Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Virology

Use of Immunoglobulin G Avidity Assays for Differentiation of Primary from Previous Infections with West Nile Virus

P. N. Levett, K. Sonnenberg, F. Sidaway, S. Shead, M. Niedrig, K. Steinhagen, G. B. Horsman, M. A. Drebot
P. N. Levett
1Provincial Laboratory, Saskatchewan Health, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: plevett@health.gov.sk.ca
K. Sonnenberg
2EUROIMMUN AG, Luebeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Sidaway
1Provincial Laboratory, Saskatchewan Health, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Shead
3National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Niedrig
4Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Steinhagen
2EUROIMMUN AG, Luebeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. B. Horsman
1Provincial Laboratory, Saskatchewan Health, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Drebot
3National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5873-5875.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Since its introduction in 1999, West Nile virus (WNV) infections have spread rapidly across the North American continent. Diagnosis of acute WNV infection by detection of WNV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) is complicated by the persistence of detectable IgM for more than 1 year in some patients. IgG antibody avidity testing was assessed as a supplemental assay in the diagnosis of current infections. Three groups of serum samples were assayed in parallel by two different IgG avidity test systems (indirect immunofluorescence test [IIFT] and prototype enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]; EUROIMMUN, Luebeck, Germany). Group I (40 sera taken between 2 and 9 days after the onset of influenza-like symptoms) and group II (40 sera taken between 10 and 43 days after onset) were acute and convalescent specimens from patients with a positive anti-WNV IgM test (ELISA; Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA). Group III consisted of 43 patient sera collected between 6 and 12 months after infection. IgG antibodies specific for WNV were detected in 38% (ELISA) and 50% (IIFT) of group I sera, in 90% (ELISA and IIFT) of group II sera, and in 100% (ELISA and IIFT) of group III sera. Low-avidity IgG antibodies were demonstrated in 86% (ELISA) and 95% (IIFT) of IgG-positive patient samples taken between 2 and 43 days after the onset of symptoms (groups I and II). High-avidity IgG antibodies were detected in 100% of group III sera obtained 6 months or more after the onset of symptoms (ELISA and IIFT). IgG avidity tests for WNV infections are rapid and simple to perform. The determination of IgG avidity provides additional diagnostic certainty in differentiating between recently acquired and previous infections with WNV.

West Nile virus (WNV) has spread rapidly across North America since it was first detected in New York in 1999 (6, 8, 12, 14, 15). Although WNV was first detected in Canada in 2001, the first cases of human illness were not identified until 2002 (5). In 2003, large outbreaks of WNV-associated illness occurred in the Midwestern United States (2) and the prairie provinces of Canada (http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/wnv-vwn/pdf_sr-rs_2004/surveillance_table_042904_hm.pdf ). As a result, a significant proportion of the population of Saskatchewan seroconverted during the 2003 mosquito season. In the southwestern region of the province, approximately 10% of the population were seropositive when surveyed in the spring of 2004 (7), most of whom had no history of WNV infection.

The diagnosis of WNV infection has relied heavily upon the detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in blood (or in the cerebrospinal fluid in cases of neurological infection). Unfortunately, IgM antibodies are persistent for more than 1 year in some patients (17). This finding has significant implications for the differentiation of recent or current infection with WNV from persistent seropositivity derived from the previous WNV season. The ability to identify immune responses persisting from previous years may be important for focusing public health efforts to control acute outbreaks. It is often difficult to obtain convalescent samples from patients after mild illness; thus, it may not be possible to confirm recent infection by detection of seroconversion using a hemagglutination (HA) inhibition (HI) assay and a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). We investigated the use of IgG avidity to exclude historical infection as a cause of IgM reactivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum specimens.Three groups of specimens, representing recent and previous infections, were studied. These included 80 sera from patients whose symptoms were consistent with a diagnosis of acute WNV infection, comprised of group I (40 sera taken between 2 and 9 days after the onset of influenza-like symptoms) and group II (40 sera taken between 10 and 43 days after onset). Group III contained 43 sera collected 6 to 12 months after exposure from patients known to have been infected with WNV in the summer of 2003.

WNV IgM ELISA.IgM antibodies against WNV were detected using an IgM capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Focus Diagnostics, Cypress, CA), as described by the manufacturer. Reactive sera were retested following a background subtraction procedure (9) to eliminate false-positive IgM results.

WNV IgG ELISA and HI assay.Serosurvey samples were screened for the presence of flavivirus IgG antibody using a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described (10). The HI assay was performed on selected serum samples essentially as described previously (3). In brief, dilutions of acetone-treated serum were mixed with 8 HA units of suckling mouse WNV antigen and incubated at 4°C overnight. Goose erythrocytes were then added to the mixture, and the solution was incubated for an additional hour at room temperature. The HI titer was determined as the highest dilution of serum that caused complete inhibition of erythrocyte agglutination by 8 HA units of viral antigen.

Plaque reduction neutralization test.ELISA/HI-reactive samples were confirmed for the presence of WNV-specific antibody by carrying out a PRNT. The standard PRNT was performed essentially as described previously (1). In brief, mixtures of virus (200 PFU) and dilutions of human sera were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and added to six-well plates containing Vero cell monolayers. After a 37°C incubation of 1 h, a nutrient agar overlay was added, and the plates were placed in a CO2 incubator for approximately 3 days, after which a second overlay containing neutral red as a vital stain was added. Plates were then checked periodically over the next few days for plaque formation. The highest serum dilution with a plaque reduction of at least 90% was defined as the titration end point.

IgG avidity IIFT.Sera were tested using an indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT) (Euroimmun AG, Luebeck, Germany). Briefly, 25 μl of serum diluted 1:10 in buffer was added to each of two reaction fields on a BIOCHIP slide. Each field contained two BIOCHIPS, one with WNV-infected cells and the second with uninfected cells. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, cells were exposed to either 6 M urea solution or to phosphate-buffered saline-Tween for 10 min. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline-Tween, cells were incubated with fluorescein-labeled anti-human globulin for 30 min and then viewed at ×20 magnification using a 488-nm excitation filter and a 520-nm blocking filter. In a specific positive reaction, the cytoplasm of infected cells demonstrated fine to coarse granular fluorescence and inclusion bodies in some cells. The presence of low-avidity IgG antibodies was inferred by the absence or significant reduction of fluorescence of cells treated with urea compared with the buffer-treated controls.

IgG avidity ELISA.Sera were tested using a prototype ELISA (Euroimmun AG, Luebeck, Germany). Briefly, 100 μl of serum diluted 1:100 in buffer was added to each of two wells coated with WNV. After incubation for 60 min at 37°C, wells were exposed to either 6 M urea solution or to phosphate buffer for 10 min. After washing, wells were incubated with peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG for 60 min at 37°C, substrate was added, and the reactions were stopped after 15 min by the addition of 100 μl stop solution per well. The reactions were read immediately at a wavelength of 450 nm using a reference wavelength of 650 nm. A relative avidity index (RAI) was calculated for each specimen and was expressed as the percentage of reactivity remaining in the urea-treated well. Samples with RAIs of <40% were regarded as having low avidity, and those with RAIs of >60% were regarded as having high avidity.

RESULTS

IgM antibodies were detected in all 80 specimens from acutely ill patients with WNV infection, and the 43 patients with previous infections were diagnosed by detection of IgM and IgG antibodies and of specific neutralizing antibodies by PRNT. IgG antibodies were detected by IIFT in 20 samples (50%) from acutely ill patients, rising to 90% of convalescent samples (Table 1). The IgG ELISA was slightly less sensitive than the IIFT, and only 15 (38%) of the acute specimens were IgG positive by ELISA. In the convalescent samples, both methods detected IgG antibodies in 36 patients (90%). In the specimens collected 6 months or more after the onset of symptoms, IgG seroprevalence was 100% using both IIFT and ELISA methods.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Detection of IgG antibodies and IgG avidity in patients with recent or previous W NV infection

Among the IgG-positive acute and convalescent samples, the great majority were of low avidity (Table 1). The number of low-avidity samples was highest in the convalescent samples, reflecting the higher prevalence of IgG in this group. In addition, the number of low-avidity samples was greater using the IIFT than the ELISA because of the higher sensitivity of the IIFT.

When tested using the IgG ELISA, there was very little difference in the proportion of IgG-positive samples showing low avidity, but the IgG ELISA appeared to be less sensitive than the IIFT for detection of IgG (Table 1). No samples from previously infected subjects showed low avidity (Fig. 1), although a few specimens from recently infected patients exhibited high avidity indices.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Difference in relative avidity index between recent and previous infection detected by ELISA (left) and difference in intensity of fluorescence in IIFT (reduction of fluorescence of cells treated with urea compared with the buffer-treated cells) (right).

DISCUSSION

IgM antibodies to WNV have been shown to persist for at least a year and for up to 500 days in some patients (17). It is not known whether persistence for longer periods occurs and, if so, if it occurs in sufficient proportions of cases and at titers high enough to be clinically confusing. Since IgM persistence may be problematic when current cases of WNV infection are identified using serological assays such as the IgM ELISA, other approaches may need to be considered. Documentation of seroconversion using acute- and convalescent-phase sera has been the “gold standard” for demonstrating a current infection; however, convalescent samples are not always available, and rises in antibody titer may be missed if acute samples are collected too late after exposure. Several approaches have been used to differentiate recent from previous flavivirus infection. Detection of IgA antibodies in patients with recent, but not previous, WNV infection has also been reported (16); further studies are needed to determine the duration of IgA persistence and its diagnostic value in helping to characterize the time frame of exposure.

IgG avidity has been employed to distinguish primary and secondary dengue virus infections (4, 13) with sensitivity similar to those of the assays described in this study. In the early stages of the immune response, IgG antibodies are produced against a wide range of antigenic epitopes, producing an IgG response of relatively low specificity, which results in low IgG avidity. Thus, the detection of low-avidity IgG after a recent febrile illness, in conjunction with a positive IgM ELISA, is presumptive evidence of an acute or recent WNV infection.

In contrast, as the immune response matures and B-cell clonal selection occurs, the resulting IgG antibodies are more specific, and the IgG avidity increases. In this study, all sera tested 6 months or more after exposure to WNV contained high-avidity IgG antibodies. Thus, our results indicate that individuals exposed to WNV during the preceding mosquito season will in almost all cases demonstrate high-avidity IgG antibodies if tested the following spring.

Antibodies to flaviviruses are cross-reactive, but cross-reactivity is somewhat less pronounced in immunofluorescence assays than in ELISA formats (11). Moreover, in many cases, differentiation is possible using a flavivirus BIOCHIP mosaic (dengue, St. Louis encephalitis, tick-borne encephalitis, and yellow fever viruses) with the determination of antibody profiles. A very small proportion of specimens from recent infections showed high IgG avidity (Fig. 1). It is not known whether cross-reacting flavivirus antibodies will result in a high-avidity result, leading to a recent WNV infection being misclassified as a previous infection, but this possibility requires further study.

The Euroimmun prototype IgG ELISA appeared to be less sensitive than the IIFT for detection of IgG early after the onset of symptoms. However, there was minimal difference between ELISA and IIFT methods for avidity determination. An ELISA using a more purified antigen, in order to increase the sensitivity of IgG detection and reduce cross-reactivity, is in development.

The value of avidity determination will be great in years following large outbreaks of WNV infection, as occurred in Saskatchewan in 2003. Weather conditions in Western Canada during the summer of 2004 limited vector development and activity, resulting in very few cases of WNV infection. Thus, most of the positive IgM tests recorded in 2004 were reflective of previous infections. Epidemiological investigation of these cases consumed much time and effort, which might have been saved if the capacity to test for the presence of high-avidity IgG antibodies had existed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sina Erdmann and Britta Arp for excellent technical support.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 July 2005.
    • Returned for modification 7 September 2005.
    • Accepted 16 September 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Beaty, B. J., C. H. Calisher, and R. S. Shope. 1989. Arboviruses, p. 797-856. In N. J. Schmidt, and R. W. Emmons (ed.), Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections, 6th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003. West Nile virus activity—United States, October 30-November 5, 2003. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.52:1080.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Clarke, D. H., and J. Casals. 1958. Techniques for hemagglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.7:561-573.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    de Souza, V. A., S. Fernandes, E. S. Araujo, A. F. Tateno, O. M. Oliviera, R. R. Oliviera, and C. S. Pannuti. 2004. Use of an immunoglobulin G avidity test to discriminate between primary and secondary dengue virus infections. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:1782-1784.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Drebot, M. A., R. Lindsay, I. K. Barker, P. A. Buck, M. Fearon, F. Hunter, P. Sockett, and H. Artsob. 2003. West Nile surveillance and diagnostics: a Canadian perspective. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol.14:105-114.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Granwehr, B. P., K. M. Lillibridge, S. Higgs, P. W. Mason, J. F. Aronson, G. A. Campbell, and A. D. Barrett. 2004. West Nile virus: where are we now? Lancet Infect. Dis.4:547-556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Guly, C. 2004. West Nile capital. Can. Med. Assoc. J.171:562.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Guptill, S. C., K. G. Julian, G. L. Campbell, S. D. Price, and A. A. Marfin. 2003. Early-season avian deaths from West Nile virus as warnings of human infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis.9:483-484.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Hogrefe, W. R., R. Moore, M. Lape-Nixon, M. Wagner, and H. E. Prince. 2004. Performance of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using a West Nile virus recombinant antigen (preM/E) for detection of West Nile virus- and other flavivirus-specific antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:4641-4648.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Johnson, A. J., D. A. Martin, N. Karabatsos, and J. T. Roehrig. 2000. Detection of anti-arboviral immunoglobulin G by using a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:1827-1831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Koraka, P., H. Zeller, M. Niedrig, A. D. Osterhaus, and J. Groen. 2002. Reactivity of serum samples from patients with a flavivirus infection measured by immunofluorescence assay and ELISA. Microbes Infect.4:1209-1215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Lanciotti, R. S., J. T. Roehrig, V. Deubel, J. Smith, M. Parker, K. Steele, B. Crise, K. E. Volpe, M. B. Crabtree, J. H. Scherret, R. A. Hall, J. S. MacKenzie, C. B. Cropp, B. Panigrahy, E. Ostlund, B. Schmitt, M. Malkinson, C. Banet, J. Weissman, N. Komar, H. M. Savage, W. Stone, T. McNamara, and D. J. Gubler. 1999. Origin of the West Nile virus responsible for an outbreak of encephalitis in the northeastern United States. Science286:2333-2337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Matheus, S., X. Deparis, B. Labeau, J. Lelarge, J. Morvan, and P. Dussart. 2005. Discrimination between primary and secondary dengue virus infection by an immunoglobulin G avidity test using a single acute-phase serum sample. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:2793-2797.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Nash, D., F. Mostashari, A. Fine, J. Miller, D. O'Leary, K. Murray, A. Huang, A. Rosenberg, A. Greenberg, M. Sherman, S. Wong, and M. Layton. 2001. The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N. Engl. J. Med.344:1807-1814.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Petersen, L. R., J. T. Roehrig, and J. M. Hughes. 2002. West Nile virus encephalitis. N. Engl. J. Med.347:1225-1226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Prince, H. E., and M. Lape-Nixon. 2005. Evaluation of a West Nile virus immunoglobulin A capture enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.12:231-233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Roehrig, J. T., D. Nash, B. Maldin, A. Labowitz, D. A. Martin, R. S. Lanciotti, and G. L. Campbell. 2003. Persistence of virus-reactive serum immunoglobulin M antibody in confirmed West Nile virus encephalitis cases. Emerg. Infect. Dis.9:376-379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Use of Immunoglobulin G Avidity Assays for Differentiation of Primary from Previous Infections with West Nile Virus
P. N. Levett, K. Sonnenberg, F. Sidaway, S. Shead, M. Niedrig, K. Steinhagen, G. B. Horsman, M. A. Drebot
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2005, 43 (12) 5873-5875; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5873-5875.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Use of Immunoglobulin G Avidity Assays for Differentiation of Primary from Previous Infections with West Nile Virus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Use of Immunoglobulin G Avidity Assays for Differentiation of Primary from Previous Infections with West Nile Virus
P. N. Levett, K. Sonnenberg, F. Sidaway, S. Shead, M. Niedrig, K. Steinhagen, G. B. Horsman, M. A. Drebot
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Dec 2005, 43 (12) 5873-5875; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5873-5875.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibody Affinity
immunoglobulin G
West Nile Fever
West Nile virus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X