MLST include high discrimination, reproducibility, simplicity of interpretation by using one technique rather than a combination of techniques, and the generation of data which are directly comparable among laboratories via the Internet (20). The ease with which the system can be transferred among laboratories was exploited in this study, with the sequence determinations being performed in two separate locations (Oxford and Bilthoven).

The seven loci chosen were a suitable basis for an MLST typing scheme, as they could be amplified and sequenced from isolates obtained from a wide variety of sources, were unlinked on the C. jejunichromosome (Fig. 1), exhibited sufficient diversity to provide a high degree of resolution, and were not subject to positive selection, as demonstrated by the dN/dS ratios calculated for each locus (Table 2). The fact that thedN/dS ratios were much less than 1 demonstrates that there is selection against amino acid change (adN/dS ratio of greater than 1 implies selection for amino acid changes). The nucleotide sequence determination for these loci was consistent with the results obtained previously from a number of phenotypic and genotypic studies ofC. jejuni, which suggested that populations of this organism are highly diverse (35, 36). Some of this diversity was likely to have been imported recently from related species, with a potential donor, C. coli, identified for some of the more diverse sequences. When these likely importation events were excluded (Table 2), the C. jejuni sample exhibited nucleotide sequence diversity similar to that observed in Neisseria meningitidis (12, 15a, 20) and substantially greater than that seen in Streptococcus pneumoniae(8).

The housekeeping gene sequences provided evidence that horizontal genetic exchange has a major influence on the structure and evolution of Campylobacter populations, which was itself consistent with previous findings for the antigen genes of C. jejuni(10). The fall in the IA from 2, for the whole data set, to 0.57, when only one example of each lineage was included, was indicative of a weakly clonal population (22) which contained a number of clonal complexes of relatively recent evolutionary origin with no tree-like phylogenetic relationship with each other (12). The presence of the same allele in isolates of diverse origins and different lineages (for example, aspA allele number 2 in isolates from humans, sand, and poultry) supported this view, as did the fact that the majority of changes within the most common lineages were likely to be due to recombinational replacement rather than mutation.

The presence of apparent lineages in isolate collections of weakly clonal organisms may be amplified by sampling (23); for example, the presence of many isolates belonging to the ST-21 complex could have been a consequence of members of this complex being more likely to be associated with human infection. Alternatively, certain lineages might be associated with a particular niche, for example, the ST-179 complex, which contained environmental isolates (from sand of United Kingdom bathing beaches) (4). Further MLST analyses of appropriate isolate collections are necessary to address these questions more fully. However, the finding that human isolates cluster predominantly in the ST-21 complex, while chicken isolates have a broader distribution, suggests that it may be unlikely that the majority of the human strains come from chickens but that human strains may come from different sources like cattle, although the number of strains studied from cattle were low. A more detailed nucleotide sequence-based investigation of the relationships of organisms classified as different Campylobacter species is also warranted given the evidence for genetic exchange among these organisms.

A number of typing techniques have been applied to C. jejuni, with Penner HS typing, which is based on the lipopolysaccharide component of the outer membrane (28), being favored by many laboratories. The data presented here demonstrated that the Penner HS serotype was consistent and conserved in some lineages, (Table 3); for example, there was a correlation between Penner HS type and ST among some members of the ST-21 complex. However, the members of the ST-45 complex were highly diverse for Penner HS serotype (Table 3). These data are consistent with those reported earlier (25, 31, 35) and suggested the existence of a number of C. jejuni strains which were genetically and antigenically stable over the sampling period.

This data set provides a basis for the exploitation of MLST in the study of C. jejuni. The MLST approach is in principle applicable to any bacterial species, and while the oligonucleotide primers described here were not designed for characterization of otherCampylobacter species, the evidence for interspecies horizontal genetic exchange between C. jejuni and at least one other Campylobacter species strongly suggests that this MLST system will be directly applicable to otherCampylobacter species. The identification of alleles with gene sequences that were diverse from the majority of C. jejuni sequences may indicate disparity between microbiological and nucleotide sequence-based species classifications of these organisms, but additional data and analyses will be required to address these issues.

The MLST scheme provides a means for the investigation of disease outbreaks in both global and local contexts, permitting confirmation of suspected routes of transmission from the environment and livestock to humans. In addition, MLST data will assist in resolving broader issues such as the relationship of environmental to disease isolates at the population level, the structure of Campylobacterpopulations, the existence or otherwise of widely distributed lineages, and the extent of intra- and interspecies recombination. TheCampylobacter MLST website is a freely accessible resource available to the community as a whole for the investigation of this important and as yet incompletely understood pathogen. Submission of data from other laboratories is welcomed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the United Kingdom Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (contract number OZ0604).

We are grateful to Birgitta Duim and Jaap Wagenaar, Department of Bacteriology, Institute for Animal Science and Health, Lelystad, The Netherlands, for providing the chromosomal DNA of the human and animal campylobacter isolates from The Netherlands.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 20 June 2000.
    • Returned for modification 4 September 2000.
    • Accepted 16 October 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Achtman M.,
    2. Zurth K.,
    3. Morelli G.,
    4. Torrea G.,
    5. Guiyoule A.,
    6. Carniel E.
    (1999) Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:14043–14048.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Adak G. K.,
    2. Cowden J. M.,
    3. Nicholas S.,
    4. Evans H. S.
    (1995) The Public Health Laboratory Service national case-control study of primary indigenous sporadic cases of campylobacter infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 115:15–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Altekruse S. F.,
    2. Stern N. J.,
    3. Fields P. I.,
    4. Swerdlow D. L.
    (1999) Campylobacter jejuni—an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:28–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bolton F. J.,
    2. Surman S. B.,
    3. Martin K.,
    4. Wareing D. R. A.,
    5. Humphrey T. J.
    (1999) Presence of Campylobacter and Salmonellae in sand from bathing beaches. Epidemiol. Infect. 122:7–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bolton F. J.,
    2. Wareing D. R. A.,
    3. Skirrow M. B.,
    4. Hutchinson D. N.
    (1992) Identification and biotyping of campylobacters. in Identification methods in applied and environmental microbiology. eds Board R. G., Jones D., Skinner F. A. (Blackwell Scientific Publications Ltd. London, United Kingdom), pp 151–161.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bygraves J. A.,
    2. Urwin R.,
    3. Fox A. J.,
    4. Gray S. J.,
    5. Russell J. E.,
    6. Feavers I. M.,
    7. Maiden M. C. J.
    (1999) Population genetic and evolutionary approaches to the analysis of Neisseria meningitidis isolates belonging to the ET-5 complex. J. Bacteriol. 181:5551–5556.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Embley T. M.
    (1991) The linear PCR reaction: a simple and robust method for sequencing amplified rRNA genes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 13:171–174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Enright M.,
    2. Spratt B. G.
    (1998) A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae: identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology 144:3049–3060.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Feavers I. M.,
    2. Gray S. J.,
    3. Urwin R.,
    4. Russell J. E.,
    5. Bygraves J. A.,
    6. Kaczmarski E. B.,
    7. Maiden M. C. J.
    (1999) Multilocus sequence typing and antigen gene sequencing in the investigation of a meningococcal disease outbreak. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3883–3887.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Harrington C. S.,
    2. Thomson Carter F. M.,
    3. Carter P. E.
    (1997) Evidence for recombination in the flagellin locus of Campylobacter jejuni: implications for the flagellin gene typing scheme. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2386–2392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Heuvelink A. E.,
    2. Tilburg J. J. H. C.,
    3. Voogt N.,
    4. van Pelt W.,
    5. van Leeuwen W. J.,
    6. Sturm J. M. J.,
    7. van de Giesen A. W.
    (1999) Surveilance of zoonotic bacteria among farm animals (Dutch). RIVM-report 285859–009. (RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands).
  12. 12.↵
    1. Holmes E. C.,
    2. Urwin R.,
    3. Maiden M. C. J.
    (1999) The influence of recombination on the population structure and evolution of the human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:741–749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hudson J. A.,
    2. Nicol C.,
    3. Wright J.,
    4. Whyte R.,
    5. Hasell S. K.
    (1999) Seasonal variation of Campylobacter types from human cases, veterinary cases, raw chicken, milk and water. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87:115–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Huson D. H.
    (1998) SplitsTree: a program for analysing and visualising evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.
    1. Jackson C. J.,
    2. Fox A. J.,
    3. Jones D. M.,
    4. Wareing D. R.,
    5. Hutchinson D. N.
    (1998) Associations between heat-stable (O) and heat-labile (HL) serogroup antigens of Campylobacter jejuni: evidence for interstrain relationships within three O/HL serovars. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2223–2228.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 15a.↵
    1. Jolley K. A.,
    2. Kalmusova J.,
    3. Feil E. J.,
    4. Gupta S.,
    5. Musilek M.,
    6. Kriz P.,
    7. Maiden M. C. J.
    (2000) Carried meningococci in the Czech Republic: a diverse recombining population. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4492–4498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 16.↵
    1. Ketley J. M.
    (1997) Pathogenesis of enteric infection by Campylobacter. Microbiology 143:5–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 17.↵
    1. Konkel M. E.,
    2. Gray S. A.,
    3. Kim B. J.,
    4. Garvis S. G.,
    5. Yoon J.
    (1999) Identification of the enteropathogens Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli based on the cadF virulence gene and its product. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:510–517.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 18.↵
    1. Kumar S.,
    2. Tamura K.,
    3. Nei M.
    (1994) MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software for microcomputers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:189–191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 19.↵
    1. Maiden M. C. J.
    (2000) High-throughput sequencing in the population analysis of bacterial pathogens of humans. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 290:183–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 20.↵
    1. Maiden M. C. J.,
    2. Bygraves J. A.,
    3. Feil E.,
    4. Morelli G.,
    5. Russell J. E.,
    6. Urwin R.,
    7. Zhang Q.,
    8. Zhou J.,
    9. Zurth K.,
    10. Caugant D. A.,
    11. Feavers I. M.,
    12. Achtman M.,
    13. Spratt B. G.
    (1998) Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3140–3145.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 21.↵
    1. Maynard Smith J.
    (1991) The population genetics of bacteria. Proc. R. Soc. London B 245:37–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 22.↵
    1. Maynard Smith J.,
    2. Dowson C. G.,
    3. Spratt B. G.
    (1991) Localized sex in bacteria. Nature 349:29–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 23.↵
    1. Maynard Smith J.,
    2. Smith N. H.,
    3. O'Rourke M.,
    4. Spratt B. G.
    (1993) How clonal are bacteria? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4384–4388.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 24.↵
    1. Nachamkin I.,
    2. Allos B. M.,
    3. Ho T.
    (1998) Campylobacter species and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:555–567.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 25.↵
    1. Nachamkin I.,
    2. Ung H.,
    3. Patton C. M.
    (1996) Analysis of HL and O serotypes of Campylobacter strains by the flagellin gene typing system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:277–281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 26.↵
    1. Parkhill J.,
    2. Wren B. W.,
    3. Mungall K.,
    4. Ketley J. M.,
    5. Churcher C.,
    6. Basham D.,
    7. Chillingworth T.,
    8. Davies R. M.,
    9. Feltwell T.,
    10. Holroyd S.,
    11. Jagels K.,
    12. Karlyshev A. V.,
    13. Moule S.,
    14. Pallen M. J.,
    15. Penn C. W.,
    16. Quail M. A.,
    17. Rajandream M. A.,
    18. Rutherford K. M.,
    19. van Vliet A. H.,
    20. Whitehead S.,
    21. Barrell B. G.
    (2000) The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences. Nature 403:665–668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 27.↵
    1. Peabody R.,
    2. Ryan M. J.,
    3. Wall P. G.
    (1997) Outbreaks of Campylobacter infection: rare events for a common pathogen. Communicable Dis. Rep. 7:R33–R37.
    OpenUrl
  29. 28.↵
    1. Penner J. L.,
    2. Hennessy J. N.,
    3. Congi R. V.
    (1983) Serotyping of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli on the basis of thermostable antigens. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2:378–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 29.↵
    1. Selander R. K.,
    2. Caugant D. A.,
    3. Ochman H.,
    4. Musser J. M.,
    5. Gilmour M. N.,
    6. Whittam T. S.
    (1986) Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacterial population genetics and systematics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51:837–884.
    OpenUrl
  31. 30.↵
    1. Skirrow M. B.
    (1994) Diseases due to Campylobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria. J. Comp. Pathol. 111:113–149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 31.↵
    1. Slater E.,
    2. Owen R. J.
    (1998) Subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni Penner heat-stable (HS) serotype 11 isolates from human infections. J. Med. Microbiol. 47:353–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 32.↵
    1. Staden R.
    (1996) The Staden sequence analysis package. Mol. Biotechnol. 5:233–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 33.↵
    1. Suerbaum S.,
    2. Maynard Smith J.,
    3. Bapumia K.,
    4. Morelli G.,
    5. Smith N. H.,
    6. Kunstmann E.,
    7. Dyrek I.,
    8. Achtman M.
    (1998) Free recombination within Helicobacter pylori. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:12619–12624.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 34.↵
    1. Walker R. I.,
    2. Caldwee M. B.,
    3. Lee E.,
    4. Guerry P.,
    5. Trust T. J.,
    6. Ruiz-Palacios G. M.
    (1986) Pathophysiology of Campylobacter enteritis. Microbiol. Rev. 50:81–94.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. 35.↵
    1. Wareing D.
    (1999) The significance of strain diversity in the epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni gastrointestinal infections. Ph.D. thesis. (University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom).
  37. 36.↵
    1. Wassenaar T. M.,
    2. Newell D. G.
    (2000) Genotyping of Campylobacter species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:1–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Multilocus Sequence Typing System forCampylobacter jejuni
K. E. Dingle, F. M. Colles, D. R. A. Wareing, R. Ure, A. J. Fox, F. E. Bolton, H. J. Bootsma, R. J. L. Willems, R. Urwin, M. C. J. Maiden
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2001, 39 (1) 14-23; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multilocus Sequence Typing System forCampylobacter jejuni
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
Multilocus Sequence Typing System forCampylobacter jejuni
K. E. Dingle, F. M. Colles, D. R. A. Wareing, R. Ure, A. J. Fox, F. E. Bolton, H. J. Bootsma, R. J. L. Willems, R. Urwin, M. C. J. Maiden
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2001, 39 (1) 14-23; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X