Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Clinical Veterinary Microbiology

Comparison of Two 3ABC Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Diagnosis of Multiple-Serotype Foot-and-Mouth Disease in a Cattle Population in an Area of Endemicity

B. M. de C. Bronsvoort, K. J. Sørensen, J. Anderson, A. Corteyn, V. N. Tanya, R. P. Kitching, K. L. Morgan
B. M. de C. Bronsvoort
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Mark.Bronsvoort@ed.ac.uk
K. J. Sørensen
2Danish Veterinary Institute, Virology Department, Lindholm, DK4771 Kalvehave, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Anderson
3Institute of Animal Health, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Corteyn
3Institute of Animal Health, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. N. Tanya
4Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, Regional Centre of Wakwa, Ngaoundere, Cameroon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. P. Kitching
3Institute of Animal Health, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. L. Morgan
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Neston, Wirral CH64 7TE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2108-2114.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    ROC curves for 3ABC CHEKIT ELISA (AUC = 0.782) and C-ELISA (AUC = 0.865) for adult and juvenile animals (n = 1,377). Two-tailed test of AUC Z statistic = 5.217; P < 0.01. Arrows mark the recommended cutoffs for each test.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    ROC curves for CHEKIT ELISA (AUC = 0.707) and C-ELISA (AUC = 0.829) based on juveniles only (n = 651). Two-tailed test of AUC Z statistic = 4.64; P < 0.01.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Scatter plots of the OD readings for the CHEKIT ELISA (+, >30%) and C-ELISA (+, ≤50%) plotted against the number of months since the herdsman reported the last outbreak of FMD for animals that were probang culture positive (n = 38). Cutoffs are marked with horizontal lines.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Estimates of Se and Sp for the CHEKIT ELISA and the C-ELISA compared to the cVNT as a gold standarda

    cVNT resultCHEKIT resultNo. of animals with C-ELISA result that was:
    +−
    Seropositiveb+2057
    −443252
    Seronegativec+64
    −41419
    • ↵ a Total number of animals tested, 1,377. The recommended cutoffs of 30% for the CHEKIT ELISA and 50% for the C-ELISA were used.

    • ↵ b Se of CHEKIT ELISA = 0.234; Se of C-ELISA = 0.714; kappa value of 0.192 between CHEKIT and C-ELISA results.

    • ↵ c Sp of CHEKIT ELISA = 0.979; Sp of C-ELISA = 0.900; kappa value of 0.182 between CHEKIT and C-ELISA results.

  • TABLE 2.

    Estimates of Se and Sp for the CHEKIT ELISA and the C-ELISA based on subset of juvenile animals and compared to the cVNT as the gold standarda

    cVNT resultCHEKIT resultNo. of animals with C-ELISA result that was:
    +−
    Seropositiveb+462
    −136134
    Seronegativec+24
    −17310
    • ↵ a Total number of animals tested, 651. The recommended cutoffs of 30% for the CHEKIT ELISA and 50% for the C-ELISA were used.

    • ↵ b Se of CHEKIT ELISA = 0.151; Se of C-ELISA = 0.572; kappa value of 0.212 between CHEKIT and C-ELISA results.

    • ↵ c Sp of CHEKIT ELISA = 0.982; Sp of C-ELISA = 0.942; kappa value of 0.136 between CHEKIT and C-ELISA results.

  • TABLE 3.

    HSe and HSp of the CHEKIT ELISAa

    No. of animals testedHSp (0, 2)bHSe for herd with indicated characteristics
    1, 2b5, 310, 420, 630, 8
    50.9020.0980.1440.1880.2710.347
    150.7210.2790.3890.4840.6330.741
    250.5610.4390.5820.6900.8310.909
    350.4200.5800.7300.8270.9310.973
    450.3000.7000.8380.9130.9760.993
    550.2000.8000.9120.9620.9930.999
    • ↵ a Assumptions: cutoff point, 1; Se, 0.23; Sp, 0.98. Sampling without replacement. Herd size, 100 animals. Hypergeometric distribution used.

    • ↵ b Number of infected animals in herd, number of test positives in herd.

  • TABLE 4.

    HSe and HSp of the C-ELISAa

    No. of animals testedHSp (0, 10)bHSe for herd with indicated characteristics
    1, 11b5, 1310, 1620, 2230, 28
    50.5840.4490.5090.5900.7200.814
    150.1810.8490.8960.9420.9830.995
    250.0480.9650.9820.9940.9991.000
    350.0100.9940.9981.0001.0001.000
    450.0020.9991.0001.0001.0001.000
    550.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000
    • ↵ a Assumptions: cutoff point, 1; Se, 0.71; Sp, 0.9. Sampling without replacement. Herd size, 100 animals. Hypergeometric distribution used.

    • ↵ b Number of infected animals in herd, number of test positives in herd.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Comparison of Two 3ABC Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Diagnosis of Multiple-Serotype Foot-and-Mouth Disease in a Cattle Population in an Area of Endemicity
B. M. de C. Bronsvoort, K. J. Sørensen, J. Anderson, A. Corteyn, V. N. Tanya, R. P. Kitching, K. L. Morgan
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2004, 42 (5) 2108-2114; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2108-2114.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Two 3ABC Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Diagnosis of Multiple-Serotype Foot-and-Mouth Disease in a Cattle Population in an Area of Endemicity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of Two 3ABC Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Diagnosis of Multiple-Serotype Foot-and-Mouth Disease in a Cattle Population in an Area of Endemicity
B. M. de C. Bronsvoort, K. J. Sørensen, J. Anderson, A. Corteyn, V. N. Tanya, R. P. Kitching, K. L. Morgan
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2004, 42 (5) 2108-2114; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2108-2114.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Cattle Diseases
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X