Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycology

Detection of Fifteen Species of Candida in an Automated Blood Culture System

Lynn L. Horvath, Benjamin J. George, Duane R. Hospenthal
Lynn L. Horvath
Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Lynn.Horvath@amedd.army.mil
Benjamin J. George
Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duane R. Hospenthal
Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00966-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Candidemia was simulated with 15 Candida spp. by using an automated blood culture system. Candida growth was detected in 479/648 (74%) bottles: 211/216 (98%) aerobic bottles, 58/216 (27%) anaerobic bottles, and 210/216 (97%) mycology bottles. Only the growth of Candida lipolytica failed to be detected in all media.

Candida species are the fourth most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections in the United States (23). Historically accounting for greater than 75% of the cases of candidemia, Candida albicans now produces only about half of the cases of candidemia (1, 7, 20, 22, 23). At least 15 species of Candida have been reported to cause candidemia (12). Recovery of Candida from blood is commonly achieved by using standard bacterial blood culture media in automated blood culture systems (ABCSs) (2, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 22). Prior clinical and simulated candidemia studies have evaluated the abilities of these systems to detect the most common Candida species (2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 22), but limited or no data exist for the recovery of the rarer non-C. albicans Candida species. Our study examines the ability of one ABCS to recover the less common Candida spp. in a simulated model of candidemia.

(This work was presented in part at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Boston, MA, 30 September to 3 October 2004.)

Six hundred forty eight BacT/ALERT (bioMerieux, Durham, NC) blood culture bottles were used in the study: 216 aerobic (FA) bottles, 216 anaerobic (SN) bottles, and 216 mycology (MB) bottles. Each bottle was first inoculated with fresh, whole, unprocessed, nonpooled blood from 20 healthy volunteers.

The yeast inocula were then prepared according to the protocol of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly NCCLS) (9, 10, 11, 16). The isolates studied included C. albicans, Candida dubliniensis, Candida famata, Candida firmetaria, Candida glabrata, Candida guilliermondii, Candida inconspicua, Candida kefyr, Candida krusei, Candida lipolytica, Candida lusitaniae, Candida norvegensis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida rugosa, and Candida tropicalis. Five isolates of each Candida species with the exception of C. norvegensis were tested; only two isolates of C. norvegensis were readily available. The isolates were obtained from our clinical laboratory and the Fungus Testing Laboratory, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Suspensions of 1 × 102, 1 × 103, and 1 × 104 yeast cells/ml were prepared for each yeast isolate.

The bottles were then each inoculated with a 0.1-ml aliquot of the yeast suspension, resulting in final inocula of 10, 100, or 1,000 yeast cells. The mycology bottles were also inoculated with 1 ml of enrichment fluid, as recommended by the manufacturer. The Prepared bottles were immediately placed into the ABCS, the BacT/ALERT 3D system (bioMerieux), and incubated at 35°C for up to 7 days. The bottles were removed when the machine detected growth or at the end of 7 days, if growth was not detected by the system. All bottles were subcultured when growth was detected or after 7 days to verify yeast viability (3, 19).

The independent variables of yeast species, inoculum, medium, and test (machine detection or terminal subculture) were compared with the dependent variables of time to detection and outcome (positive or negative) with three- and four-factor analyses of variance, followed by t tests corrected for multiple comparisons (SPSS software, version 13; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Growth was detected by the ABCS in 479/648 (74%) bottles (Table 1). All 479 bottles demonstrated yeast growth on terminal subculture. Of the 169 bottles without growth detected by the ABCS, terminal subculture demonstrated the growth of yeast in 161/169 (95%) bottles. All eight bottles without growth upon terminal subculture had been inoculated with C. lipolytica.

Growth was detected in 211/216 (98%) FA bottles and 210/216 (97%) MB bottles. All 11 without growth in these media had been inoculated with C. lipolytica isolates. Growth was detected in 58/216 (27%) SN bottles. C. glabrata and C. albicans were the only two species consistently detected in SN medium: 15/15 C. glabrata isolates and 13/15 C. albicans isolates. No growth of C. famata, C. lipolytica, C. norvegensis, or C. parapsilosis was detected in SN medium.

Three inoculum sizes were evaluated: 10, 100, and 1,000 yeast cells per bottle. More growth was detected with higher inocula: 10 yeast cells, 151/216 (70%); 100 yeast cells, 158/216 (73%); and 1,000 yeast cells 170/216 (79%).

The time to growth detection varied greatly, depending on the Candida spp., the medium, and the inoculum (Table 2). In general, growth was detected faster in FA and MB bottles than in SN bottles, and growth was detected more quickly with higher inocula. The mean time to detection of C. albicans was similar in all media at the same inoculum. The time to detection for most species was similar in FA and MB media. However, C. dubliniensis, C. parapsilosis, and C. rugosa were detected faster in FA medium than in MB medium (P < 0.01). MB medium detected the growth of C. lipolytica earlier than FA medium did. Most species demonstrated limited growth in SN medium. However, SN medium did allow significantly earlier growth detection than MB medium for C. glabrata, C. insconspicua, C. kefyr, and C. tropicalis (P < 0.01). C. glabrata was the only species that was detected significantly faster in SN medium than in FA medium (P < 0.001).

C. lipolytica was the only Candida species tested that was difficult to detect in the ABCS with all three of the media evaluated. C. lipolytica had the lowest rate of detection of any species (19/45 [42%]) and was not detected in anaerobic medium. Overall, 6/15 episodes of C. lipolytica candidemia would not have been detected. When C. lipolytica was detected, the time to growth detection was statistically (P < 0.001) slower than that for all other species, regardless of the medium or the inoculum size used. The lack of growth detection may be secondary to the fact that C. lipolytica can assimilate only a limited number of carbon sources (13). The clinical relevance of the poor detection of C. lipolytica is unknown, as this yeast rarely causes candidemia.

The use of mycology medium has been advocated by some authors to increase the rate of detection of candidemia. The use of MB medium improved the time to growth detection over the use of FA medium only for C. glabrata and C. lipolytica. MB medium is more expensive than FA and SN media and requires the addition of an enrichment fluid. Without a significant improvement in the rate of Candida detection or the time to detection, the routine use of this medium appears to be unnecessary.

Some authors advocate the use of only aerobic medium for standard blood cultures. The use of anaerobic medium in this study resulted in a clinically and a statistically significant earlier recovery of C. glabrata (P < 0.001) compared to the use of aerobic or mycology medium. Since C. glabrata causes as many as 25% of the candidemia episodes in the United States (20), it is essential that this organism be identified promptly.

Overall, the BacT/ALERT 3D ABCS has an excellent ability to detect candidal pathogens, even at low inocula, within a standard 5-day incubation period. These data suggest that the use of aerobic medium alone is adequate for the detection of most common and uncommon candidal pathogens.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Number of Candida isolates with growth detected by the BacT/ALERT 3D system

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Mean time to Candida growth detection by the BacT/ALERT 3D system

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Brooke Army Medical Center Microbiology Laboratory for the use of the BacT/ALERT 3D ABCS and the assistance of the laboratory technicians under the direction of Linda Harrison. We also thank Walter Mika for his assistance with phlebotomy and John A. Ward for his assistance with statistical analysis of the data.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. The authors are employees of the U.S. government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties, and, as such, there is no copyright to be transferred.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 9 May 2007.
    • Returned for modification 11 June 2007.
    • Accepted 28 June 2007.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Beck-Sagué, C. M., W. R. Jarvis, and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. 1993. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980-1990. J. Infect. Dis.167:1247-1251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bedini, A., C. Venturelli, C. Mussini, G. Guaraldi, M. Codeluppi, V. Borghi, F. Rumpianesi, F. Barchiesi, and R. Esposito. 2006. Epidemiology of candidaemia and antifungal susceptibility patterns in an Italian tertiary-care hospital. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.12:75-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Borst, A., M. Leverstein-Van Hall, J. Verhoef, and A. Fluit. 2000. Value of terminal subculture of automated blood cultures in patients with candidaemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.19:803-805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Bourbeau, P. P., and M. Foltzer. 2005. Routine incubation of BacT/ALERT FA FN blood culture bottles for more than 3 days may not be necessary. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:2506-2509.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Bourbeau, P. P., and J. K. Pohlman. 2001. Three days of incubation may be sufficient for routine blood cultures with BactT/Alert FAN blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:2079-2082.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Colombo, A. L., M. Nucci, B. J. Park, S. A. Nouér, B. Arthington-Skaggs, D. A. da Matta, D. Warnock, and J. Morgan for the Brazilian Network Candidemia Study. 2006. Epidemiology of candidemia in Brazil: a nationwide sentinel surveillance of candidemia in eleven medical centers. J. Clin. Microbiol.44:2816-2823.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Diekema, D. J., S. A. Messer, A. B. Brueggemann, S. L. Coffman, G. V. Doern, L. A. Herwaldt, and M. A. Pfaller. 2002. Epidemiology of candidemia: 3-year results from the emerging infections and the epidemiology of Iowa organisms study. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:1298-1302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Fricker-Hidalgo, H., F. Chazot, B. Lebeau, H. Pelloux, P. Ambroise-Thomas, and R. Grillot. 1998. Use of simulated blood cultures to compare a specific fungal medium with a standard microorganism medium for yeast detection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.17:113-116.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    George, B. J., L. L. Horvath, and D. R. Hospenthal. 2005. Effect of inoculum size on detection of Candida growth by the BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system using aerobic and anaerobic media. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:433-435.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Horvath, L. L., B. J. George, C. K. Murray, L. S. Harrison, and D. R. Hospenthal. 2004. Direct comparison of BACTEC 9240 and BacT/ALERT 3D automated blood culture systems for Candida growth detection. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:115-118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Horvath, L. L., D. R. Hospenthal, C. K. Murray, and D. P. Dooley. 2003. Detection of simulated candidemia by the BACTEC 9240 with Plus Aerobic/F and Anaerobic/F blood culture bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:4714-4717.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Krcmery, V., and A. J. Barnes. 2002. Non-albicans Candida spp. causing fungaemia: pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. J. Hosp. Infect.50:243-260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    LaRocca, M. T. 2003. Reagents, stains, and media: mycology, p. 1686-1692. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Jorgensen, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  14. 14.↵
    Marchetti, O., J. Bille, U. Fluckinger, P. Eggimann, C. Ruef, J. Garbino, T. Calandra, M. P. Glauser, M. G. Tauber, and D. Pittet for the Fungal Infection Network of Switzerland (FUNGINOS). 2004. Epidemiology of candidemia in Swiss tertiary care hospitals: secular trends, 1991-2000. Clin. Infect. Dis.38:311-320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Nakamura, T., and H. Takahasi. 2006. Epidemiological study of Candida infections in the blood: susceptibilities of Candida spp. to antifungal agents, and clinical features associated with candidemia. J. Infect. Chemother.12:132-138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard, 2nd ed. NCCLS document M27-A2. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  17. 17.↵
    Schelonka, R. L., M. K. Chai, B. A. Yoder, D. Hensley, R. M. Brockett, and D. P. Ascher. 1996. Volume of blood required to detect common neonatal pathogens. J. Pediatr.129:275-278.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Schelonka, R. L., and S. A. Moser. 2003. Time to positive culture results in neonatal Candida septicemia. J. Pediatr.142:564-565.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Shigei, J. T., J. A. Shimabukuro, M. T. Pezzlo, L. M. De La Maza, and E. M. Peterson. 1995. Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:1385-1388.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Trick, W. E., S. K. Fridkin, J. E. Edwards, R. A. Hejjeh, R. P. Gaynes, and the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Hospitals. 2002. Secular trends of hospital-acquired candidemia among intensive care unit patients in the United States during 1989-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis.35:627-630.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Vigano, E. F., E. Vasconi, C. Agrappi, and P. Clerici. 2002. Use of simulated blood cultures for time to detection comparison between BacT/ALERT™ and BACTEC™ 9240 blood cultures systems. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.44:235-240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Weinberger, M., L. Leibovici, S. Perez, Z. Samra, I. Ostfeld, I. Levi, E. Bash, D. Turner, A. Goldschmied-Reouven, G. Regev-Yochay, S. D. Pitlik, and N. Keller. 2005. Characteristics of candidaemia with Candida albicans compared with non-albicans Candida species and predictors of mortality. J. Hosp. Infect.61:146-154.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Wisplinghoff, H., T. Bischoff, S. M. Tallent, H. Seifert, R. P. Wenzel, and M. B. Edmund. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis.39:309-317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Detection of Fifteen Species of Candida in an Automated Blood Culture System
Lynn L. Horvath, Benjamin J. George, Duane R. Hospenthal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2007, 45 (9) 3062-3064; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00966-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection of Fifteen Species of Candida in an Automated Blood Culture System
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Detection of Fifteen Species of Candida in an Automated Blood Culture System
Lynn L. Horvath, Benjamin J. George, Duane R. Hospenthal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Sep 2007, 45 (9) 3062-3064; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00966-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

blood
Candida
candidiasis
fungemia
mycology

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X