Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Role and Significance of Quantitative Urine Cultures in Diagnosis of Melioidosis

Direk Limmathurotsakul, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Wirongrong Chierakul, Allen C. Cheng, Bina Maharjan, Wipada Chaowagul, Nicholas J. White, Nicholas P. J. Day, Sharon J. Peacock
Direk Limmathurotsakul
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanaporn Wuthiekanun
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wirongrong Chierakul
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allen C. Cheng
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University and Northern Territory Clinical School, Flinders University, Darwin, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bina Maharjan
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wipada Chaowagul
3Medical Department, Sappasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas J. White
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
4Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas P. J. Day
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
4Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon J. Peacock
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
4Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sharon@tropmedres.ac
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2274-2276.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Melioidosis is associated with significant mortality in countries in which it is endemic. Previous studies have demonstrated that quantitative Burkholderia pseudomallei counts in blood are predictive of mortality. Here we examine the relationship between outcomes and quantitative B. pseudomallei counts in urine. A total of 755 patients presenting to Sappasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, northeast Thailand (in the northeast part of the country), with melioidosis between July 1993 and October 2003 had quantitative urine cultures performed within 72 h of admission. Urine culture results were divided into the following groups: (i) no growth of B. pseudomallei from a neat sample or pellet, (ii) positive result from a centrifuged pellet only (<103 CFU/ml), (iii) detection of between 103 CFU/ml and 105 CFU/ml from a neat sample, or (iv) detection of ≥105 CFU/ml from a neat sample. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 45%. Patients with negative urine cultures had the lowest death rate (39%). Mortality rates rose with increasing B. pseudomallei counts in urine, from 58% for those with positive spun pellets only to 61% for those with between 103 CFU/ml and 105 CFU/ml and 71% for those with ≥105 CFU/ml. This was independent of age, presence of bacteremia, known risk factors for melioidosis such as diabetes, and the prior administration of antibiotics. The presence of B. pseudomallei in urine during systemic infection is associated with a poor prognosis.

Melioidosis, the disease caused by the gram-negative bacillus Burkholderia pseudomallei, is associated with significant mortality in countries in which it is endemic. The case fatality rate is approximately 50% for Thai adults and 19% for patients in northern Australia (2, 9). Delineating predictors of a poor outcome following admission provide clinical tools with which to identify high-risk patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that the clinical severity (1), bacterial count in the blood (8), and magnitude of the inflammatory response (6) are predictive of mortality for patients with melioidosis. Defining colony counts in blood is straightforward but is only applicable to patients with positive blood cultures upon presentation (50% of patients, in our experience) and is relatively expensive for resource-poor regions of the world.

Quantitative urine culture is a standard, inexpensive diagnostic test that is widely undertaken to provide laboratory evidence of urinary tract infection. The presence of ≥105 CFU/ml in urine culture is used to distinguish between a contaminated sample and one from a patient with urinary tract sepsis and is generally accepted as the gold standard for laboratory diagnosis (5). This interpretation is not applicable to patients with suspected melioidosis. B. pseudomallei is not a member of the human commensal flora, and the isolation of even a single colony in urine is both significant and sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of melioidosis. Furthermore, the significance of B. pseudomallei counts in urine is poorly understood. Although the urinary tract may be the primary source (especially in nephrolithiasis) of the organism or may become involved in the infective process, it is unclear whether the standard cutoff of ≥105 CFU/ml indicates an infection of the bladder, kidneys, or prostate. For this study, we explored the relationship between urinary symptoms and positive urine culture results for B. pseudomallei, determined whether the B. pseudomallei count in urine represents a marker for mortality risk, and defined the role of this simple, inexpensive technique in the diagnosis of melioidosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were recruited prospectively between July 1993 and October 2003 by a study team at Sappasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand (located in the northeastern part of the country). Patients with suspected melioidosis were actively sought during twice-daily rounds of the medical and intensive care wards, together with passive surveillance of the surgical and pediatric wards as a part of eligibility screening for clinical trials. Detailed clinical information, including the treatment regimen, was recorded. Microbiological specimens for blood culture and throat swabs were taken from all patients, and urine, pus, and sputum were collected when available. All culture-proven melioidosis patients who had urine cultures within 3 days of admission were enrolled in the study.

Urine was collected into a sterile container and transported immediately to our on-site microbiology research laboratory. Using a sterile calibrated loop, we streaked 1 μl of fresh, unprocessed urine onto one half each of a MacConkey agar plate and an Ashdown's agar plate and then incubated the plates at 37°C for 2 days or 4 days, respectively. The remaining urine sample was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min, excess supernatant was removed, and the pellet was cultured on one half of an Ashdown's agar plate. B. pseudomallei was identified by standard methodology as previously described (3).

For the purposes of analysis, urine culture results were divided into the following four groups based on the presence and number of B. pseudomallei cells: (i) no growth of B. pseudomallei from a neat sample or pellet, (ii) culture of B. pseudomallei from the centrifuged pellet only (<103 CFU/ml), (iii) detection of between 103 CFU/ml and 105 CFU/ml, or (iv) detection of ≥105 CFU/ml in a neat sample. Because renal tubular acidosis is endemic to this region, we specifically examined the profiles of a subgroup of patients with nondiabetic renal disease. Statistical analysis was performed with the statistical program Intercooled STATA, version 8.0 (College Station, Tex.). The trend across ordered groups was tested with a χ2 test for trend. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the independence of factors associated with quantitative urine cultures and the prognostic value of quantitative urine cultures for the survival outcome. Ethical approval for all clinical trials was obtained from the Ministry of Public Health, Royal Government of Thailand.

RESULTS

During the 10-year study period, 1,950 patients were admitted to Sappasithiprasong Hospital with culture-confirmed melioidosis. Quantitative urine cultures were performed within 72 h of admission in 822 of these cases 230 (28%) of which were positive for B. pseudomallei. Fifty-eight positive cases were excluded because no record had been made of the quantitative urine culture results, and nine cases were subsequently excluded because of missing outcome data. For the remaining 755 patients included in the study, the median age was 48 years (range, 1 to 89 years), and 57% of the patients were male. Diabetes (n = 363; 48%) and renal disease, including chronic renal failure and renal calculi (n = 165; 22%), were common comorbidities. Blood cultures were performed in 727 of the 755 cases, 487 (67%) of which were positive. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 45%.

Urine cultures that were positive for B. pseudomallei were analyzed from 171 patients (23%). Of these, 52 (30%) were positive from the spun pellet only (<103 CFU/ml), 51 (30%) contained between 103 CFU/ml and 105 CFU/ml, and 68 (40%) contained ≥105 CFU/ml. The urine culture was the only positive direct specimen in 70 cases. Nineteen of these (27%) were culture positive from the spun pellet only, and eight of these patients had negative blood cultures.

Positive urine cultures were significantly associated with increasing age, the presence of urinary symptoms, preexisting renal disease, and positive blood cultures upon both univariate and multiple-variable analyses. For both of these models, patients with diabetes and those who had received antibiotics which are active against B. pseudomallei prior to urine culture had lower rates of urine culture positivity (Table 1). The same factors predicted bacterial concentrations in the urine (data not shown). Only 41 patients (24%) with positive urine cultures had urinary symptoms.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Variables associated with positive urine cultures (n = 171) for 755 patients with melioidosisa

The mortality rate rose with increasing bacterial quantities in urine. For melioidosis patients with negative urine cultures, the fatality rate was 39% (228 of 584 patients). In contrast, patients with positive urine cultures from the spun pellet (<103 CFU/ml) had a 58% mortality rate (30 of 52 patients), patients with positive urine cultures with between 103 and 105 CFU/ml had a 61% mortality rate (31 of 51 patients), and patients with positive urine cultures with >105 CFU/ml had a 71% mortality rate (48 of 68 patients).

In a multiple-variable model, a positive blood culture, a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, and age were significantly associated with mortality, and diabetes and the prior administration of an effective antibiotic regimen were associated with survival. A positive urine culture was predictive of mortality independent of the prior receipt of active antibiotics, age, diabetes, blood culture positivity, and the presence of pneumonia. Furthermore, the magnitude of the urinary bacterial concentration was correlated with an increased risk of mortality compared to that of patients with negative urine cultures (χ2 test for trend; P < 0.001) (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Variables associated with in-hospital mortality (n = 337) for 755 patients with melioidosisa

There were 116 patients with nondiabetic renal disease. These patients had a higher rate of positive urine cultures (39% versus 20%; P < 0.001) but a similar rate of blood culture positivity (69% versus 64%; P = 0.29) as patients without renal disease. Nondiabetic renal disease was associated with a higher mortality rate (65% versus 41%; P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

This study has demonstrated that the presence and number of B. pseudomallei organisms in the urine of patients presenting with melioidosis have predictive value in terms of identifying patients with poor outcomes. This correlation is independent of age, bacteremia, and the timeliness of antibiotic administration. An increasing urinary bacterial concentration was associated with an increasing mortality rate, suggesting that the concentration in urine may be a surrogate marker for the overall bacterial load. The lack of association between diabetes and mortality has been noted previously (1) and may be related to the fact that distinct factors are involved in the acquisition of infection versus those influencing the outcome of disease. In addition, diabetic patients may manifest mild disease at lower levels of exposure to B. pseudomallei or may receive appropriate antibiotics earlier for presumed melioidosis.

Genitourinary tract infections were previously thought to be infrequent in Thai patients compared with other population groups, such as those in northern Australia, where prostatic involvement has been described for 19% of male patients (2). During the 10-year period of this study, only 41 of 755 patients (5%) for whom urine culture was performed had both a positive urine culture and the clinical features of urinary tract sepsis. Since many patients did not have urine cultures performed and since patients with urinary symptoms were more likely to have cultures performed, it is likely that the true rate of urinary involvement is lower than that described in this study. The finding of asymptomatic bacteriuria has been considered to represent renal filtration of bacteria present in the blood, previously termed “spillover.” We are currently investigating this assumption in a prospective study of simultaneous quantitative urine and blood cultures.

Chronic renal failure and/or renal calculi are well-recognized risk factors for melioidosis. In northeastern Thailand, renal tubular acidosis is endemic and is strongly associated with nephrolithiasis (4, 7). We found that patients with nondiabetic renal disease were more likely to have involvement of the urinary tract, probably reflecting calculi acting as a nidus of infection.

The observation that urinary symptoms are often absent from melioidosis patients with positive urine cultures indicates the utility of urine culture for the routine screening of patients with suspected disease. For one-third of patients with bacteriuria, B. pseudomallei would have been missed by standard urine culture techniques using undiluted urine since the cultures were positive for the spun urinary pellet alone. This indicates that the diagnostic sensitivity can be increased by using concentrating techniques prior to urine culture.

In conclusion, quantitative urine culture is a simple and inexpensive technique that has clinical utility for predicting the outcome of melioidosis independent of blood culture positivity and other potential confounders.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the support of the medical, nursing, and laboratory staff at Sappasithiprasong Hospital and the staff at the Wellcome Trust-Mahidol University-Oxford University Tropical Medicine Research Program, including Premjit Amornchai, Gumphol Wongsuvan, Nongluk Getchalarat, Jintana Suwannapreuk, Sukallaya Paengmee, and Nittaya Teerawattanasook. We are grateful to Andy Simpson, Jenny Short, and Yupin Supputtamongkol, who recruited patients for clinical trials during the study period.

A.C. was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Council Training Scholarship, and S.J.P. was supported by a Wellcome Trust Career Development Award in Clinical Tropical Medicine. This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 22 November 2004.
    • Returned for modification 23 December 2004.
    • Accepted 19 January 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Cheng, A. C., S. P. Jacups, N. M. Anstey, and B. J. Currie. 2003. A proposed scoring system for predicting mortality in melioidosis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.97:577-581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Currie, B. J., D. A. Fisher, D. M. Howard, J. N. Burrow, D. Lo, S. Selva-Nayagam, N. M. Anstey, S. E. Huffam, P. L. Snelling, P. J. Marks, D. P. Stephens, G. D. Lum, S. P. Jacups, and V. L. Krause. 2000. Endemic melioidosis in tropical northern Australia: a 10-year prospective study and review of the literature. Clin. Infect. Dis.31:981-986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Dance, D. A., V. Wuthiekanun, P. Naigowit, and N. J. White. 1989. Identification of Pseudomonas pseudomallei in clinical practice: use of simple screening tests and API 20NE. J. Clin. Pathol.42:645-648.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Nimmannit, S., P. Malasit, W. Susaengrat, S. Ong-Aj-Yooth, S. Vasuvattakul, P. Pidetcha, C. Shayakul, and S. Nilwarangkur. 1996. Prevalence of endemic distal renal tubular acidosis and renal stone in the northeast of Thailand. Nephron72:604-610.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Pappas, P. G. 1991. Laboratory in the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections. Med. Clin. N. Am.75:313-325.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Simpson, A. J., M. D. Smith, G. J. Weverling, Y. Suputtamongkol, B. J. Angus, W. Chaowagul, N. J. White, S. J. van Deventer, and J. M. Prins. 2000. Prognostic value of cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10) and clinical parameters in severe melioidosis. J. Infect. Dis.181:621-625.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Tosukhowong, P., K. Tungsanga, S. Eiam-Ong, and V. Sitprija. 1999. Environmental distal renal tubular acidosis in Thailand: an enigma. Am. J. Kidney Dis.33:1180-1186.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Walsh, A. L., M. D. Smith, V. Wuthiekanun, Y. Suputtamongkol, W. Chaowagul, D. A. Dance, B. Angus, and N. J. White. 1995. Prognostic significance of quantitative bacteremia in septicemic melioidosis. Clin. Infect. Dis.21:1498-1500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    White, N. J. 2003. Melioidosis. Lancet361:1715-1722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Role and Significance of Quantitative Urine Cultures in Diagnosis of Melioidosis
Direk Limmathurotsakul, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Wirongrong Chierakul, Allen C. Cheng, Bina Maharjan, Wipada Chaowagul, Nicholas J. White, Nicholas P. J. Day, Sharon J. Peacock
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2005, 43 (5) 2274-2276; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2274-2276.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role and Significance of Quantitative Urine Cultures in Diagnosis of Melioidosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Role and Significance of Quantitative Urine Cultures in Diagnosis of Melioidosis
Direk Limmathurotsakul, Vanaporn Wuthiekanun, Wirongrong Chierakul, Allen C. Cheng, Bina Maharjan, Wipada Chaowagul, Nicholas J. White, Nicholas P. J. Day, Sharon J. Peacock
Journal of Clinical Microbiology May 2005, 43 (5) 2274-2276; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2274-2276.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Burkholderia pseudomallei
melioidosis
urine

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X