Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Comparative Analysis of agr Locus Diversification and Overall Genetic Variability among Bovine and Human Staphylococcus aureus Isolates

Philippe Gilot, Willem van Leeuwen
Philippe Gilot
1Unité de Pathologie Infectieuse et Immunologie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gilot@tours.inra.fr
Willem van Leeuwen
2Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1265-1269.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The accessory gene regulator (agr) is a central system that controls the expression of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors. In this study, the distribution of agr alleles, defined by agr restriction fragment length polymorphism within agr interference groups, among S. aureus isolates from bovine and human origin was measured with PCR-based techniques. Statistically highly significant associations of some agr alleles with the infection of a specific host were found. The genetic difference between the two S. aureus populations was further stressed after analysis of their genetic background by binary typing.

Staphylococcus aureus is an important cause of a variety of diseases in humans and animals and is a large economic problem worldwide (9, 14). Whereas the mechanism of pathogenicity of S. aureus is still not completely understood, the bacterium is hypothesized to invade the tissue by starting to adhere directly to epithelial cells (13, 18). The expression of such adhesive proteins, which recognize macromolecules of the host tissue, is globally controlled by the agr locus (17). The agr operon encodes a two-component signaling system, which is driven by a quorum-sensing autoinducing peptide (AIP), encoded by the agrD gene. S. aureus isolates can be classified in four major agr interference groups on the basis of AIP specificity for its signal receptor (AgrC) (4, 6, 7). In a laboratory setting, Ji et al. showed that AIP from strains belonging to a specific agr group activate each other's agr response, whereas AIP from strains from different agr groups compete with each other at the level of agr expression, since each AIP inhibits the agr response in strains from other groups (7). This type of bacterial interference is unusual, because it affects the expression of a subset of genes rather than inhibiting growth. Diverse works have noted the existence of distinct agr alleles, as defined with agr restriction fragment length polymorphism, within agr groups both in clinical S. aureus isolates that originated with humans and in those from cows (2, 15, 16, 19, 24, 29). In a recent study, one of us identified 12 distinct agr alleles in an epidemiologically unrelated collection of bovine mastitis isolates. The majority of strains from this collection are nevertheless represented by one particular agr allele (R III A1) from agr group 1 (2). These observations suggest the occurrence of host-adapted (or tissue-adapted) S. aureus strains in which the agr restriction type (allele) may play a significant role.

In this study, we compared the distribution of agr alleles in relation to the genotype among S. aureus strains of human and bovine origin by using restriction endonuclease-PCR of the agr locus (agr RE-PCR) and binary typing (BT).

agr polymorphism.

Two hundred fifty-one human S. aureus isolates, originating in diverse collections, were analyzed by agr RE-PCR. The results were compared with those obtained from a collection of bovine mastitis isolates, previously analyzed with the same method (Table 1). In brief, a 1,070-bp variable region of the agr operon (a sequence encoding agrD, the N-terminal two-thirds of agrC, and the C-terminal part of agrB) was amplified by PCR, as described previously (2). PCR amplifications of all tested human isolates resulted in amplicons of the expected molecular weight. After restriction with AluI or RsaI, these amplicons were electrophoresed through a 3% agarose gel, giving nine (A1, A2, A4, A5, A7 to A10, and A13) and five (R I′ and R III to R VI) different profiles, respectively. Most of these patterns were previously identified after restriction of the same region of the agr locus of S. aureus bovine mastitis isolates (2). Three of them (A9, A10, and A13) were uniquely found in human isolates. Patterns A9 (502, 244, 177, and 149 bp) and A10 (772, 144, 74, 73, and 11 bp) correspond to restriction profiles of the agr locus from agr group reference strains and from strains whose genomes were sequenced, all isolated from humans (A9: agr group 2 reference strain with GenBank accession no AF001782 , strains N315 and Mu50; A10: agr group 3 reference strain with GenBank accession no AF001783 , strain MRSA-252 [2]). Pattern A13 (338, 274, 168, 155, 113, and 25 bp) was newly identified during this study (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Identification of a novel restriction pattern in the agr variable region. The amplified variable region of the agr operon was digested with AluI and electrophoresed on a 3% agarose gel. The newly identified type A13 is shown in lane 1. Molecular weight markers (50-bp DNA ladder; Promega) are shown in lane 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Strains analyzed in this study

The combination of the AluI and RsaI restriction patterns allows the construction of restriction maps and the definition of agr restriction types (alleles) (2). Eleven agr restriction types were defined among the strains isolated from humans (Fig. 2). Two of these types, type R I′-A4 (a R I′-A1 type which has lost the AluI site at position 437) and type R I′-A13 (a R I′-A1 type which has lost the AluI site at position 890) were newly identified during this study. agr restriction types were previously classified into an evolutionary scheme, which allows them to be placed in one of the four agr interference groups (2). By this kind of analysis, we found that the majority of strains isolated from humans fall into the classification agr group 1 (61.7%) and group 2 (33.5%). Group 3 contains only 4.8% of the analyzed strains, and no group 4 strains were identified in our collection of strains isolated from humans. The above agr group classification of strains was confirmed by an agr group-specific multiplex PCR (2). The repartition of human isolates in the agr interference group is quite similar to what was found for bovine mastitis isolates (69% agr group 1 strains, 23.9% agr group 2 strains, 2.8% agr group 3 strains, and 1.4% agr group 4 strains) (2). Whereas the repartition of strains in agr groups is quite similar in both populations, the 17 different agr types identified are very differently distributed in each of them. The most striking differences (statistically highly significant) were found in type R I′-A1 (35.4% of strains of human origin but only 4.2% of strains of bovine origin), type R IV-A9 (26.7% of strains of human origin but 0% of strains of bovine origin), type R III-A1 (8.8% of strains of human origin but 56.3% of strains of bovine origin), and type R IV-A7 (0.4% of strains of human origin but 8.4% of strains of bovine origin). Some types, containing only a few strains, were also found to be unique either to the population of human origin or to the population of bovine origin (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Distribution of S. aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis and from human patients. agr groups and agr types of 71 strains isolated from cows with mastitis (solid bars) and from 251 strains of humans patients (open bars) were determined and used to subdivide the populations. NT indicates strains not typeable by the restriction endonuclease-PCR of the agr locus. Chi-square tests (carried out on the actual number of occurrences) using fourfold tables and the correction of continuity devised by Yates (23) were used to analyze the significance of the differences in the distribution of strains by population origin. Quadruple asterisks, P value of <0.001; Triple asterisks, P value of <0.01 and >0.001; double asterisks, P value of <0.10 and >0.05; asterisk, P value of <0.50 and >0.10.

The distribution of agr restriction types suggests that the two populations are different and indicates that some types probably expand in one or the other population due to their possession of unique genetic characteristics.

BT.

The genetic difference between the S. aureus populations of bovine origin and those of human origin was analyzed in more detail by BT, a procedure involving strain-differentiating DNA probes which were initially identified on the basis of RAPD analysis of a large collection of S. aureus strains isolated from humans (28). The method was proved to be able to elucidate overall genetic polymorphisms and clonal relatedness among S. aureus strains and was extensively described elsewhere (30). In brief, 12 cloned strain-specific DNA fragments (AW1 to AW9, AW11, AW14, and AW15) were used as probes and were hybridized to total genomic DNA of the 71 strains isolated from cows with mastitis previously analyzed by agr RE-PCR. Hybridization of the probes was scored with a 1 or a 0 according to the presence or absence of a hybridization signal, resulting in a 12-digit binary code for each S. aureus isolate.

All bovine mastitis isolates but two were typeable by the BT method. All typeable isolates were found to hybridize with at least 3 and up to 11 of the tested probes. Probe AW9 hybridized to all typeable bovine mastitis isolates and, as suggested by a previous work, did not contribute to the discrimination power of the method for strains of bovine origin (31). BT was found to be very discriminatory and allowed the division of the collection of bovine mastitis isolates into 33 different binary types. All agr types comprising more than one strain could be subdivided with BT. The highly prevalent R III-A1 type was divided into 15 (16 if nontypeable strains were included) different binary types, whereas the following other two prevalent types, R IV-A5 and R IV-A7, were subdivided into eight and four BT types, respectively. The frequency of most BT types is only one or two strains, except for six BT types containing nine, eight, seven, five, three, and three strains (Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Dendrogram showing the clustering of 50 unrelated human S. aureus isolates and 69 unrelated bovine S. aureus isolates on the basis of hybridization scores after BT with 12 DNA probes. Isolates numbers, agr types, agr groups, binary codes, and origins of strains are shown for all isolates. Roman numerals indicate the three main clusters of strains defined at a genetic similarity of 83% (arrow). The scale indicates the level of genetic relatedness within this collection of strains.

The binary types of the strains isolated from cows with mastitis were compared to the binary types of 50 strains isolated from humans, picked randomly among all strain collections analyzed by RE-PCR of the agr locus (28). These randomly selected strains represent all major agr types as mentioned before (20 strains of the R IV-A9 type, 12 strains of the R I′-A1 type, 6 strains of the R III-A2 type, 5 strains of the R III-A1 type, 3 strains of the R IV-A5 type, 2 strains of the R VI-A8 type, and 2 strains of the R V-A4 type). All of the agr types found among these human isolates were also subdivided by BT. The prevalent R I′-A1 and R IV-A9 types were divided into 11 and 16 BT types, respectively. Types R III-A2, R III-A1, R IV-A5, R VI-A8, and R V-A4 contain six, five, three, two, and two different BT types, respectively (Fig. 3). No binary type common to strains of human and bovine origin was found.

Hierarchical clustering.

Genetic relatedness between strains was analyzed by hierarchical clustering of binary types using the squared Euclidian distance of absolute value (weights of 0 and 1 were identical), and a dendrogram was constructed (SPSS 9.0 program for Windows software) (Fig. 3). The overall clonality of all strains (except for one) based on BT results was shown by their clustering into one group for a relative genetic similarity of 79%. At a genetic similarity of 83%, three clusters, which could be linked to host specificity, were defined (Fig. 3, roman numerals). Two human isolates (RIVM IV and K2-02) do not belong to any these three clusters. The majority (84%) of the strains isolated from humans were found in clusters I and III. Both clusters also contained four strains of bovine origin (strains 125 and 130 in cluster I; strains 23 and 57 in cluster III). One of us previously reported that strains 125 and 130, isolated in Japan by Takeuchi et al., harbor a distinct agr locus. The receptor-encoding genes (agrC) of strains 125 and 130 are highly similar to those of the agr group 1 strains, whereas their propeptide-encoding genes (agrD) are highly similar to those of groups 2 and 3, respectively. Both strains are classified in the agr group 1 by the restriction map analysis method but either in group 2 (strain 125) or in group 3 (strain 130) by the multiplex PCR method. Since the propeptide and its receptor belong to different interference groups, these two strains should be impaired in the activation of RNA III by the agr system. These strains are probably in the process of evolutionary development, moving from agr group 1 to groups 2 and 3, respectively (2). Cluster II contains 92% of the strains of bovine origin and also includes six human isolates.

Identical to the agr typing results, hierarchical clustering of binary types confirms that the strain populations of bovine origin and those of human origin are genetically different. Bacterial host specificity was also described by other studies using different typing techniques to analyze the genetic background of S. aureus populations (8, 31). Diverse studies showed divergent data for prevalence of S. aureus strains within the different agr interference groups (5, 12, 15, 20-22), while we showed that the agr interference group I has spread at the expense of the other agr groups, both in the population of strains isolated from cows as well as in the population of strains isolated from humans. When allelic variations within agr groups were analyzed, a more precise scheme emerged; human isolates with the allelic variant R I′-A1 and R IV-A9 and bovine isolates with the allelic variant R III-A1 were predominant (Fig. 2). If the allelic variants R I′-A1 and R III-A1 belong to agr group 1 and are not very divergent (they were differentiated by the presence or absence of one restriction site), the RIV-A9 variant belongs to agr interference group 2 (2). This indicates that in the human population, not only has agr interference group 1 spread at the expense of the other agr groups, but also one particular allelic variant of the agr group 2 has spread at the expense of other groups. BT, detecting DNA elements with a relative high evolutionary clock speed, reflects changes arising in other parts of the genome of each of these agr restriction types. Both methods produced results consistent with the host specificity concept among S. aureus strains and showed that the transfer of strains between humans and cows is a possible but infrequent event. We believe that all strains are putatively able to infect one or the other host, but our typing results indicate that most of them are much more adapted for the infection of one host versus the other. At this moment, the underlying genetic basis for the variation among S. aureus strains from both populations is unknown, but at least two hypotheses can be conceived: (i) the agr allele of a strain is directly implicated in the regulation of the expression of genes implicated in the tropism of the strain for a particular host; (ii) the agr allele is not directly involved in host specificity, but it reveals the overall genetic evolution of S. aureus after its adaptation (host-adapted lineage[s]) to one or the other host by the acquisition (or the loss) of some virulence genes and/or pathogenicity islands. The University of Minnesota is sequencing the entire genome of a common bovine S. aureus strain. A comparative genomic analysis of a shotgun sequence of around 10% of the genome of this bovine mastitis-associated clone and the genomes of the recently sequenced human-associated strains Mu50 and N315 has already identified numerous unique sequences (3, 11). A recent study also identified a novel putative pathogenicity island, SaPIbov, in the genome of this bovine isolate (1). For these reasons it can be expected that the identification of lineages dominant in a particular host or disease, and further comparative genomic analysis will provide important insights regarding disease pathogenesis and lead to the development of new prophylactic and diagnostic tools.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant (AIP P00060, P00223) from the French association Bureau des Ressources Génétiques.

We thank Martine Braibant for critical reading of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 9 July 2003.
    • Returned for modification 23 September 2003.
    • Accepted 26 November 2003.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Fitzgerald, J., S. Monday, T. Foster, G. Bohach, P. Hartigan, W. Meaney, and C. Smyth. 2001. Characterization of a putative pathogenicity island from bovine Staphylococcus aureus encoding multiple superantigens. J. Bacteriol.183:63-70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Gilot, P., G. Lina, T. Cochard, and B. Poutrel. 2002. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:4060-4067.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Herron, L., R. Chakravarty, C. Dwan, J. Fitzgerald, J. Musser, E. Retzel, and V. Kapur. 2002. Genome sequence survey identifies unique sequences and key virulence genes with unusual rates of amino acid substitution in bovine Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun.70:3978-3981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Jarraud, S., G. Lyon, A. Figueiredo, G. Lina, F. Vandenesch, J. Etienne, T. Muir, and R. Novick. 2000. Exfoliatin-producing strains define a fourth agr specificity group in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.182:6517-6522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Jarraud, S., C. Mougel, J. Thioulouse, G. Lina, H. Meugnier, F. Forey, X. Nesme, J. Etienne, and F. Vandenesch. 2002. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect. Immun.70:631-641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Ji, G., R. Beavis, and R. Novick. 1995. Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92:12055-12059.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Ji, G., R. Beavis, and R. P. Novick. 1997. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science276:2027-2030.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Kapur, V., W. M. Sischo, R. S. Greer, T. S. Whittam, and J. M. Musser. 1995. Molecular population genetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from cows. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:376-380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Kluytmans, J., A. van Belkum, and H. Verbrugh. 1997. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.10:505-520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.
    Kreiswirth, B., J. Kornblum, R. Arbeit, W. Eisner, J. Maslow, A. McGeer, D. Low, and R. Novick. 1993. Evidence for a clonal origin of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Science259:227-230.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Kuroda, M., T. Ohta, I. Uchiyama, et al. 2001. Whole genome sequencing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet357:1225-1240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Lina, G., F. Boutile, A. Tristan, M. Bes, J. Etienne, and F. Vandenesch. 2003. Bacterial competition for human nasal cavity colonization: role of staphylococcal agr alleles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69:18-23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Lowy, F. 2000. Is Staphylococcus aureus an intracellular pathogen? Trends Microbiol.8:341-343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Miles, H., W. Lesser, and P. Sears. 1992. The economical implications of bioengineered mastitis control. J. Dairy Sci.75:596-605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Moore, P. C., and J. A. Lindsay. 2001. Genetic variation among hospital isolates of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for horizontal transfer of virulence genes. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:2760-2767.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Mullarky, I. K., C. Su, N. Frieze, Y. H. Park, and L. M. Sordillo. 2001. Staphylococcus aureus agr genotypes with enterotoxin production capabilities can resist neutrophil bactericidal activity. Infect. Immun.69:45-51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Novick, R. P., H. F. Ross, S. J. Projan, J. Kornblum, B. Kreiswirth, and S. Moghazeh. 1993. Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J.12:3967-3975.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Novick, R. 2000. Pathogenicity factors of Staphylococcus aureus and their regulation, p. 392-407. In V. Fischetti (ed.), Gram-positive pathogens. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  19. 19.↵
    Papakyriacou, H., D. Vaz, A. Simor, M. Louie, and M. McGavin. 2000. Molecular analysis of the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus and balance of virulence factor expression in epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis.181:990-1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Peacock, S., C. Moore, A. Justice, M. Kantzanou, L. Story, K. Mackie, G. O'Neill, and N. Day. 2002. Virulent combination of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun.70:4987-4996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.
    Sakoulas, G., G. Eliopoulos, R. Moellering, Jr., R. Novick, L. Venkataraman, C. Wennersten, P. DeGirolami, M. Schwaber, and H. Gold. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance? J. Infect. Dis.187:929-938.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Shopsin, B., B. Mathema, P. Alcabes, B. Said-Salim, G. Lina, A. Matsuka, J. Martinez, and B. Kreiswirth. 2003. Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing children and their guardians. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:456-459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Swinscow, T. D. V. 1978. The chi square tests, p. 42-53. In T. D. V. Swinscow (ed.), Statistics at square one. Dowson and Goodall Ltd., The Mendip Press, Bath, England.
  24. 24.↵
    Takeuchi, S., T. Maeda, N. Hashimoto, K. Imaizumi, T. Kaidoh, and Y. Hayakawa. 2001. Variation of the agr locus in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cows with mastitis. Vet. Microbiol.79:267-274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.
    Tenover, F., R. Arbeit, G. Archer, J. Biddle, S. Byrne, R. Goering, G. Hancock, G. Hébert, B. Hill, R. Hollis, W. Jarvis, B. Kreiswirth, W. Eisner, J. Maslow, L. McDougal, J. Miller, M. Mulligan, and M. Pfaller. 1994. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.32:407-415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.
    van Belkum, A., N. Riewarts Friksen, M. Sijmons, W. van Leeuwen, M. van den Bergh, J. Kluytmans, F. Espersen, and H. Verbrugh. 1997. Coagulase and protein A polymorphisms do not contribute to persistence of nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Med. Microbiol.46:222-232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.
    van Leeuwen, W., A. van Belkum, B. Kreiswirth, and H. Verbrugh. 1998. Genetic diversification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a function of prolonged geographic dissemination and as measured by binary typing and other genotyping methods. Res. Microbiol.149:497-507.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    van Leeuwen, W., H. Verbrugh, J. van der Velden, N. van Leeuwen, M. Heck, and A. van Belkum. 1999. Validation of binary typing for Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:664-674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    van Leeuwen, W., W. van Nieuwenhuizen, C. Gijzen, H. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2000. Population studies of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains reveal a lack of variability in the agrD gene, encoding a staphylococcal autoinducer peptide. J. Bacteriol.182:5721-5729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    van Leeuwen, W., C. Libregts, M. Schalk, J. Veuskens, H. Verbrugh, and A. van Belkum. 2001. Binary typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains through reversed hybridization using digoxigenin-universal linkage system-labeled bacterial genomic DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:328-331.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Zadoks, R., W. van Leeuwen, H. Barkema, O. Sampimon, H. Verbrugh, Y. H. Schukken, and A. van Belkum. 2000. Application of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and binary typing as tools in veterinary clinical microbiology and molecular epidemiologic analysis of bovine and human Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:1931-1939.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Comparative Analysis of agr Locus Diversification and Overall Genetic Variability among Bovine and Human Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
Philippe Gilot, Willem van Leeuwen
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2004, 42 (3) 1265-1269; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1265-1269.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Analysis of agr Locus Diversification and Overall Genetic Variability among Bovine and Human Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparative Analysis of agr Locus Diversification and Overall Genetic Variability among Bovine and Human Staphylococcus aureus Isolates
Philippe Gilot, Willem van Leeuwen
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2004, 42 (3) 1265-1269; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1265-1269.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • agr polymorphism.
    • BT.
    • Hierarchical clustering.
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
Genetic Variation
Staphylococcus aureus
Trans-Activators

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X