Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacteriology

Multicenter Study To Evaluate Bloodstream Infection by Helicobacter cinaedi in Japan

Tetsuya Matsumoto, Mieko Goto, Hinako Murakami, Takashi Tanaka, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Emi Ono, Chikako Okada, Etsuko Sawabe, Michiko Yagoshi, Akiko Yoneyama, Katsuko Okuzumi, Kazuhiro Tateda, Naoaki Misawa, Keizo Yamaguchi
Tetsuya Matsumoto
1Department of Microbiology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tetsuya@tokyo-med.ac.jp
Mieko Goto
2Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hinako Murakami
3Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Tanaka
4Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Nishiyama
5Surugadai Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emi Ono
6Nakano Sogo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chikako Okada
7Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etsuko Sawabe
8Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michiko Yagoshi
9Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akiko Yoneyama
7Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katsuko Okuzumi
10Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kazuhiro Tateda
3Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naoaki Misawa
11Miyazaki University, Miyazaki, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keizo Yamaguchi
3Toho University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00465-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Helicobacter cinaedi has being recognized as an important human pathogen which causes bloodstream infections. Although the first case of bacteremia with this pathogen in Japan was reported in 2003, the true prevalence of H. cinaedi as a pathogen of bloodstream infections in this country is not yet known. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the incidence of bacteremia with H. cinaedi in Japan. We conducted a prospective, multicenter analysis in 13 hospitals during 6 months in Tokyo, Japan. Among positive blood cultures from 1 October 2003 to 31 March 2004, isolates suspected of being Helicobacter species were studied for further microbial identification. Identification of the organisms was based on their biochemical traits and the results of molecular analysis of their 16S rRNA gene sequences. A total of 16,743 blood culture samples were obtained during the study period, and 2,718 samples (17.7%) yielded positive culture results for coagulase-negative staphylococci. Among nine isolates suspected to be Helicobacter species, six isolates were finally identified as H. cinaedi. The positivity rate for H. cinaedi in blood culture was 0.06% of total blood samples and 0.22% of blood samples with any positive culture results. All patients with bacteremia with H. cinaedi were found to have no human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, but many of them had complications with either malignancy, renal failure, or a history of surgical operation. Therefore, our results suggest that bacteremia with H. cinaedi is rare but can occur in compromised hosts other than those with HIV infection in Japan.

A growing number of Helicobacter species are increasingly being recognized as important human pathogens. Although the majority of helicobacters have been associated with infection of the gastrointestinal tract, several recently described helicobacters have been isolated from human blood. One of the important organisms among these may be Helicobacter cinaedi, which causes enteric or bloodstream infections. H. cinaedi was commonly isolated from homosexual men infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Later it was also isolated from other immunocompromised patients.

In 2003, the first case of bacteremia with H. cinaedi in Japan was reported by Murakami et al. (10). The patient was HIV negative but was receiving immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation. However, as far as we know, the true prevalence of this organism as a pathogen causing bacteremia in Japan is still not yet known. We therefore performed a prospective laboratory-based multicenter study, and we describe the diagnostic problems involved in identifying the causative organism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surveillance.We performed prospective laboratory-based multicenter surveillance in 13 hospitals located in Tokyo, Japan, from 1 October 2003 to 31 March 2004. All hospitals had automated blood culture systems (BACTEC; BD Diagnostic Systems, Tokyo, Japan), and all provide medical care to adults and children in different medical specialties. The research protocol was approved by the local institutional review board of each site.

Blood culture microbial identification.Blood was collected in BACTEC culture bottles and incubated in a BACTEC 9050 blood culture system for at least 4 days (Becton Dickinson, BD Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan). Positive blood culture samples were further investigated for the microbial identification. To identify the bacterial isolates, phenotypic tests commonly used to characterize helicobacters were performed. Growth was examined under aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic conditions at 35°C. Bacteria were Gram stained and tested for urease activity by using a selective rapid urea test. Dihydrogen sulfide production, γ-glutamyltransferase activity, hippurate hydrolysis, and nitrate reduction were determined by using the Campy identification system (bioMerieux Vitek, Tokyo, Japan). Some currently available biochemical tests have been reported to be unable to conclusively identify or distinguish H. cinaedi from other fastidious Campylobacter species or Helicobacter species (13). Therefore, we decided to examine both suspected Campylobacter isolates and suspected Helicobacter species for further identification.

Patients.Patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia were reviewed to determine the clinical background, the source of infection, and the outcome. The case report form contained the following information: age, gender, date of admission, ward, date of bacteremia, underlying medical conditions, exposure to invasive medical procedures, use of antibiotics or corticosteroids, management of bacteremia (antimicrobial treatment, catheter removal), and outcome.

Amplification of 16S rRNA.Bacteria were grown on blood agar plates for 48 h, and chromosomal DNA was prepared using hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium bromide as described previously (17). PCR of the 16S rRNA gene was performed with the primers 8F (5′-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3′) and 15R (5′-AAG GAG GTG ATC CAR CCG CA-3′), which were designed based on the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA numbering system. The PCR was performed in a DNA thermal cycler (PE Applied Biosystems Division, Foster City, CA) in reaction mixtures of 25 μl containing 20 ng of genomic DNA, 2.5 μl of 10-fold-concentrated reaction buffer (QIAGEN, Inc., Tokyo, Japan), 160 nM (each) primer, 0.625 U of Taq DNA polymerase (QIAGEN), and 250 μM (each) deoxynucleotide (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were incubated at 94°C for 2 min to denature the target DNA. They were then cycled 30 times at 94°C for 1 min and annealed at 55°C for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min, with a final incubation at 72°C for 10 min to complete the extension.

16S rRNA data analysis.The fragment for sequencing was amplified by PCR, and the product was purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN). The nucleotide sequence was determined directly from the PCR fragment with a PCR-based reaction using the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit (PE Applied Biosystems Division) and analyzed using the PE Applied Biosystems 310 DNA sequencer (PE Applied Biosystems Division) at the Miyazaki University Gene Research Center. To determine the central region of the 16S rRNA fragment, the primers MF (5′-AAT ATT GCG CAA TGG GGGAA-3′) and MR (5′-GGC CAT GAT GAC TTG ACG TC-3′) were used for sequencing (9). Computer analyses of the DNA sequences were performed using Genetics Computer Group programs; database similarity searches were performed through the National Center for Biotechnology Information using the BLASTX algorithm.

Similarity matrices were constructed from the aligned sequence, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic averages with Genetyx-win software (version 5.0.4).

RESULTS

Positivity rate of blood cultures.A total of 16,743 blood culture samples were obtained during the study period, and 2,718 samples (17.7%) yielded positive culture results with various organisms containing coagulase-negative staphylococci. The positivity rate of blood culture including all types of bacteria in each institution ranged from 10.6 to 32.1% (average, 17.7%) (Table 1). Among these positive blood cultures, nine isolates were suspected to be Helicobacter and other related organisms.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Results of blood cultures and H. cinaedi positivity

Bacterial identification according to biochemical characteristics.All nine Helicobacter and other related isolates were found to be gram-negative spiral rods, and urease was negative. However, three of nine isolates were suspected to be Campylobacter spp. according to the positive growth at 25°C and 42°C and on charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (Table 2). Six other isolates were biochemically more consistent with Helicobacter than with Campylobacter based on a failure to hydrolyze hippurate, to reduce nitrate, or to grow at 42°C; we were unable to identify the species of these isolates based on these biochemical characteristics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Characteristics of suspected H. cinaedi isolates and other, related organisms

Identification of organisms based on 16S rRNA sequences.Identification results for isolates based on the 16S rRNA sequences are shown in Table 3. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of each suspected H. cinaedi strain, strains 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, and 16, and H. cinaedi reference strain ADN0413 revealed a high level of similarity (98 to 99%). Furthermore, the 16S rRNA gene sequences of each suspected Campylobacter strain, no. 4, 13, 15, and 17, and of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus reference strains also revealed a high level of similarity (98 to 99%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Background data for patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia

Sequence homology among H. cinaedi isolates.A phylogenetic tree of the isolates was constructed based on the nucleotide sequences of the 16S rRNA genes (Fig. 1). The analysis demonstrates a high degree of sequence homology among the strains isolated.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. High degrees of sequence homology among the strains are demonstrated.

Incidence of H. cinaedi bacteremia and clinical characteristics.We finally detected six cases of bacteremia due to H. cinaedi during the surveillance study. The patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia were detected in only three hospitals (23%) of the total number of participating institutions. The rate of H. cinaedi bacteremia in the 13 institutions ranged from 0 to 0.104%. The overall rate of H. cinaedi bacteremia was 0.036% of all blood culture samples (Table 1).

Clinical characteristics.The clinical characteristics of the six cases are shown in Table 3. All patients except one (83%) were female, and the median age was 52 years (range, 17 to 71 years). At the time of diagnosis of bacteremia, all patients were hospitalized. Underlying diseases of the patients were as follows: cancer or hematologic disorder was documented for three patients (50%), and one of these patients was undergoing chemotherapy with immunosuppressant drugs. Two other patients were undergoing hemodialysis for chronic renal failure. Another patient underwent a cesarean section because of threatened premature delivery. All patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia had fever, but colitis was not seen in any of these patients. Neutropenia was present in only one case (16.6%). Bacteremia was generally a late complication during the hospital stay. All patients recovered after antimicrobial therapy, including expanded-spectrum cephalosporin and carbapenem.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The 16S rRNA gene sequences determined in this study have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 2.

DISCUSSION

Many Helicobacter species that are known to cause diarrhea in humans also have been isolated from blood. Of these, H. cinaedi is the most frequently reported organism. H. cinaedi bacteremia occurs primarily in immunocompromised hosts, particularly in men infected with HIV. The number of HIV-seropositive persons and AIDS patients is increasing from year to year, especially among homosexual men, in Japan. In 2005, 741 HIV-infected Japanese and 302 AIDS patients were newly recorded in Japan, and the cumulative number of HIV-infected and AIDS patients until recently was reported as 11,036 cases (1). These results suggest that HIV infection is also spreading faster in Japan. However, the official reports show that HIV infection rates in this country still remain low compared to those in other countries. Therefore, we speculate HIV infection may not become a prime risk of H. cinaedi bacteremia in Japan. The first case of H. cinaedi bacteremia in Japan was HIV negative, but he was receiving immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation. These results suggest that there may be possible risks of H. cinaedi bacteremia other than that with HIV infection.

Recently Kitamura et al. (5) reported 11 cases of H. cinaedi bacteremia and cellulitis that occurred consecutively during a particular period in the same hospital. Interestingly, as described in their report, no patient had any underlying immunocompromising conditions or had been given immunosuppressive agents. However, in our study most of our cases of H. cinaedi bacteremia had been found to have some underlying immunocompromising disease or the patients were undergoing chemotherapy with immunosuppressant drugs. We cannot clearly explain the discrepancy between these studies, but these results suggest that H. cinaedi should not be regarded as simply an opportunistic pathogen.

H. cinaedi is a fastidious organism, rendering microbiological diagnosis difficult. It rarely grows on traditional culture media. Growth may sometimes be obtained on rich, nonselective media (blood or chocolate agar) incubated in a microaerobic (5% O2) atmosphere at 35°C. It is well documented that the biochemical identification of Helicobacter strains based on a limited number of tests is difficult, since these isolates frequently exhibit unusual phenotypic profiles within the same species (12, 14). Therefore, molecular techniques have been used to determine the nucleotide sequence of the rRNA gene from these organisms for taxonomic purposes. The 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison is well established and has been used successfully to discern the relationship between some closely related and uncharacterized isolates (6). In the present study, analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence data for H. cinaedi and Flexispira rappini revealed that this approach has limitations for species-level identification of helicobacters, confirming previously published data (11, 14). Although optimal identification strategies for closely related Helicobacter spp. have not been established, a combination of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and restricted biochemical characterization often does not suffice to identify helicobacters.

Interestingly, all immunocompetent patients and neonates with H. cinaedi disease had been in contact with animals. Helicobacters also colonize the gastrointestinal tracts of many animals, including domestic species, such as cats, dogs, pigs, and poultry. Asymptomatic colonization with H. cinaedi has also been found in a wide range of animals, for example, rats, hamsters, dogs, cats, foxes, poultry, wild birds, and monkeys. Zenner has proposed that hamsters serve as a reservoir species for zoonotic infection of humans by H. cinaedi (18). Al-Soud et al. developed and evaluated a PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis technique for detection and identification of different Helicobacter species (2). Application of the PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis method to DNA extracted from feces of zoo animals revealed that baboons and red pandas also are colonized by H. cinaedi. Although we do not have any definite data about whether the patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia had any close contact with animals, it may be possible that the H. cinaedi originated with their domestic animals.

Two of the three patients in Toranomon Hospital have the same clinical problem, such as receiving dialysis for chronic renal failure. Interestingly, the first case of H. cinaedi bacteremia in Japan involved a patient who also had been receiving dialysis (10). Therefore, we think one of the risk factors for H. cinaedi bacteremia may be renal failure and receiving dialysis. We think it is doubtful that the source of infection exists in some of the common services, especially in the dialysis unit, because the period between these two episodes was about 4 months. Furthermore, the dialysis machines are properly maintained and disinfected, and contamination of the system had not been detected by routine examination.

Some clinical reports documented that immunocompromised patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia usually require multiple or prolonged courses of antibiotics prior to the resolution of their infections. However, the courses of our patient's illness were not prolonged, and they showed good response to the antimicrobial treatment. One of the reasons for this discrepancy may be the difference in the levels of immunosuppression of the patients. Another reason may be the different choices of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of sepsis. No clear guidelines are available in the literature concerning the choice of antibiotic therapy. Erythromycin is a first-line agent for treatment of these fastidious organisms, but erythromycin-resistant H. cinaedi has been identified (7). Ciprofloxacin is an alternative agent for H. cinaedi infections, but there are some reports of recurrent disease after fluoroquinolone treatment (3, 4, 8, 15), suggesting that fluoroquinolones alone may not completely eradicate H. cinaedi in immunocompromised patients. The results of an in vitro susceptibility test in a case report showed that H. cinaedi is susceptible to imipenem (16). In our study, most of the patients with H. cinaedi bacteremia were treated with β-lactams, including expanded- and broad-spectrum cephems and carbapenems. Therefore, we recommend using these beta-lactams for the treatment of bacteremia with H. cinaedi.

Sequence analysis of H. cinaedi isolates showed that three of these isolates had identical 16S RNA sequences. Furthermore, two of these strains were isolated from the same hospital. We next investigated the patients' background information, but they have nothing in common and we could not find any relationship among these cases. Whereas the finding of identical 16S RNA sequences among isolates does not always suggest that they are derived from the same clone, it may be possible that some related isolates are spreading in our country. Therefore, we would like to do further investigation with a greater number of clinical isolates.

In conclusion, our prospective, multicenter analysis finally identified only 6 isolates (0.06%) from 16,743 blood cultures as H. cinaedi. All patients with bacteremia with H. cinaedi were HIV negative, but most of them were immunocompromised hosts. Although it seems rare in Japan, we should not neglect the possibility of H. cinaedi bacteremia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the help of the local staff of the following facilities: Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Toho University, Tokyo, Japan; Nakano Sogo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan; Surugadai Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan; Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Toshiba General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Tokyo Koseinenkin Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; and Clinical Laboratory, Byotai Seiri Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.

We are indebted to J. Patrick Barron of the International Medical Communications Center of Tokyo Medical University for his review of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 March 2007.
    • Returned for modification 18 March 2007.
    • Accepted 17 June 2007.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    AIDS Surveillance Committee. 2005. Report of HIV incidence in Japan in year 2005. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. 2.↵
    Al-Soud, W. A., M. Bennedsen, S. L. On, I. S. Ouis, P. Vandamme, H. O. Nilsson, A. Ljungh, and T. Wadstrom. 2003. Assessment of PCR-DGGE for the identification of diverse Helicobacter species, and application to faecal samples from zoo animals to determine Helicobacter prevalence. J. Med. Microbiol.52:765-771.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Burman, W. J., D. L. Cohn, R. R. Reves, and M. L. Wilson. 1995. Multifocal cellulitis and monoarticular arthritis as manifestations of Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis.20:564-570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Kiehlbauch, J. A., R. V. Tauxe, C. N. Baker, and I. K. Wachsmuth. 1994. Helicobacter cinaedi-associated bacteremia and cellulitis in immunocompromised patients. Ann. Intern. Med.121:90-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Kitamura, T., Y. Kawamura, K. Ohkusu, T. Masaki, H. Iwashita, T. Sawa, S. Fujii, T. Okamoto, and T. Akaike. 2007. Helicobacter cinaedi cellulitis and bacteremia in immunocompetent hosts after orthopedic surgery. J. Clin. Microbiol.45:31-38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Kolbert, C. P., and D. H. Persing. 1999. Ribosomal DNA sequencing as a tool for identification of bacterial pathogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.2:299-305.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Kuijper, E. J., S. Stevens, T. Imamura, B. De Wever, and E. C. Claas. 2003. Genotypic identification of erythromycin-resistant Campylobacter isolates as Helicobacter species and analysis of resistance mechanism. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:3732-3736.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Mammen, M. P., Jr., N. E. Aronson, W. J. Edenfield, and T. P. Endy. 1995. Recurrent Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus: case report. Clin. Infect. Dis.21:1055.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Misawa, N., K. Kawashima, F. Kondo, E. Kushima, K. Kushima, and P. Vandamme. 2002. Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter, Helicobacter, and Anaerobiospirillum strains from a puppy with bloody diarrhea. Vet. Microbiol.87:353-364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Murakami, H., M. Goto, E. Ono, E. Sawabe, M. Iwata, K. Okuzumi, K. Yamaguchi, and T. Takahashi. 2003. Isolation of Helicobacter cinaedi from blood of an immunocompromised patient in Japan. J. Infect. Chemother.9:344-347.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Sorlin, P., P. Vandamme, J. Nortier, B. Hoste, C. Rossi, S. Pavlof, and M. J. Struelens. 1999. Recurrent “Flexispira rappini” bacteremia in an adult patient undergoing hemodialysis: case report. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:1319-1323.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Stoffel, M. H., A. E. Friess, A. Burnens, A. Schmassmann, and R. Neiger. 2000. Distinction of gastric Helicobacter spp. in humans and domestic pets by scanning electron microscopy. Helicobacter5:232-239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Tee, W., A. C. Street, D. Spelman, W. Munckhof, and A. Mijch. 1996. Helicobacter cinaedi bacteraemia: varied clinical manifestations in three homosexual males. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.28:199-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Vandamme, P., C. S. Harrington, K. Jalava, and S. L. On. 2000. Misidentifying helicobacters: the Helicobacter cinaedi example. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:2261-2266.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    van der Ven, A. J., B. J. Kullberg, P. Vandamme, and J. F. Meis. 1996. Helicobacter cinaedi bacteremia associated with localized pain but not with cellulitis. Clin. Infect. Dis.22:710-711.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Weir, S., B. Cuccherini, A. M. Whitney, M. L. Ray, J. P. MacGregor, A. Steigerwalt, M. I. Daneshvar, R. Weyant, B. Wray, J. Steele, W. Strober, and V. J. Gill. 1999. Recurrent bacteremia caused by a “Flexispira”-like organism in a patient with X-linked (Bruton's) agammaglobulinemia. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:2439-2445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    Wilson, K. 1987. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria, p. 293-332. In F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.), Current protocols in molecular biology, unit 2.4. Wiley, New York, NY.
  18. 18.↵
    Zenner, L. 1999. Pathology, diagnosis and epidemiology of the rodent Helicobacter infection. Comp. Immunol. Dis.22:41-61.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Multicenter Study To Evaluate Bloodstream Infection by Helicobacter cinaedi in Japan
Tetsuya Matsumoto, Mieko Goto, Hinako Murakami, Takashi Tanaka, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Emi Ono, Chikako Okada, Etsuko Sawabe, Michiko Yagoshi, Akiko Yoneyama, Katsuko Okuzumi, Kazuhiro Tateda, Naoaki Misawa, Keizo Yamaguchi
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2007, 45 (9) 2853-2857; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00465-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multicenter Study To Evaluate Bloodstream Infection by Helicobacter cinaedi in Japan
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Multicenter Study To Evaluate Bloodstream Infection by Helicobacter cinaedi in Japan
Tetsuya Matsumoto, Mieko Goto, Hinako Murakami, Takashi Tanaka, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, Emi Ono, Chikako Okada, Etsuko Sawabe, Michiko Yagoshi, Akiko Yoneyama, Katsuko Okuzumi, Kazuhiro Tateda, Naoaki Misawa, Keizo Yamaguchi
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2007, 45 (9) 2853-2857; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00465-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

bacteremia
Helicobacter
Helicobacter Infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X