Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Inoculum Standardization for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi Pathogenic for Humans

Eva Petrikkou, Juan L. Rodrı́guez-Tudela, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, Alicia Gómez, Ana Molleja, Emilia Mellado
Eva Petrikkou
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan L. Rodrı́guez-Tudela
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Manuel Cuenca-Estrella
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alicia Gómez
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ana Molleja
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilia Mellado
Servicio de Micologia, Centro Nacional de Microbiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1345-1347.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Two methods of inoculum preparation for filamentous fungi were compared: counting with a hematocytometer and spectrophotometric adjustment. One hundred eighty-two filamentous fungi pathogenic for humans were used. Colony counts were done for all inoculum preparations. The agreement between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts (CFU per milliliter) was 97.2%. The reproducibility between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts by means of an intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.70. Pearson's correlation index for hematocytometer counts versus colony counts was 0.56, whereas that for optical density versus colony counts was 0.008. Both methods can be used for inoculum size adjustment. However, the use of the spectrophotometric method requires that each species be standardized separately.

An increasing prevalence of infections caused by filamentous fungi has been detected in humans in recent years (1). This increasing prevalence has stimulated interest in a reliable and reproducible antifungal susceptibility testing method for molds. Recently, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) proposed a reference method (the NCCLS M38-P method) for the susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi (7). The NCCLS method recommends inoculum preparation by a spectrophotometric procedure (2-4, 7). However, it is well known that larger objects such as spores or filaments do not obey the rule that established a proportional relationship between dry weight concentration and optical density (6). In addition, the inoculum size has a great influence on the MICs for filamentous fungi (3-5, 7). Other variables such as the color of the spores can also influence the optical density value.

In the work described here, two procedures for inoculum size adjustment were evaluated, and the results were compared with those obtained by colony counting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolates.A set of clinical isolates was tested. Each isolate was obtained from a different patient and was sent to the laboratory for identification or antifungal susceptibility testing.

The following species were included: 31 Aspergillus fumigatus, 28 Aspergillus flavus, 25 Aspergillus terreus, 16 Aspergillus niger, 18 Scedosporium apiospermum, 27 Scedosporium prolificans, 24Fusarium solani, and 13 Fusarium oxysporumisolates. The isolates were maintained as a suspension in sterile distilled water at 4°C until testing was performed.

Inoculum preparation.The isolates were subcultured from the stock water suspensions on Sabouraud agar and on potato dextrose agar. Isolates of all species except members of the genus Fusariumwere incubated at 35°C; members of the genus Fusarium were incubated at 30°C. Inoculum suspensions were prepared from fresh, mature (3- to 5-day-old) cultures grown on Sabouraud agar or potato dextrose agar slants. The colonies were covered with 5 ml of distilled sterile water. Tween 20 (5%) was added to facilitate the preparation of Aspergillus inocula. For Aspergillus spp., the inocula were achieved by carefully rubbing the colonies with a sterile loop; the isolates were then shaken vigorously for 15 s with a Vortex mixer and then transferred to a sterile tube. For slowly sporulating fungi, such as Scedosporium andFusarium, the suspensions were obtained by exhaustive scraping of the surface with a sterile loop. Then, the inoculum was transferred to a sterile syringe attached to a sterile filter with a pore diameter of 11 μm (Millipore, Madrid, Spain). The suspension was filtered and collected in a sterile tube. This procedure removed the majority of the hyphae, producing a inoculum mainly composed of spores.

Inoculum adjustment.The inoculum size was adjusted to between 1.0 × 106 and 5.0 × 106spores/ml by microscopic enumeration with a cell-counting hematocytometer (Neubauer chamber; Merck, S.A., Madrid, Spain). Then, the optical density at 530 nm (OD530) of the suspensions was measured in a spectrophotometer (Bausch & Lomb, Pacisa, Madrid, Spain). All adjusted suspensions were quantified by plating on Sabouraud agar plates. The inocula were agitated for 15 s with a Vortex mixer and were diluted 1:1,000. Aliquots of 100, 50, and 25 μl were spread onto the Sabouraud agar plates with a glass hockey stick. The plates were incubated at 35°C (Aspergillus andScedosporium spp.) or 30°C (Fusarium spp.) and were observed daily for the presence of growth. The colonies were counted as soon as possible after the observation of visible growth.

Statistical analysis.The proper inoculum size range, according to previous work (2), was established to be between 1.0 × 106 and 5.0 × 106CFU/ml. The percent agreement between inoculum sizes determined by counting with a hematocytometer and colony counting was calculated by taking into account the colony counts in a range between 1.0 × 106 and 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml.

The reproducibility of the results obtained by counting with a hematocytometer and colony counting was evaluated by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Reproducibility was calculated by means of a scales analysis in which reliability was the extent to which the counting with a hematocytometer yielded an equivalent colony count. The ICC assesses reliability as an internal consistency statistic by means of interitem correlations. A two-way mixed-effect model was used to calculate the ICC, which was expressed to a maximum value of 1 and with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. When appropriate, the variables were transformed to log10data. In addition, the correlation among the hematocytometer count; the colony count, and the OD530 was also determined with Pearson's coefficient (r) , which was also expressed to a maximum value of 1. All statistical analyses were done with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 10.0; SPSS, S.L., Madrid, Spain).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1 shows the range, 95% CI, ICC, and Pearson's correlation index (r) of the colony counts versus the hematocytometer counts and OD530s. The percent agreement between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts was 97.2%. As expected, some values for the colony counts were out of the established range (1.0 × 106 to 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml). The colony count for one A. fumigatus isolate was above 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml. The colony counts for one A. niger isolate, one S. prolificans isolate, and two F. solani isolates were below 1.0 × 106 CFU/ml. Nevertheless, the 95% CIs of the colony counts were between 1.0 × 106 and 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml for all isolates tested (Table 1). Pearson's correlation indices between hematocytometer counts and colony counts were low for A. flavus (r = 0.24) andA. fumigatus (r = 0.26) . For the remainder of the filamentous fungi, Pearson's correlation indices were above 0.57 (Table 1). This fact can be explained by the hydrophobic nature ofAspergillus species, which causes more dilution mistakes with aspergillus species than with hydrophilic filamentous fungi. The exceptions were A. niger (r = 0.71) and A. terreus (r = 0.58) . The reproducibility, analyzed by determination of ICC, between the hematocytometer counts and the colony counts was adequate for all species tested. Thus, an ICC of 0.70 and 95% CIs between 0.60 and 0.78 were obtained (Table 1 and Fig. 1). On the other hand, Pearson's correlation index for hematocytometer counts versus colony counts was 0.56 (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Pearson's correlation indices between the OD530s and the colony counts were lower than those obtained by enumeration with a hematocytometer. The exceptions were A. flavus (r = 0.49) and A. fumigatus (r = 0.38) . A larger range of OD530s was obtained for each different species. As expected, the range of OD530s was species dependent. Thus, among Aspergillus species, A. fumigatus had an OD530 range between 0.03 and 0.13 absorbance units. On the other hand, the range for A. nigerwas between 0.20 and 0.50 absorbance units. The size of the spores (A. fumigatus, 2.5 to 3.0 μm; A. niger, 3.5 to 5.0 μm) and the color of the species (green versus black, respectively) can explain the differences in the OD530. In addition, each species of filamentous fungi does not have a uniform color. These differences in color tonalities can influence the OD530 and can explain the large range of values obtained for each species (Table 1). However, the 95% CI showed a narrow range, sustaining the possibility that the inoculum can be prepared by this procedure. Nevertheless, a correlation index of 0.008 was obtained when all strains were analyzed together, suggesting that each species must be standardized independently (Table 1 and Fig. 1). NCCLS document M38-P (7) recommends the spectrophotometric adjustment of the inoculum. The original article (2) showed that at certain OD530s the size of inoculum was between 1.0 × 106 and 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml (2). Unfortunately, the number of strains used was small, precluding an adequate statistical analysis (2). Further work showed that only 90% of the inocula prepared by the spectrophotometric procedure had between 4.0 × 105and 3.3 × 106 CFU/ml (4). Observations described in a subsequent article (3) sustained the previous observation. Thus, only 87% of the inoculum preparations forS. apiospermum had between 4.0 × 105 and 3.2 × 106 CFU/ml. For Aspergillus,Fusarium, and Rhizopus species, more than 92% of the the inoculum suspensions had between 4.0 × 105and 5.0 × 106 CFU/ml (3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Range, 95% CI, correlation index, and ICC among colony counts, hematocytometer counts, and OD530s

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Scatter plots of log10 colony counts versus log10 hemacytometer (Neubauer) counts (left) ( r = 0.56 ; ICC = 0.70) and log10 colony counts versus OD530 (r = 0.008) (right) for 182 strains of filamentous fungi pathogenic for humans.

By the spectrophotometric method for inoculum preparation, the best scenario is retrieval of an inoculum that varies between 4 × 105 and 5 × 106 spores per ml. This wide range of sizes of inoculum suspensions could have a significant influence on MICs. Nevertheless, the level of agreement between laboratories that use NCCLS document M38-P (7) is adequate (3).

In any case, the range of OD530 obtained in the present work included the OD530 recommended by NCCLS document M38-P (7). However, proper identification of the filamentous fungi should be done by using the spectrophotometric method for inoculum preparation. Although many laboratories can identify usual pathogens like A. fumigatus, very experienced staff is needed for the identification of less common species.

In summary, two methodologies for inoculum adjustment have been compared by using 182 strains of fungi pathogenic for humans. The results indicate that both methodologies can be used. However, counting with a hematocytometer is a universal procedure that is independent of the color of the strain and the size of the spores. Use of this procedure could save a lot of time in the process of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partially supported by a grant from the EC-TMR-EUROFUNG network (grant ERBFMXR-CT970145) and by a grant from the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant 99/0198). Alicia Gómez is a fellow of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant 99/0198).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 October 2000.
    • Returned for modification 27 December 2000.
    • Accepted 26 January 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Denning D. W.
    Invasive aspergillosis.Clin. Infect. Dis.261998781803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Espinel-Ingroff A.,
    2. Kerkering T. M.
    Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.J. Clin. Microbiol.291991393394
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Espinel-Ingroff A.,
    2. Bartlett M.,
    3. Bowden R.,
    4. Chin N. X.,
    5. Cooper C. Jr.,
    6. Fothergill A.,
    7. McGinnis M. R.,
    8. Menezes P.,
    9. Messer S. A.,
    10. Nelson P. W.,
    11. Odds F. C.,
    12. Pasarell L.,
    13. Peter J.,
    14. Pfaller M. A.,
    15. Rex J. H.,
    16. Rinaldi M. G.,
    17. Shankland G. S.,
    18. Walsh T. J.,
    19. Weitzman I.
    Multicenter evaluation of proposed standardized procedure for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.J. Clin. Microbiol.351997139143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Espinel-Ingroff A.,
    2. Dawson K.,
    3. Pfaller M.,
    4. Anaissie E.,
    5. Breslin B.,
    6. Dixon D.,
    7. Fothergill A.,
    8. Paetznick V.,
    9. Peter J.,
    10. Rinaldi M.,
    11. Walsh T.
    Comparative and collaborative evaluation of standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing for filamentous fungi.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.391995314319
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gehrt A.,
    2. Peter J.,
    3. Pizzo P. A.,
    4. Walsh T. J.
    Effect of increasing inoculum sizes of pathogenic filamentous fungi on MICs of antifungal agents by broth microdilution method.J. Clin. Microbiol.33199513021307
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Koch A. L.
    Growth measurement Manual of methods for general bacteriology. Gerhardt P., Murray G. E., Costilow R. N., Nester E. W., Wood W. A., Krieg N. R., Phillips G. B. 1981 179 207 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C.
  7. 7.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. 1998 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Wayne, Pa
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Inoculum Standardization for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi Pathogenic for Humans
Eva Petrikkou, Juan L. Rodrı́guez-Tudela, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, Alicia Gómez, Ana Molleja, Emilia Mellado
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2001, 39 (4) 1345-1347; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1345-1347.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inoculum Standardization for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi Pathogenic for Humans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inoculum Standardization for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi Pathogenic for Humans
Eva Petrikkou, Juan L. Rodrı́guez-Tudela, Manuel Cuenca-Estrella, Alicia Gómez, Ana Molleja, Emilia Mellado
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2001, 39 (4) 1345-1347; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1345-1347.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Mitosporic Fungi
mycoses

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X