Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Can Chlamydial Cervicitis Influence Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis?

M. Romanik, A. Ekiel, D. Friedek, G. Martirosian
M. Romanik
Department of Medical Microbiology Medical University of Silesia Katowice, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Ekiel
Department of Medical Microbiology Medical University of Silesia Katowice, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Friedek
Department of Medical Microbiology Medical University of Silesia Katowice, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Martirosian
Department of Medical Microbiology Medical University of Silesia Katowice, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gmartir@slam.katowice.pl
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4914-4915.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the paper entitled “Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Test, BVBlue, and Clinical and Laboratory Criteria for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis,” by Bradshaw et al., published in the March 2005 issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology (2), the authors concluded that because a majority of women at greater risk of the sequelae of bacterial vaginosis (BV) are not in settings where conventional diagnostic methods are either practical or possible, they would greatly benefit from access to rapid and reliable point-of-care tests to improve the diagnosis and management of BV. This conclusion was based on an analysis of results of several clinical (Amsel [1]) and laboratory (Nugent [6]) criteria routinely recommended for diagnosis of BV with results of rapid tests. In our opinion, this conclusion does not apply to women with chlamydial cervicitis. The use of both Nugent and Amsel criteria simultaneously appears to be important for correct diagnosing of BV in this group of patients.

To estimate the prevalence of BV by Amsel and Nugent criteria, we studied a group of 60 (mean age, 31.7 ± 6.82 years) nonpregnant women suspected for cervicitis. Patients with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, yeast infection, and human immunodeficiency virus infection were excluded from this study. The vaginal pH was measured using color strips. Three sterile cotton swabs (the first for Gram staining, the second for the KOH test, and the third for culturing of genital mycoplasmas) were used to obtain material from the posterior vaginal fornix, and one Dacron swab was used to obtain material from the endocervical canal for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by Chlamydia Direct IF (bioMerieux) (3). Evaluations of the vaginal Gram-stained smear and other criteria were performed by persons with more than 5 years of experience.

C. trachomatis was confirmed in 31 (51.6%) cases, and genital mycoplasmas were cultured in 17 (28.3%) cases. BV was diagnosed in 14 (23.4%) of 60 examined women based on threeor four Amsel criteria (pH ≥4.5, thin milky homogenous discharge, presence of “clue cells,” and amine odor upon mixing vaginal fluid with 10% KOH) and was diagnosed in 6 of them (10%) according to Nugent scores (0 to 3, negative; 4 to 6, intermediate; 7 to 10, positive) (1, 6) (Table 1). In five out of the remaining eight women with Amsel-positive, Nugent-negative scores, coinfection with C. trachomatis was observed (Table 2). Interestingly, three or four Amsel criteria were positive among 57.1% of patients with intermediate Nugent scores and in 8.5% with Nugent negative scores. BV was diagnosed by Amsel criteria in four cases out of 47 women with normal flora (Nugent score, 0 to 3). In all four cases, coinfection with C. trachomatis (in one case, also with genital mycoplasmas) and absence of “clue cells” were detected, although another three Amsel criteria were positive (Table 2). Nugent-negative, Amsel-positive scores (based on positive Amsel criteria other than “clue cells”) very often resulted from contact bleeding and the presence of cervical mucopurulent contents, especially during chlamydial or mycoplasmal infection. That's why observation of “clue cells” in our opinion must be the main characteristic when Amsel criteria are used. This is confirmed by the next observation: among seven women with intermediate Nugent scores, in four cases BV was diagnosed by using Amsel criteria, in three cases the presence of “clue cells” was found, and in one case coinfection with C. trachomatis was found. Nugent intermediate scores are reported by many authors as abnormal vaginal flora and very often are accompanied by the presence of “clue cells” (2, 6).

It is a well-known fact that abnormal vaginal discharge is a symptom of many different pathological processes in women's genital tracts. Changing (increasing) vaginal pH may follow for many reasons, especially with chlamydial infection (4, 5, 7), the presence of cervical ectopia, contact bleeding, and others.

Taking into account that chlamydial cervicitis can influence Amsel criteria, avoiding false-positive results and correct diag-nosing of BV using both Nugent and Amsel criteria (mainly “clue cells”) simultaneously is important for patients with cervicitis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Clinical and laboratory data of studied women

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Characteristics of 14 women with BV, based on Amsel criteria

  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Amsel, R., P. A. Totten, C. A. Spiegel, K. C. Chen, D. Eschenbach, and K. K. Holmes. 1983. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic association. Am. J. Med.74:14-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bradshaw, C. S., A. N. Morton, S. M. Garland, L. B. Horvath, I. Kuzevska, and C. K. Fairley. 2005. Evaluation of point-of-care test, BVBlue, and clinical and laboratory criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:1304-1308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Friedek, D., A. Ekiel, Z. Chelmicki, and M. Romanik. 2004. HPV, Chlamydia trachomatis, and genital mycoplasmas infections in women with low-grade squamous intraepitelial lesions (LSIL). Ginekol. Pol.75:457-463.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Hay, P. E., R. F. Lamont, D. Taylor-Robinson, D. J. Morgan, C. Ison, and J. Pearson. 1994. Abnormal colonization of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. Br. Med. J.308:295-298.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Hillier, S. L. 1993. Diagnostic microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.169:455-459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Nugent, R. P., M. A. Krohn, and S. L. Hiller. 1991. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol.29:297-301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Romanik, M., and G. Martirosian. 2004. Frequency, diagnostic criteria and consequences of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Przegl. Epidemiol.58:547-553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Can Chlamydial Cervicitis Influence Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis?
M. Romanik, A. Ekiel, D. Friedek, G. Martirosian
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2005, 43 (9) 4914-4915; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4914-4915.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can Chlamydial Cervicitis Influence Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Can Chlamydial Cervicitis Influence Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis?
M. Romanik, A. Ekiel, D. Friedek, G. Martirosian
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2005, 43 (9) 4914-4915; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4914-4915.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chlamydia trachomatis
Point-of-Care Systems
Uterine Cervicitis
Vaginosis, Bacterial

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X