Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Chlamydiology and Rickettsiology

Predominance of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Associated with Urogenital Infections in Females in New Delhi, India

Vineeta Singh, Sudha Salhan, B. C. Das, A. Mittal
Vineeta Singh
1Institute of Pathology-ICMR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sudha Salhan
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi 110 029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. C. Das
3Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology-ICMR, Maulana Azad Medical College Campus, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Mittal
1Institute of Pathology-ICMR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: amittal_iop@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2700-2702.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis was done for 280 endocervical swab samples by PCR specific for endogenous plasmid. Age dependency was seen in symptomatic patients, with a high chlamydial prevalence rate (28%) found in younger women. Genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of omp1 PCR-positive samples showed serovars D, E, and F to be the most prevalent.

Chlamydia trachomatis is a major cause of sexually transmitted disease (16). Serovars D to K are chiefly responsible for urogenital infections; of these serovars, E, F, and D account for up to 60 to 70% of these infections (1, 5, 14, 20). Epidemiological studies of C. trachomatis infections in sexual contacts have been few to date, which hampers the study of chlamydial transmission, its route of spread in a population, its virulence factors, and the associated risk factors of C. trachomatis infections (12, 19). Compared with immunotyping, the genotyping methods, particularly omp1 are more sensitive and precise in revealing C. trachomatis variants within serovars as well as in potential recombinants among serovars (13, 15, 18). The present study was undertaken to understand the occurrence of C. trachomatis serovars in the genital tracts of infected women, which will help in devising an effective screening program for routine diagnosis of chlamydial infections, understanding the immunopathogenesis, and developing an effective chlamydial control program.

Reference C. trachomatis standard serovars were kindly provided by T. Ossewaarde (National Institute of Public Health and Environment Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands). Cervical swabs (n = 280) were obtained from patients (17) attending the gynecology outpatient clinic for various gynecological reasons (abnormal vaginal discharge and pelvic pain) at Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India. Chlamydial DNA was extracted from the clinical specimens by the alkali lysis method (2). The study protocol was approved by the committee responsible for the evaluation of work involving human subjects. Prior consent was obtained in all cases.

The clinical samples were first screened by a PCR specific for the human β-globin gene. The primers used for the human β-globin PCR were P1 (sense, 5′ ACA CAA CTG TGT TCA CTA GC) and P2 (antisense, 5′ GAA ACC CAA GAG TCT TCT CT). Samples positive in the β-globin PCR were used for C. trachomatis detection by using a plasmid PCR performed as described previously. The plasmid primers P3 (sense, 5′GAA CAA ATC GTA TCT CGG) and P4 (antisense, 5′GAA ACC AAC TCT ACG TCG) generated a fragment of 517 bp in the C. trachomatis-positive samples. The omp1 gene was amplified by primers selected from the published sequences of the omp1 gene of C. trachomatis (L2) (21). The PCR mixture contained 25 pmol of each of the forward and reverse primers, 200 μM concentrations of each of the deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and dCTP), 10× PCR buffer (containing 10 mM Tris HCl [pH 8.3], 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% gelatin), and 0.1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco-BRL). PCR was performed in a thermocycler as follows: 5 min at 95°C; 40 cycles each consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 2 min; and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. Restriction endonuclease digestion was performed with the restriction enzymes AluI, CfoI, HinfI, DdeI, and EcoRI (Promega, Madison, Wis.) on 5-μl amounts of the amplified 871-bp PCR products by following the manufacturer's instructions.

All samples shown positive by the β-globin PCR assay were further screened by a plasmid PCR specific for the C. trachomatis endogenous plasmid. A clear age dependency was observed, showing a high prevalence rate among younger women. The overall prevalence rates of C. trachomatis in cervical swabs as determined by plasmid PCR were 28.5% in group I (age, 18 to 25 years), 7.6% in group II (age, 25 to 35 years), and 3.2% in group III (age, 35 to 45 years). C. trachomatis-positive swabs detected by plasmid PCR were further examined by omp1 PCR for genotyping by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Purified PCR products were digested with AluI to differentiate serovars of C. trachomatis (Fig. 1). Serovars D and E showed fragments varying from 244 to 91 bp in size. Serovars B and D had a closely related pattern, except for the presence (serovar B) or absence (serovar D) of a 91-bp band in the digestion profile with AluI. The standard serovar F showed fragment sizes of 321 to 80 bp after digestion. Standard serovars L3 and I, which are in the C complex, showed fragment of sizes 486 to 92 bp after digestion with AluI.

Serovars H, L3, and I were further distinguished by enzyme digestion with EcoRI and DdeI. With EcoRI, serovar I gave two bands, whereas with DdeI, it gave four bands varying between 323 to 80 bp in size. The clinical samples which were identified as having banding patterns matching that of serovar D after digestion with the AluI enzyme were further differentiated by digesting them with CfoI restriction enzyme. After analysis with the CfoI restriction enzyme, clinical samples were identified as serovar D, since they had an identical banding pattern as that of the standard serovar D. The restriction endonuclease sites for the various restriction enzymes are listed in Table 1.

C. trachomatis serovar D (48%) was found to be the most prevalent, followed by serovars E (34%), F (12%), and I (6%) in urogenital samples.

The present study demonstrated that the prevalence of symptomatic C. trachomatis infection is high in cervical swabs, as determined by a sensitive PCR assay, and is age dependent. These data are in agreement with earlier published reports showing high C. trachomatis rates (6, 10). The clinical samples could be discriminated by restriction endonuclease digestion with AluI. However, for a few clinical samples, digestion with HinfI, DdeI, CfoI, and EcoRI was done, which further aided in discriminating among C. trachomatis serovars.

In our study, serovar D (48%) was found to be the most prevalent serovar, followed by serovars E (34%), F (12%), and I (6%) in the urogenital samples. A similar distribution of C. trachomatis serovars has been reported earlier with tissue culture isolates (11). This pattern of serovar prevalence was found to be in accordance with the distribution of C. trachomatis serovars in other regions of the world (4, 7, 8, 9). We were not able to find other serovars J, H, K, or G of C. trachomatis, which have been reported by few workers (1, 3, 12). We did not observe any restriction endonuclease pattern different from the prototype or known variant strains in the 50 clinical samples examined. But this would have not been surprising, as others have found only a limited number of variants by serologic methods. In conclusion, C. trachomatis genotyping in women younger than age 30 years revealed that serovars D and E were more frequently found in symptomatic patients. The procedure we have used for cervical swabs by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis should enable basic serovar identification and provide a springboard for studies of variation.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

AluI restriction endonuclease digestion of PCR products of C. trachomatis-positive clinical samples visualized by silver staining on polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Lanes: M, molecular size marker; 1, standard serovar D; 2, clinical sample showing banding pattern matching that of standard serovar D; 3, standard serovar E; 4, clinical sample showing banding pattern matching that of standard serovar E; 5, standard serovar F; 6, clinical sample showing banding pattern matching that of standard serovar F; 7, standard serovar I; 8, clinical sample showing banding pattern matching that of standard serovar I; 9, uncut amplicon.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Restriction endonuclease sites for different restriction enzymes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partly supported by the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 October 2002.
    • Returned for modification 23 December 2002.
    • Accepted 26 February 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bandea, C. I., K. Kubota, T. M. Brown, P. H. Kilmarx, V. Bhullar, S. Yanparsain, P. Chaisilwattana, W. Siriwasin, and C. M. Black. 2001. Typing of C. trachomatis strains from urine samples by amplification and sequencing the major outer membrane protein gene (omp 1). Sex. Transm. Infect.77:419-422.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Birnboim, H. C., and J. Doly. 1979. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acid Res.7:1513-1523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Borrego, M. J., J. P. Gomes, J. F. Lefebvre, F. Eb, J. Orfila, and M. A. Catry. 1997. Genotyping of Portuguese Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital isolates. Genitourin. Med.73:561-563.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Frost, E. H., S. Deslandes, S. Veillexr, and D. Bourgauz-Ramoisy. 1991. Typing C. trachomatis by detection of RFLP in the gene encoding the MOMP. J. Infect. Dis.163:1103-1107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Gaydos, C. A., L. Bobo, L. Welsh, E. W. Hook III, K. Viscidi, and T. C. Quinn. 1992. Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease digestion. Sex. Transm. Dis.19:303-308.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Hammerschlag, M. R., N. H. Golden, K. Oh, M. Gelling, M. Sturdevant, B. R. Brown, Z. Aras, S. Neuhoff, W. Dumornay, and P. M. Rublin. 1993. Single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of genital chlamydial infection in adolescents. J. Pediatr.122:961-965.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Kuo, C. C., S. P. Wang, K. K. Holmes, and J. T. Grayston. 1983. Immunotypes of Chlamydia trachomatis isolates in Seattle, Washington. Infect. Immun.41:865-868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Lan, J., C. J. L. M. Meijer, A. R. van den Hoek, J. M. Ossewaarde, J. M. M. Walbommers, and A. J. C. van den Brule. 1995. Genotyping of C. trachomatis serovars derived from heterosexual partners and a detailed genomic analysis of serovar F. Genitourin. Med.71:299-303.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Lan, J., I. Melgers, C. J. L. M. Meijer, J. M. M. Walboomers, R. Roosendaal, C. Burger, O. P. Bleker, and A. J. C. van den Burle. 1995. Prevalence and serovar distribution of asymptomatic cervical Chlamydiatrachomatis infections as determined by highly sensitive PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:3194-3197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Mittal, A., S. Kapur, and S. Gupta. 1993. Chlamydial cervicitis: role of culture, enzyme immunoassay and Giemsa cytology in diagnosis. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immun. Scand.101:37-40.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Mittal, A. 1998. Serovar distribution of C. trachomatis isolates collected from the cervix: use of the polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease digestion. Br. J. Biomed. Sci.55:179-183.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Moore, S. A., R. Moes, and I. Van Valkengoed. 1998. Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens will facilitate large epidemiological studies. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:3077-3078.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Ossewaarde, J. M., M. Rieffe, M. Rozenberg-Arska, P. M. Ossenkoppele, R. P. Nawrocki, and A. M. van Loon. 1992. Development and clinical evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction test for detection of C. trachomatis. J. Clin. Microbiol.30:2122-2128.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Rodriguez, P., B. de Barbeyrac, K. Persson, B. Dutlith, and C. Sebear. 1993. Evaluation of molecular typing for epidemiology study of Chlamydiatrachomatis genital infections. J. Clin. Microbiol.31:2238-2240.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Sayada, C., E. Denamur, J. Orfila, and J. Elion. 1991. Rapid genotyping of the C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein by the PCR. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.83:73-78.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    Schachter, J. 1999. Infection and epidemiology, p. 391-405. In R. S. Stephens (ed.), Chlamydia: intracellular biology, pathogenesis, and immunity. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  17. 17.↵
    Singh, V., S. Rastogi, S. Garg, S. Kapur, A. Kumar, S. Salhan, and A. Mittal. 2001. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of endocervical C. trachomatis infection in women attending a gynecology outpatient department in India. Acta Cytol.46:540-544.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Stephens, R. S., E. A. Wagar, and G. K. Schoolnik. 1988. High resolution mapping of serovar-specific and common antigenic determinants of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Exp. Med.167:817-831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Viscidi, R. P., L. Bobo, E. W. Hook III, and T. C. Quinn. 1993. Transmission of C. trachomatis among sex partners assessed by polymerase chain reaction. J. Infect. Dis.168:488-492.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Wagenvoort, J. H. T., R. J. Suchland, and W. E. Stamm. 1988. Serovar distribution of urogenital C. trachomatis strains in the Netherlands. Genitourin. Med.64:159-161.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Yang, C. L., I. Maclean, and R. C. Brunham. 1993. DNA sequence polymorphism of the C. trachomatis omp1 gene. J. Infect. Dis.168:1225-1230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Predominance of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Associated with Urogenital Infections in Females in New Delhi, India
Vineeta Singh, Sudha Salhan, B. C. Das, A. Mittal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 2003, 41 (6) 2700-2702; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2700-2702.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predominance of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Associated with Urogenital Infections in Females in New Delhi, India
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Predominance of Chlamydia trachomatis Serovars Associated with Urogenital Infections in Females in New Delhi, India
Vineeta Singh, Sudha Salhan, B. C. Das, A. Mittal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jun 2003, 41 (6) 2700-2702; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2700-2702.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chlamydia Infections
Chlamydia trachomatis
Female Urogenital Diseases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X