Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

Utility of the Focus Technologies West Nile Virus Immunoglobulin M Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Testing Cerebrospinal Fluid

Harry E. Prince, Mary Lape'-Nixon, Ronald J. Moore, Wayne R. Hogrefe
Harry E. Prince
Focus Technologies, Cypress, California 90630
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hprince@focustechnologies.com
Mary Lape'-Nixon
Focus Technologies, Cypress, California 90630
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald J. Moore
Focus Technologies, Cypress, California 90630
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne R. Hogrefe
Focus Technologies, Cypress, California 90630
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.12-15.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Focus Technologies has developed an immunoglobulin M (IgM) capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit that utilizes recombinant West Nile virus (WNV) antigens to detect WNV IgM in serum. We evaluate here the utility of the kit for detecting WNV IgM in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The sensitivity was evaluated by using 52 CSF specimens from the 2002 WNV season that were positive in both the Public Health Service Laboratories WNV IgM ELISA and an in-house WNV IgM ELISA with native WNV antigen. The specificity was evaluated with two groups of specimens: (i) 73 CSF specimens submitted for in-house WNV IgM ELISA testing from February through April 2003 and yielding a negative WNV IgM result and (ii) 60 CSF specimens determined to be positive for another virus by PCR testing. Using these 185 CSF specimens at a screening dilution of 1:2, the kit was determined to be 100% sensitive and 100% specific. Endpoint titers were determined for 20 IgM-positive CSF specimens by testing serial twofold dilutions and ranged from 1:8 to 1:512. Index values (specimen absorbance value/calibrator absorbance value) for the screening dilution (1:2) showed no correlation with IgM titers, whereas index values for higher dilutions showed significant correlation with IgM titers. CSF screening dilutions of greater than 1:2 are not recommended, however, due to the risk of obtaining false-negative results. These findings show that the Focus Technologies WNV IgM capture ELISA, when utilized as recommended, offers accurate qualitative detection of WNV IgM in CSF specimens.

Laboratory assays designed to detect West Nile virus (WNV)-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) have proven to be very useful for the diagnosis of West Nile virus (WNV) infection (1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10-13). The vast majority of WNV-infected patients have detectable WNV IgM in serum specimens collected at presentation (6, 9). Involvement of the central nervous system in the infectious process is demonstrated by the detection of WNV-specific IgM in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (6, 9, 11, 12). Serum and CSF are typically screened for WNV IgM by using an IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Due to the cross-reactivity observed among flaviviruses in the Japanese encephalitis virus seroocomplex, ELISA-positive samples may be tested by using a confirmatory assay, such as the plaque reduction neutralization test, to show that the IgM detected is specific for WNV (6, 9, 10, 12).

Focus Technologies has developed a WNV IgM capture ELISA kit for the detection of WNV IgM in serum. This kit, which utilizes recombinant WNV premembrane and envelope proteins (3), demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity compared to the assays used during the 2002 WNV season in the United States (W. R. Hogrefe, R. J. Moore, and H. E. Prince, unpublished observations). The purpose of the studies presented here was to determine the performance characteristics of the Focus Technologies WNV IgM capture ELISA kit for detecting WNV IgM in CSF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CSF specimen panels.The three panels used to assess assay sensitivity and specificity are described in Table 1. The sensitivity panel consisted of frozen (−70°C) aliquots of 52 CSF specimens giving a positive result in an in-house WNV IgM capture ELISA (utilizing native WNV antigens) performed by the Focus Technologies reference laboratory Immunology section during the 2002 WNV season (10, 11). This assay was performed by using CSF at a 1:5 dilution as described previously (11). Duplicate aliquots of these specimens were forwarded to PHSL (13 different State Public Health Laboratories) for further evaluation during 2002, and all 52 specimens were also positive in the Public Health Service Laboratories (PHSL) WNV IgM capture ELISA (7, 11). Only five of these CSF specimens were tested by the plaque reduction neutralization test, and all were positive for WNV-specific antibodies. The specificity was evaluated by using two different panels. The first specificity panel consisted of 73 CSF specimens submitted for testing by the in-house WNV IgM capture ELISA (native antigen) during a period of low WNV endemicity (February through April 2003) and giving a negative WNV IgM result. The second specificity panel consisted of 60 CSF specimens positive for another virus by PCR testing performed by the Focus Technologies reference laboratory Molecular Diagnostics section; samples were frozen (−70C) after PCR testing until utilized for the present study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

CSF specimens evaluated

WNV IgM capture ELISA kit.The Focus Technologies (Cypress, Calif.) WNV IgM capture ELISA kit utilizing recombinant antigens was used according to the manufacturer's instructions, with the exception that CSF was diluted 1:2. The kit contains a calibrator serum, which is included in all runs; the reactivity of each kit control and unknown specimen is expressed relative to the reactivity of the calibrator serum, thus allowing for the interassay comparison of results. Calibrator serum (in triplicate), negative control serum, and positive control serum were diluted 1:101 in sample diluent (phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Tween 20), and CSF specimens were diluted 1:2 in sample diluent. Diluted specimens (0.1 ml) were added to microtiter wells (Nunc PolySorp) coated with rabbit anti-human IgM (heavy-chain specific). After an hour at room temperature, the wells were washed three times with 0.25-ml volumes of wash buffer (phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.1% Tween 20); the wells then received 0.1 ml of WNV recombinant antigen (lyophilized material reconstituted with sample diluent per the package insert) for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes as described above, 0.1 ml of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-flavivirus monoclonal antibody (6B6C-1), supplied as a ready-to-use reagent, was added to all wells. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min and three washes as described above, the wells received 0.1 ml of enzyme substrate (tetramethylbenzidine), supplied as a ready-to-use reagent, for 10 min; the reaction was then stopped by the addition of 0.1 ml of 2 N sulfuric acid. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured by using an ELISA reader. For each specimen, including serum controls and patient CSF specimens, the index value was calculated by dividing the specimen absorbance value by the mean absorbance value obtained for the calibrator serum. Index values of <0.90 were considered negative, values of 0.90 to 1.10 were considered equivocal, and values of >1.10 were considered positive for WNV IgM.

Titration of positive CSF specimens.To further characterize CSF specimens giving a positive result with the WNV IgM capture ELISA kit (recombinant antigen), serial twofold dilutions of positive specimens with sufficient volume (n = 20) were tested as described in the previous section. The endpoint titer was defined as the highest dilution giving an index value of ≥0.90.

Statistical analyses.The relationship between index values observed at various CSF dilutions and endpoint titers was evaluated by using linear regression anal-ysis. A correlation coefficient (R2) with a P value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity.The results for the sensitivity and specificity panels are shown in Fig. 1. All CSF specimens in the sensitivity panel exhibited WNV IgM capture ELISA (recombinant antigen) index values of >1.10, whereas all CSF specimens in the two specificity panels exhibited index values of <0.90. Thus, when used to test CSF specimens at a 1:2 dilution, the Focus Technologies WNV IgM capture ELISA kit was 100% sensitive and 100% specific.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Distribution of index values for CSF specimens tested in the Focus Technologies WNV IgM Capture ELISA kit. Each point represents the result for one specimen.

Titration studies.WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens with sufficient volume were serially diluted and tested to determine the endpoint titer. Index values are presented as a function of dilutions in Fig. 2. For 16 of 20 CSF specimens, the titer was measurable using dilutions between 1:2 and 1:256; four specimens required retesting with dilutions expanded to cover the range 1:2 to 1:1,024. The distribution of endpoint titers was as follows: 1:8 (n = 1), 1:16 (n = 4), 1:32 (n = 1), 1:64 (n = 5), 1:128 (n = 4), 1:256 (n = 2), and 1:512 (n = 3).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Titration curves for 20 WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens. Each curve represents the results for one CSF specimen.

Relationship of index values at various dilutions to endpoint titers.To determine whether index values could be used as a semiquantitative indicator of endpoint titers, index values obtained for 1:2 to 1:16 dilutions were plotted as a function of endpoint titers for the 20 WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens tested by serial dilution (Fig. 3). No significant correlation was observed between endpoint titers and index values at a 1:2 dilution. In contrast, endpoint titers were significantly correlated with index values at 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16 dilutions. Higher dilutions were associated with higher correlation coefficients. However, the strong correlation between endpoint titers and index values at the 1:16 dilution was offset by a decrease in assay sensitivity; the specimen with a titer of 1:8 exhibited a false-negative result at the 1:16 dilution, and two of three specimens with titers of 1:16 were equivocal.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Relationship of index values at various dilutions to endpoint titers for 20 WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens. Correlation coefficient (R2) values at 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16 dilutions (B, C, and D, respectively) were statistically significant (P < 0.01), whereas the correlation coefficient for the 1:2 dilution (A) did not reach statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

The findings presented in this report clearly demonstrate that the Focus Technologies WNV IgM Capture ELISA kit, initially designed for testing serum, accurately detects WNV IgM in CSF. Using a panel of well-characterized CSF specimens known to contain WNV IgM, the kit exhibited 100% sensitivity. Likewise, the kit was 100% specific; all 73 CSF specimens collected during a period of low endemicity and negative for WNV IgM by using an in-house ELISA based on reactivity with native WNV antigens were also WNV IgM negative with the kit. Studies conducted with an additional specificity panel demonstrated that CSF specimens from patients with infections caused by other viruses, including enteroviruses and herpesviruses, did not give false-positive results with the WNV IgM kit.

Due to the unavailability of CSF specimens from patients with other flavivirus infections, we were not able to perform CSF cross-reactivity studies with the Focus Technologies IgM kit. However, studies using similar IgM capture assays to evaluate serum specimens have shown that cross-reactivity may be extensive, depending on the infecting flavivirus. Martin et al. (8) found that 63% of sera from patients infected with St. Louis encephalitis virus gave a positive signal in a WNV IgM capture ELISA; in contrast, only 31% of patients with Japanese encephalitis virus infection were reactive. These findings emphasize the need to perform additional testing for patients whose CSF and/or serum are positive in a flavivirus IgM capture ELISA.

Our choice of a screening dilution of 1:2 for CSF was a compromise between precedent and practicality. Although CSF specimens are tested undiluted in the PHSL WNV IgM ELISA (7, 8), our experience in a reference laboratory setting demonstrates that the volume of CSF submitted is often too low to permit testing of undiluted sample. Thus, some degree of dilution is required to facilitate testing of all submitted CSF specimens. Further, subjecting CSF specimens to dilution serves to minimize any adverse matrix effects that may characterize utilization of undiluted CSF.

Detailed characterization of WNV IgM detection in CSF at various dilutions revealed that, at the screening dilution of 1:2, the WNV IgM capture ELISA kit functions as a qualitative assay. There was no significant correlation between the index observed at 1:2 and the endpoint titer determined by testing serial twofold dilutions. Although the results indicated that the assay exhibited quantitative characteristics at higher dilutions, the routine utilization of higher dilutions for CSF testing is not recommended. This position is based mainly on the lack of data regarding the endpoint titers of WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens exhibiting index values in the range of 1.1 to 3.0 when tested at a 1:2 dilution. Although three WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens exhibited index values in this range (Fig. 1), none had sufficient volume to allow titration studies. Along these same lines, the population of WNV IgM-positive CSF specimens used for these experiments was biased toward strongly positive specimens, since they were positive when tested at a 1:5 dilution in the 2002 WNV IgM ELISA utilizing native WNV antigen (11). Thus, it remains unclear what proportion of CSF specimens truly positive for WNV IgM, as assessed at a 1:2 dilution with the new WNV IgM ELISA kit, may give false-negative results at higher dilutions. Until the findings of such studies are available, we recommend that the Focus Technologies WNV IgM capture ELISA kit be used as a qualitative assay for the detection of WNV IgM in CSF specimens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all PHSL staff members who generated and supplied PHSL WNV IgM ELISA results. Jane Filamor, Maryam Saber- Tehrani, and Susan Vogeli provided expert technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 August 2003.
    • Returned for modification 11 September 2002.
    • Accepted 11 October 2003.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Besselaar, T. G., N. K. Blackburn, and N. Aldridge. 1989. Comparison of an antibody-capture IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with IgM-indirect immunofluorescence for the diagnosis of acute Sindbis and West Nile infections. J. Virol. Methods25:337-345.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Briese, T., X.-Y. Jia, C. Huang, L. J. Grady, and W. I. Lipkin. 1999. Identification of a Kunjin/West Nile-like flavivirus in brains of patients with New York encephalitis. Lancet354:1261-1262.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Davis, B. S., C.-J. J. Chang, B. Cropp, J. T. Roehrig, D. A. Martin, C. J. Mitchell, R. Bowen, and M. L. Bunning. 2001. West Nile virus recombinant DNA vaccine protects mouse and horse from virus challenge and expresses in vitro a noninfectious recombinant antigen that can be used in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Virol.75:4040-4047.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Karoka, P., H. Zeller, M. Niedrig, A. D. Osterhaus, and J. Groen. 2002. Reactivity of serum samples from patients with a flavivirus infection measured by immunoflurescence assay and ELISA. Microbes Infect.4:1209-1215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Malan, A. K., P. J. Stipanovich, T. B. Martins, H. R. Hill, and C. M. Litwin. 2003. Detection of IgG and IgM to West Nile virus: development of an immunofluorescence assay. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.119:508-515.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Marfin, A. A., and D. J. Gubler. 2001. West Nile encephalitis: an emerging disease in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:1713-1719.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Martin, D. A., D. A. Muth, T. Brown, A. J. Johnson, N. Karabatsos, and J. T. Roehrig. 2000. Standardization of immunoglobulin M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for routine diagnosis of arboviral infections. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:1823-1826.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Martin, D. A., B. J. Biggerstaff, B. Allen, A. J. Johnson, R. S. Lanciotti, and J. T. Roehrig. 2002. Use of immunoglobulin M cross-reactions in differential diagnosis of human flaviviral encephalitis infections in the United States. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.9:544-549.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Petersen, L. R., a nd A. A. Marfin. 2002. West Nile virus: a primer for the clinician. Ann. Intern. Med.137:173-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Prince, H. E., and W. R. Hogrefe. 2003. Performance characteristics of an in-house assay system used to detect West Nile virus (WNV)-specific immunoglobulin M during the 2001 WNV season in the United States. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.10:177-179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Prince, H. E., and W. R. Hogrefe. 2003. Detection of West Nile virus (WNV)-specific immunoglobulin M in a reference laboratory setting during the United States 2002 WNV season. 2003. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.10:764-768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Roehrig, J. T., D. Nash, B. Maldin, A. Labowitz, D. A. Martin, R. S. Lanciotti, and G. L. Campbell. 2003. Persistence of virus-reactive serum immunoglobulin M antibody in confirmed West Nile Virus encephalitis cases. Emerg. Infect. Dis.9:376-379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Tardei, G., S. Ruta, V. Chitu, T. F. Tsai, and C. Cernescu. 2000. Evaluation of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG enzyme immunoassays in serologic diagnosis of West Nile virus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:2232-2239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Utility of the Focus Technologies West Nile Virus Immunoglobulin M Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Testing Cerebrospinal Fluid
Harry E. Prince, Mary Lape'-Nixon, Ronald J. Moore, Wayne R. Hogrefe
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2004, 42 (1) 12-15; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.12-15.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Utility of the Focus Technologies West Nile Virus Immunoglobulin M Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Testing Cerebrospinal Fluid
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Utility of the Focus Technologies West Nile Virus Immunoglobulin M Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Testing Cerebrospinal Fluid
Harry E. Prince, Mary Lape'-Nixon, Ronald J. Moore, Wayne R. Hogrefe
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2004, 42 (1) 12-15; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.12-15.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Viral
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
immunoglobulin M
West Nile virus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X