Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Minireview

Rare and Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens: Concern for Resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus

M. A. Pfaller, D. J. Diekema
M. A. Pfaller
1Departments of Pathology
2Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
D. J. Diekema
1Departments of Pathology
3Medicine College of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4419-4431.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The frequency of invasive mycoses due to opportunistic fungal pathogens has increased significantly over the past two decades (35, 74, 83, 88, 89, 101, 106). This increase in infections is associated with excessive morbidity and mortality (33, 50, 108) and is directly related to increasing patient populations at risk for the development of serious fungal infections, which includes individuals undergoing solid-organ transplantation, blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), and major surgery and those with AIDS, neoplastic disease, immunosuppressive therapy, advanced age, and premature birth (5, 35, 89, 106). Serious life-threatening infections are being reported with an ever increasing array of pathogens, including the well-known opportunists Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus (35, 63, 88). New and emerging fungal pathogens include species of Candida and Aspergillus other than C. albicans and A. fumigatus: opportunistic yeast-like fungi such as Trichosporon spp., Rhodotorula spp., and Geotrichum capitatum (Blastoschizomyces capitatus); the zygomycetes; hyaline molds, such as Fusarium, Acremonium, Scedosporium, Paecilomyces, and Trichoderma species; and a wide variety of dematiaceous fungi (Table 1) (6, 57, 71, 83, 90, 94, 106, 113). The field of medical mycology has become an extremely challenging study of infections caused by a wide and taxonomically diverse array of opportunistic fungi. The message to both clinicians and clinical microbiologists is that there are no uniformly nonpathogenic fungi: any fungus can cause a lethal infection in a sufficiently immunocompromised host and should never be dismissed out of hand as a contaminant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Rare and emerging opportunistic fungal pathogensa

Given the complexity of the patients at risk for infection and the diverse and increasing array of fungal pathogens, opportunistic mycoses pose considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges (79, 106). Diagnosis depends upon clinical suspicion and the retrieval of appropriate material for culture and histopathology. Isolation and identification of the infecting organisms are extremely important for the proper management of infections due to the less common opportunistic fungi (106). Some of these organisms are inherently nonsusceptible to standard azole or polyene therapy and may require the use of alternative antifungal agents, in addition to surgical management and reversal of the underlying impairment of host defenses (106).

In this article we review selected emerging agents (e.g., C. glabrata) and less common agents of opportunistic mycoses with an emphasis on what is known of their susceptibility and resistance to both new and established antifungal agents. Although we now have available several exciting new antifungal agents with improved spectra of activity and potencies, it is useful to keep in mind that broad and injudicious use of any anti-infective agent in a severely immunocompromised host may result in superinfections due to organisms that are both unusual and drug resistant (94, 106).

EMERGING AND RARE CANDIDA SPECIES: BEYOND C. ALBICANS

More than 17 different species of Candida have been identified as etiologic agents of bloodstream infections (BSIs). Approximately 95% of all Candida BSIs are caused by four species: C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis (35, 74, 88). The excellent activities of new and established systemic antifungal agents against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis are well documented (35, 74, 85). Among these common species, only C. glabrata can be said to be truly emerging as a cause of BSIs, due in part to its intrinsic and acquired resistance to azoles and other commonly used antifungal agents (88, 101). The remaining 5% of Candida BSIs are caused by 12 to 14 different species, including C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, C. guilliermondii, C. dubliniensis, and C. rugosa, among others (83). Although these species must be considered rare causes of BSIs, several have been observed to occur in nosocomial clusters and/or to exhibit innate or acquired resistance to one or more established antifungal agents (13, 19, 22, 36, 98, 111). Given that these uncommon species may emerge as important opportunistic pathogens in the future, it is useful to describe the activities of both new and established antifungal agents as potential therapeutic options for infections due to these species (83, 84). The in vitro activities, determined by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) reference methods (67), of seven systemically active antifungal agents against one emerging species (C. glabrata) and five of the less common species of Candida isolated from blood cultures are shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

. In vitro susceptibilities of rare and emerging species of Candida to new and established antifungal agents determined by NCCLS M27-A2 broth dilution MIC methodsa

C. glabrata. C. glabrata has emerged as an important and potentially resistant opportunistic fungal pathogen (84, 88, 101). Trick et al. (101) have demonstrated that among the Candida spp. C. glabrata alone has increased in incidence as a cause of BSIs in U.S. intensive care units since 1993. Likewise, in certain regions of the United States C. glabrata both is a common cause of BSI and is also often resistant to fluconazole (35, 88). Surveys from other parts of the world, however, suggest that C. glabrata has not increased as a cause of BSIs to the same extent as that seen in the United States and, furthermore, may not be as resistant to fluconazole as U.S. isolates (84, 88, 91, 100).

In a recent study of clinically invasive isolates of C. glabrata from four different geographic regions (North America, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region), we confirmed that the azoles were less active against isolates from North America than those from other regions of the world (84). We have also shown that azoles have the greatest activities against C. glabrata isolates from the Asia-Pacific region (84, 88).

C. glabrata is innately less susceptible to fluconazole and amphotericin B than most other species of Candida (77, 81, 84) and displays the capacity to rapidly develop resistance to all azoles via induction of CgCDR1 and PDH1 efflux pumps (4, 92). Exposure of C. glabrata to subtherapeutic concentrations of fluconazole may result in resistance (4), and clinical studies have shown that the frequency of colonization and infection of patients with C. glabrata may be increased in populations subjected to fluconazole prophylaxis (52). However, the reason for the emergence of C. glabrata as an important cause of BSIs is likely not as simple as selection by drug pressure (e.g., fluconazole) but may be influenced by patient age, underlying diseases, geographic location, or other unknown factors (84, 88).

The data in Table 2 demonstrate the decreased susceptibility of C. glabrata to fluconazole (61.9% susceptible [S] at ≤8 μg/ml) and amphotericin B (75.2% S at ≤1 μg/ml). Amphotericin B MICs were >2 μg/ml for 12 of the 601 isolates tested (2%) by the Etest method (84). The activities of the new extended-spectrum triazoles against C. glabrata were considerably better than that of fluconazole. This is because the vast majority of isolates for which fluconazole MICs are 16 to 32 μg/ml (susceptible-dose dependent) appear to be susceptible to voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole (87 to 97% S at MIC ≤1 μg/ml).

It has been suggested that the new triazoles may be active against strains of C. glabrata that are resistant to fluconazole (43); however, a strong positive correlation can be seen between voriconazole (R = 0.9) and posaconazole (R = 0.8) MICs and fluconazole MICs (Fig. 1). We have also noted a similar correlation between ravuconazole MICs and fluconazole MICs, suggesting cross-resistance (86). Isolates resistant to fluconazole are less susceptible to voriconazole, ravuconazole, and posaconazole, with MICs ≥2 μg/ml for 83, 89, and 92% of isolates, respectively. Although the clinical significance of these in vitro data has yet to be determined, cross-resistance among the azoles should not be surprising with C. glabrata, given the ability of this species to rapidly upregulate CDR drug efflux pumps and the effectiveness of these pumps against all of the azoles (4).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Scattergram comparing fluconazole and voriconazole MICs (R = 0.9) (A) and fluconazole and posaconazole MICs (R = 0.8) (B) for C. glabrata. The strong correlations suggest considerable cross-resistance.

Caspofungin (MIC at which 90% of isolates are inhibited [MIC90] = 0.06 μg/ml; 100% S at MIC ≤1 μg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC90 = 0.12 μg/ml; 99.2% S) were the most active against C. glabrata (Table 2). All fluconazole-resistant strains were also susceptible to both of these agents (MICs ≤ 0.25 μg/ml). Although it may not be unexpected that a novel newly introduced agent such as caspofungin would be active against this species, the excellent potency of flucytosine against C. glabrata is not widely appreciated (82, 84). Both of these agents may be useful therapeutic options in regions where azole resistance is a concern.

C. krusei. C. krusei accounts for 2 to 3% of all Candida BSIs (88). This species is best known for its propensity to emerge in settings where fluconazole is used for prophylaxis (110, 111); however, it is worth noting that colonization and infection among those with hematologic malignancies were apparent in certain medical centers well in advance of the use of fluconazole (41, 109). The antifungal susceptibility profile of C. krusei is that of a multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole (2.9% S; all isolates should be considered resistant), amphotericin B (the MIC was ≤1 μg/ml for 8.0% of isolates), and flucytosine (4.0% S) (Table 2). This MDR pattern is well recognized for C. krusei and is the basis for continuing concern regarding this species as a possible emerging pathogen (77). Importantly, this resistance profile does not extend to the newer triazoles or the echinocandins. Cross-resistance among azoles does not appear to be an issue with C. krusei, as ≥99% of clinical isolates are susceptible to voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole (MICs = 1 μg/ml or less). Likewise, caspofungin has excellent activity against this species (MIC90 = 0.25 μg/ml; 99% S at ≤1 μg/ml).

C. lusitaniae. C. lusitaniae most often causes fungemia in patients with malignancies or other serious comorbid conditions (36). C. lusitaniae is often mentioned in the literature as being capable of developing resistance to amphotericin B during the course of therapy (36, 76, 77) and may present as breakthrough fungemia in immunocompromised patients (36). Among the 103 BSI isolates tested for amphotericin B resistance by Etest (Table 2), 96.7% were susceptible at concentrations of ≤1 μg/ml and two appeared to be highly resistant (MICs = 8 and 16 μg/ml, respectively). This level of susceptibility to amphotericin B is comparable to that seen with C. albicans (95% S) (81). In contrast to broth microdilution testing, the Etest method has been shown to be both sensitive and specific for the detection of resistance to amphotericin B in isolates of C. lusitaniae and other species of Candida (80, 107). On the basis of these data, it appears that primary resistance to amphotericin B is uncommon among incident BSI isolates of C. lusitaniae (i.e., those from the first positive blood culture); however, if amphotericin B is used to treat infections due to this species, the patient should be monitored closely for the emergence of secondary resistance (77). C. lusitaniae may exhibit resistance to flucytosine (89.3% susceptible, 6% resistant) but is highly susceptible to both triazoles (96.1 to 100% susceptible) and caspofungin (100% susceptible).

C. dubliniensis. C. dubliniensis is a recently identified opportunistic yeast pathogen that is closely related to, but genetically distinct from, C. albicans (12). This species is now recognized as a minor constituent of the normal human oral microbial flora and a cause of oral thrush in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals (12). With the development of methods to detect and identify this species (29, 44), it has become evident that C. dubliniensis may also cause oral and vaginal candidiasis in HIV-negative persons (12). Although the incidence of BSIs due to C. dubliniensis is unknown, fungemia due to this species has been reported in North America, Europe, and Australia (7, 54, 59).

Although the majority of C. dubliniensis isolates are susceptible to azoles (83), fluconazole resistance has been observed in clinical isolates from AIDS patients with prior exposure to fluconazole (56, 66). In addition, stable fluconazole resistance is rapidly induced following exposure to the drug in vitro (65). Fluconazole-resistant strains of C. dubliniensis exhibit increased expression of multidrug transporter genes, especially CdMDR1 (66). These findings suggest that antifungal resistance may be a factor in the emergence of C. dubliniensis infections.

Despite concerns regarding the ability of C. dubliniensis to become resistant to fluconazole, most studies have found clinical isolates to be quite susceptible to this agent (7, 54, 59, 83). Only 3 (2.9%) of 101 isolates tested in our laboratories were resistant to fluconazole, and 98% were highly susceptible to the extended-spectrum triazoles (Table 2). Likewise, 100% of the isolates tested were susceptible to amphotericin B, flucytosine, and caspofungin. Thus, it appears that there are several treatment options should resistance to fluconazole become an issue with C. dubliniensis.

C. guilliermondii.Although C. guilliermondii is most often associated with onychomycosis, it has been shown to cause osteomyelitis and hematogenously disseminated candidiasis (19, 98). Dick et al. (19) reported on a case of disseminated candidiasis due to C. guilliermondii in which the patient died, despite amphotericin B therapy. The organism was subsequently shown by in vitro testing to be resistant to amphotericin B. Aside from this case report, resistance to amphotericin B has not been widely appreciated for this species. Among the 102 isolates of C. guilliermondii tested by Etest, only two (MICs = 2 and 32 μg/ml, respectively) appeared to be resistant to amphotericin B. Fluconazole resistance was implicated in a case of osteomyelitis of the finger caused by C. guilliermondii (98). The infection failed to respond, despite prolonged administration of fluconazole (400 mg/day), and partial amputation of the infected finger was ultimately required. The isolate of C. guilliermondii obtained from cultures of infected bone was resistant to both fluconazole and itraconazole. In support of these observations, C. guilliermondii does appear to be less susceptible to fluconazole than the more common BSI isolates of Candida (85.3% of C. guilliermondii isolates were susceptible [Table 2], whereas 97 to 99% of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis isolates were susceptible) (24, 25, 88). Although the new triazoles appear to be quite active against this species (96.7 to 97.1% susceptibility to voriconazole, ravuconazole, and posaconazole at an MIC ≤1 μg/ml), one isolate was resistant to all three of these agents (MIC > 8 μg/ml) as well as to fluconazole. The MICs of caspofungin tend to be 2- to 16-fold higher for C. guilliermondii than for other Candida species (87); however, 96.7% of the isolates tested were susceptible at ≤1 μg/ml, and limited experience suggests that this species may respond clinically to treatment with caspofungin (64) (Table 2). All of the isolates tested were susceptible to flucytosine at the NCCLS breakpoint of ≤4 μg/ml (Table 2).

C. rugosa.Decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B, nystatin, and fluconazole has been reported for C. rugosa (22, 24). Dube et al. (22) reported on 15 episodes of candidemia due to C. rugosa in burn patients receiving topical nystatin treatment. Although the source of the outbreak was not identified, the isolates were all shown to be resistant to nystatin. More recently, a cluster of six episodes of candidemia caused by C. rugosa was reported from Brazil (13). Two of the episodes represented breakthrough infections during treatment with amphotericin B, and all four patients receiving this agent died. Thus, resistance to polyenes and nosocomial spread have been reported for C. rugosa (13, 22). Amphotericin B is clearly less active in vitro against this species than against most other Candida species (Table 2). Similarly, decreased susceptibility to flucytosine (84.6% S) and fluconazole (78.9% S) was observed. This profile resembles that of C. krusei, in that resistance to the three established antifungal agents may be seen with C. rugosa. As with C. krusei, C. rugosa is highly susceptible to voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole as well as caspofungin (100% of the isolates were susceptible to concentrations ≤1 μg/ml).

OPPORTUNISTIC YEAST-LIKE FUNGI

In the same manner that Candida species have taken advantage of immunocompromising conditions, indwelling devices, and broad-spectrum antibiotic use, so have a number of non-Candida yeast-like fungi found an “opportunity” to colonize and infect immunocompromised patients (26). These organisms may occupy environmental niches or may be found in food and water and can be normal human microbial flora. The list of these opportunistic yeasts is long, but we will limit this discussion to three genera that pose particular problems with respect to antifungal resistance: Trichosporon spp., Rhodotorula spp., and Geotrichum capitatum (formerly Blastoschizomyces capitatus; teleomorph, Dipodascus capitatus).

Trichosporon spp.The genus Trichosporon consists of six species at present: Trichosporon asahii and T. mucoides are known to cause deep invasive infections, T. asteroides and T. cutaneum cause superficial skin infections, T. ovoides causes white piedra of the scalp, and T. inkin causes white piedra of the pubic hair (26). Unfortunately, most of the literature on serious opportunistic trichosporonosis refers to the older nomenclature of T. beigelii.

Trichosporon causes catheter-associated fungemia in neutropenic patients but may gain entrance to the bloodstream via the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract as well (103, 104, 106). Widespread hematogenous dissemination may manifest as positive blood cultures and multiple cutaneous lesions. Chronic hepatic trichosporonosis mimics hepatic candidiasis and may be seen upon recovery from neutropenia (26).

Trichosporon has been reported to be the most common cause of noncandidal yeast infection in patients with hematological malignancies, and infection carries a mortality rate in excess of 80% (26, 103, 104, 106). Susceptibility to amphotericin B is variable, and this agent lacks fungicidal activity against Trichosporon. Clinical failures with amphotericin B, fluconazole, and combinations of the two have been reported; and the outcome is generally dismal in the absence of neutrophil recovery (26, 103, 104, 106). The multiresistant nature of T. asahii makes it a threat for nongranulocytopenic patients as well, as evidenced by a report of apparent nosocomial transmission of a strain resistant to amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine (112). Notably, the new triazoles appear to be more active than fluconazole against Trichosporon (75), and voriconazole has successfully been used to treat disseminated T. asahii infection in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (27).

In vitro susceptibility studies of Trichosporon species by NCCLS methods are limited and generally include only a small number of isolates (Table 3). Arikan and Hascelik (2) reported elevated amphotericin B MICs and moderate susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole for 43 isolates of T. asahii (Table 3). Similar results for these agents were reported by Paphitou et al. (75), whereas good activity was seen with the extended-spectrum triazoles, especially posaconazole (MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml) and voriconazole (MIC50, 0.06 μg/ml). Paphitou et al. (75) found non-T. asahii isolates to be more susceptible than T. asahii isolates to amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole, whereas the new triazoles gave activity comparable to that seen against T. asahii (Table 3). Espinel-Ingroff (24, 25) reported results for T. beigelii that were similar to those reported by Arikan and Hascelik (2) and Paphitou et al. (75) for amphotericin B and the azoles and, in addition, showed the lack of activity of the echinocandins, caspofungin, and anidulafungin (Table 3). On the basis of the results of these in vitro studies, it appears that the azoles in general, and voriconazole and posaconazole in particular, have activities superior to that of amphotericin B. Similar to flucytosine, the echinocandins lack any useful activity against this organism. On the basis of the limited amount of data available at present, treatment of disseminated trichosporonosis in a persistently neutropenic patient should include an azole in conjunction with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (26).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

In vitro susceptibilities of opportunistic non-Candida yeast-like fungi to new and established antifungal agents determined by NCCLS M27-A2 broth dilution MIC methodsa

Rhodotorula spp.Species of Rhodotorula include Rhodotorula glutinis, R. mucilaginosa, R. rubra, and R. minuta. These yeast-like fungi are found as commensals in skin, nails, and mucous membranes as well as in cheese and milk products and environmental sources, including air, soil, shower curtains, bathtub grouts, and toothbrushes. Rhodotorula species are emerging as important human pathogens in immunocompromised patients and those with indwelling devices (8, 23, 40, 46). Rhodotorula has been implicated as a cause of central venous catheter infection and fungemia (40, 113), ocular infections (34), peritonitis (23), and meningitis (46).

There are very few studies in the literature dealing with the in vitro susceptibility of Rhodotorula to systemically active antifungal agents (21, 28, 113). When clinical isolates of Rhodotorula are tested by NCCLS methods (67), the isolates are the most susceptible to amphotericin B (MIC90 = 0.5 μg/ml, 100% of isolates S at ≤1 μg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC90 = 0.25 μg/ml, 100% S at ≤4 μg/ml) (Table 3). The MICs of fluconazole (MIC90 = 256 μg/ml), caspofungin (MIC90 > 8 μg/ml), and micafungin (MIC90 > 64 μg/ml) were all high, representing resistance to these agents. Both itraconazole and ravuconazole were moderately active (MIC90 = 1 μg/ml). The MICs of posaconazole and voriconazole were fourfold higher than those of ravuconazole and itraconazole.

Amphotericin B has excellent activity against Rhodotorula and, coupled with catheter removal, is an optimal therapeutic approach to infections with this organism (8, 113). Flucytosine has excellent in vitro activity but should not be considered for monotherapy. Neither fluconazole nor the echinocandins should be used to treat infections due to Rhodotorula species, and the role of the extended-spectrum triazoles is uncertain pending additional clinical data. Of the extended-spectrum triazoles, ravuconazole is the most potent.

G. capitatum.Among the emerging opportunistic yeast pathogens, Geotrichum capitatum (formerly Blastoschizomyces capitatus; teleomorph, Dipodascus capitatus) is a rarely described yeast-like fungus that produces severe systemic infection in immunocompromised patients, especially those with hematological malignancies (6, 9, 17, 57). It is widely distributed in nature and may be found as part of the normal skin flora. Infection with G. capitatum presents similarly to that with Trichosporon in neutropenic patients, with breakthrough infection (36% of episodes), frequent fungemia with multiorgan (including brain) dissemination, and a mortality rate of 60 to 80% (57). Blood cultures are usually positive. As with Trichosporon, a chronic disseminated form of G. capitatum infection, similar to chronic disseminated candidiasis, may be seen upon resolution of neutropenia.

Data on the antifungal susceptibilities of G. capitatum are quite limited; however, resistance to fluconazole and decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B have been described (6, 9, 30). In vitro susceptibilities determined by NCCLS methods (Table 3) indicate high levels of susceptibility to amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole. Most isolates were susceptible to flucytosine (MIC90 = 4 μg/ml) and fluconazole (MIC90 = 8 μg/ml), although isolates with decreased susceptibilities to both of these agents were observed. Anidulafungin showed only modest activity against the few strains tested.

The optimal approach to therapy is not yet defined. Some investigators believe that G. capitatum has decreased susceptibility to amphotericin B (102); however, the strains tested generally appear to be susceptible (Table 3), and recent clinical experience with patients with leukemia was favorable for treatment with amphotericin B (57). The excellent activity of voriconazole suggests that it may be a useful agent for the treatment of G. capitatum infections. Rapid removal of central venous catheters, adjuvant immunotherapy, and novel antifungal therapies (e.g., either voriconazole or high-dose fluconazole plus amphotericin B) are recommended for treatment of this rare but devastating infection (57).

FILAMENTOUS FUNGI: BEYOND A. FUMIGATUS

Invasive infections due to Aspergillus spp. and other hyaline and dematiaceous fungi have emerged as prominent causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide (18, 50, 53). Although A. fumigatus heads the list of these opportunistic molds (18, 20, 50), infections due to less common but antifungal-resistant species such as A. terreus, an expanding array of zygomycetes, and previously uncommon hyaline (e.g., Fusarium, Acremonium, Scedosporium, Paecilomyces, and Trichoderma) and dematiaceous (e.g., Bipolaris, Cladophialophora, and Alternaria) filamentous fungi are being reported with greater frequency (3, 26, 42, 106). Infections due to these opportunistic molds are usually marked by a poor response to antifungal therapy, resistance in vitro to most available antifungal agents (Fig. 2), and an overall poor outcome with excessive mortality (26, 47, 106).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Antifungal susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. and non-Aspergillus molds to six systemically active antifungal agents, as determined by NCCLS M38-A broth dilution. Data are compiled from reference 20.

A. terreus.The frequency of Aspergillus terreus as a cause of invasive aspergillosis varies from 3 to 12.5% (42, 78). Infections due to this species appear to be increasing in recent years and are of concern given its apparent resistance in vitro to amphotericin B and poor clinical response to treatment with this agent (3, 14, 42, 47, 96). Environmental studies have found A. terreus in showerheads, hospital water storage tanks, and potted plants (1, 48).

Invasive aspergillosis caused by A. fumigatus is rarely documented by positive blood cultures (45, 78). In fact, most bloodstream isolates of Aspergillus species have been shown to represent pseudofungemia or terminal events at autopsy (45). Importantly, among all species of Aspergillus, A. terreus has been shown to cause true aspergillemia (45, 78, 93, 105). Similar to other angioinvasive filamentous fungi (e.g., Fusarium spp., Paecilomyces lilacinus, Scedosporium spp., and Acremonium spp.), A. terreus is capable of adventitious sporulation in which yeast-like spores, or aleurioconidia, are formed in tissue and blood and are more likely to be detected in blood collected for culture (78, 105). Recognition of these aleurioconidia on microscopic examination of tissue, fine needle aspirates, or bronchoscopy specimens can allow a rapid presumptive identification of A. terreus (105).

In contrast to A. fumigatus, A. terreus is resistant in vitro and in vivo to the fungicidal effects of amphotericin B (Table 4) (14, 20, 47, 96, 105). Of note, the new triazoles and echinocandins all have excellent activities in vitro against A. terreus (Table 4). Although clinical experience is limited, both voriconazole and caspofungin have successfully been used to treat invasive aspergillosis due to this species.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

In vitro susceptibilities of opportunistic filamentous fungi to new and established antifungal agents determined by NCCLS M38-A broth dilution MIC methodsa

Zygomycetes.Infections due to the zygomycetes are rare, occurring at an annual rate of 1.7 infections per million population in the United States (89). Unfortunately, when they do occur, infections due to these agents are generally acute and rapidly progressive, with mortality rates of 70 to 100% (31).

The most common etiologic agents of zygomycosis include members of the genera Rhizopus, Mucor, and Absidia. These organisms cause infections in immunocompromised individuals, especially those with diabetic ketoacidosis, neutropenia, and corticosteroid therapy (31). Zygomycetes have a marked predilection for blood vessels and produce multiple emboli with concomitant infarction and necrosis of surrounding tissues. The classic clinical presentation of zygomycosis is that of rhinocerebral and pulmonary involvement; however, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and disseminated infections are well documented (31, 94, 99).

Amphotericin B is the first-line therapy of choice for zygomycosis, often supplemented by surgical debridement and immune reconstitution (31). Most of the zygomycetes appear to be quite susceptible to amphotericin B in vitro and are generally not susceptible to the triazoles or echinocandins (Table 4). Among the extended-spectrum triazoles, however, posaconazole stands apart from both voriconazole and ravuconazole in that it appears to be active against most of the zygomycetes (Table 4) (15, 16, 20, 95). Furthermore, posaconazole has documented efficacy in murine models of zygomycosis (15, 95) and for the treatment of infections in humans, although the experience has been limited (99). In contrast, voriconazole is inactive against these agents (Table 4), and breakthrough zygomycosis has recently been reported in BMT patients receiving voriconazole prophylaxis (58, 94). The latter experience serves to emphasize the fact that in very high risk patients, such as BMT recipients, the organism with the greatest intrinsic resistance to the antifungal agent used will ultimately emerge as a cause of infection (94). Broad usage of any antifungal agent in this population carries a risk of superinfection with an unusual, drug-resistant opportunistic fungus.

Other hyaline molds.The list of hyaline molds that have been shown to cause opportunistic infections is quite long, and it is well beyond the scope of this minireview to discuss them all (26, 106). The taxonomically diverse agents of hyalohyphomycosis do share several characteristics, in that many exhibit decreased susceptibilities to a number of antifungal agents, and when they are present in tissue, they appear as hyaline (nonpigmented), septate, branching filamentous fungi that may be indistinguishable from Aspergillus (106). Culture is necessary to identify these agents and may be critical in determining the most appropriate therapy.

Among the vast numbers of hyaline molds that may serve as opportunists, there are a handful that deserve special mention, given that they are relatively more common and/or that they exhibit antifungal resistance profiles that should be recognized. These organisms are Fusarium spp., Acremonium spp., Scedosporium spp., Paecilomyces spp., and Trichoderma spp. These organisms tend to cause infections in neutropenic patients that are often disseminated in nature and that are almost uniformly fatal in the absence of immune reconstitution (106). Several of these organisms are capable of adventitious conidiation (generation of spores in tissue) with concomitant hematogenous dissemination, positive blood cultures, and multiple cutaneous lesions (26, 106).

The agents of hyalohyphomycosis as a whole tend to be considerably less susceptible than Aspergillus spp. to virtually all of the systemically active antifungal agents (Fig. 2) (20, 24, 25, 72). Fusarium spp. often appear to be resistant to amphotericin B in vitro (Table 4), and breakthrough infections occur frequently in patients treated with this agent (71, 106). Among the new triazoles, only modest activity is seen in vitro (Table 4); however, voriconazole has successfully been used in some patients with amphotericin B-refractory fusariosis (79). Primary therapy with either a lipid formulation of amphotericin B or voriconazole plus vigorous efforts at immune reconstitution is recommended at this time (71, 106).

Within the genus Scedosporium, Scedosporium apiospermum (teleomorph, Pseudallescheria boydii) and S. prolificans represent two important antifungal-resistant opportunistic pathogens. S. apiospermum is a well-known cause of mycetoma and may cause deep-seated infections (e.g., central nervous system [CNS] abscesses) and disseminated infection in BMT recipients and other neutropenic, immunosuppressed individuals (61, 70). This organism is generally considered resistant to amphotericin B, the MICs of which are elevated (Table 4) and to which the clinical response is very poor, despite the use of high doses (106). The extended-spectrum triazoles are active in vitro against S. apiospermum, and both posaconazole and voriconazole have successfully been used for the treatment of CNS abscesses (61, 70). In addition to antifungal therapy, restoration of immune competence is essential for survival in these often fatal infections (106).

S. prolificans causes bone and soft tissue infections in immunocompetent individuals and deeply invasive and disseminated infections in immunocompromised patients. S. prolificans is considered resistant to virtually all of the systemically active antifungal agents, including the extended-spectrum triazoles and the echinocandins (Table 4). Although terbinafine, an inhibitor of squalene epoxidase, does not appear to be active alone, synergy between triazoles and terbinafine against S. prolificans has been demonstrated in vitro (60), and a single patient with disseminated S. prolificans infection has successfully been treated with a combination of voriconazole and terbinafine, in addition to aggressive surgical debridement (39). Despite this apparent success, medical therapy for nonresectable or disseminated disease due to S. prolificans is virtually always ineffective (106). Surgical resection remains the only definitive therapy for infections caused by S. prolificans (106).

Invasive infections due to Acremonuim spp. are almost exclusively seen in patients with neutropenia, transplantation, or some other cause of immunodeficiency (32, 106) and present in a manner similar to that of Fusarium infections, with hematogenously disseminated skin lesions and positive blood cultures (32, 106). The optimal treatment for invasive infections due to Acremonium spp. has not been established. In vitro resistance to amphotericin B, itraconazole, and the echinocandins is seen, whereas the newer triazoles, such as voriconazole, appear to be active in vitro (Table 4). A recent report of successful treatment of a pulmonary infection due to Acremonium strictum with posaconazole suggests that the new triazoles may be useful in treatment of Acremonium infections (37).

Although they are uncommon, Paecilomyces spp. may cause invasive disease in organ and hematopoietic stem cell recipients, individuals with AIDS, and other immunocompromised patients (10, 49, 55, 73). The portal of entry is often breaks in the skin or intravascular catheters; and dissemination, possibly aided by adventitious conidiation in tissue, is common (51, 73). Susceptibility to amphotericin B is variable, with resistance seen in P. lilacinus (Table 4). The triazoles and caspofungin demonstrate good activities (Table 4), and voriconazole has successfully been used to treat both severe cutaneous infections (38) and disseminated disease (55). Given the poor responses of disseminated infections to high-dose amphotericin B therapy that have been reported, the use of voriconazole or lipid formulations of amphotericin B may prove more effective and less toxic (106).

Trichoderma spp. are excellent examples of fungi previously labeled as nonpathogenic that have emerged as important opportunistic pathogens in immunocompromised patients and in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (11). Fatal disseminated disease due to Trichoderma longibrachiatum occurs in patients with hematologic malignancies and following BMT or solid-organ transplantation (11). Most Trichoderma spp. show decreased susceptibilities to amphotericin B, itraconazole, fluconazole, and flucytosine (Table 4) (11). Voriconazole appears to be active against the few species tested (Table 4).

Dematiaceous molds.As with the agents of hyalohyphomycosis, the list of dematiaceous fungi is both long and taxonomically diverse. These organisms are characterized by the presence of a pale brown to dark melanin-like pigment in the cell wall. The dematiaceous fungi may cause a variety of cutaneous and subcutaneous infections in immunocompetent individuals and invasive or disseminated infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients (69, 90, 97).

Infections involving dematiaceous fungi are known as phaeohyphomycoses. The number of dematiaceous molds reported to be etiologic agents of phaeohyphomycosis continues to grow, and several of these organisms appear to be neurotropic (90, 106). Those fungi known to be neurotropic include Cladophialophora bantiana, Bipolaris spicifera, Exophiala spp., Wangiella dermatitidis, Ramichloridium obovoideum, and Chaetomium atrobrunneum (90). Brain abscess is the most common CNS presentation. Bipolaris spp. and Exerohilum rostratum infections may initially present as sinusitis, which then extends into the CNS (90, 106).

The optimal treatment for disseminated or CNS phaeohyphomycosis has not yet been established, although it most often includes early administration of amphotericin B and complete surgical excision (90, 106). Despite these efforts, phaeohyphomycosis does not respond well to therapy and relapses are common (69, 90).

The in vitro activities of the antifungal triazoles (itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole) are superior to that of amphotericin B against many of the dematiaceous molds (Table 4). Posaconazole has successfully been used to treat disseminated infections due to Exophiala spinifera (69). In those patients with brain abscesses, complete excision of the lesion has been associated with improved survival (90). Long-term triazole (posaconazole or voriconazole) therapy coupled with repeat surgical resection may prevent recurrences (106).

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Given the ever increasing number of individuals at risk for fungal infections, it is imperative that physicians “think fungus” when evaluating a potentially infected patient. The list of documented fungal pathogens is extensive, and one can no longer ignore or dismiss fungi as contaminants or clinically insignificant when they are isolated from clinical material. It is also apparent that the prognosis and response to therapy may vary with the type of fungus causing the infection as well as with the immunological status of the host. The extended-spectrum triazoles and the echinocandins clearly expand the coverage available against opportunistic pathogens; however, several of the less common opportunists discussed herein are not susceptible to these newer agents. Thus, fungi with intrinsic resistance to even the very newest antifungal agents already exist in our environment and will surely emerge as opportunistic pathogens as these agents are used broadly in the high-risk patient groups. Both clinicians and microbiologists must become familiar with the various fungi, their epidemiologic and pathogenic features, and the optimal approaches to diagnosis and therapy.

  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Anaissie, E. J., S. L. Stratton, C. Diginani, C. Summerbell, J. H. Rex, T. P. Monson, T. Spencer, M. Kasai, A. Francesconi, and T. J. Walsh. 2002. Pathogenic Aspergillus species recovered from a hospital water system: a 3-year prospective study. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:780-789.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Arikan, S., and G. Hascelik. 2002. Comparison of NCCLS microdilution method and Etest in antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical Trichosporon asahii isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.43:107-111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Baddley, J. W., P. G. Pappas, A. C. Smith, and S. A. Moser. 2003. Epidemiology of Aspergillus terreus at a university hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:5525-5529.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Bennett, J. E., K. Izumikawa, and K. A. Marr. 2004. Mechanism of increased fluconazole resistance in Candida glabrata during prophylaxis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:1773-1777.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Blumberg, H. M., W. R. Jarvis, J. M. Soucie, J. E. Edwards, J. E. Patterson, M. A. Pfaller, M. S. Rangel-Frausto, M. G. Rinaldi, L. Saiman, R. T. Wiblin, R. P. Wenzel, and the NEMIS Study Group. 2001. Risk factors for candidal bloodstream infections in surgical intensive care unit patients: the NEMIS prospective multicenter study. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:177-186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Bouza, E., and P. Munoz. 2004. Invasive infection caused by Blastoschizomyces capitatus and Scedosporium spp. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(Suppl. 1):76-85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Brandt, M. E., L. H. Harrison, M. Pass, A. N. Sofair, S. Huie, R.-K. Lee, C. J. Morrison, D. W. Warnock, and R. A. Hajjeh. 2000. Candida dubliniensis fungemia: the first four cases in North America. Emerg. Infect. Dis.6:46-49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Braun, D. K., and C. A. Kauffman. 1992. Rhodotorula fungemia: a life-threatening complication of indwelling central venous catheters. Mycoses35:305-308.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Buchta, V., P. Zak, A. Kohout, and M. Otcenasek. 2001. Case report: disseminated infection of Blastoschizomyces capitatus in a patient with acute myelocytic leukemia. Mycoses44:505-512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Chan-Tack, K. M., C. L. Thio, N. S. Miller, C. L. Karp, C. Ho, and W. G. Merz. 1999. Paecilomyces lilacinus fungemia in an adult bone marrow transplant recipient. Med. Mycol.376:57-60.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Chouaki, T., V. Lavarde, L. Lachaud, C. P. Raccurt, and C. Hennequin. 2002. Invasive infections due to Trichoderma species: report of 2 cases, findings of in vitro susceptibility testing, and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis.35:1360-1367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Coleman, D. C., D. J. Sullivan, D. E. Bennett, G. P. Moran, H. J. Barry, and D. B. Shanley. 1997. Candidiasis: the emergence of a novel species, Candida dubliniensis. AIDS11:557-567.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Colombo, A. L., A. S. A. Melo, R. F. C. Rosas, R. Salomao, M. Briones, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, and M. A. Pfaller. 2003. Outbreak of Candida rugosa candidemia: an emerging pathogen that may be refractory to amphotericin B therapy. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.46:253-257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Dannaoui, E., E. Borel, F. Persat, M. A. Piens, and S. Picot. 2000. Amphotericin B resistance of Aspergillus terreus in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis. J. Med. Microbiol.49:601-606.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Dannaoui, E., J. F. G. M. Meis, J. W. Mouton, P. E. Verweij, and the Eurofung Network. 2002. In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycota to polyenes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.49:741-744.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Dannaoui, E., J. Meletiadis, J. W. Mouton, J. F. G. M. Meis, P. E. Verweij, and the Eurofung Network. 2003. In vitro susceptibilities of zygomycetes to conventional and new antifungals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.51:45-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    D'Antonio, D., A. Mazzoni, A. Iacone, B. Violante, M. A. Capuani, F. Schioppa, and F. Romano. 1996. Emergence of fluconazole-resistant strains of Blastoschizomyces capitatus causing nosocomial infections in cancer patients. J. Clin. Microbiol.34:753-755.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Denning, D. W., A. Marianas, and J. Cohen. 1998. An EORTC multicenter prospective survey of invasive aspergillosis in haematological patients: diagnosis and therapeutic outcome. J. Infect.37:173-180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Dick, J. D., R. P. Rosengard, W. G. Merz, R. K. Stuart, G. M. Hutchins, and R. Saral. 1985. Fatal disseminated candidiasis due to amphotericin B-resistant Candida guilliermondii. Ann. Intern. Med.102:67-68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Diekema, D. J., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, and M. A. Pfaller. 2003. Activities of caspofungin, itraconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against 448 recent clinical isolates of filamentous fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:3623-3626.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Diekema, D. J., B. Petroelje, S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, and M. A. Pfaller. Activity of available and investigational antifungal agents against Rhodotorula species. J. Clin. Microbiol., submitted for publication.
  22. 22.↵
    Dube, M. P., P. N. R. Heseltine, M. G. Rinaldi, S. Evans, and B. Zawachi. 1994. Fungemia and colonization with nystatin-resistant Candida rugosa in a burn unit. Clin. Infect. Dis.18:77-82.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Eisenberg, E. S., B. E. Alpert, R. A. Weiss, N. Mittman, and R. Soeiro. 1983. Rhodotorula rubra peritonitis in patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am. J. Med.75:349-352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. Comparison of in vitro activities of the new triazole SCH56592 and the echinocandins MK-0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:2950-2956.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Espinel-Ingroff, A. 1998. In vitro activity of the new triazole voriconazole (UK-109,496) against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and common and emerging yeast pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:198-202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Flemming, R. V., T. J. Walsh, and E. J. Anaissie. 2002. Emerging and less common fungal pathogens. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.16:915-933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Fourneir, S., W. Parageau, M. Feulillhade, S. Deplus, A. M. Zagdanski, O. Verola, H. Dombret, and J. M. Molina. 2002. Use of voriconazole to successfully treat disseminated Trichosporon asahii infection in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.21:892-896.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Galan-Sanchez, F., P. Garcia-Martos, C. Rodriquez-Ramos, P. Marin-Casanova, and J. Mira-Gutierrez. 1999. Microbiological characteristics and susceptibility patterns of strains of Rhodotorula isolated from clinical samples. Mycopathologia145:109-112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Gales, A. C., M. A. Pfaller, A. K. Houston, S. Joly, D. J. Sullivan, D. C. Coleman, and D. R. Soll. 1999. Identification of Candida dubliniensis based on temperature and utilization of xylose and α-methyl-d-glucoside as determined with the API 20C AUX and Vitek YBC systems. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:3804-3808.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Girmenia, C., G. Pizzarelli, D. D'Antonio, F. Cristini, and P. Martino. 2003. In vitro susceptibility testing of Geotrichum captatum: comparison of the E-Test, disk diffusion, and Sensititre colorimetric methods with the NCCLS M27-A2 broth microdilution reference method. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:3985-3988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Gonzalez, C. E., M. G. Rinaldi, and A. M. Sugar. 2002. Zygomycosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am.16:895-914.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    Guaro, J., W. Gams, I. Pujol, and J. Gene. 1997. Acremonium species: new emerging fungal opportunists—in vitro antifungal susceptibilities and review. Clin. Infect. Dis.25:1222-1229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Gudlaugsson, O., S. Gillespie, K. Lee, J. Vande Berg, J. Hu, S. Messer, L. Herwaldt, M. Pfaller, and D. Diekema. 2003. Attributable mortality of candidemia, revisited. Clin. Infect. Dis.37:1172-1177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Guerra, R., G. M. Cavallini, L. Longanesi, C. Casolani, G. Bertoli, F. Rivasi, and U. Fabio. 1992. Rhodotorula glutinis keratitis. Int. Ophthalmol.16:187-190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Hajjeh, R. A., A. N. Sofair, L. H. Harrison, G. M. Lyon, B. A. Arthington-Skaggs, S. A. Mirza, M. Phelan, J. Morgan, W. Lee-Yang, M. A. Ciblak, L. E. Benjamin, L. Thompson Sanza, S. Huie, S. F. Yeo, M. E. Brandt, and D. W. Warnock. 2004. Incidence of bloodstream infections due to Candida species and in vitro susceptibilities of isolates collected from 1998 to 2000 in a population-based active surveillance program. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:1519-1527.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Hawkins, J. L., and L. M. Baddour. 2003. Candida lusitaniae infections in the era of fluconazole availability. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:e14-e18.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    Herbrecht, R., V. Letscher-Bru, C. Fohrer, F. Campos, S. Natarajan-Ame, A. Zamfir, and J. Waller. 2002. Acremonium strictum pulmonary infection in a leukemic patient successfully treated with posaconazole after failure of amphotericin B. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21:814-817.
  38. 38.↵
    Hilmarsdottir, I., S. B. Thorsteirsson, P. Asmundsson, M. Bodvarsson, and M. Arnadottir. 2000. Cutaneous infection caused by Paecilomyces lilacinus in a renal transplant patient: treatment with voriconazole. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.32:331-332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Howden, B. P., M. A. Slavin, A. P. Schwarer, and A. M. Mijch. 2003. Successful control of disseminated Scedosporium prolificans infection with a combination of voriconazole and terbinafine. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.22:111-113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Hsueh, P.-R., L.-J. Teng, S.-W. Ho, and K.-T. Luh. 2003. Catheter-related sepsis due to Rhodotorula glutinis. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:857-859.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Iwen, P. C., D. M. Kelly, E. C. Reed, and S. H. Hinrichs. 1995. Invasive infection due to Candida krusei in immunocompromised patients not treated with fluconazole. Clin. Infect. Dis.20:342-347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Iwen, P. C., M. E. Rupp, A. N. Langnas, E. C. Reed, and S. H. Hinrichs. 1998. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis due to Aspergillus terreus: 12-year experience and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis.26:1092-1097.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Johnson, L. B., and C. A. Kauffman. 2003. Voriconazole: a new triazole antifungal agent. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:630-637.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Kirkpatrick, W. R., S. G. Revankar, R. K. McAtee, J. L. Lopez-Ribot, A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, S. E. Sanche, R. A. Cantu, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 1998. Detection of Candida dubliniensis in oropharyngeal samples from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in North America by primary CHROMagar Candida screening and susceptibility testing of isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:3007-3012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Kontoyiannis, D. P., D. Sumoza, J. Tarrand, G. P. Bodey, R. Storey, and I. I. Raad. 2000. Significance of aspergillemia in patients with cancer: a 10-year study. Clin. Infect. Dis.31:188-189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Lanzafame, M., G. DeChecchi, A. Parinello, M. Trevenzoli, and A. M. Cattelan. 2001. Rhodotorula glutinis-related meningitis. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:410.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Lass-Florl, C., G. Kofler, G. Kropshofer, J. Hermans, A. Kreczy, M. P. Dierich, and D. Niederwieser. 1998. In vitro-testing of susceptibility to amphotericin B is a reliable predictor of clinical outcome in invasive aspergillosis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.42:497-502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Lass-Florl, C., P.-M. Rath, D. Niederwieser, G. Kofler, R. Wurzner, A. Krezy, and M. P. Dierich. 2000. Aspergillus terreus infections in haematological malignancies: molecular epidemiology suggests association with in-hospital plants. J. Hosp. Infect.46:31-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Lee, J., W. W. Yew, and C. S. Chiu. 2002. Delayed sternotomy wound infection due to Paecilomyces variotii in a lung transplant recipient. J. Heart Lung Transplant.21:1131-1134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    Lin, S., J. Schranz, and S. Teutsch. 2001. Aspergillosis case-fatality rate: systemic review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis.32:358-366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    Liu, K., D. N. Howell, J. R. Perfect, and W. A. Schell. 1998. Morphologic criteria for preliminary identification of Fusarium, Paecilomyces, and Acremonium species by histopathology. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.109:45-54.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    Marr, K. A., K. Seidel, T. C. White, and R. A. Bowden. 2000. Candidemia in allogeneic blood and marrow transplant recipients: evolution of risk factors after the adoption of prophylactic fluconazole. J. Infect. Dis.181:309-316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    Marr, K. A., R. A. Carter, F. Crippa, A. Wald, and L. Corey. 2002. Epidemiology and outcome of mould infections in hematopoetic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:909-917.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    Marriott, D., M. Laxton, and J. Harkness. 2001. Candida dubliniensis candidemia in Australia. Emerg. Infect. Dis.7:479.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Martin, C. A., S. Roberts, and R. N. Greenberg. 2002. Voriconazole treatment of disseminated Paecilomyces infection in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis.35:e78-e81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    Martinez, M., J. L. Lopez-Ribot, W. R. Kirkpatrick, B. J. Coco, S. P. Bachmann, and T. F. Patterson. 2002. Replacement of Candida albicans with C. dubliniensis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis treated with fluconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:3135-3139.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    Martino, R., M. Salavert, R. Parody, J. F. Tomas, R. de la Camara, L. Vazquez, I. Jarque, E. Prieto, J. L. Sastre, I. Gadea, J. Peman, and J. Sierra. 2004. Blastoschizomyces capitatus infection in patients with leukemia: report of 26 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis.38:335-341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    Marty, F. M., L. Cosimi, and L. R. Baden. 2004. Breakthrough zygomycosis after voriconazole treatment in recipients of hematopoietic stem-cell transplants. N. Engl. J. Med.350:950-952.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    Meis, J. F. G. M., M. Ruhnke, B. E. DePauw, F. C. Odds, W. Siegert, and P. E. Verweij. 1999. Candida dubliniensis candidemia in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and bone marrow transplantation. Emerg. Infect. Dis.5:150-153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    Meletiadis, J., J. F. G. M. Meis, J. W. Mouton, J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela, J. P. Donnelly, P. E. Verweij, and the EUROFUNG Network. 2002. In vitro activities of new and conventional antifungal agents against clinical Scedosporium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:62-68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    Mellinghoff, I. K., D. J. Winston, G. Mukwaya, and G. J. Schiller. 2002. Treatment of Scedosporium apiospermum brain abscesses with posaconazole. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:1648-1650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. 62.
    Minassian, B., E. Huczko, T. Washo, D. Bonner, and J. Fung-Tomc. 2003. In vitro activity of ravuconazole against zygomycetes, Scedosporium, and Fusarium isolates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.9:1250-1252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. 63.↵
    Mirza, S. A., M. Phelan, D. Rimland, E. Graviss, R. Hamill, M. E. Brandt, T. Gardner, M. Sattah, G. Ponce de Leon, W. Baughman, and R. A. Hajjeh. 2003. The changing epidemiology of cryptococcosis: an update from population-based active surveillance in 2 large metropolitan areas, 1992-2000. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:789-794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. 64.↵
    Mora-Duarte, J., R. Betts, C. Rotstein, A. L. Colombo, L. Thompson-Moya, J. Smietana, R. Lupinacci, C. Sable, N. Kartsonis, and J. Perfect. 2002. Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med.347:2020-2029.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  65. 65.↵
    Moran, G. P., D. J. Sullivan, M. C. Herman, C. E. McCreary, B. J. Harrington, D. B. Shanley, and D. C. Coleman. 1997. Antifungal drug susceptibilities of oral Candida dubliniensis isolates from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and non-NIV-infected subjects and generation of stable fluconazole-resistant derivatives in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.41:617-623.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. 66.↵
    Moran, G. P., D. Sanglard, S. M. Donnelly, D. B. Shanley, D. J. Sullivan, and D. C. Coleman. 1998. Identification and expression of multidrug transporters responsible for fluconazole resistance in Candida dubliniensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42:1819-1830.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution testing of yeasts. Approved standard, 2nd ed. M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  68. 68.
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Approved standard. M38-A. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, Pa.
  69. 69.↵
    Negroni, R., S. H. Helou, N. Petri, A. M. Robles, A. Arechavala, and M. H. Bianchi. 2004. Case study: posaconazole treatment of disseminated phaeohyphomycosis due to Exophiala spinifera. Clin. Infect. Dis.38:e15-e20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  70. 70.↵
    Nesky, M. A., C. McDougal, and J. E. Peacock, Jr. 2000. Pseudallescheria boydii brain abscess successfully treated with voriconazole and surgical drainage: case report and literature review of central nervous system pseudallescheriosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.31:673-677.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  71. 71.↵
    Nucchi, M., K. A. Marr, F. Queiroz-Telles, C. A. Martins, P. Trabasso, S. Costa, J. C. Voltarelli, A. L. Colombo, A. Imhof, R. Pasquini, A. Maiolino, C. A. Souza, and E. Anaissie. 2004. Fusarium infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis.38:1237-1242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  72. 72.↵
    Odabasi, Z., V. L. Paetznick, J. R. Rodriguez, E. Chen, and L. Ostrosky-Zeichner. 2004. In vitro activity of anidulafungin against selected clinically important mold isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48:1912-1915.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    Orth, B., R. Frei, P. H. Itin, M. G. Rinaldi, B. Speck, A. Gratwohl, and A. F. Widmer. 1996. Outbreak of invasive mycoses caused by Paecilomyces lilacinus from a contaminated skin lotion. Ann. Intern. Med.125:799-806.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. 74.↵
    Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., J. H. Rex, P. G. Pappas, R. J. Hamill, R. A. Larsen, H. W. Horowitz, W. J. Powderly, N. Hyslop, C. A. Kauffman, J. Cleary, J. E. Mangino, and J. Lee. 2003. Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:3149-3154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.↵
    Paphitou, N. I., L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, V. L Paetznick, J. R. Rodriguez, E. Chen, and J. H. Rex. 2002. In vitro antifungal susceptibilities of Trichosporon species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:1144-1146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. 76.↵
    Pappagianis, D., M. S. Collins, R. Hector, and J. Remington. 1979. Development of resistance to amphotericin B in Candida lusitaniae infecting a human. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.16:123-126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. 77.↵
    Pappas, P. G., J. H. Rex, J. D. Sobel, S. G. Filler, W. E. Dismukes, T. J. Walsh, and J. E. Edwards. 2004. Guidelines for treatment of candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis.38:161-189.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.↵
    Perfect, J. R., G. M. Cox, J. Y. Lee, C. A. Kauffman, L. de Repentigny, S. W. Chapman, V. A. Morrison, P. Pappas, J. W. Hiemenz, D. A. Stevens, and the Mycoses Study Group. 2001. The impact of culture isolation of Aspergillus species: a hospital-based survey of aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.33:1824-1833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. 79.↵
    Perfect, J. R., K. A. Marr, T. J. Walsh, R. N. Greenberg, B. DuPont, J. de la Torre-Cisneros, G. Just-Nubling, H. T. Schlamm, I. Lutsor, A. Espinel-Ingroff, and E. Johnson. 2003. Voriconazole treatment for less-common emerging, or refractory fungal infections. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:1122-1131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  80. 80.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, and A. Bolmstrom. 1998. Evaluation of Etest for determining in vitro susceptibility of yeast isolates to amphotericin B. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.32:223-227.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, R. N. Jones, and D. J. Diekema. 2002. In vitro activities of ravuconazole and voriconazole compared with those of four approved systemic antifungal agents against 6,970 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:1723-1727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, H. Huynh, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2002. In vitro activities of 5-fluorocytosine against 8,803 clinical isolates of Candida spp.: global assessment of primary resistance using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards susceptibility testing methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:3518-3521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. 83.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, and R. N. Jones. 2004. In vitro susceptibilities of rare Candida bloodstream isolates to ravuconazole and three comparative antifungal agents. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.48:101-105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  84. 84.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2004. Geographic variation in the susceptibilities of invasive isolates of Candida glabrata to seven systemically active antifungal agents: a global assessment from the ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance Program conducted in 2001 and 2002. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:3142-3146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2004. In vitro activities of voriconazole, posaconazole, and fluconazole against, 4,169 clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans collected during 2001 and 2002 in the ARTEMIS global antifungal surveillance program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.48:201-205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  86. 86.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2004. Cross-resistance between fluconazole and ravuconazole and the use of fluconazole as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to ravuconazole among 12,796 clinical isolates of Candida spp. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:3137-3141.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., S. A. Messer, L. Boyken, C. Rice, S. Tendolkar, R. J. Hollis, and D. J. Diekema. 2004. Further standardization of broth microdilution methodology for in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida species by use of an international collection of more than 3,000 clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:3117-3119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. 88.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., and D. J. Diekema. 2004. Twelve years of fluconazole in clinical practice: global trends in species distribution and fluconazole susceptibility of bloodstream isolates of Candida. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(Suppl. 1):11-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  89. 89.↵
    Rees, J. R., R. W. Pinner, R. A. Hajjeh, M. R. Brandt, and A. L. Reingold. 1998. The epidemiologic features of invasive mycotic infection in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1992-1993: results of a population-based laboratory active surveillance. Clin. Infect. Dis.27:1138-1147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  90. 90.↵
    Revankar, S. G., D. A. Sutton, and M. G. Rinaldi. 2004. Primary central nervous system phaeohyphomycosis: a review of 101 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis.38:206-216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  91. 91.↵
    Richet, H., P. Roux, C. Des Champs, Y. Esnault, A. Andremont, and the French Candidemia Study Group. 2002. Candidemia in French hospitals: incidence rates and characteristics. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.8:405-412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  92. 92.↵
    Sanglard, D., F. Ischer, D. Calabrese, P. A. Majcherczyk, and J. Bille. 1999. The ATP binding cassette transporter gene CgCDR1 from Candida glabrata is involved in the resistance of clinical isolates to azole antifungal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43:2753-2765.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. 93.↵
    Schett, G., B. Casati, B. Willinger, G. Weinlander, T. Binder, F. Grabenevoger, W. Sperr, K. Geissler, and U. Jager. 1998. Endocarditis and aortal embolization caused by Aspergillus terreus in a patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission: diagnosis by peripheral-blood culture. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:3347-3351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  94. 94.↵
    Siwek, G. T., K. J. Dodgson, M. de Magalhaes-Silverman, L. A. Bartlet, S. B. Kilborn, P. Hoth, D. J. Diekema, and M. A. Pfaller. 2004. Four cases of invasive zygomycosis in bone marrow transplant patients receiving voriconazole prophylaxis. Clin. Infect. Dis.39:584-587.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  95. 95.↵
    Sun, Q. N., A. W. Fothergill, D. I. McCarthy, M. G. Rinaldi, and J. R. Graybill. 2002. In vitro activities of posaconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, amphotericin B, and fluconazole against 37 clinical isolates of zygomycetes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46:1581-1582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. 96.↵
    Sutton, D. A., S. E. Sanche, S. G. Revankar, A. W. Fothergill, and M. G. Rinaldi. 1999. In vitro amphotericin B resistance in clinical isolates of Aspergillus terreus, with a head-to-head comparison to voriconazole. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:2343-2345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. 97.↵
    Teixeira, A. B. A., P. Trabasso, M. L. Moretti-Branchini, F. H. Aoki, A. L. Vigorito, M. Miyaji, Y. Mikami, M. Takada, and A. Z. Schrieber. 2003. Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Chaetomium globosum in an allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipient. Mycopathologia156:309-312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  98. 98.↵
    Tietz, H. J., V. Czaika, and W. Sterry. 1999. Case report. Osteomyelitis caused by highly-resistant Candida guilliermondii. Mycoses42:577-580.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  99. 99.↵
    Tobon, A. M., M. Arango, D. Fernandez, and A. Restrepo. 2003. Mucormycosis (zygomycosis) in a heart-kidney transplant recipient: recovery after posaconazole therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis.36:1488-1491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  100. 100.↵
    Tortorano, A. M., E. Biraghi, A. Astolfi, C. Ossi, M. Tejada, C. Farina, S. Perin, C. Bonnanccorso, C. Cavanna, A. Raballo, A. Grossi, and the FIMUA Candidemia Study Group. 2002. European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) prospective study of candidemia: report from one Italian region. J. Hosp. Infect.51:297-304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  101. 101.↵
    Trick, W. E., S. K. Fridkin, J. R. Edwards, R. A. Hajjeh, R. P. Gaynes, and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Hospitals. 2002. Secular trend of hospital-acquired candidemia among intensive care unit patients in the United States during 1989-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis.35:627-630.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  102. 102.↵
    Venditti, M., B. Posteraro, G. Morace, and P. Martino. 1991. In vitro comparative activity of fluconazole and other antifungal agents against Blastoschizomyces capitatus. J. Chemother.3:13-15.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  103. 103.↵
    Walsh, T. J., G. P. Melcher, M. G. Rinaldi, J. Lecciones, D. A. McGough, P. Kelly, J. Lee, D. Callender, M. Rubin, and P. A. Pizzo. 1990. Trichosporon beigellii, an emerging pathogen resistant to amphotericin B. 1990. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1616-1622.
  104. 104.↵
    Walsh, T. J., J. W. Lee, G. P. Melcher, E. Navarro, J. Bacher, D. Callender, K. D. Reed, T. Wu, G. Lopez-Berestein, and P. A. Pizzo. 1992. Experimental Trichosporon infection in persistently granulocytopenic rabbits: implications for pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of an emerging opportunistic mycosis. J. Infect. Dis.166:121-133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  105. 105.↵
    Walsh, T. J., V. Petraitis, R. Petraitiene, A. Field-Ridley, D. Sutton, M. Ghannoum, T. Sein, R. Schaufele, J. Peter, J. Bacher, H. Casler, D. Armstrong, A. Espinel-Ingroff, M. G. Rinaldi, and C. A. Lyman. 2003. Experimental pulmonary aspergillosis due toAspergillus terreus: pathogenesis and treatment of an emerging fungal pathogen resistant to amphotericin B. J. Infect. Dis. 188:305-319.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.↵
    Walsh, T. J., A. Groll, J. Hiemenz, R. Flemming, E. Roilides, and E. Anaissie. 2004. Infections due to emerging and uncommon medically important fungal pathogens. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(Suppl. 1):48-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  107. 107.↵
    Wanger, A., K. Mills, P. W. Nelson, and J. H. Rex. 1995. Comparison of Etest and National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth macrodilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing: enhanced ability to detect amphotericin B-resistant Candida isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39:2520-2522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. 108.↵
    Wilson, L. S., C. M. Reyes, M. Stolpman, J. Speckman, K. Allen, and J. Beney. 2002. The direct cost and incidence of systemic fungal infections. Value Health5:26-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  109. 109.↵
    Wingard, J. R. 1995. Importance of Candida species other than C. albicans as pathogens in oncology patients. Clin. Infect. Dis.20:115-125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  110. 110.↵
    Wingard, J. R. 2002. Antifungal prophylaxis after blood and marrow transplantation. Clin. Infect. Dis.34:1386-1390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  111. 111.↵
    Wingard, J. R., W. G. Merz, M. G. Rinaldi, T. R. Johnson, J. E. Karp, and R. Saral. 1991. Increase in Candida krusei infection among patients with bone marrow transplantation and neutropenia treated prophylactically with fluconazole. N. Engl. J. Med.325:1274-1277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  112. 112.↵
    Wolf, D. G., R. Falk, M. Hacham, B. Theelen, T. Boekhout, G. Scorgetti, M. Shapiro, C. Block, I. F. Salkin, and I. Polacheck. 2001. Multidrug-resistant Trichosporon asahii infection of nongranulocytopenic patients in three intensive care units. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:4420-4425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. 113.↵
    Zaas, A. K., M. Boyce, W. Schell, B. A. Lodge, J. L. Miller, and J. R. Perfect. 2003. Risk of fungemia due to Rhodotorula and antifungal susceptibility testing of Rhodotorula isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:5233-5235.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Rare and Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens: Concern for Resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus
M. A. Pfaller, D. J. Diekema
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Oct 2004, 42 (10) 4419-4431; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4419-4431.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rare and Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens: Concern for Resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Rare and Emerging Opportunistic Fungal Pathogens: Concern for Resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus
M. A. Pfaller, D. J. Diekema
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Oct 2004, 42 (10) 4419-4431; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4419-4431.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • EMERGING AND RARE CANDIDA SPECIES: BEYOND C. ALBICANS
    • OPPORTUNISTIC YEAST-LIKE FUNGI
    • FILAMENTOUS FUNGI: BEYOND A. FUMIGATUS
    • SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Communicable Diseases, Emerging
Drug Resistance, Fungal
fungi
mycoses
opportunistic infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X