Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About JCM
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mycobacteriology and Aerobic Actinomycetes

Association between 16S-23S Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequence Groups of Mycobacterium avium Complex and Pulmonary Disease

Jason E. Stout, Gregory W. Hopkins, Jay R. McDonald, Anita Quinn, Carol D. Hamilton, L. Barth Reller, Richard Frothingham
Jason E. Stout
1Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: stout002@mc.duke.edu
Gregory W. Hopkins
2Human Vaccine Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay R. McDonald
3Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita Quinn
4Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carol D. Hamilton
5Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Barth Reller
6Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Frothingham
7Human Vaccine Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, and Infectious Diseases Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00719-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Organisms within the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) may have differential virulence. We compared 33 subjects with MAC pulmonary disease to 75 subjects with a single positive culture without disease. M. avium isolates were significantly more likely to be associated with MAC pulmonary disease (odds ratio = 5.14, 95% confidence interval = 1.25 to 22.73) than M. intracellulare.

Exposure to aerosols containing organisms in the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) likely occurs often (11, 12), but resultant pulmonary disease is uncommon (13, 16). The MAC group of organisms consists of two relatively common named species, M. avium and M. intracellulare, and a third group of organisms that until recently were not denoted by species names. Whether some species of MAC are more likely to cause pulmonary disease than others is unknown.

(This article was previously published as an abstract [abstr. A820] and presented as an oral presentation at the May 2007 American Thoracic Society Meeting, San Francisco, CA.)

We performed a case-control study comparing persons with MAC pulmonary disease to persons with a single positive respiratory culture but no evidence of disease. Persons who had a respiratory specimen that grew MAC between 1 January 1993 and 30 June 1999 and available medical records were considered for inclusion (n = 600). Case subjects were considered for inclusion if they met the 1997 American Thoracic Society criteria for MAC pulmonary disease (1). The following criteria were used to exclude both potential cases and controls: (i) human immunodeficiency virus infection, (ii) cystic fibrosis, (iii) age under 18 years, (iv) recipient of organ or bone marrow transplant, (v) pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, and (iv) active tuberculosis. The control group was randomly selected from patients with a positive respiratory MAC culture who did not meet American Thoracic Society criteria and had a low likelihood of having MAC pulmonary disease, including no radiographic evidence of MAC pulmonary disease. All controls had (i) a single positive culture for a MAC organism from a respiratory site (as described above), (ii) negative acid-fast smears on the same specimen and all other respiratory specimens collected, and (iii) at least two mycobacterial cultures obtained from the respiratory tract. Patients were excluded from the control group if they had (i) a diagnosis of MAC pulmonary disease by an infectious disease specialist or a pulmonologist, (ii) received a specific therapy directed at MAC pulmonary disease (as defined above under inclusion criteria for cases), or (iii) granulomatous inflammation in any biopsy specimens taken from the respiratory tract.

Clinical isolates were identified by the Duke Clinical Microbiology Laboratory as MAC based on growth characteristics, lack of pigmentation, biochemical testing, and confirmation with the MAC AccuProbe (Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA). Duplicated samples comprising 10% of the isolates were analyzed as a quality control.

The internal transcribed spacer region between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes was amplified from bacterial lysates using 30 cycles of PCR with the primers CCL (5′-TTGTACACACCGCCCGTC-3′) and 23S (5′-TCTCGATGCCAAGGCATCCACC-3′) (5). Purified PCR products were sequenced directly using the internal primer P5B (5′-GACGAAGTCTAACAAGGTAGC-3′) at the Duke University Medical Center's DNA Sequencing Facility. Sequences were aligned by using CLUSTAL W (version 1.83; ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/dos/clustalw/clustalw1.83.XP.zip ), and isolates were assigned to known sequevars based on exact matching. A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on maximum likelihood using PHYLIP 3.65, (http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip.html ). The data were resampled with 100 bootstrap replications. Groupings found on more than 70% of the bootstrap replications are marked on the phylogenetic tree. The relationship between sequevar group and case status was assessed by using odds ratios and exact 95% confidence intervals with SAS version 9.1 (SAS Systems, Cary, NC).

Forty case subjects were selected, but isolates were only available for thirty-three. Eighty control subjects were selected, but four did not have isolates and one had a dual/ambiguous sequence, leaving seventy-five subjects with analyzable sequence data (Table 1). Sequencing of the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer from the 108 isolates revealed 22 distinct sequevars (see the supplemental material), whose phylogenetic relationships are demonstrated in the Fig. 1. Six isolates (5.6%) were genetically distant from the rest of the M. avium complex (“Non-MAC” sequevar group). Sixty-nine (63.9%) isolates clustered with M. intracellulare, thirteen (12.0%) clustered with M. avium, and twenty (18.5%) clustered with neither species (“MAC, other”). Compared to M. intracellulare group isolates, M. avium group isolates were significantly more likely to be associated with true MAC pulmonary disease (Table 2).

We found a significant association between M. avium sequevar group MAC isolates and MAC pulmonary disease, with a >5-fold increase in the odds of true MAC pulmonary disease in the M. avium sequevar group compared to the M. intracellulare sequevar group. However, consistent with other studies (3, 4, 8, 18, 25), the majority of MAC isolates (63.9%) among study subjects with or without MAC pulmonary disease belonged to the M. intracellulare sequevar group. M. intracellulare organisms are preferentially aerosolized (compared to M. avium) (17), resulting in relatively greater potential for respiratory exposure to M. intracellulare. Our data suggest the hypothesis that when respiratory exposure occurs, M. avium may be more likely to cause pulmonary disease than M. intracellulare; in other words, M. avium might be more virulent after respiratory exposure, all other factors being equal. M. avium possesses specific virulence factors not found in M. intracellulare (3, 19), is better able to invade and replicate inside macrophages than M. intracellulare (14), and has been associated with more invasive forms of MAC disease (3, 10, 21, 27).

Our data differ from the findings of a recent study by Han et al., who found that M. avium (identified by 16S rRNA sequencing) isolated from clinical specimens was actually less likely to be associated with pulmonary disease than was M. intracellulare (9). In that study, M. avium isolation was strongly associated with hematologic malignancy but did not often cause clinical disease (16.1% of isolates), while 63.1% of patients with M. intracellulare had clinical disease. Since that study was conducted at a cancer referral hospital, the vast majority of patients had malignancies, so the results are unlikely to reflect what occurs in the general population. Furthermore, the study was cross-sectional, so misclassification of disease status may have occurred. Geographic strain differences resulting in differential exposure and resultant disease may also explain the difference between the Han et al. study and the present study.

Our data have several inherent limitations. Only one mycobacterial isolate per case subject was examined. MAC pulmonary disease is often polyclonal (25), and reinfection with new strains occurs frequently (24). Examining only one isolate may have resulted in misclassification of the infecting MAC sequevar in some case subjects. However, this misclassification would be most likely nondifferential and therefore would reduce the association between any particular sequevar and case status. Some subjects who truly had MAC pulmonary disease may have been inappropriately assigned to the control group. Again, this misclassification would tend to reduce any observed associations between case status and sequevar group. The demographics and comorbidities of the case and control groups were quite different, and observed differences in sequevar distributions may have been a result of confounding. Our study lacked statistical power to thoroughly explore this question, but in an exploratory analysis, no demographic/comorbidity was significantly associated with sequevar group (data not shown). Patients with fibrocavitary MAC pulmonary disease were not well represented in our study, and the sequevars associated with disease among patients with fibrocavitary MAC may well differ from those associated with disease among patients with nodular/bronchiectatic MAC.

The 2007 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections recommend that all clinically significant nontuberculous mycobacteria should be identified to the species level (7). Our data emphasize the importance of species identification in understanding the role of nontuberculous mycobacteria in lung disease. DNA sequencing of mycobacterial isolates is a powerful and increasingly popular method for speciation. The use of the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer is a well-validated method to divide mycobacteria into species and subspecies groups (5, 6, 15, 26); other commonly used loci are the 16S ribosomal (3), rpoB (2), and hsp65 (20) genes. Use of these techniques has enabled provisional assignment of new species names to at least two previously unspeciated organisms within MAC (22, 23). Further studies using these techniques to study well-defined patient groups will be necessary to better understand the role of MAC in human disease.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Phylogenetic tree of M. avium complex isolates based on 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer sequences. Line segment lengths represent phylogenetic distances based on maximum-likelihood analysis. The dots represent groupings found on more than 70% of bootstrap replications. “Min” isolates are isolates that cluster with M. intracellulare, “Mav” isolates cluster with M. avium, and “MAC” isolates cluster with neither species. “Nov” isolates represent novel sequevars (not previously described). Other mycobacterial species are included in the tree for reference. Arrows demonstrate the groups selected for analysis. The box inset in panel A represents organisms belonging to the Mycobacterium avium complex; this section of the tree is expanded and represented in panel B. Numbers next to sequevar names represent the total number of subject isolates (case or control) that belonged to this sequevar group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Characteristics of case and control subjects

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Association between case status and MAC sequevar group

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

J.E.S. acknowledges support from NIH K23 AI051409. R.F. acknowledges support from the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Duke Center for Translational Research, National Institutes of Health grant P30 AI51445, and NIH training grant AI07392.

We thank Scott Langdon for advice on DNA sequencing.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 April 2008.
    • Accepted 3 June 2008.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Adekambi, T., P. Colson, and M. Drancourt. 2003. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:5699-5708.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    American Thoracic Society. 1997. Diagnosis and treatment of disease caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.156:S1-S25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Beggs, M. L., R. Stevanova, and K. D. Eisenach. 2000. Species identification of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates by a variety of molecular techniques. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:508-512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    De Smet, K. A., T. J. Hellyer, A. W. Khan, I. N. Brown, and J. Ivanyi. 1996. Genetic and serovar typing of clinical isolates of the Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex. Tuberc. Lung Dis.77:71-76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Frothingham, R., and K. H. Wilson. 1993. Sequence-based differentiation of strains in the Mycobacterium avium complex. J. Bacteriol.175:2818-2825.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Frothingham, R., and K. H. Wilson. 1994. Molecular phylogeny of the Mycobacterium avium complex demonstrates clinically meaningful divisions. J. Infect. Dis.169:305-312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Griffith, D. E., T. Aksamit, B. A. Brown-Elliott, A. Catanzaro, C. Daley, F. Gordin, S. M. Holland, R. Horsburgh, G. Huitt, M. F. Iademarco, M. Iseman, K. Olivier, S. Ruoss, C. F. von Reyn, R. J. Wallace, Jr., and K. Winthrop. 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.175:367-416.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Guthertz, L. S., B. Damsker, E. J. Bottone, E. G. Ford, T. F. Midura, and J. M. Janda. 1989. Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare infections in patients with and without AIDS. J. Infect. Dis.160:1037-1041.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Han, X. Y., J. J. Tarrand, R. Infante, K. L. Jacobson, and M. Truong. 2005. Clinical significance and epidemiologic analyses of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare among patients without AIDS. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:4407-4412.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Hazra, R., S. H. Lee, J. N. Maslow, and R. N. Husson. 2000. Related strains of Mycobacterium avium cause disease in children with AIDS and in children with lymphadenitis. J. Infect. Dis.181:1298-1303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Khan, K., J. Wang, and T. K. Marras. 2007. Nontuberculous mycobacterial sensitization in the United States: national trends over three decades. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.
  12. 12.↵
    Kirschner, R. A., Jr., B. C. Parker, and J. O. Falkinham, III. 1992. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria: Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum in acid, brown-water swamps of the southeastern United States and their association with environmental variables. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.145:271-275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Maugein, J., M. Dailloux, B. Carbonnelle, V. Vincent, and J. Grosset. 2005. Sentinel-site surveillance of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. Eur. Respir. J.26:1092-1096.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Meyer, M., P. W. von Grunberg, T. Knoop, P. Hartmann, and G. Plum. 1998. The macrophage-induced gene mig as a marker for clinical pathogenicity and in vitro virulence of Mycobacterium avium complex strains. Infect. Immun.66:4549-4552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Novi, C., L. Rindi, N. Lari, and C. Garzelli. 2000. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium avium isolates by sequencing of the 16S-23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer and comparison with IS1245-based fingerprinting. J. Med. Microbiol.49:1091-1095.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    O'Brien, R. J., L. J. Geiter, and D. E. Snider, Jr. 1987. The epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases in the United States: results from a national survey. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.135:1007-1014.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Parker, B. C., M. A. Ford, H. Gruft, and J. O. Falkinham III. 1983. Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. IV. Preferential aerosolization of Mycobacterium intracellulare from natural waters. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.128:652-656.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Prammananan, T., S. Phunpruch, N. Tingtoy, S. Srimuang, and A. Chaiprasert. 2006. Distribution of hsp65 PCR-restriction enzyme analysis patterns among Mycobacterium avium complex isolates in Thailand. J. Clin. Microbiol.44:3819-3821.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Rindi, L., D. Bonanni, N. Lari, and C. Garzelli. 2003. Most human isolates of Mycobacterium avium Mav-A and Mav-B are strong producers of hemolysin, a putative virulence factor. J. Clin. Microbiol.41:5738-5740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Swanson, D. S., V. Kapur, K. Stockbauer, X. Pan, R. Frothingham, and J. M. Musser. 1997. Subspecific differentiation of Mycobacterium avium complex strains by automated sequencing of a region of the gene (hsp65) encoding a 65-kilodalton heat shock protein. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.47:414-419.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Swanson, D. S., X. Pan, M. W. Kline, R. E. McKinney, Jr., R. Yogev, L. L. Lewis, M. T. Brady, G. D. McSherry, W. M. Dankner, and J. M. Musser. 1998. Genetic diversity among Mycobacterium avium complex strains recovered from children with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection. J. Infect. Dis.178:776-782.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Tortoli, E., L. Rindi, M. J. Garcia, P. Chiaradonna, R. Dei, C. Garzelli, R. M. Kroppenstedt, N. Lari, R. Mattei, A. Mariottini, G. Mazzarelli, M. I. Murcia, A. Nanetti, P. Piccoli, and C. Scarparo. 2004. Proposal to elevate the genetic variant MAC-A, included in the Mycobacterium avium complex, to species rank as Mycobacterium chimaera sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.54:1277-1285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Turenne, C. Y., L. Thibert, K. Williams, T. V. Burdz, V. J. Cook, J. N. Wolfe, D. W. Cockcroft, and A. Kabani. 2004. Mycobacterium saskatchewanense sp. nov., a novel slowly growing scotochromogenic species from human clinical isolates related to Mycobacterium interjectum and Accuprobe-positive for Mycobacterium avium complex. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.54:659-667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Wallace, R. J., Jr., Y. Zhang, B. A. Brown-Elliott, M. A. Yakrus, R. W. Wilson, L. Mann, L. Couch, W. M. Girard, and D. E. Griffith. 2002. Repeat positive cultures in Mycobacterium intracellulare lung disease after macrolide therapy represent new infections in patients with nodular bronchiectasis. J. Infect. Dis.186:266-273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Wallace, R. J., Jr., Y. Zhang, B. A. Brown, D. Dawson, D. T. Murphy, R. Wilson, and D. E. Griffith. 1998. Polyclonal Mycobacterium avium complex infections in patients with nodular bronchiectasis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.158:1235-1244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Xiong, L., F. Kong, Y. Yang, J. Cheng, and G. L. Gilbert. 2006. Use of PCR and reverse line blot hybridization macroarray based on 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer sequences for rapid identification of 34 Mycobacterium species. J. Clin. Microbiol.44:3544-3550.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    Yakrus, M. A., and R. C. Good. 1990. Geographic distribution, frequency, and specimen source of Mycobacterium avium complex serotypes isolated from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol.28:926-929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Association between 16S-23S Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequence Groups of Mycobacterium avium Complex and Pulmonary Disease
Jason E. Stout, Gregory W. Hopkins, Jay R. McDonald, Anita Quinn, Carol D. Hamilton, L. Barth Reller, Richard Frothingham
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aug 2008, 46 (8) 2790-2793; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00719-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Journal of Clinical Microbiology article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association between 16S-23S Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequence Groups of Mycobacterium avium Complex and Pulmonary Disease
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Association between 16S-23S Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequence Groups of Mycobacterium avium Complex and Pulmonary Disease
Jason E. Stout, Gregory W. Hopkins, Jay R. McDonald, Anita Quinn, Carol D. Hamilton, L. Barth Reller, Richard Frothingham
Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aug 2008, 46 (8) 2790-2793; DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00719-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

DNA, Ribosomal Spacer
Mycobacterium avium
Mycobacterium avium complex
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About JCM
  • Editor in Chief
  • Board of Editors
  • Editor Conflicts of Interest
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Resources for Clinical Microbiologists
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #JClinMicro

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

 

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0095-1137; Online ISSN: 1098-660X