Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Epidemiology

Sequential Outbreaks of Infections by Distinct Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in a Public Teaching Hospital in Houston, Texas

Samuel A. Shelburne III, Kavindra V. Singh, A. Clinton White Jr., Laura Byrne, Alexis Carmer, Celest Austin, Edward Graviss, Charles Stager, Barbara E. Murray, Robert L. Atmar
Samuel A. Shelburne III
1Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: samuels@bcm.tmc.edu
Kavindra V. Singh
3Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Clinton White Jr.
1Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Byrne
1Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexis Carmer
1Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Celest Austin
2Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Graviss
2Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Stager
2Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara E. Murray
3Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Atmar
1Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01459-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Invasive disease due to Acinetobacter baumannii is an increasing problem in health care settings worldwide. Whether certain clones of A. baumannii are more likely to cause invasive disease in hospitalized patients is unknown. We studied all patients at a public teaching hospital in Houston, Texas, from whom the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex was isolated over a 14-month period in 2005 to 2006. One hundred seven unique patient isolates were identified, with 87 of the strains classified as being A. baumannii, the majority of which were multidrug resistant. The A. baumannii isolates were comprised of 18 unique pulsed-field types, with strains of clone A and clone B accounting for 66 of the 87 isolates. Epidemiologic analysis showed the predominance of the two A. baumannii clones at distinct time periods, with the remainder of the A. baumannii and non-A. baumannii strains being evenly distributed. Patients from whom clone A strains were isolated were more likely to be bacteremic than were patients with other A. baumannii isolates. Conversely, clone B strains were more likely to be isolated from patients with tertiary peritonitis. Patients from whom clone A was isolated had a significantly higher rate of mortality. Multilocus sequence typing demonstrated that clones A and B are related to each other and to A. baumannii strains previously isolated in Western Europe, sharing five of seven alleles. Taken together, we conclude that the outbreak of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex in our institution was due to two distinct A. baumannii clones that were associated with significantly different patient outcomes.

Infections due to antimicrobial-resistant organisms are a major public health issue (10, 14, 35). Acinetobacter baumannii is a gram-negative bacterium that is increasingly being identified as a significant cause of serious antibiotic-resistant nosocomial infections, especially in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting (12, 15, 31, 34). Moreover, the presence of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii infections in personnel returning from the war in Iraq has drawn additional attention to this organism (4, 7, 17, 27, 30).

Our understanding of the clinical characteristics of A. baumannii infection and the molecular basis of its pathogenesis is hampered by several issues (2, 12). First, standard laboratory techniques do not reliably distinguish A. baumannii from other species of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex (26). The A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex consists of the phenotypically similar but genetically diverse A. calcoaceticus and A. baumannii strains, Acinetobacter genomic species 3, and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU (33). Thus, studies that do not use molecular techniques to distinguish A. baumannii from related Acinetobacter species may generate inaccurate data regarding clinical epidemiology and disease outcomes. Second, A. baumannii often colonizes rather than infects patients, thereby obscuring the true significance of organism isolation (25). Finally, given that patients are often critically ill at the time of infection with A. baumannii, whether A. baumannii infection actually increases patient mortality has been debated (11, 18, 20). These difficulties have left major gaps in our understanding of the epidemiology and clinical relevance of A. baumannii infections, which in turn limits the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic strategies.

To date, the virulence of specific A. baumannii strains has been attributed mainly to the presence or absence of drug resistance elements (12, 20). However, factors other than drug resistance are likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of A. baumannii infection in a fashion similar to those of other bacteria (6). To this end, we investigated a recent A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex outbreak at a public teaching hospital in Houston, Texas. We used a combination of epidemiologic and molecular techniques, including the newly described A. baumannii multilocus sequence typing (MLST), to investigate whether patient acquisition of a particular A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex clone resulted in a difference in clinical outcome. The outbreak investigation showed that A. baumannii clone A strains, which are related to invasive strains previously isolated in Europe by MLST, caused high rates of bacteremia and were associated with increased patient mortality (1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital description and infection control practices.The study was conducted at Ben Taub General Hospital, a 588-bed teaching facility that is the primary public hospital in Houston. There are three separate adult ICUs at Ben Taub General Hospital: (i) a 30-bed open unit and six-isolation-room surgical ICU, (ii) a 14-bed open unit and two-isolation-room neurosurgical ICU, and (iii) a 16-bed individual-room medical ICU located two floors above the surgical and neurosurgical ICUs. Before a perceived increase in serious A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex infections in the winter of 2004 to 2005, standard infection control interventions included infection control audits and education, alcohol gel dispensers, and cohorting and contact isolation procedures for patients with multidrug-resistant isolates. Additional responses to the outbreak included increasing nursing and house staff education, intensive environmental cleaning, dedicated equipment for patients with multidrug-resistant isolates, and environmental sampling.

Sample and data collection.To gain insight into whether an outbreak was occurring, we compared the annual numbers of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates from 1995 to 2004. Having determined that an outbreak was occurring, we sought to characterize the molecular epidemiology of the outbreak by saving all A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates beginning on 1 May 2005. This report details isolates collected between 1 May 2005 and 30 June 2006. The date of first isolation of an A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolate and the isolate's antibiotic resistance profile were recorded for all patients. Subsequent reviews of the patients' medical records were utilized to extract epidemiologic data and clinical information including age, sex, hospital location, duration of ICU and hospital stay, date and type of antimicrobial therapy received, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, date of insertion and duration of central catheters, surgical intervention, and laboratory data. The severity of patient illness was calculated using the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score at the time of admission (21). Data for calculating the Glasgow coma score were not consistently available retrospectively; therefore, the APACHE II score was modified to exclude the Glasgow coma score. A cluster of patients was defined as patients located within three beds of one another from whom an A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolate with identical drug susceptibility patterns was isolated. The study was performed under a protocol approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board.

Infection definitions.Infection was defined as the isolation of an A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolate from a normally sterile site with signs and symptoms compatible with infection or as noted below. Criteria for defining catheter-related bloodstream infection were not consistently available (i.e., quantitative cultures from a catheter segment, simultaneous quantitative blood cultures from the catheter and peripheral blood, or differential period to positivity of catheter versus peripheral cultures), so we identified catheter-associated bloodstream infections according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines: a primary bloodstream infection (i.e., the isolate was not related to an infection present at another site) that occurred in a patient with a central catheter that was in use in the 48 h prior to the development of the bacteremia (24). Ventilator-associated pneumonia was diagnosed using standard definitions, i.e., a patient on mechanical ventilation in whom a new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate developed on chest radiography, and when the organism was isolated from a lower respiratory tract sample or from either pleural fluid or blood (3). Tertiary peritonitis was defined as the isolation of an A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolate from peritoneal fluid >48 h after treatment for either primary or secondary peritonitis (3). Colonization was defined as the isolation of an A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolate from at least one clinical specimen in the absence of clinical symptoms consistent with infection.

Species-level identification and susceptibility testing.Organisms were identified as belonging to the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex by using standard microbiologic methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by broth automated microdilution testing and/or Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion testing. Organisms were defined as multidrug resistant if there was resistance to two or more of the following: expanded-spectrum cephalosporins or extended-spectrum β-lactams, quinolones, carbapenems, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or aminoglycosides. Species-level identification of organisms in the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex was performed using amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (8).

Genotyping.Genotyping of all organisms identified as being A. baumannii isolates was performed using digestion with ApaI followed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) according to previously reported standardized techniques (28). Isolates were assigned to clonal groups according to the criteria described previously by Tenover et al. (29). For each of the major clonal types of A. baumannii identified by PFGE, five strains from unique patients that were not geographically or temporally related were selected for MLST, which was performed as previously described (1; http://pubmlst.org/abaumannii/ ).

Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis was performed using the NCSS statistical package, 2004 version (NCSS Statistical Software). A Student's t test was used for analysis of continuous data with normal distribution (e.g., age), whereas the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for analysis of nonparametric data (e.g., time from ICU admission to organism isolation). Categorical data were analyzed using the χ2 test. Stepwise logistic regression was employed for multivariate analysis of variables found to have a P value of ≤0.20 by univariate analysis. All test results with a two-sided P value of <0.05 were considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Outbreak description.From 1995 to 2003, the total number of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates in the ICUs was, on average, 55 ± 12. Without significant changes in ICU patient load or institution of new surveillance practices, the total number of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates from the ICUs increased to 177 in 2004 and 193 in 2005. In response to a perceived increase in severe A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex infections in the surgical ICU in the winter of 2004 to 2005, a hospital-wide prospective collection of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates was begun on 1 May 2005. Over the 14 months of active surveillance, we identified 107 unique patients from whom A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates were isolated (Table 1). Ninety-nine patients (93%) met the definition of nosocomial acquisition. Ninety-five patients (89%) had an A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolate initially isolated while in the ICU or within 48 h of leaving the ICU. The breakdown by ICU was as follows: 56 patients (52%) in the surgical ICU, 25 patients (23%) in the medical ICU, and 14 patients (13%) in the neurosurgical ICU. The number of isolates peaked during the summer of 2005, declined in the winter of 2005 to 2006, and then increased again as the summer of 2006 began (Fig. 1A). Increased environmental cleaning and patient cohorting began in spring 2005 and was reemphasized in the fall of 2005, with a subsequent decrease in A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolation that was not sustained (Fig. 1A). Environmental sampling in the surgical ICU resulted in the detection of multidrug-resistant A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates on two separate occasions (Fig. 1A). Temporal and geographical clusterings were noted on 15 occasions, with 12 cases occurring in the open-ward surgical ICU. When clusterings were noted, intensive environmental cleaning and focused health care worker education were undertaken.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Temporal distribution of Acinetobacter calcoacetius-A. baumannii complex isolates. (A) Number of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates by month. Arrows refer to times of increased infection control initiatives as described in Materials and Methods. Stars refer to time of environmental sampling of the surgical ICU for A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates. (B) Number of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates by month broken down by species identification as noted in the legend. (C) Number of A. baumannii isolates broken down by PFGE type as noted in the legend.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Comparison of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex-colonized and -infected patientsa

Cohort characteristics.Sixty-three patients (58%) met the definition for A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii infection, with a breakdown as follows: 30 patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infection, 25 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, 7 patients with tertiary peritonitis, and one patient with brain abscess (Table 2). Overall, 43 patients (40.1%) were bacteremic due to either a catheter or another focus, usually pneumonia. The patients who were deemed to be colonized by A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii had isolates obtained from nonsterile sites (e.g., sputum, urine, and surgical wounds) without objective evidence of infection. We note two unusual aspects of our cohort. First, more than 40% of our patients had bloodstream infection, which is higher than the typical 5 to 10% reported previously for other A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex cohorts (25, 31). Moreover, the recovery of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates from an intra-abdominal abscess, as occurred in seven of our patients, is distinctly unusual (16).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates

Comparison of infected versus colonized patients.Patients may or may not develop invasive disease following initial colonization with A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates, possibly depending on coexisting illnesses or perhaps due to characteristics of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolate (25). We investigated the possibility that sicker patients were more likely to develop infection by comparing modified APACHE II scores at the time of hospital admission for colonized versus infected patients (Table 1). Interestingly, we found no statistical difference in the initial modified APACHE II scores among infected versus colonized patients (12.4 ± 7.7 for colonized patients versus 14.2 ± 8.5 for infected patients; P = 0.30). Although the baseline APACHE II scores were not significantly different, the mortality rate for patients infected with A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii was significantly higher than that for colonized patients (36.5% versus 13.6%; P = 0.009). The initial modified APACHE II levels were significantly higher in patients who subsequently died than in patients who did not die, confirming that APACHE II scores in our cohort did provide prognostic information (17.2 ± 6.9 versus 12.1 ± 8.5, respectively; P = 0.002). Given the similar clinical characteristics of the colonized versus infected patients, these data suggest that variability in the virulence of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates may have contributed to the development of invasive disease.

Characteristics of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates.Standard automated microbiology techniques can assign organisms to the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex only, which comprises at least four distinct species (20). Using amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis, we found that 87 of the 107 A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex isolates (81%) were A. baumannii (33). The remaining 20 isolates were either Acinetobacter genomic species 3 (15 isolates), Acinetobacter genomic species 13 (three isolates), or not identified (two isolates). Sixty-one of the 63 cases of infection were due to A. baumannii isolates, whereas 18 of the 44 colonizing isolates were non-A. baumannii strains (P < 0.001). Moreover, more than 90% of the A. baumannii isolates were multidrug resistant, compared to 15% of the non-A. baumannii isolates (Table 2) (P < 0.001). When the outbreak epidemiologic data were stratified by species, the variability in the rates of A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolation was found to be due to A. baumannii; non-A. baumannii strain isolation rates remained steady (Fig. 1B). These data support previous observations that A. baumannii isolates cause the majority of serious infections among isolates of the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex and are more likely to be multidrug resistant than other A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex species (2, 19, 22).

Genetic characterization of A. baumannii isolates.Next, we used PFGE to determine genetic relatednesses among the A. baumannii strains in our cohort (28). Of the 87 strains studied, there were 18 distinct pulsed-field types. We identified two major clonal types, with clone A comprising 44 strains and clone B consisting of 20 strains (Fig. 2). The remaining 23 strains belonged to one of 16 clonal types or were nonresolvable by PFGE (four strains). Over the 14 months of the study, the two major clones showed distinct temporal trends, with clone A predominating for several months before gradually being replaced by clone B (Fig. 1C). The other A. baumannii isolates (not clone A or B) were evenly distributed over the 14-month period (Fig. 1C). Clone A was identified in all adult ICUs (25 isolates in the surgical ICU, 13 isolates in the medical ICU, and 6 isolates in the neurosurgical ICU), whereas clone B isolates were found predominantly in the surgical ICU (17 of 20 isolates). Of the 15 clusters of patients with A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates, 7 were due to clone A strains and 5 were due to clone B strains. The isolates in the remaining three clusters had no clear genetic relationship. Given that the majority of A. baumannii isolates were multidrug resistant, we could discern no statistically significant differences in the percentages of strains that were multidrug resistant for a particular clonal type. Although all clone A and clone B strains were resistant to amikacin, clone A strains were universally resistant to gentamicin, whereas 19 of 20 clone B strains were gentamicin susceptible, suggesting differing mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance between the two major clones (23). We conclude that in our cohort, there were two major multidrug-resistant clones that made up the majority of the A. baumannii isolates.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Representative PFGE profiles of A. baumannii isolates digested with ApaI. Lanes 1 to 4 contain clone A strains. Lanes 5 and 6 contain clone B strains. Lanes 7 and 8 contain A. baumannii strains other than clone A or B.

Site specificity and virulence of the two major A. baumannii clones.In light of the large numbers of cases of bacteremia in our cohort, we next investigated whether a particular A. baumannii clone was responsible for a disproportionate number of bacteremias. Indeed, 36 of the 43 cases (83.7%) of bacteremia were caused by clone A, although clone A accounted for only 41% of all A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii isolates and 50% of A. baumannii isolates (P < 0.001 for clone A causing a disproportionate number of bacteremias). When looked at in a different manner, 36 of the 44 patients (81.8%) who had clone A isolates developed bacteremia, compared to only 7 patients (15.9%) who had other A. baumannii strains isolated. To evaluate whether clone A was found preferentially in patients at high risk of developing bacteremia, we compared the clinical characteristics of patients from whom clone A was isolated to those of patients from whom other A. baumannii strains were isolated (Table 3). No statistically significant differences in measured clinical criteria including modified APACHE II scores upon admission to the ICU and the presence or duration of use of an indwelling central venous catheter were observed between the two groups of patients (Table 3). However, the mortality rate for patients from whom clone A was isolated was 45.5%, compared with 18.6% for patients from whom other A. baumannii strains were isolated (P = 0.007).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Comparison of patients with and those without A. baumannii clone Aa

In addition to the large numbers cases of bloodstream infection, our cohort was also characterized by a number of intra-abdominal abscesses. Although clone A accounted for the vast majority of bloodstream infections in our cohort, there was only one case of intra-abdominal abscess involving this particular clone. The remaining intra-abdominal infections were all caused by clone B. Although clone B accounted for only 22% of the A. baumannii isolates, it caused 85% of the intra-abdominal abscesses in this cohort (P < 0.001). In contrast, clone B accounted for only 7% of the bacteremias due to A. baumannii strains and was not associated with increased mortality compared to other A. baumannii strains (P = 0.910). Taken together, we conclude that clone A caused a disproportionate number of bloodstream infections and was associated with increased mortality, whereas clone B caused a high percentage of intra-abdominal abscesses and was not associated with increased mortality. These data suggest both a site-specific predisposition for the two clonal lineages and a difference in virulence.

Multivariate analysis of mortality associated with clone A.To determine whether the isolation of clone A was independently associated with increased mortality, we performed a multivariate analysis using logistic regression for all patients from whom A. baumannii strains were isolated. The variables entered into the model included all covariates associated with mortality at a P value of 0.20 or less in univariate analysis, which included isolation of clone A, modified APACHE II score, renal replacement therapy, and presence of a central bloodstream catheter. In the multivariate model, the odds ratio of death after acquisition of clone A was 3.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.27, 9.15; P = 0.024). Therefore, we conclude that isolation of clone A was associated with increased mortality independent of other risk factors, suggesting increased virulence compared with those of other A. baumannii strains isolated in this cohort.

MLST.We next determined whether strains identified as belonging to clone A by PFGE would have the same MLST profile by analyzing five clone A isolates from unique patients. Each of the five clone A strains had the same MLST profile (Table 4). We also performed MLST on five clone B isolates from unique patients and found that all five clone B isolates had the same MLST profile, which was distinct from that of clone A (Table 4). The clone A and clone B strains each shared five alleles (gltA, gdhB, recA, cpn60, and rpoD) but were distinct at the gyrB locus (4-bp difference) and the gpi locus (11-bp difference). In contrast, an A. baumannii PFGE type F strain shared gltA and rpoD alleles with clone A and clone B but had distinct gyrB, gdhB, recA, cpn60, and gpi alleles (Table 4). A comparison of clone A and clone B data to published MLST data found that each strain shares five alleles (gltA, gdhB, recA, cpn60, and rpoD) with sequence types 6, 10, and 19, which include invasive A. baumannii isolates from Spain and Germany (1). Therefore, we conclude that clone A and clone B are related to each other and to certain A. baumannii strains previously isolated in Europe. Finally, we performed MLST on A. baumannii strains isolated from environmental samples and found that clone A was isolated in December 2005, whereas clone B was isolated in May 2006 (Fig. 1A). These data demonstrate that the presence of the two A. baumannii clones in the environmental samples was temporally associated with their isolation from patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Multilocus sequence typing of A. baumannii isolatesa

DISCUSSION

In this cohort of all patients from whom the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex was isolated over a 14-month period, we found that the isolation of a specific A. baumannii clone (clone A) was associated with a high level of bacteremia and increased mortality compared to other strains of A. baumannii and to strains of the broader A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex. We were unable to discern patient-related factors that explained these findings, suggesting that some intrinsic property of clone A itself may be responsible. Although significant efforts were made to control for confounding variables, it is important to note that there are limitations inherent in the retrospective design and single-center nature of our study. Our data have parallels with data from a recent report noting an increased rate of bacteremia for a particular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone and, as such, add to our understanding of serious nosocomial infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria (9).

At present, colonization with A. baumannii in a susceptible host is thought to be the major risk factor for the subsequent development of invasive disease (12, 20). However, there is tremendous genetic diversity among A. baumannii strains, and it seems reasonable to speculate that the development of invasive disease following colonization is not the same for all strains (13). Indeed, one of the key findings of our investigation was that clone A caused a disproportionate number of bacteremias compared to other clones of A. baumannii. Whereas clone A comprised about 50% of the A. baumannii isolates, it accounted for 84% of the bloodstream infections. Our data suggest that clone A may possess some inherent property, such as an ability to produce biofilm or to adhere to epithelial cells, that provides it with a capacity to produce bacteremia.

An unexpected finding of our study was the presence of A. baumannii strains in abdominal abscesses. Reviews of descriptive studies of A. baumannii colonization/infection show that the majority of isolates are recovered from sputum, urine, blood, wounds, and catheters (2, 20, 25). Most previously reported cases of peritonitis involving A. baumannii have involved patients receiving chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (32). However, one study found that multidrug-resistant A. baumannii isolates could be recovered from the stool of patients in the ICU (5). As our patients with abdominal abscesses had gastrointestinal tract disruption secondary to various processes, it does not seem unexpected that A. baumannii might be recovered from patients with nosocomial peritonitis. Importantly, however, we found that all but one of the patients with an intra-abdominal abscess were infected with A. baumannii clone B. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the finding of clone B in abdominal abscesses was related to its prevalence in the surgical ICU, we note that of the 36 patients in the surgical ICU that had A. baumannii strains other than clone B isolated, only 1 had an isolate from an abdominal abscess. This finding suggests that clone B may have a particular predilection for the gastrointestinal tract in a fashion similar to that of clone A, which seems predisposed to caused bloodstream infections.

Our data highlight the need for microbiology laboratories to provide clinicians and infection control practitioners with more discriminative information than reporting an isolate as belonging to the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex. Given the vastly different outcomes between patients infected with A. baumannii and those infected with non-A. baumannii strains, practitioners need to know what A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex species has been isolated and perhaps be provided with molecular data regarding A. baumannii strains. Without molecular investigation, we would not have discovered that our two peaks of infection were actually caused by the dissemination of two genetically distinct A. baumannii strains (Fig. 1). MLST provides researchers with a tool for geographically diverse investigations and also allows the rapid molecular identification of strains in individual patients. Such information may help clinicians with therapeutic decisions and infection control departments with outbreak containment strategies.

In conclusion, we found that a particular clone of A. baumannii was significantly associated with the development of bacteremia and adverse patient outcomes compared to other A. baumannii strains and non-A. baumannii strains belonging to the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex. We present the first MLST data for A. baumannii strains isolated in North America and demonstrate that the dominant clones of A. baumannii at our facility are related to strains previously isolated in Western Europe. Our findings provide a framework for a more detailed investigation of A. baumannii pathogenesis and improved understanding of A. baumannii epidemiology.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease career development grant K08 RR17665-04 (S.A.S.) and by the Harris County Hospital District.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 19 July 2007.
    • Returned for modification 24 October 2007.
    • Accepted 30 October 2007.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Bartual, S. G., H. Seifert, C. Hippler, M. A. Luzon, H. Wisplinghoff, and F. Rodriguez-Valera. 2005. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:4382-4390.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Bergogne-Berezin, E., and K. J. Towner. 1996. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.9:148-165.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Calandra, T., and J. Cohen. 2005. The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med.33:1538-1548.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2004. Acinetobacter baumannii infections among patients at military medical facilities treating injured U.S. service members, 2002-2004. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.53:1063-1066.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Corbella, X., M. Pujol, J. Ayats, M. Sendra, C. Ardanuy, M. A. Dominguez, J. Linares, J. Ariza, and F. Gudiol. 1996. Relevance of digestive tract colonization in the epidemiology of nosocomial infections due to multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin. Infect. Dis.23:329-334.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Cunningham, M. W. 2000. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.13:470-511.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Davis, K. A., K. A. Moran, C. K. McAllister, and P. J. Gray. 2005. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter extremity infections in soldiers. Emerg. Infect. Dis.11:1218-1224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Dolzani, L., E. Tonin, C. Lagatolla, L. Prandin, and C. Monti-Bragadin. 1995. Identification of Acinetobacter isolates in the A. calcoaceticus-A. baumannii complex by restriction analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA intergenic-spacer sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:1108-1113.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Edgeworth, J. D., G. Yadegarfar, S. Pathak, R. Batra, J. D. Cockfield, D. Wyncoll, R. Beale, and J. A. Lindsay. 2007. An outbreak in an intensive care unit of a strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 239 associated with an increased rate of vascular access device-related bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis.44:493-501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Espinal, M. A., A. Laszlo, L. Simonsen, F. Boulahbal, S. J. Kim, A. Reniero, S. Hoffner, H. L. Rieder, N. Binkin, C. Dye, R. Williams, M. C. Raviglione, et al. 2001. Global trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs. N. Engl. J. Med.344:1294-1303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Falagas, M. E., and P. I. Rafailidis. 2007. Attributable mortality of Acinetobacter baumannii: no longer a controversial issue. Crit. Care11:134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Fournier, P. E., and H. Richet. 2006. The epidemiology and control of Acinetobacter baumannii in health care facilities. Clin. Infect. Dis.42:692-699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Fournier, P. E., D. Vallenet, V. Barbe, S. Audic, H. Ogata, L. Poirel, H. Richet, C. Robert, S. Mangenot, C. Abergel, P. Nordmann, J. Weissenbach, D. Raoult, and J. M. Claverie. 2006. Comparative genomics of multidrug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Genet.2:e7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Fridkin, S. K., J. C. Hageman, M. Morrison, L. T. Sanza, K. Como-Sabetti, J. A. Jernigan, K. Harriman, L. H. Harrison, R. Lynfield, and M. M. Farley. 2005. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N. Engl. J. Med.352:1436-1444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Gaynes, R., and J. R. Edwards. 2005. Overview of nosocomial infections caused by gram-negative bacilli. Clin. Infect. Dis.41:848-854.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Goh, B. K., G. Alkouder, T. K. Lama, and C. E. Tan. 2005. Multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii intra-abdominal abscess. Surg. Infect.6:345-347.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    Griffith, M. E., D. R. Lazarus, P. B. Mann, J. A. Boger, D. R. Hospenthal, and C. K. Murray. 2007. Acinetobacter skin carriage among US army soldiers deployed in Iraq. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.28:720-722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Grupper, M., H. Sprecher, T. Mashiach, and R. Finkelstein. 2007. Attributable mortality of nosocomial Acinetobacter bacteremia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.28:293-298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Houang, E. T., Y. W. Chu, K. Y. Chu, K. C. Ng, C. M. Leung, and A. F. Cheng. 2003. Significance of genomic DNA group delineation in comparative studies of antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:1472-1475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Joly-Guillou, M. L. 2005. Clinical impact and pathogenicity of Acinetobacter. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11:868-873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Knaus, W. A., E. A. Draper, D. P. Wagner, and J. E. Zimmerman. 1985. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med.13:818-829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Lee, J. H., C. H. Choi, H. Y. Kang, J. Y. Lee, J. Kim, Y. C. Lee, S. Y. Seol, D. T. Cho, K. W. Kim, D. Y. Song, and J. C. Lee. 2007. Differences in phenotypic and genotypic traits against antimicrobial agents between Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.59:633-639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Murray, B. E., and R. C. Moellering, Jr. 1979. Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus (Herellea vaginicola): explanation for high-level aminoglycoside resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.15:190-199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    O'Grady, N. P., M. Alexander, E. P. Dellinger, J. L. Gerberding, S. O. Heard, D. G. Maki, H. Masur, R. D. McCormick, L. A. Mermel, M. L. Pearson, I. I. Raad, A. Randolph, R. A. Weinstein, et al. 2002. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR Recomm. Rep.51:1-29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Rodriguez-Bano, J., J. M. Cisneros, F. Fernandez-Cuenca, A. Ribera, J. Vila, A. Pascual, L. Martinez-Martinez, G. Bou, and J. Pachon. 2004. Clinical features and epidemiology of Acinetobacter baumannii colonization and infection in Spanish hospitals. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.25:819-824.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Schreckenberger, P., M. Daneshvar, R. S. Weyant, and D. Hollis. 2003. Acinetobacter, Achromobacter, Chryseobacterium, Moraxella, and other nonfermentative gram-negative rods, p. 749-779. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  27. 27.↵
    Scott, P., G. Deye, A. Srinivasan, C. Murray, K. Moran, E. Hulten, J. Fishbain, D. Craft, S. Riddell, L. Lindler, J. Mancuso, E. Milstrey, C. T. Bautista, J. Patel, A. Ewell, T. Hamilton, C. Gaddy, M. Tenney, G. Christopher, K. Petersen, T. Endy, and B. Petruccelli. 2007. An outbreak of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex infection in the US military health care system associated with military operations in Iraq. Clin. Infect. Dis.44:1577-1584.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Seifert, H., L. Dolzani, R. Bressan, T. van der Reijden, B. van Strijen, D. Stefanik, H. Heersma, and L. Dijkshoorn. 2005. Standardization and interlaboratory reproducibility assessment of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis-generated fingerprints of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:4328-4335.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Tenover, F. C., R. D. Arbeit, R. V. Goering, P. A. Mickelsen, B. E. Murray, D. H. Persing, and B. Swaminathan. 1995. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:2233-2239.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Turton, J. F., M. E. Kaufmann, M. J. Gill, R. Pike, P. T. Scott, J. Fishbain, D. Craft, G. Deye, S. Riddell, L. E. Lindler, and T. L. Pitt. 2006. Comparison of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from the United Kingdom and the United States that were associated with repatriated casualties of the Iraq conflict. J. Clin. Microbiol.44:2630-2634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    Turton, J. F., M. E. Kaufmann, M. Warner, J. Coelho, L. Dijkshoorn, T. van der Reijden, and T. L. Pitt. 2004. A prevalent, multiresistant clone of Acinetobacter baumannii in Southeast England. J. Hosp. Infect.58:170-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Valdez, J. M., M. O. Asperilla, and R. A. Smego, Jr. 1991. Acinetobacter peritonitis in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. South. Med. J.84:607-610.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    Vaneechoutte, M., L. Dijkshoorn, I. Tjernberg, A. Elaichouni, P. de Vos, G. Claeys, and G. Verschraegen. 1995. Identification of Acinetobacter genomic species by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol.33:11-15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Villegas, M. V., and A. I. Hartstein. 2003. Acinetobacter outbreaks, 1977-2000. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.24:284-295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Wootton, J. C., X. Feng, M. T. Ferdig, R. A. Cooper, J. Mu, D. I. Baruch, A. J. Magill, and X. Z. Su. 2002. Genetic diversity and chloroquine selective sweeps in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature418:320-323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Sequential Outbreaks of Infections by Distinct Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in a Public Teaching Hospital in Houston, Texas
Samuel A. Shelburne III, Kavindra V. Singh, A. Clinton White Jr., Laura Byrne, Alexis Carmer, Celest Austin, Edward Graviss, Charles Stager, Barbara E. Murray, Robert L. Atmar
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2008, 46 (1) 198-205; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01459-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sequential Outbreaks of Infections by Distinct Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in a Public Teaching Hospital in Houston, Texas
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Sequential Outbreaks of Infections by Distinct Acinetobacter baumannii Strains in a Public Teaching Hospital in Houston, Texas
Samuel A. Shelburne III, Kavindra V. Singh, A. Clinton White Jr., Laura Byrne, Alexis Carmer, Celest Austin, Edward Graviss, Charles Stager, Barbara E. Murray, Robert L. Atmar
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Jan 2008, 46 (1) 198-205; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01459-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Acinetobacter Infections
Acinetobacter baumannii
Cross Infection
Disease Outbreaks

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X