Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

Heterogeneity and Seroprevalence of a Newly Identified Avian Hepatitis E Virus from Chickens in the United States

F. F. Huang, G. Haqshenas, H. L. Shivaprasad, D. K. Guenette, P. R. Woolcock, C. T. Larsen, F. W. Pierson, F. Elvinger, T. E. Toth, X. J. Meng
F. F. Huang
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Haqshenas
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. L. Shivaprasad
2California Animal Health & Food Safety Laboratory System, Fresno Branch, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Fresno, California 93725
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. K. Guenette
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. R. Woolcock
2California Animal Health & Food Safety Laboratory System, Fresno Branch, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Fresno, California 93725
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. T. Larsen
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. W. Pierson
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Elvinger
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. E. Toth
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. J. Meng
1Center for Molecular Medicine and Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0342
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: xjmeng@vt.edu
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4197-4202.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We recently identified and characterized a novel virus, designated avian hepatitis E virus (avian HEV), from chickens with hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome (HS syndrome) in the United States. Avian HEV is genetically related to but distinct from human and swine HEVs. To determine the extent of genetic variation and the seroprevalence of avian HEV infection in chicken flocks, we genetically identified and characterized 11 additional avian HEV isolates from chickens with HS syndrome and assessed the prevalence of avian HEV antibodies from a total of 1,276 chickens of different ages and breeds from 76 different flocks in five states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, and Wisconsin). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a truncated recombinant avian HEV ORF2 antigen was developed and used to determine avian HEV seroprevalence. About 71% of chicken flocks and 30% of chickens tested in the study were positive for antibodies to avian HEV. About 17% of chickens younger than 18 weeks were seropositive, whereas about 36% of adult chickens were seropositive. By using a reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay, we tested 21 bile samples from chickens with HS syndrome in California, Connecticut, New York, and Wisconsin for the presence of avian HEV RNA. Of the 21 bile samples, 12 were positive for 30- to 35-nm HEV-like virus particles by electron microscopy (EM). A total of 11 of the 12 EM-positive bile samples and 6 of the 9 EM-negative bile samples were positive for avian HEV RNA by RT-PCR. The sequences of a 372-bp region within the helicase gene of 11 avian HEV isolates were determined. Sequence analyses revealed that the 11 field isolates of avian HEV had 78 to 100% nucleotide sequence identities to each other, 79 to 88% identities to the prototype avian HEV, 76 to 80% identities to chicken big liver and spleen disease virus, and 56 to 61% identities to other known strains of human and swine HEV. The data from this study indicated that, like swine and human HEVs, avian HEV isolates are genetically heterogenic and that avian HEV infection is enzoonotic in chicken flocks in the United States.

Human hepatitis E is an important public health disease in many developing countries, and sporadic cases of hepatitis E have also been reported in some industrialized countries including the United States (1, 16, 20, 24, 30-33, 38, 40-41, 44, 45). The disease is generally transmitted by the fecal-oral route via contaminated water (1, 10, 22, 36). Hepatitis E virus (HEV), the causative agent of hepatitis E, is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus (1, 7, 16, 18). The HEV genome contains three open reading frames (ORFs). ORF1 encodes viral nonstructural proteins, ORF2 encodes the putative capsid protein, and ORF3 encodes a small protein that may be involved in virus replication (1, 42, 44, 45, 49).

Seroepidemiological studies revealed that anti-HEV antibodies are present in numerous animal species, including pigs, rodents, chickens, dogs, cows, sheep, and goats, from both developing and industrialized countries (2, 3, 8, 19, 23, 29-31, 48; N. T. Tien, H. T. Clayson, H. B. Khiem, P. K. Sac, A. L. Corwin, K. S. Myint, and D. W. Vaughn, Abstract, Am. Trop. Med. Hyg. 57:211, 1997; S. A. Tsarev, M. P. Shrestha, J. He, R. M. Scott, D. W. Vaughn, E. Clayson, S. Gigliotti, C. F. Longer, and B. L. Innis, Abstract, Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 59:242, 1998), suggesting that these animal species have been exposed to HEV-like virus. The first animal strain of HEV, swine HEV, was identified and characterized in 1997 from a pig in the United States (26). The U.S. swine HEV strain is genetically more closely related to two U.S. human HEV strains than to strains of HEV from other geographic regions (7, 26-28, 38, 39). Recently, many swine HEV strains have been genetically identified from pigs in the United States, Taiwan, The Netherlands, and Japan (17, 18, 34, 36, 43, 47, 48). Phylogenetic analyses revealed that, like human HEV (25, 38, 39, 44, 45), these strains of swine HEV from different geographic regions are also genetically heterogenic (17, 18, 34, 36, 43, 47, 48). Interspecies HEV transmission has been documented: a U.S. strain of human HEV infected pigs, and swine HEV infected nonhuman primates (11, 28, 46). Recent seroepidemiological studies indicated that individuals working with swine have higher risks of HEV infection (6, 15, 21, 29, 32). Taken together, these data strongly suggest that HEV is zoonotic and that there exist animal reservoirs for HEV.

More recently, another animal strain of HEV, designated avian HEV, has been genetically identified and characterized from chickens with hepatitis-splenomegaly (HS) syndrome in the United States (13, 14). The newly discovered avian HEV is genetically related to but distinct from other known HEV strains. Unlike swine HEV, which causes only subclinical infection in pigs, avian HEV is associated with HS syndrome in chickens (13, 14). HS syndrome in chickens was first described in 1991 in western Canada and is now recognized in eastern Canada and the United States (37). HS syndrome is characterized by above-normal mortality in laying hens at the age of 30 to 72 weeks. Infected birds usually have red fluid in their abdomens and enlarged livers and spleens (37). Microscopically, liver lesions vary from multifocal patches to areas of extensive hepatic necrosis and hemorrhage (13, 37). We have now successfully reproduced HS syndrome in adult specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens by infection with avian HEV (F. F. Huang et al., unpublished data). Since avian HEV is a novel virus and only one strain of avian HEV has been identified in the United States thus far, the molecular and serological epidemiology of this new virus is not known. In this study, we genetically characterized 11 additional avian HEV isolates from chickens with HS syndrome in the United States and assessed the prevalence of anti-HEV antibodies in chickens of different ages from five different states.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical specimens.Bile samples used for genetic identification and characterization of avian HEV isolates in this study were collected from 21 chickens with HS syndrome in California, Connecticut, New York, and Wisconsin from 1993 to 2001 (Table 1). Twelve samples were positive by electron microscopy (EM) examination for 30- to 35-nm avian HEV-like virus particles, and nine samples were negative by EM.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Detection of avian HEV RNA from bile samples of chickens with HS syndrome in the United States

Serum samples used for the seroprevalence study were collected from 1,276 chickens of different ages from 76 chicken flocks located in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Virginia, and Wisconsin (see Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Prevalence of antibodies to avian HEV in chickens of different ages in the United States

ELISA to detect anti-HEV in chickens.A truncated recombinant ORF2 protein of avian HEV was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by affinity chromatography (14). The purified avian HEV truncated ORF2 protein was used as the antigen to standardize an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect anti-HEV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in chickens essentially as previously described for the ELISAs used to detect anti-HEV antibodies in humans and swine (26-29, 32). The purified ORF2 antigen of avian HEV was coated onto 96-well plates. A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-chicken IgG (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) was used as the secondary antibody. The cutoff value was determined on the basis of the optical density (OD) values of the 85 adult chicken sera collected from a commercial SPF flock (Charles River Laboratory Inc., Wilmington, Mass.) and from two high-health university research flocks. The cutoff value was set conservatively at 0.30, which is about 6 standard deviations above the mean OD value of the normal chicken sera. All sera from 76 chicken flocks in the five states were tested in duplicate at a dilution of 1:100 in 0.05% Tween-phosphate-buffered saline blocking buffer containing 5% nonfat dried milk and 5% goat sera. Sera from SPF chickens were used for negative controls, and convalescent-phase sera from SPF chickens experimentally infected with avian HEV were included as positive controls. In general, the OD values for the positive sera from experimentally infected chickens were above 1.0 whereas those from naturally infected birds were about 0.5.

RT-PCR assay for detection of field isolates of avian HEV.To identify field isolates of avian HEV, it was necessary to develop a reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assay capable of detecting avian HEV strains with significant genetic variation. Our previous studies showed that the helicase gene is the most highly conserved between avian HEV and other known strains of HEV (13, 14); therefore, primers for RT-PCR were targeted in the helicase gene region. A short stretch of the helicase gene sequence of the Australian chicken big liver and spleen disease virus (BLSV) has been reported, and it had about 80% nucleotide sequence identity to avian HEV (13, 35). The primers were selected from conserved helicase gene regions based on a sequence alignment of BLSV (35), the prototype strain of avian HEV (13), and other HEV strains. The primer sequences were of BLSV origin: forward primer (B1), 5′-GCTAGGCGACCCGCACCAGAT-3′; reverse primer (B2), 5′ GGTTAGCGCAACAATAGCATG-3′. The RT-PCR assay with this set of primers was able to detect the prototype strain of avian HEV and was therefore used to identify additional field isolates of avian HEV. Briefly, total RNAs were extracted with TriZol Reagent from 100 μl of bile samples from each of the 21 chickens with HS syndrome. Total RNAs were resuspended in DNase- and RNase-free water. RT was performed at 42°C for 60 min with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (GIBCO-BRL) using the reverse primer B2. A 5-μl volume of the resulting cDNA was amplified using AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer). The PCR parameters included a denaturation at 95°C for 9 min followed by 39 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94°C, annealing for 1 min at 42°C, and extension for 1 min at 72°C, with one final incubation at 72°C for 7 min. Negative and positive controls were included in each set of RT-PCR amplifications. The negative control was a water sample treated in the same way as the bile samples. The positive control was a fecal stock of avian HEV with a titer of about 104 genomic equivalents per ml.

Nucleotide sequencing.The expected PCR products of field isolates of avian HEV were purified using the glassmilk procedure with a GENECLEAN kit (Bio 101 Inc., Carlsbad, Calif.). PCR products amplified from 11 chicken bile samples from chicken flocks in four states were directly sequenced at the Virginia Tech DNA Sequencing Facility. Sequences of the PCR products were determined for both DNA strands.

Development of a more sensitive RT-PCR assay for the detection of avian HEV.The RT-PCR assay described above was based primarily on the helicase gene of BLSV (35) and the prototype strain of avian HEV (12). Therefore, it was possible that more genetically divergent field isolates of avian HEV would not be detected by the RT-PCR assay. With the availability of the sequence information from 11 additional field isolates of avian HEV, we attempted to develop a more sensitive RT-PCR assay that is capable of detecting genetically divergent field strains of avian HEV. Briefly, the resulting sequences of the 11 field isolates of avian HEV and the prototype strain of avian HEV were aligned and a set of degenerate primers were designed based on the sequence alignment: forward primer (helicase F), 5′-TGGCGCACC(T)GTT(A)TCC(T)CACCG-3′; reverse primer (helicase R), 5′-CCTCA(G)TGGACCGTA(T)ATCGACCC-3′. The parameters for the RT-PCR assay with the degenerate primers helicase F and helicase R included a denaturation at 95°C for 9 min followed by 39 cycles of denaturation for 50 s at 94°C, annealing for 50 s at 46°C, and extension for 50 s at 72°C, with one final incubation at 72°C for 7 min. Positive and negative controls were the same as the ones described above.

Sequence and phylogenetic analyses.The primer sequences used to amplify the avian HEV isolates were excluded from the sequence and phylogenetic analyses. The resulting 330-bp sequences of the helicase genes of the 11 field isolates of avian HEV were analyzed and compared with the corresponding regions of the prototype avian HEV, BLSV, and other known strains of swine and human HEVs available in the GenBank database by the MacVector computer program (Oxford Molecular Inc.). Phylogenetic analysis was conducted with the aid of the PAUP program (David Swofford, Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C., distributed by Sinauer Associate Inc. Sunderland, Mass.). A heuristic search with 1,000 replicates was used to produce a phylogenetic tree.

The geographic origins and the GenBank accession numbers of the nucleotide sequences of the HEV strains used in the phylogenetic and sequence analyses are as follows: JRA1 (Japan, AP003430 ), SWJ570 (Japan, AB073912 ), swine HEV (United States, AF082843 ), US1 (United States, AF060668 ), US2 (United States, AF060669 ), T1 (China, AJ272108 ), Burma (Burma, M73218 ), Myanmar (Myanmar, D10330 ), Hyderabad (India, AF076239 ), Madras (India, X99441 ), Nepal (Nepal, AF020486 ), hev037 (India, X98292 ), Xinjiang (China, D11092 ), Uigh179 (China, D11093 ), Hetian (China, L08816 ), Sar-55 (Pakistan, M80581 ), and Mexico (Mexico, M74506 ).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The sequences of the helicase gene region of the 11 avian HEV isolates have been deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers AF531898 through AF531908 .

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Avian HEV is enzoonotic in chicken flocks in the United States.The prevalence of anti-HEV in commercial pig herds in the United States has been reported previously (26, 29). Seropositivity for swine HEV in pigs is age dependent: most pigs younger than 2 months were seronegative, whereas most pigs older than 3 months were seropositive (26, 29). In this study, we tested 1,276 serum samples from chickens of various ages in five states for the presence of antibodies to avian HEV (Table 2). The percentage of seropositive chickens varied greatly from flock to flock, ranging from 0% to 100%. Of the 76 flocks tested, 54 (71%) were positive for anti-HEV IgG. Similar to swine HEV, the prevalence of avian HEV antibodies in adult chickens (older than 18 weeks) was higher than that in younger ones: about 17% of chickens younger than 18 weeks were seropositive, whereas about 36% of adult chickens were seropositive. However, the age-related difference in avian HEV seropositivity in chickens is less definitive than that previously observed in swine (data not shown). Several flocks of adult chickens were also found to be negative for antibodies to avian HEV. It is possible that these negative flocks may have better biosecurity measures that could prevent the transmission of avian HEV. The antibodies to avian HEV detected in some 1-day-old chickens are probably maternal antibodies, which usually wane at about 3 weeks of age. So far, avian HEV has been isolated only from chickens in the United States. The BLSV identified in Australia is genetically and antigenically related to HEV (12, 13, 14), and it is likely that the big liver and spleen disease in Australia (4, 5, 12, 35) and the HS syndrome in North America (13, 14, 37) are caused by variant strains of the same virus.

Detection of avian HEV by RT-PCR.Twenty-one bile samples from chickens with HS syndrome (increased mortality and decreased egg production) were examined for avian HEV-like virus particles by EM and for avian HEV RNA by RT-PCR. Twelve of them were positive for 30- to 35-nm virus particles by EM. RT-PCR results with the B1 and B2 primers, based primarily on BLSV sequence, showed that 7 of the 12 EM-positive bile samples and 4 of the 9 EM-negative bile samples were positive for avian HEV RNA (Table 1). The bile samples that tested negative with the B1 and B2 primers were further tested by a more sensitive RT-PCR assay with degenerate primers helicase F and helicase R based on the sequence alignment of 11 avian HEV isolates and the prototype avian HEV. Another four EM-positive and two EM-negative bile samples turned out to be positive for avian HEV RNA (Table 1). The six additional positive bile samples detected by the more sensitive RT-PCR assay with the degenerate primers were confirmed by sequencing (data not shown). Overall, 11 of 12 EM-positive and 6 of 9 EM-negative bile samples from chickens with HS syndrome were positive for avian HEV RNA by RT-PCR, indicating that RT-PCR is a more sensitive method than EM for detection of avian HEV. The RT-PCR assay developed in this study should be very useful for future avian HEV studies.

Field isolates of avian HEV are genetically heterogenic.It has been reported that swine and human HEV isolates from different geographic regions are genetically heterogenic (17, 39, 44). The extent of genetic variation of avian HEV is not known, since only one strain of avian HEV has been characterized. The PCR products from the 11 avian HEV isolates amplified by the B1 and B2 primers were sequenced. The 330-bp sequences within the helicase genes were analyzed and compared to each other and to the corresponding regions of the prototype avian HEV, BLSV, and other known strains of HEV. Sequence analyses revealed that the avian HEV isolates identified in this study had 78 to 100% nucleotide sequence identities to each other, 79 to 88% identities to the prototype avian HEV, 76 to 80% identities to BLSV, and 56 to 61% identities to other known strains of human and swine HEVs (Table 3). At the amino acid sequence level, the 11 avian HEV isolates identified in this study displayed 90 to 100% sequence identities to each other, 89 to 98% identities to the prototype avian HEV, 78 to 79% identities to BLSV, and 55 to 62% identities to other known strains of human and swine HEVs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Pairwise comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the partial helicase gene of 11 avian HEV isolates identified in this study and other virusesa

Phylogenetic analyses revealed that all the U.S. avian HEV isolates identified in this study clustered with the prototype avian HEV and BLSV but are distinct from other known strains of HEV (Fig. 1). Minor branches, indicating heterogeneity, also exist among avian HEV isolates. Whether avian HEV represents a fifth HEV genotype or belongs to a separate genus remains to be determined.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Phylogenetic tree based on the sequences of the helicase gene of avian HEV isolates from this study and other selected HEV strains. The tree was constructed with the aid of the PAUP program by using a heuristic search with 1,000 replicates and midpoint rooting option. The scale bar indicating the numbers of character state changes is proportional to the genetic distance. The 11 avian HEV isolates from this study are indicated in boldface type.

An increasing amount of data suggested that HEV infection is zoonotic. Recently it was reported that swine veterinarians (29, 32) and other pig handlers (6) may be at higher risk of HEV infection than normal blood donors. Therefore, it will be important to determine if avian HEV infection is also zoonotic and if chicken handlers have a higher risk of HEV infection, as swine handlers do.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Virginia Tech DNA Sequencing Facility for assistance with DNA sequencing.

This study was supported in part by a grant from the USDA-NRICGP program NRI 2002-35204-12531 and by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI01653, AI46505, and AI50611).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 April 2002.
    • Returned for modification 6 July 2002.
    • Accepted 4 August 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aggarwal, R., and K. Krawczynski. 2000. Hepatitis E: an overview and recent advances in clinical and laboratory research. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.15:9-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Arankalle, V. A., M. K. Goverdhan, and K. Banerjee. 1994. Antibodies against hepatitis E virus in Old World monkeys. J. Viral Hepat.1:125-129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Clayson, E. T., B. L. Innis, K. S. Myint, S. Narupiti, D. W. Vaughn, S. Giri, P. Ranabhat, and M. P. Shrestha. 1995. Detection of hepatitis E virus infections among domestic swine in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.53:228-232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Crerar, S. K., and G. M. Cross. 1994. The experimental production of big liver and spleen disease in broiler breeder hens. Aust. Vet. J.71:414-417.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Crerar, S. K., and G. M. Cross. 1994. Epidemiological and clinical investigations into big liver and spleen disease of broiler breeder hens. Aust. Vet. J.71:410-413.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Drobeniuc, J., M. O. Favorov, C. N. Shapiro, B. P. Bell, E. E. Mast, A. Dadu, D. Culver, P. Iarovoi, B. H. Robertson, and H. S. Margolis. 2001. Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence among persons who work with swine. J. Infect. Dis.184:1594-1597.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Erker, J. C., S. M. Desai, G. G. Schlauder, G. J. Dawson, and I. K. Mushahwar. 1999. A hepatitis E virus variant from the United States: molecular characterization and transmission in cynomolgus macaques. J. Gen. Virol.80:681-690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Favorov, M. O., M. Y. Kosoy, S. A. Tsarev, J. E. Childs, and H. S. Margolis. 2000. Prevalence of antibody to hepatitis E virus among rodents in the United States. J. Infect. Dis.181:449-455.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.
    Garkavenko, O., A. Obriadina, J. Meng, D. A. Anderson, H. J. Benard, B. A. Schroeder, Y. E. Khudyakov, H. A. Fields, and M. C. Croxson. 2001. Detection and characterization of swine hepatitis E virus in New Zealand. J. Med. Virol.65:525-529.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Grimm, A. C., and G. Shay Fout. 2002. Development of a molecular method to identify hepatitis E virus in water. J. Virol. Methods101:175-188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Halbur, P. G., C. Kasorndorkbua, C. Gilbert, D. Guenette, M. B. Potters, R. H. Purcell, S. U. Emerson, T. E. Toth, and X. J. Meng. 2001. Comparative pathogenesis of infection of pigs with hepatitis E viruses recovered from a pig and a human. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:918-923.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Handlinger, J. H., and W. Williams. 1988. An egg drop associated with splenomegaly in broiler breeders. Avian Dis.32:773-778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Haqshenas, G., H. L. Shivaprasad, P. R. Woolcock, D. H. Read, and X. J. Meng. 2001. Genetic identification and characterization of a novel virus related to human hepatitis E virus from chickens with hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome in the United States. J. Gen. Virol.82:2449-2462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Haqshenas, G., F. F. Huang, M. Fenaux, D. K. Guenette, F. W. Pierson, C. T. Larsen, H. L. Shivaprasad, T. E. Toth, and X. J. Meng. 2002. The putative capsid protein of the newly identified avian hepatitis E virus shares antigenic epitopes with that of swine and human hepatitis E viruses and the chicken big liver and spleen disease virus. J. Gen. Virol.83:2201-2209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Hsieh, S. Y., X. J. Meng, Y. H. Wu, S. T. Liu, A. W. Tam, D. Y. Lin, and Y. F. Liaw. 1999. Identity of a novel swine hepatitis E virus in Taiwan forming a monophyletic group with Taiwan isolates of human hepatitis E virus. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:3828-3834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Huang, C. C., D. Nguyen, J. Fernandez, K. Y. Yun, K. E. Fry, D. W. Bradley, A. W. Tam, and G. R. Reyes. 1992. Molecular cloning and sequencing of the Mexico isolate of hepatitis E virus (HEV). Virology191:550-558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Huang, F. F., G. Haqshenas, D. K. Guenette, P. G. Halbur, S. K. Schommer, F. W. Pierson, T. E. Toth, and X. J. Meng. 2002. Detection by reverse transcription-PCR and genetic characterization of field isolates of swine hepatitis E virus from pigs in different geographic regions of the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:1326-1332.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Kabrane-Lazizi, Y., X. J. Meng, R. H. Purcell, and S. U. Emerson. 1999. Evidence that the genomic RNA of hepatitis E virus is capped. J. Virol.73:8848-8850.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Kabrane-Lazizi, Y., J. B. Fine, J. Elm, G. E. Glass, H. Higa, A. Diwan, C. J. Gibbs, Jr., X. J. Meng, S. U. Emerson, and R. H. Purcell. 1999. Evidence for widespread infection of wild rats with hepatitis E virus in the United States. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.61:331-335.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. 20.↵
    Kabrane-Lazizi, Y., M. Zhang, R. H. Purcell, K. D. Miller, R. T. Davey, and S. U. Emerson. 2001. Acute hepatitis caused by a novel strain of hepatitis E virus most closely related to United States strains. J. Gen. Virol.82:1687-1693.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Karetnyi, Y. V., M. J. Gilchrist, and S. J. Naides. 1999. Hepatitis E virus infection prevalence among selected populations in Iowa. J. Clin. Virol.14:51-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Kasorndorkbua, C., P. G. Halbur, P. J. Thomas, D. K. Guenette, T. E. Toth, and X. J. Meng. 2002. Use of a swine bioassay and a RT-PCR assay to assess the risk of transmission of swine hepatitis E virus in pigs. J. Virol. Methods101:71-78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Maneerat, Y., E. T. Clayson, K. S. Myint, G. D. Young, and B. L. Innis. 1996. Experimental infection of the laboratory rat with the hepatitis E virus. J. Med. Virol.48:121-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Mast, E. E., I. K. Kuramoto, M. O. Favorov, V. R. Schoening, B. T. Burkholder, C. N. Shapiro, and P. V. Holland. 1997. Prevalence of and risk factors for antibody to hepatitis E virus seroreactivity among blood donors in Northern California. J. Infect. Dis.176:34-40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Meng, J., J. Pillot, X. Dai, H. A. Fields, and Y. E. Khudyakov. 1998. Neutralization of different geographic strains of the hepatitis E virus with anti-hepatitis E virus-positive serum samples obtained from different sources. Virology249:316-324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Meng, X. J., R. H. Purcell, P. G. Halbur, J. R. Lehman, D. M. Webb, T. S. Tsareva, J. S. Haynes, B. J. Thacker, and S. U. Emerson. 1997. A novel virus in swine is closely related to the human hepatitis E virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:9860-9865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.
    Meng, X. J., P. G. Halbur, J. S. Haynes, T. S. Tsareva, J. D. Bruna, R. L. Royer, R. H. Purcell, and S. U. Emerson. 1998. Experimental infection of pigs with the newly identified swine hepatitis E virus (swine HEV), but not with human strains of HEV. Arch. Virol.143:1405-1415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Meng, X. J., P. G. Halbur, M. S. Shapiro, S. Govindarajan, J. D. Bruna, I. K. Mushahwar, R. H. Purcell, and S. U. Emerson. 1998. Genetic and experimental evidence for cross-species infection by the swine hepatitis E virus. J. Virol.72:9714-9721.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Meng, X. J., S. Dea, R. E. Engle, R. Friendship, Y. S. Lyoo, T. Sirinarumitr, K. Urairong, D. Wang, D. Wong, D. Yoo, Y. Zhang, R. H. Purcell, and S. U. Emerson. 1999. Prevalence of antibodies to the hepatitis E virus in pigs from countries where hepatitis E is common or is rare in the human population. J. Med. Virol.58:297-302.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Meng, X. J. 2000. Zoonotic and xenozoonotic risks of hepatitis E virus. Infect. Dis. Rev.2:35-41.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Meng, X. J. 2000. Novel strains of hepatitis E virus identified from humans and other animal species: is hepatitis E a zoonosis? J. Hepatol.33:842-845.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Meng, X. J., B. Wiseman, F. Elvinger, D. Guenette, T. E. Toth, R. E. Engle, S. U. Emerson, and R. H. Purcell. 2002. Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis E virus in veterinarians working with swine and in normal blood donors in the United States and other countries. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:117-122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Meng, X. J. Swine hepatitis E virus: cross-species infection and risk in xenotransplantation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., in press.
  34. 34.↵
    Okamoto, H., M. Takahashi, T. Nishizawa, K. Fukai, U. Muramatsu, and A. Yoshikawa. 2001. Analysis of the complete genome of indigenous swine hepatitis E virus isolated in Japan. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.289:929-936.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Payne, C. J., T. M. Ellis, S. L. Plant, A. R. Gregory, and G. E. Wilcox. 1999. Sequence data suggests big liver and spleen disease virus (BLSV) is genetically related to hepatitis E virus. Vet. Microbiol.68:119-125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    Pina S., M. Buti, M. Cotrina, J. Piella, and R. Girones. 2000. HEV identified in serum from humans with acute hepatitis and in sewage of animal origin in Spain. J. Hepatol.33:826-833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Riddell, C. 1997. Hepatitis-splenomegaly syndrome, p. 1041. In B. W. Calnek, H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, L. R. McDougald, and Y. M. Saif (ed.), Diseases of poultry. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
  38. 38.↵
    Schlauder, G. G., G. J. Dawson, J. C. Erker, P. Y. Kwo, M. F. Knigge, D. L. Smalley, J. E. Rosenblatt, S. M. Desai, and I. K. Mushahwar. 1998. The sequence and phylogenetic analysis of a novel hepatitis E virus isolated from a patient with acute hepatitis reported in the United States. J. Gen. Virol.79:447-456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Schlauder, G. G., and I. K. Mushahwar. 2001. Genetic heterogeneity of hepatitis E virus. J. Med. Virol.65:282-292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Takahashi, K., K. Iwata, N. Watanabe, T. Hatahara, Y. Ohta, K. Baba, and S. Mishiro. 2001. Full-genome nucleotide sequence of a hepatitis E virus strain that may be indigenous to Japan. Virology287:9-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Thomas, D. L., P. O. Yarbough, D. Vlahov, S. A. Tsarev, K. E. Nelson, A. J. Saah, and R. H. Purcell. 1997. Seroreactivity to hepatitis E virus in areas where the disease is not endemic. J. Clin. Microbiol.35:1244-1247.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Tsarev, S. A., S. U. Emerson, G. R. Reyes, T. S. Tsareva, L. J. Legters, I. A. Malik, M. Iqbal, and R. H. Purcell. 1992. Characterization of a prototype strain of hepatitis E virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89:559-563.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Van der Poel, W. H., F. Verschoor, R. van der Heide, M. I. Herrera, A. Vivo, M. Kooreman, and A. M. de Roda Husman. 2001. Hepatitis E virus sequences in swine related to sequences in humans, The Netherlands. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7:970-976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Wang, Y., R. Ling, J. C. Erker, H. Zhang, H. Li, S. Desai, I. K. Mushahwar, and T. J. Harrison. 1999. A divergent genotype of hepatitis E virus in Chinese patients with acute hepatitis. J. Gen. Virol.80:169-177.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Wang, Y., H. Zhang, R. Ling, H. Li, and T. J. Harrison. 2000. The complete sequence of hepatitis E virus genotype 4 reveals an alternative strategy for translation of open reading frames 2 and 3. J. Gen. Virol.81:1675-1686.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Williams, T. P., C. Kasorndorkbua, P. G. Halbur, G. Haqshenas, D. K. Guenette, T. E. Toth, and X. J. Meng. 2001. Evidence of extrahepatic sites of replication of the hepatitis E virus in a swine model. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:3040-3046.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Wu, J. C., C. M. Chen, T. Y. Chiang, W. H. Tsai, W. J. Jeng, I. J. Sheen, C. C. Lin, and X. J. Meng. 2002. Spread of hepatitis E virus among different-aged pigs: two-year survey in Taiwan. J. Med. Virol.66:488-492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Yoo D., P. Willson, Y. Pei, M. A. Hayes, A. Deckert, C. E. Dewey, R. M. Friendship, Y. Yoon, M. Gottschalk, C. Yason, and A. Giulivi. 2001. Prevalence of hepatitis E virus antibodies in Canadian swine herds and identification of a novel variant of swine hepatitis E virus. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.8:1213-1219.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Zafrullah, M., M. H. Ozdener, S. K. Panda, and S. Jameel. 1997. The ORF3 protein of hepatitis E virus is a phosphopretein that associates with the cytoskeleton. J. Virol.71:9045-9053.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Heterogeneity and Seroprevalence of a Newly Identified Avian Hepatitis E Virus from Chickens in the United States
F. F. Huang, G. Haqshenas, H. L. Shivaprasad, D. K. Guenette, P. R. Woolcock, C. T. Larsen, F. W. Pierson, F. Elvinger, T. E. Toth, X. J. Meng
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Nov 2002, 40 (11) 4197-4202; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4197-4202.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Heterogeneity and Seroprevalence of a Newly Identified Avian Hepatitis E Virus from Chickens in the United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Heterogeneity and Seroprevalence of a Newly Identified Avian Hepatitis E Virus from Chickens in the United States
F. F. Huang, G. Haqshenas, H. L. Shivaprasad, D. K. Guenette, P. R. Woolcock, C. T. Larsen, F. W. Pierson, F. Elvinger, T. E. Toth, X. J. Meng
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Nov 2002, 40 (11) 4197-4202; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4197-4202.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chickens
Genetic Variation
Hepatitis Antibodies
Hepatitis E
hepatitis E virus
Poultry Diseases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X