Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Phenotypic Methods for Determining Genomovar Status of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex

Deborah A. Henry, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam, Peter Vandamme, Tom Coenye, David P. Speert
Deborah A. Henry
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eshwar Mahenthiralingam
School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Vandamme
Microbiology Laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Coenye
Microbiology Laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David P. Speert
Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1073-1078.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    PCR-RFLP analysis of 16S rRNA products of B. cepacia complex bacteria and related organisms. Lanes: M, molecular size markers (the sizes [in base pairs] of appropriate bands are indicated on the left); I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII, RFLP profiles for genomovars I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII, respectively, of the B. cepacia complex; Pan, RFLP profile forPandoreae spp.; Bf, RFLP profile forfungorum.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1.

    Characteristics of B. cepacia complex and phenotypically similar organismsa

    Test or specimen source% of strains positive for test specimen or source
    Genomovar I Genomovar II Genomovar IIIGenomovar IV Genomovar V Genomovar VI Genomovar VIIB. gladioliPandoraea speciesR. pickettii
    Tests
     Oxidationbof:
      Glucose 100100 95 (96) 100 100 100 100 10011 (89) 100
      Maltose 39 (70) 98 (99)78 (86) 93 97 (100) 100 100 0 0 92
      Lactose 61 (91) 100 79 (88) 93 97 (100)100 100 0 0 92
      Xylose 87 (100)98 (99) 88 (92) 44 (78) 75 (86) 100 10096 0 83 (92)
      Sucrose 87 (91) 088 (91) 0 94 (97) 0 94 0 0 0
      Adonitol 70 (78) 91 (92) 79 (87) 78 (96)0 100 100 93 (96) 0 0
     Lysine decarboxylase 100 53 99 100 100 0 100 00 0
     Ornithine decarboxylase 30 0 71 1000 0 0 0 0 0
     Growth at 42°C 43100 84 0 100 100 22 4 89 83
     PNPGc or ONPG 100 98 99 0100 100 100 100 0 0
     Oxidased100 100 100 100100 100 100 0 67 100
     Nitrate reductionc4 94 31 4 47100 67 33 11 17
     Gelatin liquefactionc74 2 55 93 00 94 70 0 33
     Esculin hydrolysisc56 2 33 0 00 56 11 0 0
     Growth on MacConkey agar 8396 84 93 83 100 100 96 100 50
     Pigment brown 4 2 14 0 0 0 6 330 0
     Pigment yellow 78 2 3 0 0 00 44 0 0
     Alpha hemolysis 9 1 9 036 0 83 22 0 0
     Beta hemolysis 9 03 0 36 0 83 22 0 0
     BCSA 100100 100 100 100 100 100 18 100 100
     API 20 NEe96 94 86 483 100 100 70 0 0
     BCESM 0 063 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
    Specimen sources
     CF 26 8876 56 56 100 22 82 100 75
     Non-CF clinical 30 6 20 33 19 0 0 11 025
     Environmental 44 6 4 11 25 078 7 0 0
    • ↵a The number of strains positively identified as being of a particular genomovar or species are as follows: for genomovar I, 23; for genomovar II (B. multivorans), 109; for genomovar III, 139; for genomovar IV (B. stabilis), 27; for genomovar V (B. vietnamiensis), 36; for genomovar VI, 9; for genomovar VII (B. ambifaria), 18; for B. gladioli, 27; forPandoraea species, 9; and for R. pickettii, 12.

    • ↵b Oxidation test results were recorded after 3 days of incubation (data in parentheses were recorded after 7 days of incubation).

    • ↵c Results presented are from API 20 NE strip test.

    • ↵d In tests using the Pathotech cytochrome oxidase strip, the slow, weak reaction occurred in 10 to 30 s and the fast, strong reaction occurred in less than 10 s. OnlyR. pickettii displayed a fast, strong reaction.

    • ↵e For B. cepacia complex strains, results represent very good or excellent identification (≥99.0%), although API database admits that any given strain may be B. gladioli.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Phenotypic Methods for Determining Genomovar Status of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex
Deborah A. Henry, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam, Peter Vandamme, Tom Coenye, David P. Speert
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2001, 39 (3) 1073-1078; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1073-1078.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phenotypic Methods for Determining Genomovar Status of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Phenotypic Methods for Determining Genomovar Status of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex
Deborah A. Henry, Eshwar Mahenthiralingam, Peter Vandamme, Tom Coenye, David P. Speert
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2001, 39 (3) 1073-1078; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1073-1078.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • METHODS AND MATERIALS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Typing Techniques
Burkholderia Infections
Burkholderia cepacia
cystic fibrosis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X