Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR | Letter to the Editor | Letters to the Editor

LightCycler-Based Quantitative PCR for Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Blood, Urine, and Respiratory Samples

Angela M. Kearns, Brenda Draper, Wendy Wipat, Andrew J. L. Turner, Janice Wheeler, Roger Freeman, Jayne Harwood, F. Kate Gould, John H. Dark
Angela M. Kearns
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenda Draper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy Wipat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. L. Turner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janice Wheeler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Freeman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayne Harwood
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Kate Gould
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. Dark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2364-2365.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In response to a recently published article by Schaade et al. (12) describing the value of LightCycler technology for quantitative analysis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in clinical material, we wish to add our experience. Using a different LightCycler (LC; Idaho Technology Inc., Idaho Falls, Idaho), we too have developed a real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR) assay for CMV (11). Our assay targets a shorter fragment of the glycoprotein B gene (150 bp) and incorporates a cyanine 5-labeled reverse primer and a sequence-specific fluorescein-labeled hybridization probe, allowing the identification of PCR product by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. We have designed a quantitative standard (plasmid cloned) with a 2-bp mismatch in the probe-binding region to facilitate its differentiation from CMV target sequence by using melting curve analysis (2, 3). The assay is sensitive (detection limit ≤ 10 copies), with an overall dynamic range of 2 × 103 to 5 × 108 copies/ml. When applied to blood samples, the results compared well with an in-house modification of a qualitative assay (5) and the quantitative data correlated (r = 0.88; P < 0.001) with an independent TaqMan-based QPCR assay (9).

PCR has previously proved suitable for the detection and quantification of CMV DNA in urine (4, 7, 10), whereas standard detection of early antigen fluorescent foci (DEAFF) testing (8) is slow (up to 72 h), lacks sensitivity, and may be hampered by cytotoxicity (1). We therefore sought to extend the clinical utility of our assay to the examination of urine and respiratory samples (including sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and nasopharyngeal secretion) to aid the identification of patients at risk of developing CMV disease. We have tested such specimens from pediatric and adult transplant patients, including 46 urine samples (assayed directly, without DNA extraction) and 86 respiratory samples (extracted using the QIAamp DNA minikit; Qiagen, West Sussex, United Kingdom).

QPCR proved to be more sensitive than DEAFF testing, giving three- and five-fold increases in the positivity rate in urine and respiratory samples, respectively, with viral loads ranging from <2 × 103 to 1 × 108 copies/ml (Table1). All samples were readily evaluated by PCR, whereas 21 of 132 samples (16%) were toxic in the DEAFF test, 7 (33.3%) of which were PCR positive. DNA extraction of urine samples did not improve the positivity rate in our hands (unpublished data), suggesting that direct detection of CMV DNA in urine will suffice, as previously reported (4, 7).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison of LightCycler real-time PCR and DEAFF testing for detection of CMV in urine and respiratory samples

Our data confirm and extend those of Schaade et al. (12). The LC QPCR assay is rapid (<2 h), provides timely results, and is suitable for the detection of CMV DNA in a range of clinical specimens. The application of LC-based QPCR to testing urine, respiratory, and other specimens, in addition to the determination of CMV viral load in blood, may assist in the early identification of patients with a high risk of progression to CMV disease and in determining appropriate parameters for therapeutic intervention. Prospective monitoring, using QPCR technology to determine the rate of increase in viral load, may refine attempts to identify patients at greatest risk of CMV disease (6).

FOOTNOTES

  • ↵* Phone: 44 191 2261074 Fax: 44 191 2260365 E-mail:newakear{at}north.phls.nhs.uk

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Aitken C.,
    2. Barrett-Muir W.,
    3. Millar C.,
    4. Templeton K.,
    5. Thomas J.,
    6. Sheridan F.,
    7. Jeffries D.,
    8. Yaqoob M.,
    9. Breuer J.
    (1999) Use of molecular assays in diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus disease following renal transplantation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2804–2807.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bernard P. S.,
    2. Lay M. J.,
    3. Wittwer C. T.
    (1998) Integrated amplification and detection of the C677T point mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and probe melting curves. Anal. Biochem. 255:101–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Cane P. A.,
    2. Cook P.,
    3. Ratcliffe D.,
    4. Mutimer D.,
    5. Pillay D.
    (1999) Use of real-time PCR and fluorimetry to detect lamivudine resistance-associated mutations in hepatitis B virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1600–1608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Cope A. V.,
    2. Sweny P.,
    3. Sabin C.,
    4. Rees L.,
    5. Griffiths P. D.,
    6. Emery V. C.
    (1997) Quantity of cytomegalovirus viruria is a major risk factor for cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. J. Med. Virol. 52:200–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Darlington J.,
    2. Super M.,
    3. Patel K.,
    4. Grundy J. E.,
    5. Griffiths P. D.,
    6. Emery V. C.
    (1991) Use of the polymerase chain reaction to analyse sequence variation within a major neutralising epitope of glycoprotein B (gp58) in clinical isolates of human cytomegalovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 72:1985–1989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Emery V. C.,
    2. Sabin C. A.,
    3. Cope A. V.,
    4. Gor D.,
    5. Hassan-Walker A. F.,
    6. Griffiths P. D.
    (2000) Application of viral-load kinetics to identify patients who develop cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Lancet 355:2032–2036.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Fox J.,
    2. Kidd C. M.,
    3. Griffiths P. D.,
    4. Sweny P.,
    5. Emery V. C.
    (1995) Longitudinal analysis of cytomegalovirus load in renal transplant recipients using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction: correlation with disease. J. Gen. Virol. 76:309–319.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Griffiths P. D.,
    2. Panjwani D. D.,
    3. Stirk P. R.,
    4. Ball M. G.,
    5. Ganezakowski M.,
    6. Blacklock H. A.,
    7. Prentice H. G.
    (1984) Rapid diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompromised patients by detection of early antigen fluorescent foci. Lancet ii:1242–1245.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Guiver, M., A. J. Fox, K. Mutton, N. Mogulkoc, and J. Egan. Comparative evaluation of CMV viral load using TaqMan CMV quantitative PCR with CMV antigenaemia in heart and lung transplant recipients. Transplantation, in press.
  10. ↵
    1. Jones R. N.,
    2. Neal M. L.,
    3. Beattie B.,
    4. Westmoreland D.,
    5. Fox J. D.
    (2000) Development and application of a PCR-based method including an internal control for diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Kearns, A. M., M. Guiver, V. James, and J. King.Development and evaluation of a real-time quantitative PCR for the detection of human cytomegalovirus. J. Virol. Methods, in press.
  12. ↵
    1. Schaade L.,
    2. Kockelkorn P.,
    3. Ritter K.,
    4. Kleines M.
    (2000) Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in human specimens by LightCycler PCR. J. Clin. Mirobiol. 38:4006–4009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

AUTHORS' REPLY

The findings of Kearns et al. focus on the detection of CMV DNA in urine and respiratory samples and on the prospective monitoring of CMV load for the prediction of CMV disease with the LightCycler instrument.

Indeed, we are convinced that these approaches will lead to the early and specific diagnosis of CMV disease and the evaluation of appropriate therapeutic options, too. Thus, the successful application of the LightCycler technology for the detection and quantification of CMV DNA from various materials is important. The quantitative measurement of CMV DNA in saliva, respiratory swabs, urine, and blood will enlighten the relation between local CMV replication and systemic infection.

The speed of the LightCycler system will, on the one hand, support insights in CMV pathogenesis and replication and, on the other, help to establish the wide clinical use of the application of CMV load kinetics for the prediction of CMV disease (1-1), an approach that will be of major relevance in the future.

The anticipated short-term CMV DNA follow-up of risk patients will require the automated extraction of CMV DNA from variant types of samples. The clinical evaluation of principles that are suitable for automated nucleic acid extraction from clinical samples and the evaluation of extraction instruments themselves are needed now. Otherwise, the prospective monitoring of CMV DNA load for the identification of risk patients will not be established as a standard procedure due to economically restricted man power and laboratory capacity.

FOOTNOTES

  • ↵* Phone: 49 241 8088460 Fax: 49 241 8888483 E-mail:mkleines{at}post.klinikum.rwth-aachen.de

REFERENCE

  1. 1-1.↵
    1. Emery V. C.,
    2. Sabin C. A.,
    3. Cope A. V.,
    4. Gor D.,
    5. Hassan-Walker A. F.,
    6. Griffiths P. D.
    (2000) Application of viral-load kinetics to identify patients who develop cytomegalovirus disease after transplantation. Lancet 355:2032–2036.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
LightCycler-Based Quantitative PCR for Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Blood, Urine, and Respiratory Samples
Angela M. Kearns, Brenda Draper, Wendy Wipat, Andrew J. L. Turner, Janice Wheeler, Roger Freeman, Jayne Harwood, F. Kate Gould, John H. Dark
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 2001, 39 (6) 2364-2365; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2364-2365.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
LightCycler-Based Quantitative PCR for Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Blood, Urine, and Respiratory Samples
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
LightCycler-Based Quantitative PCR for Detection of Cytomegalovirus in Blood, Urine, and Respiratory Samples
Angela M. Kearns, Brenda Draper, Wendy Wipat, Andrew J. L. Turner, Janice Wheeler, Roger Freeman, Jayne Harwood, F. Kate Gould, John H. Dark
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 2001, 39 (6) 2364-2365; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2364-2365.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
    • AUTHORS' REPLY
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCE
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X