Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Is Throat Screening Necessary To Detect Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients upon Admission to an Intensive Care Unit?

Stephan Harbarth, Jacques Schrenzel, Gesuele Renzi, Christophe Akakpo, Bara Ricou
Stephan Harbarth
1Infection Control Program University of Geneva Hospitals 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: harbarth@post.harvard.edu
Jacques Schrenzel
2Division of Clinical Microbiology University of Geneva Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gesuele Renzi
2Division of Clinical Microbiology University of Geneva Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Akakpo
3Infection Control Program University of Geneva Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bara Ricou
4Division of Intensive Care University of Geneva Hospitals Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02121-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the September 2006 issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Nilsson and Ripa reported interesting study results about the potential value of throat screening to detect Staphylococcus aureus colonization in hospitalized patients and health-care workers (3). In an orthopedic ward, they detected a higher prevalence of pharyngeal carriage than nasal carriage in both patients (40% versus 31%; P = 0.037) and personnel (54% versus 36%; P = 0.023). In their discussion, the authors advocate performing throat screening for the identification of patients colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). To test the hypothesis that throat screening may retrieve additional MRSA carriers not detected by routine nasal and perineal screening, we conducted a prospective cohort study including 150 patients admitted to our surgical intensive care unit (ICU) and screened for MRSA carriage upon admission to the ICU. Swabs were performed using a cotton stick moistened with sterile 0.9% saline solution, and samples were collected from the throat, both anterior nares and perineal region. For MRSA isolation and identification, we used previously described conventional methods with enrichment broth (4). From March through May 2005, 13 of 150 patients (8.7%) had MRSA colonization identified upon admission to the ICU (Table 1). Five MRSA carriers identified by nasal and perineal swabs gave MRSA-negative results by throat swabs. Thus, throat screening alone yielded a low sensitivity (62%). Only one patient (a 56-year-old male undergoing cardiac surgery) gave a positive result for throat swabs and negative results for perineal and nasal swabs. The sensitivity and specificity of combined nasal and perineal screening were 92% and 99%, respectively, with an excellent negative likelihood ratio (0.08). We used the likelihood ratio test to determine whether a logistic regression model that included throat screening provided a significantly better fit than did a model limited to nasal and perineal screening alone. In this analysis, the addition of throat screening did not significantly improve the accuracy of detecting MRSA colonization (P = 0.6).

Our data suggest that MRSA colonization of the throat without carriage at other body sites is rare in ICU patients. Therefore, the reported findings about throat carriage of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) in less severely ill patients and health-care workers may not be entirely applicable to critically ill patients colonized with MRSA. Several reasons may explain the discrepancy between our findings and those reported by Nilsson and Ripa (3). First, our screening may have underestimated the frequency of MRSA throat carriage due to technical reasons. However, the microbiological proce-dures used have high sensitivities, suggesting that if such a detection bias exists, the magnitude would rather be small (2). Second, the throats of 65 additional patients could not be screened for various reasons. It seems unlikely that including these patients would have changed the diagnostic performance of throat screening. Third, we performed perineal screening, which may detect patients with gastrointestinal MRSA carriage, and increases the yield of nasal screening only (1). Finally, we searched only for MRSA and not for MSSA. It is possible that MSSA strains differ from MRSA strains in their colonization patterns.

Overall, we believe that the study by Nilsson and Ripa is valuable in showing the dynamics of MSSA carriage. However, caution should be applied when generalizing these findings to ICU patients colonized with MRSA. Clearly, further studies are needed to determine the most cost-effective strategies to screen patients for MRSA. This is particularly important in the light of the recent rise in community-acquired MRSA infections, as nasal carriage appears to be less common in this group of patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Results for 150 patients screened for MRSA carriage upon admission to the surgical intensive care unit of University of Geneva Hospitals in 2005

  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Boyce, J. M., N. L. Havill, and B. Maria. 2005. Frequency and possible infection control implications of gastrointestinal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:5992-5995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Harbarth, S., H. Sax, C. Fankhauser-Rodriguez, J. Schrenzel, A. Agostinho, and D. Pittet. 2006. Evaluating the probability of previously unknown carriage of MRSA at hospital admission. Am. J. Med.119:275.e15-275.e23.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Nilsson, P., and T. Ripa. 2006. Staphylococcus aureus throat colonization is more frequent than colonization in the anterior nares. J. Clin. Microbiol.44:3334-3339.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Sax, H., S. Harbarth, G. Gavazzi, N. Henry, J. Schrenzel, P. Rohner, J. P. Michel, and D. Pittet. 2005. Prevalence and prediction of previously unknown MRSA carriage on admission to a geriatric hospital. Age Ageing34:456-462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Is Throat Screening Necessary To Detect Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients upon Admission to an Intensive Care Unit?
Stephan Harbarth, Jacques Schrenzel, Gesuele Renzi, Christophe Akakpo, Bara Ricou
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2007, 45 (3) 1072-1073; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02121-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is Throat Screening Necessary To Detect Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients upon Admission to an Intensive Care Unit?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Is Throat Screening Necessary To Detect Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients upon Admission to an Intensive Care Unit?
Stephan Harbarth, Jacques Schrenzel, Gesuele Renzi, Christophe Akakpo, Bara Ricou
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Mar 2007, 45 (3) 1072-1073; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02121-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Carrier State
Mass Screening
methicillin resistance
pharynx
Staphylococcal Infections
Staphylococcus aureus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X