Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis Distinguishes Biotypes of Streptococcus bovis: Streptococcus bovis Biotype II/2 Is a Separate Genospecies and the Predominant Clinical Isolate in Adult Males

Jill E. Clarridge III, Silvia M. Attorri, Qing Zhang, John Bartell
Jill E. Clarridge III
Department of Pathology and
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, and
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia M. Attorri
Department of Pathology and
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qing Zhang
Department of Pathology and
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John Bartell
MIDI, Inc., Newark, Delaware
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1549-1552.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We characterized 22 human clinical strains of Streptococcus bovis by genotypic (16S rRNA gene sequence analysis [MicroSeq]; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and phenotypic (API 20 Strep and Rapid ID32 Strep systems (bioMerieux Vitek, Hazelton, Mo.) methods. The strains, isolated from blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine, formed two distinct 16S ribosomal DNA sequence clusters. Three strains which were associated with endocarditis urinary tract infection (UTI), and sepsis clustered with the S. bovis type strain ATCC 33317 (cluster 1); other closely related type strains were S. equinus and S. infantarius. Nineteen strains clustered at a distance of about 2.5% dissimilarity to the S. bovis type strain (cluster 2) and were associated with central nervous system (CNS) disease in addition to endocarditis, UTI, and sepsis. All strains were distinct from S. gallolyticus. Within cluster 2, a single strain grouped with ATCC strain 43143 (cluster 2a) and may be phenotypically distinct. All the other strains formed a second subgroup (cluster 2b) that was biochemically similar toS. bovis biotype II/2 (mannitol negative and beta galactosidase, alpha galactosidase, beta glucuronidase, and trehalose positive). The API 20 Strep system identified isolates of cluster 2b asS. bovis biotype II/2, those of cluster 1 as S. bovis biotype II/1, and that of cluster 2a as S. bovis biotype I. There was an excellent correlation of biotype and genotype: S. bovis biotype II/2 isolates form a separate genospecies distinct from the S. bovis, S. gallolyticus, and S. infantarius type strains and are the most common isolates in adult males.

S. bovis is a human pathogen associated with endocarditis, sepsis, and meningitis (2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10). Since the early 1980s genetic and biochemical diversity among S. bovis has been noted (4, 7, 8). Several groups studied this diversity and devised schemes to distinguish strains by biotype. S. bovisstrains from humans are said to be biotype I (or typical) if, among other traits, they ferment mannitol and produce glucan and biotype II (or variant) if they cannot ferment mannitol or produce glucan. TheS. bovis biotype II strains are further divided into type II/1 and type II/2 by the ability of the later group to produce beta-galactosidase and beta-glucuronidase and ferment trehalose but not glycogen (4, 8).

Recently the S. bovis group has been further defined based on 16S rRNA gene sequence, ribotyping, and whole-cell protein electrophoresis patterns. S. infantarius, with a 1.8% difference by 16S rRNA gene sequence from the S. bovis type strain, is phenotypically like S. bovis biotype II/1 (1, 9). Ribotyping patterns were used to differentiate all related species from S. infantarius and distinguish two subspecifics within the group (9). S. gallolyticus, originally isolated from Koala dung, is phenotypically that of biotype I (5, 9). Devriese et al. examined strains previously identified as S. bovis by both phenotypic methods and whole-cell protein electrophoresis and reported that many of the human strains associated with endocarditis and animal (goat, pigeon, and cow) strains were S. gallolyticus(5). By comparing our strains with the more recently described species, we wished to determine the distribution of the various S. bovis groups within our population. Although there have been some previous reports of frequency of occurrence of theS. bovis groups (7), none have been based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of strains from a single population. We characterized by genotypic and phenotypic methods 21 human strains ofS. bovis that were isolated in a single hospital from adult males and one referred strain from a child. The correlation of phenotype with genotypic cluster is presented here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinically significant strains of S. bovis were collected over a period of 10 years, with no two isolates collected in the same month. From 1998 to 2000, the isolates were sequential. They were not a single genetically related cluster. After initial isolation, strains were frozen at −70°C until further study. Presumptive phenotypic identification was performed by Gram stain, colony morphology, sheep blood hemolysis, and catalase reaction. For biochemical testing, streptococcal strains were grown at 37°C on Columbia agar plates (Remel, Lenexa, Kans., and BBL, Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) in anaerobic conditions. Biochemical testing was performed using the API 20 Strep system (version 6) and the Rapid ID32 Strep system (bioMerieux Vitek). The interpretation of all these tests was done according to manufacturers' instructions. 16S rRNA gene sequence identification was performed at MIDI Labs (Newark, Del.) and Houston VA laboratories using the MicroSeq 500 Gene kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Test strain sequences were compared against the MicroSeq 16S rRNA gene sequence database. The database contains sequences from 1,297 different species (1,187 type strains), including 36 type strains from the genusStreptococcus, 18 type strains from the genusEnterococcus, and 2 type strains from the genusAerococcus. Within the S. bovis group, S. bovis type strain ATCC 33317 was sequenced. Sequence data obtained from GenBank on non-type strains was also included in the analysis. These strains and their accession numbers are as follows: S. bovis, ATCC 43143; S. bovis, AF104114 .1; S. infantarius, AF177729 ; and five S. bovissequences—AF082730 .1, AF202263 .1, AF135453 .1, AF104109 .1, andAB002481 .1.

RESULTS

The relatedness of strains as determined by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis is shown in a dendrogram (Fig.1). Although sequence comparisons were performed on all 22 of our isolates, all strains in the MicroSeq database (including 36 streptococcal type strains), and all sequences in GenBank, for convenience, only the closely related or better-known type strains, close sequences from GenBank, and 20 of our strains are shown on the dendrogram. The strains from our study are prefaced with “VAMC”, and others are as listed as in Materials and Methods. Details of all clinical strains are given in Table1. There are two major genogroups into which the strains cluster. Cluster 1 includes three clinical strains, three type strains (S. bovis ATCC 33317, S. equinus ATCC 9812, and S. infantariusAF177729 ), and four sequences from GenBank. Cluster 2 includes 19 clinical strains,S. bovis ATCC 43143, and a sequence from GenBank. These two clusters differ by about 2.5%. Within cluster 2, a single strain grouped with ATCC 43143 (cluster 2a), while all the other strains (18) formed a second subgroup (cluster 2b), for which there was only one similar sequence in the databases, belonging to an undescribed organism isolated from a human. Strain 4337 and all strains in the identical group show 2.43% difference in sequence from S. bovis type strain ATCC 33317. Cluster 2a differs from 2b by about 0.8%. The S. gallolyticus sequence (Fig. 1) did not cluster within the S. bovis-S. infantarius-S. equinus node.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Dendrogram of phylogenetic relationships amongStreptococcus bovis isolates and ATCC type strains. Distances were calculated by the neighbor-joining method. The bar at the top indicates a 5% difference measured horizontally.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Biochemical characteristics by strain and genotypic cluster of strains isolated in this studya

Table 1 shows the source, API20 Strep system biotype, and Rapid ID32 Strep biotype of all the tested clinical strains. The three strains that clustered with the S. bovis type strain ATCC 33317 were isolated from blood, cardiac tissue, and urine, while strains in cluster 2 were isolated from the central nervous system (CNS) in addition to blood and urine. All organisms were positive for hydrolysis of esculin, production of acetoin and leucine aminopeptidase, and production of acid from lactose, maltose, raffinose, and sucrose. The significant tests that were negative were hydrolysis of hippurate and urea and production of acid from ribose, l-arabinose, and sorbitol. Our data for tests that were variable or important in distinguishing related strains are shown in Table2 in the first three data columns. The other seven columns show comparative data from sources as indicated. We found that strains that are different genetically also show consistent biochemical differences. For example, all the S. bovisstrains in cluster 1 are trehalose negative and those in cluster 2 are trehalose and beta-galactosidase positive. Within this cluster, one strain, 3076 (cluster 2a), is biochemically distinct and genetically closer to S. bovis strain ATCC 43143. The rest of the strains are in cluster 2b. The API 20 Strep system identified isolates of cluster 2b as S. bovis biotype II/2, those of cluster 2a as S. bovis biotype I (although the test results are not as described by others [7] for S. bovis biotype I), and those of cluster 1 as S. bovis biotype II/1. Both the API 20 Strep system and the Rapid ID32 Strep system identified all strains as S. bovis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Summary of differential characteristics of the strainsa

DISCUSSION

Recently two new species closely related to the S. bovis-S. equinus group have been described. S. infantarius, so named because it had been isolated from infant's stools, was distinguished based on 16S rRNA gene sequence and ribotyping. S. gallolyticus was reported as isolated from both human and animal specimens. We began this study because the genetic and biochemical diversity of the S. bovis group had not clearly distinguished whether there would be separate biotype or genotype groups for isolates from different clinical settings, e.g., adults and infants, humans and animals, urine and CNS, or isolates associated with colon cancer and isolates not associated with colon cancer. A previous excellent study indicated that biotype I was more commonly associated with underlying cancer or gastrointestinal (GI) disease and that biotype II/2 occurred less frequently (7). Confirming this and clarifying the occurrence of genetically defined strains could lead to a better understanding of the pathogenic role of S. bovis.

In fact, the 22 human strains of S. bovis that we characterized by both 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and biochemical methods formed two distinct 16S rRNA sequence clusters. However, the genotypic clusters did not clearly segregate the isolates according to source, age of patient, or type of infection. Both clusters 1 and 2 contained isolates that were obtained from blood and urine and associated with sepsis, endocarditis, and urinary tract disease. The single strain from a child that we examined clustered with the majority of our strains from adults, not with the S. infantariusstrain as we thought it might. One difference that might be explored further is that the three isolates that were associated with CNS disease were in cluster 2. Although we did not purposefully compare human and animal strains, it is interesting that our analysis of a serendipitous strain isolated from a septic dog placed it in cluster 1 (data not shown) with the S. bovis type strain ATCC 33317, also isolated from an animal.

The genotypic clusters did, however, segregate the isolates into biochemically homogeneous biotypes. The three strains that clustered with S. bovis type strain ATCC 33317 (originally isolated from cow dung) were trehalose negative and compatible with biotype II/1, as is the type strain (4), and also similar to the published description of S. infantarius (see Table 2). All the other strains were similar to S. bovis biotype II/2 in that they produced beta-galactosidase and beta-glucuronidase and fermented trehalose but not glycogen. A single strain that was closest to ATCC strain 43143 (originally isolated from human blood) was also most similar biochemically to S. bovis biotype II/2; the slightly different biochemical pattern may not be significant. In contrast to the results of Devriese (5), we found no strains phenotypically similar to S. bovis biotype I by most descriptions (i.e., none were mannitol positive, even though the Strep API 20 code book called one isolate S. bovis biotype I), and none of our S. bovis strains clustered with the S. gallolyticus sequence.

Thus, in contrast to studies on other populations, S. bovisbiotype II/2 is the most frequently occurring of the various S. bovis group biotypes within our adult, predominantly male population. The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics demonstrate that they are clearly distinct from the S. bovis, S. gallolyticus, and S. infantarius type strains and represent a hitherto unnamed species.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.Sequences for strains VAMC blood3395 and VAMC 3076 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers AF313406 and AF313408 , respectively.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 October 2000.
    • Returned for modification 19 December 2000.
    • Accepted 27 January 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bovet A.,
    2. Grimont F.,
    3. Collins M. D.,
    4. Benaoudia F.,
    5. Devine C.,
    6. Regnault B.,
    7. Grimont P. A.
    Streptococcus infantarius sp. nov. related to Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus equinus.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.4181997393395
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Clarridge J. E. III,
    2. Osting C.,
    3. Jalali M.,
    4. Osborne J.,
    5. Waddington M.
    Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of “Streptococcus milleri” group isolates from a veterans administration hospital population.J. Clin. Microbiol.37199936813687
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cohen L.,
    2. Dunbar S.,
    3. Clarridge J. E. III.
    Streptococcus bovis infection of the central nervous system: report of two cases and review.Clin. Infect. Disease.251997819823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Coykendall A.
    Classification and identification of the viridans streptococci.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.21989315328
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Devriese L. A.,
    2. Vandamme P.,
    3. Pot B.,
    4. Vanrobaeys M.,
    5. Kersters K.,
    6. Haesebrouck F.
    Differentiation between Streptococcus gallolyticus strains of human clinical and veterinary origins and Streptococcus bovis strains from the intestinal tracts of ruminants.J. Clin. Microbiol.36199835203523
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Moellering R. C. Jr.
    Enterococcus species, Streptococcus bovis and Leuconostoc species Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Mandell G., Bennett J., Dolin R. 2000 2147 2156 Churchill Livingstone New York, N.Y
  7. 7.↵
    1. Ruoff K.,
    2. Miller S. I.,
    3. Garner C. V.,
    4. Ferraro M. J.,
    5. Calderwood S. B.
    Bacteremia with Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus salivarius: clinical correlates of more accurate identification of isolates.J. Clin. Microbiol.271989305308
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Ruoff K.,
    2. Whiley R. A.,
    3. Beighton D.
    Streptococcus Manual of clinical microbiology 7th ed. Murray P. R. 1999 283 296 ASM Press Washington, D.C.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schlegel L.,
    2. Grimont F.,
    3. Collins M. D.,
    4. Regnault B.,
    5. Grimont P. A.,
    6. Bouvet A.
    Streptococcus infantarius sp. nov., Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius subsp. nov. and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli subsp. nov., isolated from humans and food.Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.50200014251434
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Tabibian N.,
    2. Clarridge J. E.
    Streptococcus bovis septicemia and large bowel neoplasia: four new cases and review of the literature.Am. Fam. Physician391989227229
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis Distinguishes Biotypes of Streptococcus bovis: Streptococcus bovis Biotype II/2 Is a Separate Genospecies and the Predominant Clinical Isolate in Adult Males
Jill E. Clarridge III, Silvia M. Attorri, Qing Zhang, John Bartell
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2001, 39 (4) 1549-1552; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1549-1552.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis Distinguishes Biotypes of Streptococcus bovis: Streptococcus bovis Biotype II/2 Is a Separate Genospecies and the Predominant Clinical Isolate in Adult Males
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis Distinguishes Biotypes of Streptococcus bovis: Streptococcus bovis Biotype II/2 Is a Separate Genospecies and the Predominant Clinical Isolate in Adult Males
Jill E. Clarridge III, Silvia M. Attorri, Qing Zhang, John Bartell
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Apr 2001, 39 (4) 1549-1552; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.4.1549-1552.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Typing Techniques
Genes, rRNA
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Streptococcal Infections
Streptococcus bovis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X