Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotheraphy
    • Applied and Environmental Mircobiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

LightCycler Multiplex PCR for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Common Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System

Steven J. Read, Joanne L. Mitchell, Colin G. Fink
Steven J. Read
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne L. Mitchell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Colin G. Fink
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3056-3059.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A conventional multiplex PCR assay that detects herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, varicella-zoster virus, and enteroviruses for the diagnosis of central nervous system infections was modified to be performed using the LightCycler system. The sensitivity of detection of each of the viruses using the LightCycler assay was compared to that of the conventional assay using external quality assessment material. The assays had equivalent sensitivities, but the LightCycler assay was more rapid, reduced the risk of contamination, and used an amplicon detection format that demonstrated greater discrimination than a gel electrophoresis method.

Molecular methods for the diagnosis of viral central nervous system (CNS) infections are now well established in the routine clinical laboratory. Several studies, which have recently been reviewed (14), have demonstrated the high sensitivity, specificity, and utility of the laboratory molecular diagnosis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and enterovirus CNS infections (9, 15). Molecular methods have replaced conventional virological techniques, such as viral isolation from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by cell culturing or detection of a virus-specific antibody response, approaches which, in comparison, are slow or lack sensitivity. The widespread use of the PCR technique, in particular, has improved the laboratory diagnosis and understanding of viral etiologies of clinical syndromes such as aseptic meningitis, for example, when associated with viral reactivation in varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and HSV type 2 (HSV-2) infections in the absence of specific skin lesions (4, 12).

Modifications to the basic PCR technique have been used to increase the sensitivity of detection of viruses, e.g., by using nested primers, or to allow the detection of more than one virus in an assay, e.g., by using multiplex primers. These techniques are particularly relevant to the detection of viruses in CSF because the concentration of viral genomes found in CSF may be low and because several viruses commonly cause similar symptoms. Nested primer PCR has disadvantages, however, in particular, an increased risk of false-positive results caused by contamination.

The LightCycler system (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Lewes, United Kingdom) is a combined thermal cycler and fluorimeter which allows PCR product detection and identification with a variety of fluorescence chemistries. The LightCycler system can provide the clinical virologist with rapid PCR results because of very fast temperature transition rates and online analysis of data and with reduced risk of contamination because product detection is accomplished in a closed system, advantages that have also been recently described for other applications in clinical virology (2, 5, 6, 11,13). PCR amplicon detection is possible using the dye SYBR Green 1 (2, 13), which fluoresces only when bound to double-stranded DNA. On completion of PCR, amplicons are identified by measurement of their melting temperatures (Tm s). It is possible to interpret the results of multiplex PCR using this system if theTm s of the specific amplicons are sufficiently different and constant to allow differentiation (2).

The aim of the present study was to adapt an existing conventional thermal cycler nested multiplex PCR assay for the three most common causes of viral CNS infections in the United Kingdom (10) to a final amplification and analysis of results by use of the LightCycler system. The perceived advantages of the new assay would be rapidity and, because of the closed-system detection format, a reduced risk of false-positive results due to contamination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nucleic acid was extracted and purified from CSF samples and quality control material by using a High Pure viral nucleic acid kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sample volume processed was 200 μl, and the elution buffer volume applied to the extraction column was 100 μl. For some (n = 20) of the enterovirus-positive CSF samples, frozen (−20°C) archived extracted nucleic acid was used for the assay. For the herpes- virus and the remaining enterovirus-positive CSF samples and the control material, fresh nucleic acid was extracted from frozen (−20°C) archived CSF samples or virus-infected cell culture fluids.

The sensitivity of the LightCycler assay was compared to that of the conventional assay (10) using titrations of HSV-1, HSV-2, and enterovirus isolates that were supplied by the European Union Concerted Action for Quality Control of Nucleic Acid Amplification in Diagnostic Virology (EU CA) program. For VZV, a titration of a previously described isolate was used (10). The specificity of amplicon identification byTm measurements was verified by using isolates of HSV, VZV, and enteroviruses from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). In order to determine if there were any differences in the Tm s of amplicons derived from different enterovirus serotypes, control samples containing isolates of coxsackieviruses A9, A16, B2, and B5, echoviruses 1 and 9, and enterovirus 71, supplied either by the EU CA, the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS), or the ATCC, were assayed by the LightCycler assay. The LightCycler assay was also used to test retrospectively 50 CSF samples found positive by the conventional thermal cycler assay—6 for HSV-1, 9 for HSV-2, 4 for VZV, and 31 for enteroviruses.

PCR primers used for the reverse transcription of enterovirus RNA and the subsequent amplifications of HSV and VZV DNAs and enterovirus cDNA were described previously (10). The reaction conditions and the thermal cycling incubations for the reverse transcription and the first round of PCR amplification using a conventional thermal cycler (Primus 25; MWG Biotech, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) were described previously (10), except that 25 cycles of amplification were used and the reagent suppliers were those described for the secondary amplifications (see below).

Secondary amplifications with nested primers and online analysis of PCR products were performed with the LightCycler system. Each reaction had a total volume of 20 μl containing 1 μl of the primary reaction solution, 16 mM (NH4)2SO4, 67 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8 at 25°C), 0.01% (wt/vol) Tween 20, 5.0 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (Sigma Ltd., Poole, United Kingdom), 0.5 μM each oligonucleotide primer (MWG Biotech), 1.25 U of Taqpolymerase (Qiagen Ltd.), 1 μl of 10× SYBR Green 1 (Sigma), and 0.01 mg of bovine serum albumin (Sigma).

The thermal cycling incubations used for the nested primer amplifications on the LightCycler instrument were done at 96°C for 1 s, 55°C for 5 s, 72°C for 5 s, and 86°C for 5 s. At the end of each 86°C incubation, the fluorescent signal of each reaction was measured at a wavelength of 530 nm using the LightCycler fluorimeter. PCR amplification with the nested primers was done by 25 cycles, following which the LightCycler system melting curve analysis program was performed. In this program, the incubation temperature was increased from 75°C to 98°C at a transition rate of 0.2°C/s, with measurement of the emitted fluorescent signals at each step increase. TheTm of the dominant PCR product from each reaction was measured from the downloaded data using LightCycler version 3 software, and these temperatures were compared to theTm s for positive control reactions containing HSV-1, VZV, and nonpoliovirus enterovirus genomes, which were included in each batch of tests.

RESULTS

The molecular sensitivity of detection by the LightCycler assay was compared to that of the conventional thermal cycler assay by use of the EU CA virus titrations for HSV-1, HSV-2, and enteroviruses and by use of the titration of a well-characterized isolate for VZV. Similar sensitivities for the detection of HSV-1, HSV-2, and VZV were measured, but a slightly lower sensitivity was observed with the LightCycler assay than with the conventional assay for the enterovirus titrations tested (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison of the sensitivity of detection of HSV-1, HSV-2, and enteroviruses by the conventional thermal cycler assay and the LightCycler system assay

The measurement of amplicon Tm s for the ATCC isolates of HSV-1, HSV-2, VZV, and enteroviruses allowed for unequivocal interpretation of the multiplex PCR results by analysis with the LightCycler system melting curve program (Fig.1). For the nonpoliovirus enteroviruses supplied by EU CA, UK NEQAS, and ATCC, the range of ampliconTm s across the serotyped isolates was only 1.37°C (Table 2). Amplicons from the three poliovirus isolates tested, representing serotypes 1, 2, and 3, had Tm s (averageT m, 90.46°C) that were consistently approximately 2°C higher than those of the amplicons derived from the nonpoliovirus enteroviruses tested (averageTm , 88.09°C). No difference in ampliconTm s was observed between HSV-1 and HSV-2.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

LightCycler system melting curve analysis of ATCC isolates amplified by multiplex PCR. Enterovirus is echovirus type 1, ATCC VR-31, T m of 88.20°C; poliovirus is poliovirus type 2 (attenuated), ATCC VR-301,T m of 90.79°C; VZV is ATCC VR-586,T m of 92.17°C; HSV-1 is ATCC VR-260,T m of 93.83°C; and HSV-2 is ATCC VR-734, T m of 93.91°C. The line designated “blank” represents the analysis of a PCR mixture without the addition of a target. The vertical line at 86°C represents the incubation temperature at which the levels of fluorescent signals were measured during each cycle of PCR. The y axis is the negative differential of fluorescence over temperature (−dF/dT).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Tm data for virus amplicons from CSF samples and control materiala

In the retrospective testing of 50 CSF samples which had been found positive by the conventional thermal cycler assay, 49 samples were also found positive by the LightCycler assay, the exception being an enterovirus-positive sample which failed to be reamplified from archived extracted RNA.

DISCUSSION

The advantages for the clinical virology laboratory of performing PCR with the LightCycler system are several. The speed of laboratory diagnosis of a CNS infection is important because a definitive laboratory finding of a viral etiology in suspected meningitis may resolve further patient investigation, associated health expenditure, and anxiety. For an unusual or unexpected result, where confirmation is required, a rapid assay may also be repeated during the same work day. Despite the disadvantages of the technique, nested PCR is often used for the diagnosis of viral CNS infection because of the requirement for high sensitivity. Nested PCR was used for this assay because the sensitivity of assays performed with the LightCycler system may be compromised by the small volume of extracted nucleic acid that can be added to the glass capillary reaction vessels used in the instrument (7). An existing, well-optimized multiplex PCR assay was therefore adapted so that the secondary amplification, product detection, and identification steps were performed with the LightCycler system using a template from the conventional thermal cycler reverse transcription-multiplex primary PCR.

Greater discrimination based on differences in amplicon GC content in addition to length is a potential advantage of the LightCycler SYBR Green 1 detection format compared to gel electrophoresis (2). Differences in ampliconTm s could potentially be exploited to allow some enterovirus serotyping and the differentiation of HSV-1 and HSV-2. A requirement of this assay, however, is the use of primers for highly conserved targets in the viral genome so that false-negative results, caused by sequence heterogeneity, are avoided. The primers used in this assay for the amplification of conserved regions of the enterovirus and HSV genomes therefore precluded any potential for greater discrimination. Usefully, however, it was possible to use Tm measurements to discriminate polioviruses from the other enteroviruses tested. Although there is little clinical benefit in enterovirus serotyping, in the United Kingdom it is a requirement of good laboratory practice that poliovirus be excluded when an enterovirus infection is diagnosed, in order to comply with the surveillance requirement of the World Health Organization Eradication of Poliovirus Program. The apparent differences in Tm s between amplicons from poliovirus and nonpoliovirus enteroviruses in this assay need to be confirmed using further serotyped viral isolates.

It is possible to derive quantitative data from the LightCycler assay, as amplicon concentration is monitored in real time and emitted fluorescence will increase more rapidly in samples with a higher initial concentration of target viral nucleic acid. The relative concentrations of viral nucleic acids in different samples of CSF may therefore be compared by recording the cycle at which the fluorescence signal increases above the background level. Furthermore, if external quantitation standards with known copy numbers of viral genomes are included in batches of tests, then an accurate measurement of the actual viral genome concentration is possible. For CNS infection, quantitation may be useful for monitoring antiviral treatment and establishing prognosis in HSV encephalitis (3), monitoring chronic enterovirus infections in patients with hypogammaglobulinemia, or monitoring VZV infection, where the clinical significance of qualitative VZV detection is uncertain (1).

It is interesting that the noise band crossing point for enterovirus-positive CSF samples assayed in this study ranged from cycles 12 to 22; for the HSV-1 samples, the crossing points ranged from cycles 5 to 12, and for the HSV-2 samples, all of which were from adult females with meningitis, the range was cycles 12 to 19. If there were equivalent PCR efficiencies for different enterovirus serotypes and for both HSV types, then these data would indicate a broad range of enterovirus RNA concentrations in CSF during illness and would confirm what has been postulated previously—that there is a higher CSF viral load in HSV-1 disease than in HSV-2 disease (8,10).

This report demonstrates that, by exploiting differences in ampliconTm s, multiplex PCR assays may be adapted to the LightCycler system in order to provide a more rapid laboratory diagnosis, a greater safeguard against contamination, and additional diagnostic information compared to the results obtained with an ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel electrophoresis detection format.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 February 2001.
    • Returned for modification 10 April 2001.
    • Accepted 11 June 2001.
  • ↵* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Micropathology Ltd., University of Warwick Science Park, Barclays Venture Centre, Sir William Lyons Rd., Coventry CV4 7EZ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-(0)2476-323222. Fax: 44-(0)2476-323333. E-mail: sjread{at}micropathology.com.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Burke D. G.,
    2. Kalayjian R. C.,
    3. Vann V. R.,
    4. Madreperla S. A.,
    5. Shick H. E.,
    6. Leonard D. G.
    (1997) Polymerase chain reaction detection and clinical significance of varicella-zoster virus in cerebrospinal fluid from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1080–1084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Cubie H. A.,
    2. Seagar A. L.,
    3. McGoogan E.,
    4. Whitehead J.,
    5. Brass A.,
    6. Arends M. J.,
    7. Whitley M. W.
    (2001) Rapid real time PCR to distinguish between high risk human papillomavirus types 16 and 18. Mol. Pathol. 54:24–29.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Domingues R. B.,
    2. Lakeman F. D.,
    3. Mayo M. S.,
    4. Whitley R. J.
    (1998) Application of competitive PCR to cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with herpes simplex encephalitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:2229–2234.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Echeverria J. M.,
    2. Casas I.,
    3. Tenorio T.,
    4. de Ory F.,
    5. Martinez Martin P.
    (1994) Detection of varicella-zoster virus-specific DNA sequences in cerebro-spinal fluid from patients with acute aseptic meningitis and no cutaneous lesions. J. Med. Microbiol. 43:331–335.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Espy M. J.,
    2. Ross T. K.,
    3. Teo R.,
    4. Svien K. A.,
    5. Wold A. D.,
    6. Uhl J. R.,
    7. Smith T. F.
    (2000) Evaluation of LightCycler PCR for implementation of laboratory diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3116–3118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Espy M. J.,
    2. Teo R.,
    3. Ross T. K.,
    4. Svien K. A.,
    5. Wold A. D.,
    6. Uhl J. R.,
    7. Smith T. F.
    (2000) Diagnosis of varicella-zoster virus infections in the clinical laboratory by LightCycler PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3187–3189.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Kessler H. H.,
    2. Mühlbauer G.,
    3. Rinner B.,
    4. Stelzl E.,
    5. Berger A.,
    6. Dörr H.-W.,
    7. Santner B.,
    8. Marth E.,
    9. Rabenau H.
    (2000) Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2638–2642.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Mitchell P. S.,
    2. Espy M. J.,
    3. Smith T. F.,
    4. Toal D. R.,
    5. Rys P. N.,
    6. Berbari E. F.,
    7. Osmon D. R.,
    8. Persing D. H.
    (1997) Laboratory diagnosis of central nervous system infections with herpes simplex virus by PCR performed with cerebrospinal fluid specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2873–2877.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Read S. J.,
    2. Jeffery K. J. M.,
    3. Bangham C. R. M.
    (1997) Aseptic meningitis and encephalitis: the role of PCR in the diagnostic laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:691–696.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Read S. J.,
    2. Kurtz J. B.
    (1999) Laboratory diagnosis of common viral infections of the central nervous system by using a single multiplex PCR screening assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:1352–1355.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Schaade L.,
    2. Kockelkorn P.,
    3. Ritter K.,
    4. Kleines M.
    (2000) Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in human specimens by LightCycler PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4006–4009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Schlesinger Y.,
    2. Tebas P.,
    3. Gaudreault-Keener M.,
    4. Buller R. S.,
    5. Storch G. A.
    (1995) Herpes simplex virus type 2 meningitis in the absence of genital lesions: improved recognition with use of the polymerase chain reaction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 20:842–848.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Schröter M.,
    2. Zöllner B.,
    3. Schäfer P.,
    4. Laufs R.,
    5. Feucht H.-H.
    (2001) Quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA by LightCycler PCR and comparison with two different PCR assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:765–768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Tang Y.-W.,
    2. Mitchell P. S.,
    3. Espy M. J.,
    4. Smith T. F.,
    5. Persing D. H.
    (1999) Molecular diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infections in the central nervous system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2127–2136.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Yerly S.,
    2. Gervaix A.,
    3. Simonet V.,
    4. Catflisch M.,
    5. Perrin L.,
    6. Wunderli W.
    (1996) Rapid and sensitive detection of enteroviruses in specimens from aseptic meningitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:199–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
LightCycler Multiplex PCR for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Common Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System
Steven J. Read, Joanne L. Mitchell, Colin G. Fink
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2001, 39 (9) 3056-3059; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3056-3059.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
LightCycler Multiplex PCR for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Common Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
Share
LightCycler Multiplex PCR for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Common Viral Infections of the Central Nervous System
Steven J. Read, Joanne L. Mitchell, Colin G. Fink
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2001, 39 (9) 3056-3059; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3056-3059.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X