Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Use of a Panfungal PCR Assay for Detection of Fungal Pathogens in a Commercial Blood Culture System

Peter C. Iwen, Alison G. Freifeld, Tricia A. Bruening, Steven H. Hinrichs
Peter C. Iwen
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: piwen@unmc.edu
Alison G. Freifeld
2of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tricia A. Bruening
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven H. Hinrichs
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2292-2293.2004
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A panfungal PCR assay was used to evaluate the ability of the ESP blood culture system to detect fungemia. The results showed that the ESP system is reliable for the detection of fungi and showed the applicability of using a molecular-based assay as a potential rapid and reliable method for the identification of fungi.

Fungemia has emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients. Although Candida albicans is the major cause of this infection, numerous other fungal species, such as C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Malassezia furfur, have emerged as important causes of serious disease (3, 13). Presently, the major method used to diagnosis fungemia is culture of blood, using a growth-based approach to detect and identify the pathogen (15).

The detection of fungal species in commercial blood culture bottles has been reported to be <90% in comparisons of culture systems (2, 4). This inability to detect fungi, along with the increased time required to phenotypically identify a fungal species, has led to a proposal to consider molecular biology-based methods for testing (1, 6, 8, 16). Numerous continuous-monitoring blood culture systems have been developed, and molecular approaches to detect microbial pathogens in bottles have shown promise (2, 9-12, 14, 15, 17, 18). ESP Culture System II (TREK Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Westlake, Ohio) is one such method. It utilizes a sensitive approach to measure pressure change within the headspace of a culture bottle for microbial detection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the ESP blood culture system (ESP system) to detect fungi in the blood of patients and to evaluate the applicability of using a molecular biology-based method for detection and identification.

(This work was presented at the 102nd General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Salt Lake City, Utah, 19 to 23 May 2002.)

Five to 18 ml of blood was collected from patients at the bedside (one sample per patient) and was immediately inoculated evenly into ESP 80A Aerobic and ESP 80N Anaerobic bottles as a part of routine patient care. The anaerobic bottles were not evaluated further as a part of this study. The aerobic bottles were incubated at 35 to 37°C for 14 days or until a bottle was flagged as positive by the ESP instrument. Contents of aerobic bottles flagged as positive were Gram stained and subcultured to Sabouraud dextrose (SAB) agar and to sheep blood agar (Remel Labs, Lenexa, Kans.) and were then incubated at 30°C for up to 14 days and 37°C for up to 5 days, respectively. Bottles flagged as positive whose contents Gram stained negative for any microbial pathogen were placed back onto the machine for continued monitoring. Aerobic bottles that subsequently contained bacterial pathogens by culture were excluded from further evaluation. No bottles were determined by culture to contain both bacterial and fungal pathogens simultaneously. All bottles that did not flag positive were subcultured to SAB agar and to sheep blood agar on the 14th day of incubation at the date of culture termination. Fungal growth on SAB agar consistent with that of a yeast was assessed for the ability to form germ tubes and, if a negative result was obtained, was tested by using the API 20C (BioMerieux, Hazelwood, Mo.) sugar assimilation strip for identification. A total of 210 aerobic blood culture bottles were included in the evaluation (142 randomly collected bottles from patients at risk for fungemia [56 from neonatal intensive care, 42 from high-dose chemotherapy, 18 from solid organ transplant, and 26 from general medicine patients] and 68 that had flagged positive but were negative for microbes by Gram staining).

Additionally, a 100-μl sample of the blood-broth mixture was taken from each bottle at the time of flagging positive or at the time of culture termination for DNA extraction. The process for extraction was as follows: (i) wash the sample twice by adding it to 900 μl of sterile water and centrifuging it at 13,000 × g for 2 min; (ii) after the second wash, resuspend the pellet in 400 μl of DNA extraction buffer as described by van Burik et al. (19); (iii) sonicate the sample in a water bath (model 2210; Branson) for 15 min; (iv) heat at 100°C for 5 min; and (v) purify by using the QIAmp blood kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, Calif.) with protocols supplied by the manufacturer for crude cell lysates.

The extracted DNA was amplified, sequenced, and analyzed by using the procedures described by Henry et al. (7). Briefly, a PCR assay was performed with fungus-specific primers that amplified the complete internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 regions of the ribosomal DNA complex (ITS-PCR). Prior to amplification, the extracted DNA was diluted 1:10 and 1:100 to prevent inhibitors in the blood-broth sample from interfering with the PCR assay (5).

Table 1 shows a comparison of blood culture instrumentation, plate culture, and ITS-PCR assay results. ITS-PCR was negative for all 183 samples that were negative by culture while it was positive for all 27 culture-positive samples, for a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. All 27 culture-positive samples were also positive by the ESP system. In 26 cases, the identification by ITS-PCR in combination with sequence analysis and by culture matched (C. albicans [8 isolates], C. parapsilosis [5 isolates], Cryptococcus neoformans [4 isolates], C. glabrata [4 isolates], and one isolate each for M. furfur, Candida lusitaniae, C. krusei, C. tropicalis, and Aspergillus nidulans). In one case, phenotypic testing was unable to resolve the identification and called the isolate Cryptococcus-like while sequence analysis of the PCR product confirmed this isolate to be C. neoformans by a >99% homology to known sequences within GenBank. The inability to identify all the fungal species by using biochemical methods has been reported by others (20).

Only 3 of the 68 positively flagged, Gram stain-negative samples were considered true positives by culture. False-positive results from continuously monitored blood culture systems have been well documented, although the factors causing the false positives are not fully understood (15). Blood bottles from patients at high risk for M. furfur- and Aspergillus species-caused infections were purposely included in this study, because these fungi are known to be difficult to detect in blood (15). The ITS-PCR analysis showed no evidence of these or any other fungi present in the bottles.

The three positively flagged, Gram stain-negative samples eventually grew in culture and were identified as C. albicans (two cases) and A. nidulans (one case). The patient from whom A. nidulans was detected subsequently died as a result of complications secondary to premature birth, with no postmortem exam being performed. Because A. nidulans is a rare cause of aspergillosis and is common as an environmental contaminant, it was unlikely that this organism was the immediate cause of death, although no other etiology was identified as a cause of sepsis in this patient.

These results showed that the ESP system was able to detect fungal pathogens in blood. This study also showed the applicability of using a molecular biology-based assay on blood culture bottles as a potential rapid and reliable method for the identification of fungal species. Future variations in the platforms used for molecular testing will enhance the applicability of this method for patient care.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Comparison of methods for the detection of fungal pathogens from blood culture bottlesd

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Merck & Co. for support through the Medical School Grant program.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 October 2003.
    • Returned for modification 18 November 2003.
    • Accepted 30 January 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Chang, H. C., S. N. Leaw, A. H. Huang, T. L. Wu, and T. C. Chang. 2001. Rapid identification of yeasts in positive blood cultures by a multiplex PCR method. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:3466-3471.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Cockerill, F. R., III, C. A. Torgerson, G. S. Reed, E. A. Vetter, A. L. Weaver, J. C. Dale, G. D. Roberts, N. K. Henry, D. M. Ilstrup, and J. E. Rosenblatt. 1996. Clinical comparison of Difco ESP, Wampole Isolator, and Becton Dickinson Septi-Chek aerobic blood culturing systems. J. Clin. Microbiol.34:20-24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Diekema, D. J., S. A. Messer, A. B. Brueggemann, S. L. Coffman, G. V. Doern, L. A. Herwaldt, and M. A. Pfaller. 2002. Epidemiology of candidemia: 3-year results from the emerging infections and the epidemiology of Iowa organisms study. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:1298-1302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Doern, G. V., A. Barton, and S. Rao. 1998. Controlled comparative evaluation of BacT/Alert FAN and ESP 80A aerobic media as means for detecting bacteremia and fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:2686-2689.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Fredricks, D. N., and D. A. Relman. 1998. Improved amplification of microbial DNA from blood cultures by removal of the PCR inhibitor sodium polyanetholesulfonate. J. Clin. Microbiol.36:2810-2816.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Guiver, M., K. Levi, and B. A. Oppenheim. 2001. Rapid identification of Candida species by TaqMan PCR. J. Clin. Pathol.54:362-366.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Henry, T., P. C. Iwen, and S. H. Hinrichs. 2000. Identification of Aspergillus species using internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:1510-1515.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Iwen, P. C., S. H. Hinrichs, and M. E. Rupp. 2002. Utilization of the internal transcribed spacer regions as molecular targets to detect and identify human fungal pathogens. Med. Mycol.40:87-109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Jansen, G. J., M. Mooibroek, J. Idema, H. J. M. Harmsen, G. W. Welling, and J. E. Degener. 2000. Rapid identification of bacteria in blood cultures by using fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:814-817.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.
    Kempf, V. A. J., K. Trebesius, and I. B. Autenrieth. 2000. Fluorescent in situ hybridization allows rapid identification of microorganism in blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:830-838.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    Louie, L., J. Goodfellow, P. Mathieu, A. Glatt, M. Louie, and A. E. Simor. 2002. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci from blood culture bottles by using a multiplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:2786-2790.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Luo, G., and T. G. Mitchell. 2002. Rapid identification of pathogenic fungi directly from cultures by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:2860-2865.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Pfaller, M. A., D. J. Diekema, R. N. Jones, H. S. Sader, A. C. Fluit, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, and The Sentry Participant Group. 2001. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:3254-3259.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Qian, Q., Y.-W. Tang, C. P. Kolbert, C. A. Torgerson, J. G. Hughes, E. A. Vetter, W. S. Harmsen, S. O. Montgomery, F. R. Cockerill III, and D. H. Persing. 2001. Direct identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene: evaluation of BACTEC 9240 instrument true-positive and false-positive results. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:3578-3582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Reimer, L. G., M. L. Wilson, and M. P. Weinstein. 1997. Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.10:444-465.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Reiss, E., K. Tanaka, G. Bruker, V. Chazalet, D. Coleman, J. P. Debeaupuis, R. Hanazawa, J. P. Latage, J. Lortholary, K. Makimura, C. J. Morrison, S. Y. Murayama, S. Naoe, S. Paris, J. Sarfati, K. Shibuya, D. Sullivan, K. Uchida, and H. Yamaguchi. 1998. Molecular diagnosis and epidemiology of fungal infections. Med. Mycol.36(Suppl.):249-257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Shin, J. H., F. S. Nolte, and C. J. Morrison. 1997. Rapid identification of Candida species in blood cultures by a clinically useful PCR method. J. Clin. Microbiol.35:1454-1459.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Turenne, C. Y., E. Witwicki, D. J. Hoban, J. A. Karlowsky, and A. M. Kabani. 2000. Rapid identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures by fluorescence-based PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:513-520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    van Burik, J. A., R. W. Schreckhise, T. C. White, R. A. Bowden, and D. Myerson. 1998. Comparison of six extraction techniques for isolation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Med. Mycol.36:299-303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Xu, J. B., C. Millar, J. E. Moore, R. McClurg, M. J. Walker, J. Evans, S. Hedderw, and R. McMullan. 2002. Comparison of API20C with molecular identification of Candida spp isolated from blood stream infections. J. Clin. Pathol.55:774-777.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Use of a Panfungal PCR Assay for Detection of Fungal Pathogens in a Commercial Blood Culture System
Peter C. Iwen, Alison G. Freifeld, Tricia A. Bruening, Steven H. Hinrichs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2004, 42 (5) 2292-2293; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2292-2293.2004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of a Panfungal PCR Assay for Detection of Fungal Pathogens in a Commercial Blood Culture System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Use of a Panfungal PCR Assay for Detection of Fungal Pathogens in a Commercial Blood Culture System
Peter C. Iwen, Alison G. Freifeld, Tricia A. Bruening, Steven H. Hinrichs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2004, 42 (5) 2292-2293; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2292-2293.2004
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

blood
fungemia
mycology
polymerase chain reaction

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X