DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01706-06
Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIG. 1.
Dendrogram representation and virtual gel image of rep-PCR fingerprints from MRSA isolates. Percentages of similarity are shown at the bottom left of the dendrogram. Clusters A, B, C, and D are shown along with the SCCmec type and PVL status.
Tables
- TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial susceptibility profile comparison of MRSA isolates with SCCmec types II and IV
Antimicrobial agent(s) No. (%) of susceptible isolatesa Type II (n = 31) Type IV (n = 19) Sulbactam-ampicillin 0 (0) 0 (0) Cefazolin 0 (0) 0 (0) Clindamycin 18 (58) 18 (95) Erythromycin 0 (0) 2 (11) Gentamicin 30 (97) 18 (95) Levofloxacin 0 (0) 11 (58) Linezolid 30 (97) 19 (100) Moxifloxacin 4 (13) 15 (79) Oxacillin 0 (0) 0 (0) Penicillin 0 (0) 0 (0) Rifampin 31 (100) 19 (100) Tetracycline 31 (100) 17 (89) Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 30 (97) 19 (100) Vancomycin 31 (100) 19 (100) ↵ a Data available for 50 of the 60 patients in the study.
